Skip to main content
Log in

Critical Masses: Augmented Virtual Experiences and the Xenoplastic at Australia’s Cold War and Nuclear Heritage Sites

  • Research
  • Published:
Archaeologies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Critical Masses is a multidisciplinary pilot project that aims to graphically represent and mediate the histories, spaces and narratives concerning former nuclear installations within central Australia. These include the abandoned British atomic test sites at Emu Field and Maralinga, the Intercontinental Ballistic Missile (ICBM)/Intermediate Range Ballistic Missile (IRBM) rocket launchers at Woomera, and the decommissioned US National Security Agency early warning satellite base at Nurrungar. Significantly, each of these Cold War sites are situated in either hazardous, remote, secure and/or culturally sensitive areas and require sophisticated analysis and negotiation in order to best render their complexity for both online access and on-site tourism. In association with the Maralinga-Pilling Trust and traditional indigenous landowners a multi-tiered approach (re)creating these locations is being modelled across platforms for diverse audiences. Digital materials are being authored and designed for stand-alone DVD, online interactive sites and archives, an immersive/simulated space for interpretation centres, and augmented/enhanced reality interfaces via GPS and mobile/handheld devices used in situ at key sites.

Résumé

Masses Critiques est un projet pilote multidisciplinaire qui vise à représenter graphiquement et arbitrer les histoires, les espaces et les récits concernant les anciennes installations nucléaires de l’Australie centrale. Cela inclus les sites d’essais atomiques Britanniques abandonnés d’Emu Field et Maralinga, le lanceur de fusée ICBM/IRBM de Woomera, et la base du satellite US de première alerte hors service de l’Agence Nationale de Sécurité de Nurrungar. Tous ces site de la guerre froide sont principalement situés soit dans des zones dangereuses, éloignées, sures et/ou culturellement sensibles et demandent analyse sophistiquée et tractation de manière à mieux présenter leur complexité à l’accès en ligne et au tourisme sur site. En association avec le trust Maralinga-Pilling et les propriétaires indigènes traditionnels une approche multi-facettes (re)créant ces sites va être modélisée sur des plateformes pour des audiences diverses. Des supports numériques vont être écris et conçus pour des DVD autonomes, des sites interactifs en ligne et des archives, un espace d’immersion/simulation pour les centres d’interprétariat, des interfaces accrues et améliorées via GPS et appareils mobiles/portatifs utilisés in situ sur des sites clés.

Resumen

Critical Masses es un proyecto piloto multidisciplinar que tiene como objetivo representar gráficamente y actuar como mediador en las historias, los espacios y las narrativas relacionadas con las instalaciones nucleares de Australia central. Entre ellas se incluyen los centros abandonados de pruebas atómicas nucleares en Emu Field y Maralinga, las lanzaderas de ICBM/IRBM en Woomera y la base de satélites desmantelada de la Agencia de Seguridad Nacional Estadounidense en Nurrungar. Es significativo el hecho de que estos sitios de la Guerra Fría se encuentran bien en zonas peligrosas, remotas, seguras o con sensibilidad cultural que requieren análisis y negociaciones avanzados para, a pesar de su complejidad, hacerlos accesibles en línea y permitir turismo en el sitio. En asociación con el Maralinga-Pilling Trust y los terratenientes indígena tradicionales, se está creando un enfoque multinivel para recrear estos lugares en plataformas para diversas audiencias. Asimismo, se están elaborando y diseñando materiales digitales para DVD independientes, sitios interactivos en línea y archivos, un espacio inmersivo y simulado para centros de interpretación y más y mejores interfaces sobre realidad mediante GPS, sin olvidar los dispositivos móviles utilizados in situ en los lugares clave.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 9
Figure 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References Cited

  • Ascott, R. 1996. The Museum of the Third Kind. Intercommunication 15:74–79. Online at http://www.ntticc.or.jp/pub/ic_mag/ic015/ascott/ascott_e.html, retrieved 12th April 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ball, D. (1980). A Suitable Piece of Real Estate: American Installations in Australia. Hale and Iremonger, Sydney.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ball, D. (1987). A Base for Debate: The U.S. Satellite Station at Nurrungar. Allen & Unwin, Sydney.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beadell, L. (1967). Blast the Bush. New Holland Press, Sydney.

    Google Scholar 

  • Broderick, M. 2006. The Power We Love to Hate. The Australian Higher Education Supplement 9 August:6.

