Skip to main content
Log in

Let us go back to the type materials to investigate the cranial differences among the Meriones species (Rodentia, Gerbillinae)

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Biologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The genus Meriones Illiger, 1811 comprises species that are mainly desert or semi-desert inhabitants in the Palearctic region. These species are usually distinguished from each other by some external and cranial characters, yet they show a considerable level of intra-specific variation. Studies demonstrated that their taxonomy is complex, and that they show a considerable level of morphological plasticity. This study mainly deals with such taxonomical issues in jirds belonging to the genus Meriones, and provides a contribution to their conservation status. To explore cranial shape and size differences among Meriones species, morphological variables of type specimens of ten valid Meriones species, as well as of their synonyms were investigated. These include Meriones libycus, M. crassus, M. persicus, M. tristrami, M. meridianus, M. hurrianae, M. rex, M. shawii, M. sacramenti, and M. arimalius. To obtain the geometry of the biological forms, 2D-landmark data was acquisitioned, and analysed using geometric morphometric techniques. Multivariate analyses on the shape data of ventral, dorsal, and lateral views showed that, although some species reveal an overlap in morpho-space, in some views they are morphologically distinct. A cluster analyses demonstrates the existence of at least two major groups. Although, it is possible to discriminate some Meriones species based on the relative bulla’ size, the results support the hypothesis that this criterion is not applicable to all of them. Size analyses demonstrated that the inter-landmarks distances representing the length of the tooth row and the opening of suprameatal triangle are significantly different between some jird species, and hence should be considered as a distinctive trait in the identification keys on jirds. Conclusively, only a thorough systematic revision of the genus Meriones, considering zoogeographic and ecological data, may complete the puzzle of the taxonomy of these species.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  • Abiadh A, Colangelo P, Capanna E, Lamine-Cheniti T, Chetoui M (2010) Morphometric analysis of six Gerbillus species (Rodentia, Gerbillinae) from Tunisia. C R Biol 333:687. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crvi.2010.07.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alhajeri BH (2019) Cranial variation in geographically widespread dwarf gerbil Gerbillus nanus (Gerbillinae, Rodentia) populations: isolation by distance versus adaptation to local environments. J Zool Syst Evol 57:191–203. https://doi.org/10.1111/jzs.12247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alhajeri BH (2020) A geometric morphometric analysis of geographic mandibular variation in the dwarf gerbil, Gerbillus nanus (Gerbillinae, Rodentia). J Mamm Evol 28:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10914-020-09530-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alhajeri BH (2021) A geometric morphometric analysis of geographic mandibular variation in the dwarf gerbil Gerbillus nanus (Gerbillinae, Rodentia). J Mamm Evol 28:469–480. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10914-020-09530-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alhajeri BH, Hunt OJ, Steppan SJ (2015) Molecular systematics of gerbils and deomyines (Rodentia: Gerbillinae, Deomyinae) and a test of desert adaptation in the tympanic bulla. J Zool Syst Evol 53:312–330. https://doi.org/10.1111/jzs.12102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bookstein FL (1991) Morphometric tools for landmark data. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Boroni L, Lobo N, Romano LS, Romano PSR, Lessa G (2017) Taxonomic identification using geometric morphometric approach and limited data: an example using the upper molars of two sympatric species of Calomys (Cricetidae: Rodentia). Zoologia 34:1–11. https://doi.org/10.3897/zoologia.34.e19864

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cardini A, Elton S (2009) The radiation of red colobus monkeys (Primates, Colobinae): morphological evolution in a clade of endangered African primates. Zool J Linnean Soc 157:197–224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cardini A, Jansson A, Elton S (2007) Ecomorphology of vervet monkeys: a geometric morphometric approach to the study of clinal variation. J Biogeogr 34:1663–1678

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cardini A, Diniz Filho JAF, Polly PD, Elton S (2010) Biogeographic analysis using geometric morphometrics: clines in skull size and shape in a widespread African arboreal monkey. In: Elewa A (eds) Morphometrics for Nonmorphometricians. Lecture Notes in Earth Sciences, vol 124. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 191–217

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Chaworth-Musters JL, Ellerman JR (1947) A revision of the genus Merioes. Proc Zool Soc Lond 117:478–504. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1096-3642.1947.tb00533.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chevret P, Dobigny G (2005) Systematics and evolution of the subfamily Gerbillinae (Mammalia, Rodentia, Muridae). Mol Phylogenet Evol 35:674–688. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2005.01.001

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Darvish J (2009) Morphmetric comparison of fourteen species of the genus Meriones Illiger, 1811 (Gerbillinae, Rodentia) from Asia and North Africa. Iran Anim Biosyst (IJAB) 5:59–77

    Google Scholar 

  • Darvish J (2011) Morphological comparison of fourteen species of the genus Meriones Illiger, 1811 (Rodentia: Gerbillinae) from Asia and North Africa. Iran Anim Biosyst (IJAB) 7:50–72. https://doi.org/10.22067/ijab.v7i1.25506

