Archaeologies

, Volume 4, Issue 2, pp 233–249 | Cite as

Sowing the Seeds of Modernity on the Ottoman Frontier: Agricultural Investment and the Formation of Large Farms in Nineteenth-Century Transjordan

Research
  • 121 Downloads

Abstract

In the nineteenth century, the Ottoman Empire initiated a series of modernization reforms. In an effort to address the economic viability of the state, it turned its attentions to its frontiers, in an attempt to bring these regions back into the fold of the empire. In Transjordan, the state targeted Bedouin subjects; as part of the Ottoman project of modernity, efforts were made to settle nomadic pastoralists and transform pastureland into agricultural spaces. The rural countryside was opened to capitalist investment in agriculture. However, agricultural intensification, and the establishment of large farms created a crisis of modernity for many Bedouin. The intensification of agriculture brought increased taxation, diminished control over production, indebtedness, and ultimately the appropriation of land. But some Bedouin used the built environment and natural landscape to confront the Ottoman project of modernity as it unfolded on the frontier.

Keywords

Ottoman Empire Bedouin Modernity Agricultural Intensification 

Résumé

Au neuvième siècle, l’Empire Ottoman a introduit une série de réformes modernes. Dans un effort pour assurer la viabilité de l’économie de l’état, elle a porté son attention sur ses frontières, en tentant de ramener ses régions sous l’influence de l’empire. En Transjordanie, l’état s’est intéressé aux Bédouins en les incluant à son projet de modernisation dans un effort de sédentarisation de ces pastoraux et par la transformation de leurs terres en espaces pour l’agriculture. Ainsi, ces campagnes furent ouvertes aux investissements capitalistes en agriculture. Il en résultat une intensification de l’agriculture et l’implantation de grandes fermes qui provoquèrent une crise de modernité chez beaucoup de Bédouins. L’intensification de l’agriculture apporta une augmentation des taxes, une diminution du contrôle sur la production, l’endettement, et ultimement, l’appropriation des terres. Cependant, des Bédouins vont utiliser l’environnement modifié et le paysage naturel pour confronter le projet d’expansion moderne de l’Empire Ottoman s’étendant alors aux frontières.

Resumen

En el siglo diecinueve, el Imperio Otomano inició una serie de reformas de modernización. En su afán por mejorar la economía del estado, volcó su atención en las fronteras del imperio con intención de desplegar las medidas en estas regiones. En la Transjordania, el estado se puso como objetivo el problema beduino; una parte importante del proyecto otomano de modernidad consistió en convertir en sedentarios a los pastores nómadas y en transformar la tierra de pastos en un espacio aprovechable para la agricultura. Así, el campo se abrió a las inversiones capitalistas agrícolas. Sin embargo, para muchos beduinos, la intensificación agrícola y el establecimiento de grandes granjas supusieron una crisis de modernidad. La intensificación de la agricultura produjo un aumento de los impuestos, un menor control sobre la producción, un mayor endeudamiento, y a la postre, la apropiación de la tierra. Pero algunos beduinos utilizaron el entorno construido y el paisaje natural para oponerse al proyecto otomano de modernidad a medida que se desplegaba en la frontera.

Notes

Acknowledgments

Archaeological survey for this study was supported by the 2001 Tall Hisban investigations of the Madaba Plains Project Consortium. This work would not be possible without the continued support and dialogues I have enjoyed over the years with Bethany Walker (Grand Valley State University) and Sten LaBianca (Andrews University), and the hard work of their team, especially David Chaudoir (University of Arkansas) who conducted an ethnographic study of Hisban in 2001, Lean Fakhouri (University of Jordan) and her team who conducted the architectural study of Beyt Nabulsi; and Adam Fenner (Stanford University) for additional historical data. I am also grateful and indebted to Uzi Baram, Robin Brown, and Amy Groleau for their comments and suggestions. This work has benefitted from all of their help, while all omissions and errors are the author’s alone.

