Skip to main content
Log in

Redescription of Hoplolaimus indicus Sher, 1963 (Rhabditida, Hoplolaimidae) from Iran, including the first SEM study of the species

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Biologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

During a survey on the biodiversity of plant-parasitic nematodes in the south of Iran, Hoplolaimus indicus from the grass was recovered. Hoplolaimus are ectoparasites or semiendoparasites of various crops. Hoplolaimus indicus was studied using morphological and molecular techniques. Hoplolaimus indicus is identified based on the lip region with three annuli, five clear and one obscure pharyngeal nucleus, excretory pore at the isthmus level, and spicules with 42–46 µm long. The scan electron microscopy (SEM) observation revealed basal annuli of the lip region divided into six blocks, and one incisure along the body starts from 7–8 annuli posterior to the lip region ended at the tail tip. Principal component analysis (PCA) showed that the present H. indicus and the population of the same species from Iran stand very close to each other. Besides, H. indicus and H. columbus stand separately. Nblast for the 28S rDNA revealed 100% identity of the tested species and other H. indicus from Iran (MF421900) and Myanmar (MN462843). In contrast, the COI of mtDNA showed 97% similarity with several sequences of the American populations of H. columbus (e.g., KP864621). However, the phylogenetic analysis using the mentioned above markers placed H. indicus very close to H. columbus, H. indicus, and H. seinhorsti, particularly using 28S rDNA. Measurements, light microscopy (LM), SEM, and phylogenetic analysis for H. indicus are given. The COI of mtDNA sequence and SEM observation for H. indicus are reported for the first time. In conclusion, the result indicated that 28S rDNA is not a good marker to distinguish H. indicus from the close species, including H. seinhorsti and H. columbus.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

This material is the authors’ own original work, which has not been previously published elsewhere and has no conflict of interest. Two slides of Hoplolaimus indicus were deposited in the Nematology laboratory collection of the University of Limpopo, South Africa. One slide was deposited in the Nematode Collection of the Department of Animal Biology, Plant Biology, and Ecology of the University of Jaén (Spain).

References

  • Abolafia J (2015) A low-cost technique to manufacture a container to process meiofauna for scanning electron microscopy. Microsc Res Tech 78:771–776. https://doi.org/10.1002/jemt.22538

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Abolafia J, Peña-Santiago R (2017) On the identity of Chiloplacus magnus Rashid & Heyns, 1990 and C. insularis Orselli & Vinciguerra, 2002 (Rhabditida: Cephalobidae), two confusable species. Nematology 19:1017–1034. https://doi.org/10.1163/15685411-00003104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Addinsoft, (2007) XLSTAT, Analyse de données et statistique avec MS Excel. Addinsoft, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahmadi Mansourabad M, Ghaderi R, Kashi L, Karegar A (2016) Observations on Hoplolaimus indicus Sher, 1963 and Hoplolaimus seinhorsti Luc, 1958 (Nematoda: Hoplolaimidae) from Southern Iran. J Crop Protec 5:189–201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ali Ramaji F, Pourjam E, Karegar A (2006) Some tylenchids associated with pistachio and almond trees in Iran. Proceedings of IVthIS on Pistachio and Almonds. Acta Hort 726:659–666. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2006.726.114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson RV (1983) Morphological characteristics of Hoplolaimus indicus Sher, 1963 in Canada, a parasite of wild rice. J Nematol 15:367–369

    Google Scholar 

  • Archidona-Yuste A, Cai R, Cantalapiedra-Navarrete C, Carreira JA, Rey A, Viñegla B, Liébanas G, Palomares-Rius JE, Castillo P (2020) Morphostatic speciation within the dagger nematode Xiphinema hispanum-complex species (Nematoda: Longidoridae). Plants 9:1649. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants9121649

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Baermann G (1917) Eine einfache Methode zur Auffindung von Ankylostomum (Nematoden) Larven in Erdproben. Geneeskunding Tijdschrift Voor Nederlandsch-Indië 57:131–137

    Google Scholar 

  • Barooti S, Geraert E (1994) Some plant parasitic nematodes (Tylenchida) from Iran. In: Abstracts of the 22th International Symposium of the European Society of the European Society of Nematologists, Gent, Belgium, p 33

  • Barooti S, Tanha Maafi Z, Kheiri A, Gol Mohammadzade Khiaban N (2002) Plant parasitic nematodes of southern regions of Baluchistan, Iran. In: Proceedings of 15th Iranian Plant Protection Congress. Volume II: Plant Diseases and Weeds, Kermanshah, Iran, pp 304–305

  • Cantalapiedra-Navarrete C, Navas-Cortés JA, Liébanas G, Vovlas N, Subbotin SA, Palomares-Rius JE, Castillo P (2013) Comparative molecular and morphological characterisations in the nematode genus Rotylenchus: Rotylenchus paravitis n. sp., an example of cryptic speciation. Zool Anz 252:246–268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcz.2012.08.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chaturvedi Y, Khera S (1979) Studies on taxonomy, biology and ecology of nematodes associated with jute crop. Tech Monog Zool Surv India 2:1–105

