Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Sound conflict management and resolution for virtual-enterprise collaborations

  • Original Research Paper
  • Published:
Service Oriented Computing and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

For fulfilling customer requests, enterprises are increasingly part of collaboration networks with peers. Such collaborations, also known as virtual enterprises (VE), are governed by pre-defined contracts that restrict the behaviour of each participating enterprise. However, since each enterprise is autonomous, the potential arises for conflicts during collaboration. In this paper, we extend our earlier work on virtual-enterprise modelling and address the existing gap of conflict modelling, management and resolution in VEs. Our approach works as follows: first, to detect a conflict by analysing the exceptions reported during execution; second, to uncover the conflict type, origin and impact of an exception; and third, depending on the nature of an exception, to implement the appropriate conflict negotiation and resolution strategy among the participating entities of a VE. Crucial to this approach, and serving as one of the key contributions of this paper, is the conflict ontology. This ontology helps to model conflict types along with related exceptions, negotiation and resolution strategies, thereby enabling conflict management and resolution. Throughout this paper, we illustrate our ideas with a running example and also present a detailed evaluation based on a case study from the automotive production domain.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. eSourcing.owl http://tinyurl.com/nogogon.

  2. For compactness, we use the LTL acronym to denote LTL on finite traces.

  3. http://cpntools.org/.

  4. Full CPN Tools model: http://tinyurl.com/lo7f2ps.

  5. Guardtime: https://guardtime.com/blog.

References

  1. Abubkr A (2013) A toolkit for model checking of electronic contracts. PhD thesis, Newcastle University

  2. Adams M., Hofstede AHM, Aalst WMP, Edmond D (2007) Dynamic, extensible and context-aware exception handling for workflows. In: On the move to meaningful internet systems 2007: CoopIS, DOA, ODBASE, GADA, and IS. Lecture notes in computer science, vol 4803, pp 95–112

  3. Angelov S (2006) Foundations of B2B electronic contracting. Dissertation, Technology University Eindhoven, Faculty of Technology Management, Information Systems Department

  4. Apache (2013) Apache Xalan project. https://xalan.apache.org/

  5. Apache (2013) Hadoop. https://hadoop.apache.org/

  6. Apache (2013) Hive. https://hive.apache.org/

  7. Avizienis A, Laprie JC, Randell B, Landwehr C (2004) Basic concepts and taxonomy of dependable and secure computing. IEEE Trans Dependable Secure Comput 1(1):11–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Baxter G, Sommerville I (2011) Socio-technical systems: from design methods to systems engineering. Interact Comput 23(1):4–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Business Process Modeling Notation (BPMN), Version 2.0. Object Management Group, (2011). http://www.bpmn.org/spec/BPMN/2.0/

  10. Buyya R, Yeo CS, Venugopal S, Broberg J, Brandic I (2009) Cloud computing and emerging IT platforms: vision, hype, and reality for delivering computing as the 5th utility. Future Gener Comput Syst 25(6):599–616

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Casati F, Ceri S, Paraboschi S, Pozzi G (1999) Specification and implementation of exceptions in workflow management systems. ACM Trans Database Syst 24(3):405–451

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Chou SW, Chiang CH (2013) Understanding the formation of software-as-a-service (saas) satisfaction from the perspective of service quality. Decis Support Syst 56:148–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Cloudera (2013) Impala. http://www.cloudera.com/content/cloudera/en/products/cdh/impala.html

  14. Davidrajuh R (2013) Distributed workflow based approach for eliminating redundancy in virtual enterprising. J Supercomput 63(1):107–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Derler P, Lee EA, Vincentelli AS (2012) Modeling cyber-physical systems. Proc IEEE 100(1):13–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Duan Y (2012) A survey on service contract. In: 13th ACIS international conference on software engineering, artificial intelligence, networking and parallel & distributed computing (SNPD), 2012, pp 805–810. IEEE

  17. Erven H, Hicker G, Huemer C, Zaptletal M (July 2007) The web services-businessactivity-initiator (ws-ba-i) protocol: an extension to the web services-businessactivity specification. In: IEEE international conference on web services, 2007, ICWS 2007, pp 216–224

  18. Eshuis R, Norta A, Kopp O, Pitkanen E (2015) Service outsourcing with process views. IEEE Trans Serv Comput 8(1):136–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Georgakopoulos D, Papazoglou MP (2008) Service-oriented computing. The MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  20. Georgios K, Daskalopulu G, Daskalopulu A (2011) Normative conflicts in electronic contracts. Electron Commer Res Appl 10(2):247–267. Special Issue on Electronic Auctions: Strategies and Methods

  21. Giret A, Noriega P (2011) On grievance protocols for conflict resolution in open multi-agent systems. In: 44th Hawaii international international conference on systems science (HICSS-44 2011), proceedings, 4–7 Jan 2011, Koloa, Kauai, HI, USA, pp 1–10

  22. Haibei Z, Xu Y (2012) The architecture design of a distributed workflow system. In: 11th International symposium on distributed computing and applications to business, engineering science (DCABES), 2012, pp 9–12

