Abstract
Intersectionality arose as a strategy to understand how oppression operates simultaneously on multiple aspects of a person’s identity. As such, it provides a useful framework to recognize how gendered performances, racialized identities, and religious adherence shaped relationships between Europeans and Indigenous communities along with the enduring ramifications arising from initial contacts through today. Interrogating how Indigenous leaders, particularly of Caddo communities, interacted with Roman Catholic missionaries of New Spain offers an opportunity to understand broader relationships to power situated in intercultural negotiations of intersectional identities. These relationships are integral to archeological interpretations of the use and meaning of cultural materials.
Résumé
L'intersectionnalité est apparue comme une stratégie afin de comprendre comment l'oppression fonctionne simultanément sur des aspects multiples de l'identité d'une personne. À ce titre, elle fournit un cadre utile pour reconnaître comment les performances genrées, les identités racialisées et l'observance religieuse ont façonné les relations entre les Européens et les communautés indigènes au même titre que les ramifications durables ayant découlé des contacts initiaux jusqu'à nos jours. S'interroger sur la manière dont les dignitaires indigènes, en particulier ceux des communautés Caddo, interagissaient avec les missionnaires catholiques romains de la Nouvelle Espagne donne la possibilité de comprendre les relations plus vastes de pouvoir situées dans les négociations interculturelles des identités intersectionnelles. Ces relations font partie intégrante des interprétations archéologiques de l'utilisation et du sens des matériaux culturels.
Resumen
La interseccionalidad surgió como una estrategia para comprender cómo la opresión opera simultáneamente en múltiples aspectos de la identidad de una persona. Como tal, proporciona un marco útil para reconocer cómo las actuaciones de género, las identidades racializadas y la adhesión religiosa dieron forma a las relaciones entre los europeos y las comunidades indígenas junto con las ramificaciones duraderas que surgen de los contactos iniciales hasta la actualidad. Interrogar cómo los líderes indígenas, particularmente de las comunidades Caddo, interactuaron con los misioneros católicos romanos de la Nueva España ofrece una oportunidad para comprender relaciones más amplias con el poder situadas en negociaciones interculturales de identidades interseccionales. Estas relaciones son parte integral de las interpretaciones arqueológicas del uso y significado de los materiales culturales.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Atalay, S. (2012). Community-based archaeology: research with, by, and for indigenous and local Communities. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Alberti, B. (2006). Archaeology, men, and masculinities. In S. R. Nelson (Ed.), Handbook of Gender in Archaeology (pp. 401–424). Walnut Creek: AltaMira Press.
Alberti, B. (2014). Archaeology, risk, and the alter-politics of materiality. (Society for Cultural Anthropology), https://culanth.org/fieldsights/476-archaeology-risk-and-the-alter-politics-of-materiality. Retrieved 1 June 2020
Barr, J. (2004). A diplomacy of gender: Rituals of first contact in the ‘land of the Tejas.’ The William and Mary Quarterly, 61(3), 393–434.
Bayers, P. L. (2014). ‘We unman ourselves’: Colonial Mohegan manhood in the writings of Samson Occom. Melus, 39(1), 173–191.
Brod, H., & Kaufman, M. (Eds.). (1994). Theorizing Masculinities. Newbury Park: Sage Publishing Series on Men and Masculinities.
Brodkin, K., Morgen, S., & Hutchinson, J. (2011). Anthropology as white public space? American Anthropologist, 113(4), 545–556.
Bruchac, M., Hart, S. M., & Hobst, H. M. (Eds.). (2010). Indigenous Archaeologies: A Reader on Decolonization. Walnut Creek: Left Coast Press.
Carastathis, A. (2014). The concept of intersectionality in feminist theory. Philosophy Compass, 9(5), 304–314.
Castanha, T. (2015). The doctrine of discovery: The legacy and continuing impact of Christian “discovery” on American Indian populations. American Indian Culture and Research Journal, 39(3), 41–64.
Castañeda, A. (1993). Sexual violence in the politics and policies of conquest. In A. de la Torre & B. M. Pesquera (Eds.), Building with Our Hands: New Directions in Chicana Studies (pp. 15–33). Berkeley: University of California Press.
Cho, S., Crenshaw, K. W., & McCall, L. (2013). Toward a field of intersectionality studies: Theory, applications, and praxis. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 38(4), 785–810.
