Advertisement

Archaeologies

, Volume 9, Issue 2, pp 295–319 | Cite as

Heritage in Palestine: Colonial Legacy in Postcolonial Discourse

Research

Abstract

This essay addresses the need to look into ‘postcolonial’/‘post-Oslo’ Palestine heritage discourses and practices to uncover commonalities and divergences. These practices and discourses, I claim, tell a story about hidden codes of subjectivity while revealing the setbacks of postcolonial heritage discourses in a ‘postcolonial era’. I show that the Palestinian ‘postcolonial’ heritage polices and preservation practices echo colonial discourses in terms of approach, legal framework and end results. My premise is built on a long engagement with governmental and non-governmental heritage organisations as well as the literature on the topic that shows heritage discourses and practices implicated within the specific narrative that they are destined to (re) produce. I claim that postcolonial approaches to the material culture, consciously and unconsciously, reproduce the colonial situation and while the impetus towards preservation itself is a symptom of postmodernity, it is still carried out in a modernist spirit. Throughout my analysis, I show that what spills out from the heritage discourses, as well as the unintended consequences of heritage practices are worth considering in any analytical approach of heritage discourses.

Key Words

Palestine Heritage Preservation Colonial and postcolonial discourse Decolonisation 

Résumé

Cet essai répond au besoin d’étudier les pratiques et discours patrimoniaux dans la Palestine « postcoloniale » / « post-Oslo », pour y découvrir des points communs et des divergences. Je soutiens l’idée que ces pratiques et discours en disent long à propos des codes subjectifs sous-jacents, en révélant les retards pris par les discours patrimoniaux postcoloniaux à « l’ère postcoloniale ». Je démontre que les politiques et les pratiques de préservation patrimoniales postcoloniales palestiniennes font écho aux discours coloniaux en termes d’approche, de cadre légal et de résultats finaux. Mon postulat est construit sur un long engagement au sein d’organisations patrimoniales gouvernementales et non gouvernementales ainsi que sur la littérature portant sur ce sujet, qui montre des discours et pratiques patrimoniaux impliqués dans le récit spécifique qu’ils sont destinés à (re)produire. Je soutiens que les approches postcoloniales de la culture matérielle reproduisent, consciemment et inconsciemment, la situation coloniale. De plus, bien que l’élan vers la préservation soit en lui-même un symptôme de postmodernité, il reste mis en œuvre dans un esprit moderniste. Tout au long de mon analyse, je démontre que ce qui transparaît dans les discours patrimoniaux, au même titre que les conséquences inattendues des pratiques patrimoniales, mérite d’être pris en compte dans toute approche analytique des discours patrimoniaux.

Resumen

El presente ensayo aborda la necesidad de revisar los discursos y las prácticas “poscoloniales” / “post-Oslo” sobre el patrimonio de Palestina para descubrir coincidencias y divergencias. Argumento que estas prácticas y discursos dicen una historia sobre códigos ocultos de subjetividad revelando al mismo tiempo los obstáculos de los discursos poscoloniales sobre el patrimonio en una “era poscolonial”. Muestro que las políticas sobre el patrimonio y las prácticas de conservación “poscolonial” palestinas repiten los discursos coloniales en términos de enfoque, marco legal y resultados finales. Mi premisa se construye gracias a un largo compromiso con organizaciones gubernamentales y no gubernamentales del patrimonio, así como también al material publicado sobre el tema que muestra discursos y prácticas sobre el patrimonio implicados dentro de la narrativa específica que están destinados a (re)producir. Argumento que los enfoques poscoloniales de la cultura material, consciente e inconscientemente, reproducen la situación colonial, y aunque el ímpetu hacia la propia conservación es un síntoma de posmodernidad, todavía se lleva con espíritu modernista. A lo largo de mi análisis, muestro que vale la pena considerar, en cualquier enfoque analítico de los discursos sobre el patrimonio, lo que se desprende de los discursos sobre el patrimonio, así como también las consecuencias no intencionadas de las prácticas sobre el patrimonio