  23. Hu J, Song Y, Sun Y (2012) Multi-agent oriented policy-based management system for virtual enterprise. J Softw 7(10):2357

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Huang M, Lu FQ, Ching WK, Siu TK (2011) A distributed decision making model for risk management of virtual enterprise. Expert Syst Appl 38(10):13208–13215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Jensen K, Michael L, Wells KL (2007) Coloured PetriNets and CPN tools for modelling and validation of concurrent systems. Int J Softw Tools Technol Transf 9:213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Jensen K, Kristensen LM (2009) Coloured Petri nets: modelling and validation of concurrent systems. Springer, Berlin

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  27. Jordan D, Evdemon J, Alves A, Arkin A (2007) Business process execution language for web-services 2.0. http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/10347/wsbpel-specification-draft-120204.htm

  28. Kazman R, Klein M, Clements P (2002) ATAM: method for architecture evaluationevaluation: ATAM—architecture trade-off analysis method report. http://www.sei.cmu.edu/ata/ata_method.html

  29. Kollingbaum MJ, Vasconcelos WW, García-Camino A, Norman TJ (2007) Managing conflict resolution in norm-regulated environments. In: Engineering societies in the agents world VIII, 8th international workshop, ESAW 2007, Athens, Greece, 22–24 Oct 2007. Revised selected papers, pp 55–71

  30. Kollingbaum MJ, Vasconcelos WW, García-Camino A, Norman TJ (2007) Managing conflict resolution in norm-regulated environments. In: Engineering societies in the agents world VIII, 8th international workshop, ESAW 2007, Athens, Greece, 22–24 Oct 2007. Revised selected papers, pp 55–71

  31. Kollingbaum MJ, Vasconcelos WW, García-Camino A, Norman TJ (2007) Conflict resolution in norm-regulated environments via unification and constraints. In: Baldoni M, Son TC, van Riemsdijk MB, Winikoff M (eds) DALT. Lecture notes in computer science, vol 4897. Springer, Berlin, pp 158–174

    Google Scholar 

  32. Kutvonen L, Norta A, Ruohomaa S (Sept 2012) Inter-enterprise business transaction management in open service ecosystems. In: Enterprise distributed object computing conference (EDOC), 2012 IEEE 16th international, pp 31–40

  33. Maggi FM, Dumas M, García-Bañuelos L, Montali M (2013) Discovering data-aware declarative process models from event logs. BPM, pp 81–96

  34. Mehandjiev N, Grefen P (eds) (2010) Dynamic business process formation for instant virtual enterprises. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  35. Minsky N (2005) Law governed interaction (lgi): a distributed coordination and control mechanism. Department of Computer Science, Rutgers University, 0.9, 2, 2005

  36. Minsky N (2012) Decentralized governance of distributed systems via interaction control. Logic Programs, Norms and Action, pp 374–400. Springer

  37. Minsky N (2014) Dependable management of untrusted distributed systems. arXiv preprint arXiv:1403.4321

  38. Molina-Jimenez C, Shrivastava S, Strano M (2012) A model for checking contractual compliance of business interactions. IEEE Trans Serv Comput 5(2):276–289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Molina-Jimenez C, Shrivastava S, Wheater S (2011) An architecture for negotiation and enforcement of resource usage policies. In: 2011 IEEE international conference on service-oriented computing and applications (SOCA), pp 1–8. IEEE

  40. Mougayar W (2014) The Blockchain is the New Database, Get Ready to Rewrite Everything. http://startupmanagement.org/2014/12/27/theblockchain-is-the-new-database-get-ready-to-rewrite-everything/

  41. Nagl C, Rosenberg F, Dustdar S (2006) Vidre—a distributed service-oriented business rule engine based on ruleml. In: Enterprise distributed object computing conference, 2006, EDOC’06. 10th IEEE international, pp 35–44

  42. Norta A (forthcoming) Creation of smart-contracting collaborations for decentralized autonomous organizations. In: Proceedings of the 14th international conference on perspectives in business informatics research, BIR’15, 2015. http://tinyurl.com/qzjrxoc

  43. Norta A, Grefen P, Narendra NC (2014) A reference architecture for managing dynamic inter-organizational business processes. Data Knowl Eng 91:52–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Norta A, Ma L, Duan Y, Rull A, Kõlvart M, Taveter K (2015) eContractual choreography-language properties towards cross-organizational business collaboration. J Internet Serv Appl 6(1):1–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Norta A, and Kutvonen L (2012) A Cloud HUB for brokering business processes as a service: a rendezvous platform that supports semi-automated background checked partner discovery for cross-enterprise collaboration. In: SRII global conference (SRII), 2012 annual, pp 293–302