Christman, A. R. (2007). The early church. In J. Buckley, F. Bauerschmidt, & T. Pomplun (Eds.), The Blackwell companion to Catholicism (pp. 36–48). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
Clayton, L. A., Knight, V. J., & Moore, E. C. (Eds.). (1993). The De Soto Chronicles: The expedition of Hernando de Soto to North America in 1539–1543. Tuscaloosa: The University of Alabama Press.
Collins, P. H. (1990). Toward an Afrocentric feminist epistemology. In Y. S. Lincoln & N. K. Denizen (Eds.), Turning Points in Qualitative Research: Tying Knots in a Handkerchief (pp. 47–72). Walnut Creek: AltaMira Press.
Collins, P. H. (2019). Intersectionality as critical social theory. Durham: Duke University Press.
Conkey, M. W. (1993). Experimenting with style in archaeology: Some historical and theoretical issues. In M. W. Conkey & C. A. Hastorf (Eds.), The uses of style in archaeology (pp. 5–17). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cordova, V. F. (2007). In K. D. Moore, K. Peters, T. Jojola, & A. Lacy (Eds.), How it is: The Native American Philosophy of V.F. Cordova. Tucson: The University of Arizona Press.
Crenshaw, K. (1989). Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A Black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist politics. The University of Chicago Legal Forum, 1989(1), 139–167.
Deagan, K. (2002). Artifacts of the Spanish colonies of Florida and the Caribbean, 1500–1800. Vol. 2. Portable personal possessions. Washington, D.C.: Smithsonian Institution Press.
Deloria, V., Jr. (1997). Red Earth, White Lies: Native Americans and the myth of scientific fact. Wheat Ridge: Fulcrum Publishing.
Deloria, V., Jr. (2003). God is red: A native view of religion. Wheat Ridge: Fulcrum Publishing.
DuVal, K. (2008). Indian intermarriage and Métissage in colonial Louisana. William and Mary Quarterly, 65(2), 267–304.
Early, A. M. (ed.) (2000). Forest Farmsteads: A Millennium of Human Occupation at Winding Stair in the Ouachita Mountains. Research Series, 57. Arkansas Archaeological Survey, Fayetteville, Arkansas.
Ekenstam, C. (1998). En historia om manlig gra˚t. In C. Ekenstam, J. Frykman, T. Johansson, J. Kuosmanen, J. Ljunggren, & A. Nilsson (Eds.), Radd Att Falla: Studier i Man-Lighet (pp. 55–123). Stockholm: Gidlund.
Elliott, M. (1994). “This Indian Bait”: Samson Occom and the voice of liminality. Early American Literature, 29(3), 233–253.
Fletcher, A. C. (1907). Caddo. In Hodge, F. (ed.), Handbook of American Indians North of Mexico, Bureau of American Ethnology Bulletin 30, Smithsonian Institution, Washington D.C., pp. 179--183.
Fradkin, A., & Walter, T. (2018). Foodways at a colonial military frontier outpost in northern New Spain: The faunal assemblage from Presidio San Sabá, 1757–1772. Historical Archaeology, 52, 397–419.
Hamilakis, Y., & Theou, E. (2013). Enacted multi-temporality. In A. Gonzalez-Ruibal (Ed.), Reclaiming archaeology: Beyond the tropes of modernity (pp. 181–194). London: Routledge.
Hann, J. H., & McEwan, B. G. (1998). The Apalachee Indians and Mission San Luis. Gainesville: University Press of Florida.
Haraway, D. (1998). Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. Feminist Studies, 14(3), 575–599.
Hardin, M. (2002). Altering masculinities: The Spanish conquest and the evolution of the Latin American Machismo. International Journal of Sexuality and Gender Studies, 7(1), 1–22.
Harnois, C. (2017). Intersectional masculinities and gendered political consciousness: How do race, ethnicity and sexuality shape men’s awareness of gender inequality and support gender activism? Sex Roles, 77(3–4), 141–154.
Harvey, G. (2006). Animism: Respecting the living world. New York: Columbia University Press.
Hatcher, M. A. (1927). Descriptions of the Tejas or Asinai Indians, 1691–1722. I. Southwestern Historical Quarterly, 30(3), 206–218.
Hatcher, M. A. (1927). Descriptions of the Tejas or Asinai Indians, 1691–1722. II. Southwestern Historical Quarterly, 30(3), 283–304.
Hatcher, M. A. (1927). Descriptions of the Tejas or Asinai Indians, 1691–1722. III. Southwestern Historical Quarterly, 31(2), 50–62.