    Google Scholar 

  • Cobb NA (1913) New nematode genera found inhabiting fresh water and non-brackish soils. J Wash Acad Sci 3:432–444

    Google Scholar 

  • Darriba D, Taboada GL, Doallo R, Posada D (2012) jModelTest 2: more models, new heuristics and parallel computing. Nat Methods 9:772. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.2109

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • De Grisse A (1969) Redescription ou modifications de quelques techniques utilisées dans l’étude des nematodes phytoparasitaire]. Mededelingen Rijksfaculteit der Landbouwwetenschappen Gent 34:351–369

    Google Scholar 

  • De Man JG (1876) Onderzoekingen over vrij in de aarde levende Nematoden. Tijdschrift der Nederlandsche Dierkundige Vereeniging 2:78–196

    Google Scholar 

  • De Man JG (1881) Die einheimischen, frei in der reinen Erde und im süssen Wasser lebenden Nematoden. Vorläufiger Bericht und descriptiv-systematischer Theil. Tijdschrift Nederlandsche Dierkundige Vereeniging 5:1–104

    Google Scholar 

  • De Ley P, Felix MA, Frisse LM, Nadler SA, Sternberg PW, Thomas WK (1999) Molecular and morphological characterisation of two reproductively isolated species with mirror-image anatomy (Nematoda: Cephalobidae). Nematology 2:591–612. https://doi.org/10.1163/156854199508559

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Derycke S, Vanaverbeke G, Rigaux A, Backljau T, Moens T (2010) Exploring the use of cytochrome oxidase c subunit 1 (COI) for DNA barcoding of free-living marine nematodes. PLoS ONE 10:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0013716

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Divsalar N, Shokoohi E, Marais M, Mashela PW (2020) Molecular and morphological characters of Helicotylenchus species from Iran with a note on the identity of H. pseudorobustus. Zootaxa 4789(1):266–280. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4789.1.10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fassuliotis G (1974) Host range of the Columbia lance nematode Hoplolaimus columbus. Plant Dis Rep 58:1000–1002

    Google Scholar 

  • Filipjev IN (1934) The classification of the free-living nematodes and their relation to the parasitic nematodes. Smithsonian Misc Collect 89(6):1–63

    Google Scholar 

  • Fortuner R (1991) The Hoplolaiminae. In: Nickle WR (ed) Manual of agricultural Nematology. Marcel Dekker Inc., New York, pp 669–719

    Google Scholar 

  • Gazaway WS, McLean KS (2003) A survey of plant parasitic nematodes associated with cotton in Alabama. J Cotton Sci 7:1–7

    Google Scholar 

  • Golden AM, Minton NA (1970) Description and larval heteromorphism of Hoplolaimus concaudajuvencus, n. sp. (Nematoda: Hoplolaimidae). J Nematol 2(2):161–166

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Guindon S, Gascuel O (2003) A simple, fast and accurate method to estimate large phylogenies by maximum-likelihood. Syst Biol 52:696–704. https://doi.org/10.1080/10635150390235520

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hall TA (1999) BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/ 98NT. Nucl Acids Symp Ser 41:95–98

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Handoo ZA, Golden M (1992) A key and diagnostic compendium to the species of the genus Hoplolaimus Daday, 1905 (Nematoda: Hoplolaimidae). J Nematol 24:45–53

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Holguin CM, Baeza JA, Mueller JD, Agudelo P (2015) High genetic diversity and geographic subdivision of three lance nematode species (Hoplolaimus spp.) in the United States. Ecol Evol 5(14):2929–2944. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.1568

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Khan E, Chawla ML (1975) CIH description of plant parasitic nematodes Set 5. Commonwealth Institute of Helminthology, St. Albans

    Google Scholar 

  • Luc M (1958) Nematodes and wilting in cotton in Southwestern Madagascar. Cot Fibr Trap 13:239–256

    Google Scholar 

  • Ma X, Agudelo P, Mueller JD, Knap HT (2011) Molecular characterization and phylogenetic analysis of Hoplolaimus stephanus. J Nematol 43:25–34

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Ma X, Robbins RT, Bernard EC, Holguin CM, Agudelo P (2019) Morphological and molecular characterisation of Hoplolaimus smokyensis n. sp. (Nematoda: Hoplolaimidae), a lance nematode from Great Smoky Mountains National Park, USA. Nematology 21:923–935. https://doi.org/10.1163/15685411-00003266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin SB, Mueller JD, Saunders JA, Jones WI (1994) A survey of South Carolina cotton fields for plant-parasitic nematodes. Plant Dis 78:717–719. https://doi.org/10.1094/PD-78-0717