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dianat M, Darvish J, Aliabadian M, Siahsarvie R, Krystufek B, Nicolas V (2020) Systematics and evolution of the Libyan jird based on molecular and morphometric data. J Zool Syst Evol 58:439–458. https://doi.org/10.1111/jzs.12335

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellerman J (1948) Key to the rodents of south-West Asia in the British museum collection. Proc Zool Soc Lond: 765-816. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1096-3642.1948.tb00406.x

  • Fadda C, Corti M (2001) Three-dimensional geometric morphometrics of Arvicanthis: implications for systematics and taxonomy. J Zool Syst Evol 39:235–245. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1439-0469.2001.00169.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hammer Ø, Harper DA, Ryan PD (2001) PAST: paleontological statistics software package for education and data analysis. Palaeontol Electron 4:9

    Google Scholar 

  • Happold DCD (2013) Mammals of Africa. Volume 3: Rodents, Hares and Rabbits. Bloomsbury Publishing, London, pp 27-691

  • Harrison DL (1972) The mammals of Arabia: Lagomorpha; Rodentia. Benn, London, pp 382–670

    Google Scholar 

  • Heptner WG (1940) [The gerbilline fauna of Iran, with zoogeographic peculiarities of Anatolia, Iran, Afghan regions]. Novye Memuary MOIP. Vol. 20, pp 171. [In Russian]

  • IUCN (2016) The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species, Version 2021–3. http://www.iucnredlist.org/. Accessed Sept 2021

  • Klingenberg C (2008) Morphological integration and developmental modularity. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 39:115–132. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.37.091305.110054

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Macholán M, Mikula O, Vohralík V (2008) Geographic phenetic variation of two eastern-Mediterranean non-commensal mouse species, Mus macedonicus and M. cypriacus (Rodentia: Muridae) based on traditional and geometric approaches to morphometrics. Zool Anz 247:67–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcz.2007.07.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahmoodzadeh A, Eisapoor SS, Mirghiasy SA (2022) Biodiversity in the third millennium. Sci Rep Life Sci 3(2):1–14. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6840509

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Musser GG, Carleton, MD (2005) Superfamily muroidea. In: Wilson DE,  Reeder DM (eds) Mammal species of the world: a taxonomic and geographic reference. The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, p 2142

  • Pavlinov IY (2008) A review of phylogeny and classification of Gerbillinae (Mammalia: Rodentia). University Publishing Moscow, Moscow

    Google Scholar 

  • Pavlinov II, Rogovin K (2000) The correlation of the size of the pinna and the auditory bulla in specialized desert rodents. Zh Obshch Biol 61:87–101

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Polly PD (2018) Geometric morphometrics. In: López-Varela SL (ed) The SAS encyclopedia of archaeological sciences, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Oxford. p. 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119188230.saseas0258

  • Popesko P, Rajtovaa V, Horaak J (1992) A colour atlas of the anatomy of small laboratory animals. Saunders Ltd, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Rey-Rodríguez I, Arnaud J, López-García J-M, Stoetzel E, Denys C, Cornette R, Bazgir B (2021) Distinguishing between three modern Ellobius species (Rodentia, Mammalia) and identification of fossil Ellobius from Kaldar cave (Iran) using geometric morphometric analyses of the first lower molar. Palaeontol Electron 24(1):1–18. https://doi.org/10.26879/1122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rey-Rodríguez I, Arnaud J, López-García J-M, Stoetzel E, Denys C, Arnaud J, Parfitt S, Fernández-Jalvo Y, King T (2022) Palaeoecological reconstructions of the middle to Late Pleistocene occupations in the southern Caucasus using rodent assemblages. Archaeol Anthropol Sci 14(5):96. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12520-022-01555-w

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rohlf FJ (1996) Morphometric spaces, shape components and the effects of linear transformations. In: Marcus LF, Corti M, Loy A, Naylor GJP, Slice DE (eds) Advances in Morphometrics. NATO ASI Series, vol 284. Springer, Boston, MA, pp 117–129

    Google Scholar 

  • Rohlf FJ (2004) TPS series. Department of Ecology and Evolution, State University of New York, Stony Brook

  • Rohlf FJ, Slice D (1990) Extensions of the Procrustes method for the optimal superimposition of landmarks. Syst Biol 39:40–59. https://doi.org/10.2307/2992207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • StatSoft, Inc. (2004). STATISTICA (data analysis software system), version 12. www.statsoft.com. Accessed Sept 2021

  • Stoetzel E, Cornette R, Lalis A, Nicolas V, Cucchi T, Denys C (2017) Systematics and evolution of the Meriones shawii/grandis complex (Rodentia, Gerbillinae) during the Late Quaternary in northwestern Africa: exploring the role of environmental and anthropogenic changes. Quat Sci Rev 164:199–216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2017.04.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tabatabaei Yazdi F (2011) Patterns of variation in skull phenotypes in Meriones (Rodentia: Muridae) from the Iranian region, in relation to species and environmental-geographical diversity. Ghent University. Faculty of Sciences, Ghent, Belgium. https://hdl.handle.net/1854/LU-1270182