Hodder, I. (2012). Entangled: An Archaeology of the Relationships between Humans and Things. Malden: Wiley-Blackwell.
Hoffman, F. L. (1935). Diary of the Alarcón Expedition into Texas, 1718–1719, by Fray Francisco Céliz. Los Angeles: The Quivira Society.
Holbraad, M. (2012). Truth in motion: The recursive anthropology of Cuban divination. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Hunt, S. (2014). Ontologies of Indigeneity: The politics of embodying a concept. Cultural Geographies, 21(1), 27–32.
Ingold, T. (2011). Being alive: Essays on movement knowledge and description. London: Routledge.
Jones, S. (2002). The archaeology of ethnicity: Constructing identities in the past and present. London: Routledge.
Knight, V. J., Jr. (2013). Iconographic method in new world prehistory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kovach, M. (2009). Indigenous methodologies: Characteristics, conversations, and contexts. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
La Vere, D. (1998). The Caddo Chiefdoms: Caddo economics and politics, 700–1835. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
Lightfoot, K. G. (2006). California colonial histories: The integration of historical documents, Native oral traditions, and archaeology. In A. Dirlik (Ed.), Pedagogies of the Global: Knowledge in the Human Interest (Cultural Politics and the Promise of Democracy) (pp. 255–271). New York: Routledge.
Loren, D. D. (2007). Corporeal concerns: Eighteenth-century casta paintings and colonial bodies in Spanish Texas. Historical Archaeology, 41(1), 23–36.
Loren, D. D. (2010). The archaeology of clothing and adornment in colonial America. Gainsville: University Press of Florida.
Marceaux, P., & Wade, M. (2014). Missions untenable: Experiences of the Hasinai Caddo and the Spanish in east Texas. In L. Panich & T. Schneider (Eds.), Indigenous Landscapes and Spanish Missions: New Perspectives from Archaeology and Ethnohistory (pp. 57–76). Tucson: University of Arizona Press.
Martel, H. (2013). Colonial allure: Normal homoeroticism and sodomy in French and Timucuan encounters in sixteenth-century Florida. Journal of the History of Sexuality, 22(1), 34–64.
McCall, L. (2005). The complexity of intersectionality. Signs, 30(3), 1771–1800.
Oakes, E. T. (2007). Jesus christ. In J. Buckley, F. Bauerschmidt, & T. Pomplun (Eds.), The Blackwell companion to Catholicism (pp. 297–311). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
Pauketaut, T. R. (2012). An archaeology of the Cosmos: Rethinking agency and religion in ancient America. New York: Routledge.
Pavao-Zuckerman, B., & Loren, D. (2012). Presentation is everything: Foodways, tablewares, and colonial identity at Presidio Los Adaes. International Journal of Historical Archaeology, 16(1), 199–226.
Perea, J. B. (2017). Audiovisualizing Iñupiaq men and masculinities on the ice. In J. Barker (Ed.), Critically Sovereign: Indigenous gender, sexuality, and feminist studies (pp. 127–168). Durham: Duke University Press.
Perry, E. M., & Joyce, R. A. (2001). Interdisciplinary applications: Providing a past for “bodies that matter”: Judith Butler’s impact on the archaeology of gender. International Journal of Sexuality and Gender Studies, 6(1), 63–76.
Perttula, T. K. (1997). ‘The Caddo Nation’: Archaeological and ethnohistoric perspectives. Austin: University of Texas Press.
Reid, R. (2011). Past and presentism: The ‘precolonial’ and the foreshortening of African history. The Journal of African History, 52(2), 135–155.
Reilly, F. K., III (2004). People of Earth, people of sky: Visualizing the sacred in Native American art of the Mississippian Period. In Townsend, R. F. (ed.), Hero, Hawk, and Open Hand: American Indian Art of the Ancient Midwest and South, Art Institute of Chicago, Illinois, pp. 125—138.
Rothschild, N. A. (2003). Colonial encounters in a native American landscape: The Spanish and Dutch in North America. Washington, D.C.: Smithsonian Book.
Russell, K. (2007). Feminist dialectics and Marxist theory. Radical Philosophy Review, 10(1), 33–54.
Sabo, G., & III. (1992). Rituals of encounter: Interpreting Native American views of European explorers. The Arkansas Historical Quarterly, 51(1), 54–68.
Sabo, G., & III. (1995). Encounters and images: European contact and the Caddo Indians. Historical Reflections/Réflexions Historiques, 21(2), 217–242.