References Cited

  1. Abujaber, R.S. 1989 Pioneers Over Jordan: The Frontier of Settlement in Transjordan, 1850–1914. I.B. Tauris and Co. Ltd., London.Google Scholar
  2. Abujaber R.S., Felicity Cobbing 2005 Beyond the River: Ottoman Transjordan in Original Photographs. Stacey International, London.Google Scholar
  3. Ahmad, A.S., D. al-Huseini, D. Anbatawi, and A. Musa 2001. Mabani Qaryat Hisban (Architectural report on the Nabulsi farmhouse submitted to MPP by the students of Dr. L. Fakhouri, College of Architecture, University of Jordan). University of Jordan, Amman.Google Scholar
  4. Al-Nimr, I. 1938. Tarikh Jabal Nablus wa al-Balqa, Vol. I. Damascus, SyriaGoogle Scholar
  5. Amiry S., V. Tamari 1989 The Palestinian Village Home. British Museum Publications, London.Google Scholar
  6. Carroll Lynda, Adam Fenner, Øystein S. LaBianca 2006 The Ottoman Qasr at Hisban: Architecture, Reform, and New Social Relations. Near Eastern Archaeology 69(3–4):138–145.Google Scholar
  7. Chaudoir, D., and K. Habash n.d. History of the Qasr, and its Caves, in Hisban. Unpublished report on file with the Madaba Plains Project—Hisban Excavations. Andrews University, Berrien Springs, Michigan.Google Scholar
  8. Cribb, Roger 1991 Nomads in Archaeology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  9. Deringil, Selim 1998 The Well-Protected Domains: Ideology and the Legitimation of Power in the Ottoman Empire 1876–1909. I.B. Tauris & Co Ltd, London.Google Scholar
  10. Deringil, Selim 2003 “They Live in a State of Nomadism and Savagery”: The Late Ottoman Empire and the Post-Colonial Debate. Society for Comparative Study of Society and History 45(3):311–342.Google Scholar
  11. Ferch A.R., M.B. Russell, W.K. Vyhmeister 1989 Hisban 3: Historical Foundations: Studies of Literary References to Hisban and Vicinity. Andrews University Press, Berrien Springs, Michigan.Google Scholar
  12. Fischbach, Michael 2000 State Society & Land in Jordan. Brill Academic Publishers, Leiden.Google Scholar
  13. Given, Michael 2004 The Archaeology of the Colonized. Routledge, London.Google Scholar
  14. Greene, M. 2005. The Ottoman Experience. Dædalus Spring 2005:88–99.Google Scholar
  15. Hütteroth, W., and K. Abdulfattah 1977. Historical Geography of Palestine, Transjordan and Southern Syria in the Late 16th Century. Selbstverlag der Frankischen Geographischen Gesellschaft in Kommission bei Palm und Enke, Erlangen.Google Scholar
  16. Ibach, Robert D. Jr. 1987 Hesban 5: Archaeological Survey of the Hesban Region. Andrews University Press, Berrien Springs, Michigan.Google Scholar
  17. Johns, Jeremy 1994 The Longue Durée: State and Settlement Strategies in Southern Transjordan Across the Islamic Centuries. In Village, Steppe and State: The Social Origins of Modern Jordan, by Eugene L. Rogan, Tariq Tell, pp. 1–13. British Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
  18. Johnson, Matthew 1996 An Archaeology of Capitalism. Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar
  19. Kanáan, R. 1993. Patronage and Style in Mercantile Residential Architecture of Ottoman Bilad Al-Sham: The Nablus Region in the Nineteenth Century. Unpublished Master Thesis, Oxford University, on file in the American Center of Oriental Research, Amman, Jordan.Google Scholar
  20. Kasaba, Resat 1988 The Ottoman Empire and the World Economy: The Nineteenth Century. State University of New York Press, Albany.Google Scholar
  21. LaBianca, Ø.S. 1990. Sedentarization and Nomadization: Food System Cycles at Hisban and Vicinity in Transjordan. Hisban 1. Institute of Archaeology and Andrews University Press, Berrien Springs, Michigan.Google Scholar
  22. LaBianca, Øystein S. 2000 Daily Life in the Shadow of Empire: A Food Systems Approach to the Archaeology of the Ottoman Empire. In A Historical Archaeology of the Ottoman Empire: Breaking New Ground, edited by Uzi Baram, Lynda Carroll, pp. 203–218, Plenum Press, New York.Google Scholar