  46. Norta A, Eshuis R (2010) Specification and verification of harmonized business-process collaborations. Inf Syst Front 12:457–479. doi:10.1007/s10796-009-9164-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Norta A, Hendrix M, Grefen P (October 2006) A pattern-knowledge base supported establishment of inter-organizational business processes. In: Meersman R, Tari Z (eds) On the move to meaningful internet systems 2006: CoopIS, DOA, and ODBASE. Lecture notes in computer science, Montpellier, France, LNCS, vol 4277, p 834843. Springer

  48. Olsson NL (2013) Xml content translator. http://www.nikse.dk/XmlContentTranslator/

  49. openNMS (2013) Event translator. http://www.opennms.org/wiki/Event_Translator

  50. Padgham L, Thangarajah J, Winikoff M (2014) Prometheus research directions. In: Shehory O, Sturm A (eds) Agent-oriented software engineering. Springer, Berlin, pp 155–171

    Google Scholar 

  51. Pesic M, Schonenberg H, van der Aalst WMP (2007) Declare: full support for loosely-structured processes. In: Enterprise distributed object computing conference, 2007. EDOC 2007. 11th IEEE international, pp 287–287. IEEE

  52. Pimentel F, De Paoli E, Zavattaro G (2012) Service-oriented and cloud computing

  53. Queensland University of Technology. YAWL home page. http://www.yawl-system.com

  54. Reichert M, Weber B (2012) Aristaflow bpm suite. Enabling Flexibility in Process-Aware Information Systems, pp 441–464. Springer, Berlin

  55. Reinecke J, Dessler G, Schoell W (1989) Introduction to business—a contemporary view. Allyn and Bacon, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  56. Ruohomaa S, Kaur P, Kutvonen L (2012) From subjective reputation to verifiable experiences augmenting peer-control mechanisms for open service ecosystems. In: Dimitrakos T, Moona R, Patel D, McKnight DH (eds) Trust management VI. IFIP advances in information and communication technology, vol 374, pp 142–157. Springer, Berlin

  57. Russell N, van der Aalst WMP, Hofstede A (2006) Workflow exception patterns. In: Advanced information systems engineering. Lecture notes in computer science, vol 4001, pp 288–302

  58. Russell N, van der Aalst WMP, ter Hofstede AHM (2008) NewYAWL: designing a workflow system using coloured Petri nets. In: Proceedings of the international workshop on Petri nets and distributed systems, PNDS’08

  59. Shrouf F, Ordieres J, Miragliotta G (Dec 2014) Smart factories in industry 4.0: a review of the concept and of energy management approached in production based on the Internet of things paradigm. In: 2014 IEEE international conference on industrial engineering and engineering management (IEEM), pp 697–701

  60. Sterling L, Taveter K (2009) The art of agent-oriented modeling. The MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  61. Szabo N (1997) Formalizing and securing relationships on public networks. First Monday 2(9):2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Ter Hofstede AHM, van der Aalst WMP, Adams M, Russell N (2009) Modern business process automation: YAWL and its support environment. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  63. van der Aalst WMP (1996) Structural characterizations of sound workflow nets. Computing Science Reports 96/23, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven

  64. van der Aalst WMP, ter Hofstede AHM (2002) Yawl: yet another workflow language

  65. van der Aalst WMP, Pesic M, Schonenberg H (2009) Declarative workflows: balancing between flexibility and support. Comput Sci Res Dev 23(2):99–113

  66. Wang X, Wong TN, Wang G (2012) Service-oriented architecture for ontologies supporting multi-agent system negotiations in virtual enterprise. J Intell Manuf 23(4):1331–1349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Westergaard M (2013) CPN tools 4: multi-formalism and extensibility. In: Colom JM, Desel J (eds) Application and theory of Petri nets and concurrency. Lecture notes in computer science, vol 7927, pp 400–409. Springer, Berlin

  68. Zarras A, Fredj N, Manel, Georgantas N, Issarny V (2006) Engineering reconfigurable distributed software systems: issues arising for pervasive computing. In: Rigorous development of complex fault-tolerant systems, pp 364–386. Springer

  69. Zhao Z (2014) A rule-based agent-oriented framework for weakly-structured scientific workflows. PhD thesis, Freie Universität Berlin, Germany

Download references

Acknowledgments

The work reported in this paper is partly supported by the research Project SF0140013s10 “Model-based Creation and Management of Evolutionary Information Systems” by the Estonian Ministry of Education and Research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. MS Ramaiah University of Applied Sciences, Bengaluru, India

    Nanjangud C. Narendra

  2. Tallinn University of Technology, Tallinn, Estonia

    Alex Norta & Msury Mahunnah

  3. University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia

    Fabrizio Maria Maggi

  4. University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shanghai, China

    Lixin Ma

Authors
  1. Nanjangud C. Narendra
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Alex Norta
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Msury Mahunnah
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Lixin Ma
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Fabrizio Maria Maggi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nanjangud C. Narendra.

Additional information

Thanks to Kuldar Taveter for his feedback.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Narendra, N.C., Norta, A., Mahunnah, M. et al. Sound conflict management and resolution for virtual-enterprise collaborations. SOCA 10, 233–251 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11761-015-0183-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11761-015-0183-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation