Advertisement

Archaeologies

, Volume 9, Issue 3, pp 506–525 | Cite as

Waging War on the Dead: The Necropolitics of Sufi Shrine Destruction in Mali

  • Emily Jane O’DellEmail author
Research

Abstract

The destruction of Sufi heritage in Timbuktu used and abused heritage to assert sovereignty, terrorize the living, and repudiate materiality. Archeologists have not analyzed how necropolitics relates to the desecration of the dead and the torture of the living in Mali, where “bodies” are becoming prime stages for radical performances of sovereignty, ideology, and materiality. To understand how Sufi shrines are becoming prime ideological battlegrounds, we must consider the affective presence and emotive materiality of the dead “bodies” and “spirits” of the saints being “slayed,” and acknowledge the relationship between the disturbance of the dead and postcolonial violence on the living.

Key Words

Mali Sufism Necropolitics Terrorism 

Résumé

La destruction des sanctuaires soufis à Tombouctou est une violence faite au patrimoine dans le but d’imposer une souveraineté, de terroriser les vivants et de rejeter la matérialité. Les archéologues n’ont pas analysé comment la nécropolitique est liée à la désacralisation des morts et à la torture des vivants au Mali, où les « corps » deviennent les premiers bastions d’un exercice radical en termes de souveraineté, d’idéologie et de matérialité. Pour comprendre comment les sanctuaires soufis sont en train de devenir les principaux champs de bataille idéologiques, nous devons prendre en compte la présence affective et la matérialité émotionnelle des « corps » et des « esprits » morts des saints « occis » et reconnaître la relation entre la perturbation des morts et la violence postcoloniale sur les vivants.

Resumen

La destrucción de santuarios sufíes en el maltratado patrimonio de Tombuctú para reafirmar la soberanía, aterroriza a los vivos y repudia la materialidad. Los arqueólogos no han analizado cómo la necropolítica se relaciona con la profanación de los muertos y la tortura de los vivos en Malí, donde los “cuerpos” se están convirtiendo en escenarios primordiales de las representaciones radicales de soberanía, ideología y materialidad. Para comprender cómo los santuarios sufíes se están convirtiendo en campos de batalla ideológicos primordiales, debemos considerar la presencia afectiva y la materialidad emotiva de los “cuerpos” y “espíritus” muertos de los santos “asesinados” y reconocer la relación entre la perturbación de los muertos y la violencia postcolonial sobre los vivos.

References

  1. Appadurai, A. 1998. Dead Certainty: Ethnic Violence in the Era of Globalization. Public Culture 10(2):225–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baines, E. 2010. Spirits and Social Reconstruction After Mass Violence: Rethinking Transitional Justice. African Affairs 109(436):409–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baran, Z. (editor) 2004. Understanding Sufism and Its Potential Role in US Policy. http://www.islamawareness.net/Sufism/sufism_us_policy.pdf. Accessed 11 November 2013.
  4. Butler, J. 1989. Foucault and the Paradox of Bodily Inscription. Journal of Philosophy 86(11):601–607.Google Scholar
  5. Deleuze, G., and F. Guattari 1986. Nomadology: The War Machine. Semiotext(e)/Foreign Agents, New York.Google Scholar
  6. Elias, J. 2007. (Un)making Idolatry: From Mecca to Bamiyan. Future Anterior 4(2):12–29.Google Scholar
  7. Eppel S. 2001. Healing the Dead to Transform the Living: Exhumation and Reburial in Zimbabwe. http://www.icrc.org/themissi.nsf/32db2800384e72adc12569dd00505ac6/72889407ac24b246c1256b04004739f6/$FILE/healing%20the%20dead-%20calif%20conf%202001.rtf. Accessed 10 November 2013.
  8. Fanon, F. 1991. The Wretched of the Earth, Trans C. Farrington. Grove Weidenfeld, New York.Google Scholar
  9. Fontein J. 2009. The Politics of the Dead: Living Heritage, Bones and Commemoration in Zimbabwe. ASA Online 1(2):1–27. http://www.theasa.org/publications/asaonline/articles/asaonline0102.pdf. Accessed 11 November 2013.
  10. Fontein, J. 2010. Between Tortured Bodies and Resurfacing Bones: The Politics of the Dead in Zimbabwe. Journal of Material Culture 15(4):423–448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Foucault, M. 2002. The Archaeology of Knowledge (2nd.). Routledge, London.Google Scholar
  12. Geary, P. 1988. Sacred Commodities: The Circulation of Medieval Relics. In The Social Life of Things, edited by A. Appadurai, pp. 169–191. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  13. Gell, A. 1998. Art and Agency: An Anthropological Theory. Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  14. Heidegger, M. 1982. The Question Concerning Technology. Harper Torchbooks, New York.Google Scholar
  15. Ingold, T. 2007. Materials Against Materiality. Archaeological Dialogues 14(1):1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Latour, B. 2002. What Is Iconoclash? Or Is There a World Beyond the Image Wars? In Icono-clash: Beyond the Image Wars in Science, Religion, and Art, edited by B. Latour, and P. Weibel, pp. 14–37. ZKM, Karlsruhe.Google Scholar
  17. Mbembe, A. 2003. Necropolitics. Public Culture 15(1):11–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Navaro-Yashin, Y. 2009. Affective Spaces, Melancholic Objects: Ruination and the Production of Anthropological Knowledge. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 15(1):1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Olcott M. 2007. Sufism in Central Asia: A Force for Moderation or a Cause of Politicization? http://carnegieendowment.org/files/cp84_olcott_final2.pdf. Accessed 11 November 2013.
  20. Pape, R. 2003. The Strategic Logic of Suicide Terrorism. American Political Science Review 97(3):343–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Rabasa, A., Benard, C., Schwartz, L., and P. Sickle 2007. Building Moderate Muslim Networks. http://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/monographs/2007/RAND_MG574.pdf. Accessed 11 November 2013.
  22. Scott, M. 2005. Hybridity, Vacuity, and Blockage: Visions of Chaos from Anthropological Theory, Island Melanesia and Central Africa. Comparative Studies of Society and History 47(1):190–216.Google Scholar
  23. Taylor, C. 1999. Sacrifice as Terror. Berg, New York.Google Scholar
  24. Verdery, K. 1999. The Political Lives of Dead Bodies. Columbia University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  25. Williams, H. 2004. Death Warmed Up: The Agency of Bodies and Bones in Early Anglo-Saxon Cremation Rites. Journal of Material Culture 9:263–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© World Archaeological Congress 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of History & ArchaeologyAmerican University of BeirutBeirutLebanon

Personalised recommendations