Shanks, M. (1992). Experiencing the past: On the character of archaeology. London: Routledge.
Silliman, S. (2005). Culture contact or colonialism? Challenges in the archaeology of Native North America. American Antiquity, 70(1), 55–74.
Smith, A. (2011). Queer theory and Native studies: The heteronormativity of settler colonialism. In Q. Driskill, C. Finley, B. J. Gilley, & S. L. Morgensen (Eds.), Queer indigenous studies: Critical interventions in theory, politics, and literature (pp. 43–65). Tucson: University of Arizona Press.
Smith, D. M. (1998). An Athapaskan way of knowing: Chipewyan ontology. American Ethnologist, 25(3), 412–432.
Spencer-Wood, S. M. (1992). A feminist paradigm for a non-sexist archaeology. In L. Wandsnider (Ed.), Quandaries and Quests: Visions of Archaeology’s future, occasional paper 20: Center for Archaeological Investigations (pp. 98–113). Carbondale: Southern Illinois University.
Spencer-Wood, S. M. (1995). Toward the further development of feminist historical archaeology. World Archaeological Bulletin, 7, 118–136.
Spencer-Wood, S. M. (2006). Feminist theory and gender research in historical archaeology. In S. R. Nelson (Ed.), Handbook of gender in archaeology (pp. 59–104). Walnut Creek: AltaMira Press.
Spencer-Wood, S. M. (2016). Feminist theorizing of patriarchal colonialism, power dynamics, and social agency materialized in colonial institutions. International Journal of Historical Archaeology, 20(3), 477–491.
Stump, D. (2013). On applied archaeology, Indigenous knowledge, and the usable past. Current Anthropology, 54(3), 268–298.
Swanton, J. R. (1942). Source material on the history and ethnology of the Caddo Indians. Washington, D.C.: Bureau of American Ethnology Bulletin.
Todd, Z. (2016). An Indigenous feminist’s take on the ontological turn: ‘Ontology’ is just another word for colonialism. Journal of Historical Sociology, 29(1), 4–22.
Valtrová, J. (2020). Christian material culture and the Mongols: The case of William of Rubruck. Eurasian Studies, 17(2), 228–243.
Voss, B. L. (2000). Colonial sex: Archaeology, structured space and sexuality in alta California’s Spanish- colonial missions. In R. Schmidt & B. Voss (Eds.), Archaeologies of Sexuality (pp. 35–62). London: Routledge.
Voss, B. L. (2008). Domesticating imperialism: Sexual politics and the archaeology of empire. American Anthropologist, 110(2), 191–203.
Waselkov, G. A., & Smith, M. T. (Eds.). (2017). Forging Southeastern identities: social archaeology, Ethnohistory, and folklore of the Mississippian to early historic south. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.
Watts, C. (2013). Relational archaeologies: Roots and routes. In C. Watts (Ed.), Relational Archaeologies: Humans Animals, Things (pp. 1–20). New York: Routledge.
Watts, V. (2013). Indigenous place-thought & agency among humans and non-humans (first woman and sky woman go on a European tour!). Decolonization: Indigeneity, Education, & Society, 2(1), 20–34.
Wright, W. (2007). Spirituality. In J. Buckley, F. Bauerschmidt, & T. Pomplun (Eds.), The Blackwell companion to Catholicism (pp. 389–402). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
Wylie, A. (2007). Doing archaeology as a feminist: Introduction. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 14(3), 209–216.
Wyss, H. E. (2006). Mary Occom and Sarah Simon: Gender and Native literacy in colonial New England. The New England Quarterly, 79(3), 387–412.
Acknowledgements
This article benefited from comments and discussion with several colleagues. I express my gratitude for their comments on this work’s clarity, particularly Suzanne Spencer-Wood and Jennifer Cantu Trunzo for their feedback on manuscript drafts. Additionally, I want to thank the other participants involved in the 2018 Society for Historical Archaeology meeting session where the first version of this article was presented for their conversations, discussions, and contributions to my thinking about these matters. All errors and omissions are solely my responsibility.
The author is the sole researcher of this work. No funding was received to assist with the preparation of this manuscript. The author is not aware of any financial or proprietary conflicts of interests in any material discussed in this article.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rutecki, D.M. At the Crossroads: Intersections at Colonization. Arch 18, 45–71 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11759-022-09441-6
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11759-022-09441-6