Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Psychotherapie versus § 66c StGB

Psychotherapy versus § 66c German penal code

  • Blitzlicht
  • Published:
Forensische Psychiatrie, Psychologie, Kriminologie Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Literatur

  • Kröber H‑L (2011) Anmerkungen zum Eckpunktepapier der Arbeitsgruppe Sicherungsverwahrung Berlin-Brandenburg. Forens Psychiatr Psychol Kriminol 5:98–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Voß T, Klemke K, Schneider-Njepel V, Kröber H‑L (2015) Forensische Rehabilitation zuvor Sicherungsverwahrter in der Forensisch-Therapeutischen Ambulanz Berlin. Forens Psychiatr Psychol Kriminol 9:38–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Oranienburger Str. 285, 13437, Berlin, Deutschland

    Hans-Ludwig Kröber

Authors
  1. Hans-Ludwig Kröber
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hans-Ludwig Kröber.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kröber, HL. Psychotherapie versus § 66c StGB. Forens Psychiatr Psychol Kriminol 10, 295–296 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11757-016-0392-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11757-016-0392-1

Search

Navigation