References

  1. Abu El-Haj, Nadia (2002) Facts on the Ground: Archaeological Practice and Territorial Self-Fashioning in Israeli Society, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Abu-Sitta, Salman H. (2004) Atlas of Palestine, 1948, Palestine Land Society, London.Google Scholar
  3. Amiry, Suad, Bshara, Khaldun (2007) A Political Conflict Mirrored in the Protection of Cultural Heritage, ICCROM, Rome.Google Scholar
  4. Anderson, Benedict R. O’. G. (1983) Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism, Verso, London.Google Scholar
  5. Benvenisti, Meron (1996) City of Stone, the Hidden History of Jerusalem, University of California Press, Berkeley and Los Angeles.Google Scholar
  6. Benvenisti, Meron 2000. Sacred Landscape: The Buried History of the Holy Land Since 1948. Maxine Kaufman-Lacusta, trans. University of California Press, Berkeley.Google Scholar
  7. Bourdieu, Pierre 1979[1972]. Algeria 1960: The Disenchantment of the World: The Sense of Honour: The Kabyle House or the World Reversed. Richard Nice, trans. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  8. Butler, Judith (1997) The Psychic Life of Power: Theories in Subjection, Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA.Google Scholar
  9. Chakrabarty, Dipesh (2000) Provincializing Europe: Postcolonial Thought and Historical Difference, Princeton University Press, Princeton.Google Scholar
  10. Dabashi, Hamid (ed.) (2006) Dreams of a Nation, On Palestinian Cinema, Verso, London and New York.Google Scholar
  11. Darwish, Mahmud 2006[1995]. Why did you Leave the Horse Alone? Jeffrey Sacks, trans. Archipelago Books, Brooklyn, NY.Google Scholar
  12. De Certeau, Michel 1984. The Practice of Everyday Life. Steven F. Rendall, trans. University of California Press, Berkeley, Los Angeles, London.Google Scholar
  13. De Cesari, Chiara 2010. Creative Heritage: Palestinian Heritage NGOs and Defiant Arts of Government. American Anthropologist 112:625–637.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Deleuze, Gilles, and Felix Guattari 1977[1972]. Anti Oedipus, Capitalism and Schizophrenia. The Viking Press, New York.Google Scholar
  15. Doumani, Beshara 2009. Archiving Palestine and the Palestinians: The Patrimony of Ihsan Nimr. Jerusalem Quarterly 36:3–12.Google Scholar
  16. Fanon, Frantz 2004[1961]. The Wretched of the Earth. Richard Philcox. Trans. with commentary by Jean-Paul Sartre and Homi K. Bhabha. Grove Press, New York.Google Scholar
  17. Foucault, Michel 1978. The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality, edited by Graham Burchell et al. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
  18. Giddens, Anthony (2000) The Consequences of Modernity, Stanford University PressStanford.Google Scholar
  19. Halbwachs, Maurice 1992[1925]. On Collective Memory. Lewis A. Coser, ed. and trans. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, London.Google Scholar
  20. Hodder, Ian, Cessford, Craig 2004. Daily Practice and Social Memory at Çatalhöyük. American Antiquity 69(1):17–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Khalidi, Walid (ed.) (1992) All That Remains: The Palestinian Villages Occupied and Depopulated by Israel in 1948, Institute for Palestinian Studies, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  22. Kristeva, Julia 1989[1987]. Black Sun: Depression and Melancholia. Leon S. Roudiez, trans. Columbia University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  23. Latour, Bruno (1993) We Have Never Been Modern, Harvester Wheatsheaf, New York.Google Scholar
  24. Lowenthal, David, Binney, Marcus (eds.) (1981) Our Past Before Us, Why Do We Save It?, Temple Smith, London.Google Scholar
  25. Mamdani, Mahmood (1996) Citizens and Subjects: Contemporary Africa and the Legacy of Late Colonialism, Princeton University Press, New Jersey.Google Scholar
  26. Mantena, Rama Sundari (2012) The Origins of Modern Historiography in India: Antiquarianism and Philology, 1780–1880, Palgrave Macmillan, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Masalha, Nur (1992) Expulsion of the Palestinians: The Concept of ‘Transfer’ in Zionists Political Thought, 1882–1948, Institute for Palestine Studies, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  28. Mbembe, Achille (2001) The Postcolony, University of California Press, Berkeley, Los Angeles, London.Google Scholar
  29. Morris, Benny (1987) The Birth of the Palestinian Refugee Problem, 1947–1949, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  30. Muhawi, Farhat, Qawasmi, Sahar (eds.) (2012) Re-Walk Heritae: Ramallah Highlands Trail, Riwaq, Ramallah.Google Scholar
  31. Nazzal, Nafez (1978) The Palestinian Exodus from Galilee 1948, Institute for Palestine Studies, Beirut.Google Scholar
  32. Nora, Pierre (editor) 2001[1984]. Rethinking France: Les Lieus De Memoire, vol. 1: The State. Mary Trouille, and David P. Jordan, trans. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
  33. Oliver, Kelly (2004) The Colonization of Psychic Space: A Psychoanalytic Social Theory of Oppression, The University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis.Google Scholar
  34. Pappé, Ilan 2007[2006]. The Ethnic Cleansing of Palestine. Oneworld, Oxford.Google Scholar
  35. Shoshan, Malkit, and Eitan Bronstein 2006. Reinventing Lifta. An electronic source: http://www.seamless-israel.org1, accessed in January 2006.
  36. Silberman, Neil A 1990. Ba’hthan ‘an Aaliha wa Watan [Digging for God and Country, Exploration, Archeology, and the Secrete Struggle for the Holly Land 1799–1917]. Doubleday, New York, 2001. Fadel Hatkar, trans. Cadmus, Damascus.Google Scholar
  37. Silberman, Neil A 2001. Ba’hthan ‘an Aaliha wa Watan [Digging for God and Country, Exploration, Archeology, and the Secrete Struggle for the Holly Land 1799–1917]. Doubleday, New York, 1990. Fadel Hatkar, trans. Cadmus, Damascus.Google Scholar
  38. Slyomovics, Susan (1998) The Object of Memory: Arab and Jew Narrate the Palestinian Village, University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
  39. Stein, Rebecca L., Swedenburg, Ted (eds.) (2005) Palestine, Israel, and the Politics of Popular Culture, Duke University Press, Durham and London.Google Scholar
  40. Tamari, Salim (2003) Bourgeois Nostalgia and Exilic Narratives. In Homeland: Poetic Power and the Politics of Space, edited by Ron Robinand Bo Strath, Brussels, P.I.E.-Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  41. Tsemel, Lea (1996) The Trap is Closing on Palestinian Jerusalemites, Alternative Information Center, Jerusalem.Google Scholar
  42. Weiner, Annette B. (1992) Inalienable Possessions: The Paradox of Keeping-While-Giving, University of California Press, Berkeley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© World Archaeological Congress 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.RIWAQ—Centre for Architectural ConservationRamallahPalestine

Personalised recommendations