  23. Layne, Linda 1994 Home and Homeland: The Dialogics of Tribal and National Identities in Jordan. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.Google Scholar
  24. Lewis N. 1987 Nomads and Settlers in Syria and Jordan 1800–1980. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  25. Lindner, Rudi P. 1983 Nomads and Ottomans in Medieval Anatolia. Research Institute for Inner Asian Studies. Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana.Google Scholar
  26. Makdisi, Ussama 1992 Ottoman Orientalism. The American Historical Review. 107(3): 768–796.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. McQuitty, Allison 2005 The Rural Landscape of Jordan in the Seventh–Nineteenth Centuries AD: The Kerak Plateau. Antiquity 79(304):327–338.Google Scholar
  28. Mrozowski, Stephen A. 1999 Colonization and the Commodification of Nature. International Journal of Historical Archaeology 3(3):153–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Oestgaard Terje, Lynda Carroll, Øystein S. LaBianca 2003 Field G. in The Islamic Qusr of Tall Hisban: Preliminary Report on the 1998 and 2001 Seasons. ADAJ Annual of the Department of Antiquities, Jordan 47:455–462.Google Scholar
  30. Palmer, Carol 1999 Whose Land is it Anyway? An historical examination of land tenure and agriculture in Northern Jordan. In The Prehistory of Food: Appetites for Change, edited by Chris Gosden, Jon G. Hather, pp. 288–305. Routledge, London.Google Scholar
  31. Pamuk, Sevket 1987 The Ottoman Empire and European Capitalism, 1820–1913: Trade, Investment, and Production. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  32. Prag, K. 1991. A Walk in the Wadi Hesban. Palestine Exploration Quarterly, pp. 48–61.Google Scholar
  33. Rogan, Eugene L. 1994 Bringing the State Back: The Limits of Ottoman Rule in Jordan, 1840–1910. in Village, Steppe and State: The Social Origins of Modern Jordan, edited by Eugene L. Rogan, Tariq Tell, pp. 32–57. British Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
  34. Rogan, Eugene L. 1999 Frontiers of the State in the Late Ottoman Empire: Transjordan, 1850–1921. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Russell M. 1989 Hisban During the Arab Period: A.D. 635 to the Present. In Hisban 3: Historical Foundations: Studies of Literary References to Hisban and Vicinity, edited by Lawrence T. Geraty, Leona G. Running, pp. 25–35. Andrews University Press, Berrien Springs, Michigan.Google Scholar
  36. Salt Development Corporation. 1990. Salt: A Plan for Action, Vol. 1, June. Amman, JordanGoogle Scholar
  37. Schilcher, Linda 1991 The Grain Economy of Late Ottoman Syria and the Issue of Large-Scale Commercialization. In Landholding and Commercial Agriculture in the Middle East. edited by Çaglar Keyder, Faruk Tabak, pp. 173–198. State University of New York Press, Albany, New York.Google Scholar
  38. Walker, Bethany J. 1999 Militarization to Nomadization: The Middle and Late Islamic Periods. Near Eastern Archaeology 62(4):202–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Walker, B.J. 2001. The Late Ottoman Cemetery in Field L, Tall Hisban. Bulletin of the American Schools of Oriental Research 322: 47–65.Google Scholar
  40. Walker Bethany J., Øystein S. LaBianca 2003 The Islamic Qusãr of Tall Hisban: Preliminary Report on the 1998 and 2001 Seasons. ADAJ Annual of the Department of Antiquities, Jordan 47:443–471.Google Scholar
  41. Walker, B.J., and Ø.S. LaBianca 2005. Tall Hisban. In Archaeology in Jordan, 2004 Season, edited by S.H. Savage, K.A. Zamora, and D.R. Keller. American Journal of Archaeology 109(3):536–539.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© World Archaeological Congress 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Public Archaeology FacilityState University of New York at BinghamtonBinghamtonUSA

Personalised recommendations