  • Cawte, A. (1993). Atomic Australia. University of NSW Press, Kensington NSW.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cody, S. 1997. Historical Museums on the World Wide Web: An Exploration and Critical Analysis. The Public Historian 19(4): 29-53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Craik, J. (2001). Tourism, Culture and National Identity. In: Bennett, T. and Carter, C. Culture in Australia: Policy Publics and Programs, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge: pp. 89–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cross, R. (2001). Fallout: Hedley Marsden and the British Bomb Tests in Australia. Wakefield Press, Adelaide SA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cross, R., Hudson, A. (2005). Beyond belief: the British bomb tests, Australia’s veterans speak out. Wakefield Press, Adelaide SA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fairclough, G. (2007). The Cold War in context: Archaeological explorations of private, public and political complexity. In Schofield, J. and Cocroft, W. (eds.), A Fearsome Heritage: Diverse Legacies of the Cold War, Left Coast Press, Walnut Creek, CA., pp 19-32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, G. 2007. Meta-Design: Expanding Boundaries and Redistributing Control in Design. Online at http://l3d.cs.colorado.edu/~gerhard/, retrieved 1st June 2005.

  • Fiske, J, Hodge, B, Turner, G. (1987). Myths of Oz: Reading Australian Popular Culture. Allen & Unwin, Sydney.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giaccardi, E., H. Eden, and G. Sabena 2006. The Silence of the Lands: Promoting the Virtual Museum as a Place of Cultural Negotiation. Proceedings of the New Heritage Forum, Hong Kong, pp. 94–114. Online at http://x.i-dat.org/~e.g/research/pdf/Giaccardi-et-al_NHF06.pdf, retrieved 12th April 2009.

  • Hamilakis, Y. (2009). The “War on Terror” and the Military-Archaeology Complex: Iraq, Ethics, and Neo-Colonialism. Archaeologies: Journal of the World Archaeological Congress 5(1): 39-65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hooper-Greenhill, E. (1992). Museums and the Shaping of Knowledge. Routledge, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mack, A. 1987. Arms Control and the US Australia Joint Defence Facilities: The Case of Nurrungar. Peace Research Centre, Australian National University.

  • Manovich, L. 2002. Metadating the Image. Online at http://www.manovich.net/DOCS/metadata.doc, retrieved 29th May 2007.

  • Maralinga Tjarutja Inc and Ochre Consultants Pty Ltd. 2003. Maralinga Village Redevelopment: Land Management & Heritage Resource Centre., Maralinga Tjarutja Inc., Ceduna SA.

  • MARTAC 2003. Rehabilitation of Former Nuclear Test Sites at Emu and Maralinga (Australia). Report by the Maralinga Rehabilitation Technical Advisory Committee, Department of Education, Science and Training, Canberra.

  • McClelland. J.R. (1985). The Report of the Royal Commission into British Nuclear Tests in Australia. AGPS, Canberra.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGlann, J. (2005). Culture and technology: the way we live now, what is to be done? Interdisciplinary Science Reviews 30(2): 179-189. doi:10.1179/030801805X25918.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milliken, R. (1986). No Conceivable Injury. Penguin Books, Ringwood Vic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morton, P. (1989). Fire Across the Desert: Woomera and the Anglo-Australian Joint Project 1946-1980. Department of Defence, Canberra.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parkinson, A. (2007). Maralinga: Australia’s nuclear waste cover-up. ABC Books, Sydney.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rabbit-Roff, S. 2001. Australians Were Nuclear Guinea pigs—Claim. University of Dundee, Press Release, 11 May. Online at http://www.dundee.ac.uk/pressreleases/prmay01/roff.htm, retrieved 2nd May 2006.

  • Reynolds, W. (2000). Australia’s Bid for the Atomic Bomb. Melbourne University Press, Carlton South, Vic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ricoeur, P. (1971). The Conflict of Interpretation, (trans. Kathleen McLaughlin). Northwestern University Press, Evanston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schofield, J. and Cocroft, W. (eds.) (2007). A Fearsome Heritage: Diverse legacies of the Cold War, Left Coast Press, Walnut Creek CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schofield, J., Klausmeiser, A., and Purbrick, L. (eds.) (2006). Re-mapping the field: New Approaches in Conflict Archaeology, Westkreuz-Verlag, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sterling, B. 2006. Viridian Note 00459: Emerging Technology 2006. Online at http://www.viridiandesign.org/2006/03/viridian-note-00459-emerging.html, retrieved 29th May 2007.

  • Steve Museum 2007. Steve: The Museum Social Tagging Project. Online at http://www.steve.museum, retrieved 29th May 2007.

  • Tame, A. and Robotham, R. (1982). Maralinga: British A-bomb. Australian legacy, Fontana, Sydney.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilks, J. (1980). Field of thunder: the Maralinga story. Friends of the Earth, Collingwood Vic.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mick Broderick.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Broderick, M., Cypher, M. & Macbeth, J. Critical Masses: Augmented Virtual Experiences and the Xenoplastic at Australia’s Cold War and Nuclear Heritage Sites. Arch 5, 323–343 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11759-009-9110-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11759-009-9110-3

Keywords

Navigation