  • Tabatabaei Yazdi F (2017) Testing and quantification of cranial shape and size variation within Meriones hurrianae (Rodentia: Gerbillinae): a geometric morphometric approach. Mammalia 87:160–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mambio.2017.08.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tabatabaei Yazdi F, Adriaens D (2013) Cranial variation in Meriones tristrami (Rodentia: Muridae: Gerbillinae) and its morphological comparison with Meriones persicus, Meriones vinogradovi and Meriones libycus: a geometric morphometric study. J Zool Syst Evol 51:239–251. https://doi.org/10.1111/jzs.12020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tabatabaei Yazdi F, Adriaens D, Darvish J (2012) Geographic pattern of cranial differentiation in the Asian midday Jird Meriones meridianus (Rodentia: Muridae: Gerbillinae) and its taxonomic implications. J Zool Syst Evol 50:157–164. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0469.2011.00642.x

  • Tabatabaei Yazdi F, Adriaens D, Darvish J (2014) Cranial phenotypic variation in Meriones crassus and M. libycus (Rodentia, Gerbillinae), and a morphological divergence in M. crassus from the Iranian plateau and Mesopotamia (Western Zagros Mountains). Eur J Taxon 88:1–28. https://doi.org/10.5852/ejt.2014.88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tabatabaei Yazdi F, Colangelo P, Adriaens D (2015) Testing a long-standing hypothesis on the relation between the auditory bulla size and environmental conditions: a case study in two jird species (Muridae: Meriones libycus and M. crassus). Mammalia 79:185–200. https://doi.org/10.1515/mammalia-2013-0043

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vaughan TA, Ryan JM, Czaplewski NJ (2000) Mammalogy, 4th edn. Harcourt College Publisher, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson DE, Reeder DM (2005) Mammal species of the world: a taxonomic and geographic reference. JHU Press, Baltimore

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wrobel M (2006) Elsevier, dictionary of mammals. Elsevier

    Google Scholar 

  • Yigit N, Gharaheloo MM, Çolak E, Özkurt Ş, Bulut Ş, Kankiliç T, Çolak R (2006) The karyotypes of some rodent species (Mammalia: Rodentia) from eastern Turkey and northern Iran with a new record, Microtus schidlovskii Argyropulo, 1933, from eastern Turkey. Turk J Zool 30:459–464

    Google Scholar 

  • Zelditch ML, Swiderski DL, Sheets HD, Fink WL (2004) Geometric morphometrics for biologists: a primer. pp 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012778460-1/50003-X

Download references

Acknowledgments

We are very grateful to all museum curators and collection managers who provided us with access to the collections. Thanks to anonymous referees for their helpful comments that improved the quality of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Both authors contributed equally in all aspects of this study and both approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fatemeh Tabatabaei Yazdi.

Ethics declarations

All authors have read and agreed to the submitted version of the manuscript.

Ethical approval

Ethical approval is not required for the studied specimens.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

Collection numbers of the studied specimens at the British Museum of Natural History (London, UK).

Meriones crassus Sundevall, 1842

5. 10. 4. 38, 24. 8. 2. 4, 10. 3. 12. 5, 2. 11. 4. 64, 83. 11. 30. 1, 19. 7. 7. 2246.

Meriones libycus Lichtenstein, 1823

24. 8. 2. 5., 12. 4. 1. 44., 82. 7. 29. 9, 2. 11. 4. 56, 25. 5. 12. 59, 19. 7. 7. 1560, 5. 7. 2. 2, 24. 8. 2. 6., 24. 8. 2. 7.

Meriones persicus Blanford, 1875

5. 10. 4. 35, 76. 3. 10. 2, 19. 11. 7. 69.

Meriones shawii (Dovernoy, 1842)

19. 7. 7.1567, 82. 7. 29. 10., 82. 7. 29. 8., 92. 7. 1. 6, 19. 7. 7. 2981, 19. 7. 7. 1941, 82. 7. 29. 7.

Meriones rex Yerbury and Thomas, 1895

2. 11. 22. 9, 40. 272, 95. 6. 1. 30

Meriones tristrami Thomas, 1892

3. 6. 1. 1., 8. 7. 1. 28

Meriones sacramenti Thomas, 1922

22. 10. 4. 1

Meriones hurrianae Jordan, 1867

7. 6. 8. 7

Meriones meridianus (Pallas, 1773)

8. 8. 7. 30.

Sekeetamys calurus (Thomas, 1892)

1988. 558.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tabatabaei Yazdi, F., Dousti, S. Let us go back to the type materials to investigate the cranial differences among the Meriones species (Rodentia, Gerbillinae). Biologia 78, 2779–2791 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11756-023-01402-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11756-023-01402-w

Keywords

Navigation