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nguyen TH, Bui QD, Trinh PQ (2015) Description of Hoplolaimus bachlongviensis sp. n. (Nematoda: Hoplolaimidae) from banana soil in Vietnam. Biodiv Data J 3:e6523. https://doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.3.e6523

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riascos-Ortiz D, Mosquera-Espinosa AT, De Agudelo FV, de Oliveira C, Muñoz-Flórez JE (2019) Morpho-molecular characterization of Colombian and Brazilian populations of Rotylenchulus associated with Musa spp. J Nematol 51:e2019-47. https://doi.org/10.21307/jofnem-2019-047

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Robbins RT (1982) Description of Hoplolaimus magnistylus n. sp. (Nematoda: Hoplolaimidae). J Nematol 14(4):500–506

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Ronquist F, Huelsenbeck J (2003) MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics 19:1572–1574. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btg180

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schuurmans Stekhoven JH, Teunissen RJH (1938) Nématodes libres terrestres. Expl Parc Nat Albert, Mission de Witte (1933–35) Bruxelles. Institut des Parcs Nationaux du Congo Belge 2, pp 1–229

    Google Scholar 

  • Shamsi MA (1979) Basirolaimus gen.n. (Nematoda: Hoplolaimidae) with the description of Basirolaimus sacchari n.sp. from India. Nematol Mediterr 7:15–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Sher SA (1963) Revision of the Hoplolaiminae (Nematoda). II. Hoplolaimus Daday, 1905 and Aorolaimus n. gen. Nematologica 9:267–295. https://doi.org/10.1163/187529263X00476

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shokoohi E, Marais M, Fourie H, Panahi H (2018) Morphological and molecular characterization of three Helicotylenchus species from Iran. Zootaxa 4388:207–220. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4388.2.4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shokoohi E, Abolafia J, Mashela PW, Divslar N (2019) New data on known species of Hirschmanniella and Pratylenchus (Rhabditida, Pratylenchidae) from Iran and South Africa. J Nematol 51:e2019-41. https://doi.org/10.21307/jofnem-2019-041

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Shokoohi E, Abolafia J, Mashela PW (2020) Redescription of Paratrophurus anomalus from South Africa. Nematology 22:543–554. https://doi.org/10.1163/15685411-00003322

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shokoohi E, Marais M, Mashela PW, Divsalar N (2021) Variation within Helicotylenchus vulgaris. Biologia 76(2):549–563. https://doi.org/10.2478/s11756-020-00551-6

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Siddiqi MR (2000) Tylenchida parasites of plants and insects, 2nd edn. CABI Publishing, Wallingford, p 833

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Singh MK (1995) Studies on the morphology and bio-ecology of nematode fauna of Rewa. PhD thesis. University of Rewa, India, pp 317

  • Steiner G (1945) Helicotylenchus, a new genus of plant-parasitic nematodes and its relationship to Rotylenchus Filipjev. Proc Entomol Soc Wash 12:34–38

    Google Scholar 

  • Straube D, Juen A (2013) Storage and shipping of tissue samples for DNA analyses: A case study on earthworms. Europ J Soil Biol 57:13–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejsobi.2013.04.001

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson JD, Higgins DG, Gibson TJ (1994) CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap enalties and weight matrix choice. Nuc Acids Res 22:4673–4680

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Thorne G (1935) Notes on free-living and plant-parasitic nematodes II. Proc Helm Soc Wash 2:96–98

    Google Scholar 

  • von Daday E (1905) Untersuchungen über die Süsserwasser-Mikrofauna Paraguays. Zool Stuttgart 18:1–349

    Google Scholar 

  • Vovlas N (1983) Morphology of Hoplolaimus seinhorsti as seen by scanning electron microscope. Nematol Medit 11:145–149

    Google Scholar 

  • Wrather JA, Niblack TL, Milam MR (1992) Suvey of plant-parasitic nematodes in Missouri cotton fields. J Nematol 24:779–782

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the research support plans "PAIUJA 2019/2020: EI_RNM02_2019" and "PAIUJA 2021/2022: EI_RNM02_2021" of the University of Jaén, Spain. The SEM pictures were obtained with the assistance of technical staff (Amparo Martínez-Morales) and equipment of “Centro de Instrumentación Científico-Técnica (CICT)” from the University of Jaén. The authors also acknowledge Mr. Hadi Panahi for providing the samples to the Iranian population.

Funding

This study was financially supported by the University of Jaén (Spain) for the SEM photographs. The rest of the project was supported by ES.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

ES conducted the study, identified the species and analysed the data, wrote and revised the manuscript. PWM revised the manuscript. JA revised the manuscript, analyzed the data, taken LM and SEM of the species. ES and JA contributed to the final draft of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ebrahim Shokoohi.

Ethics declarations

Ethical statement

The paper reflects the authors’ own research and analysis in a truthful and complete manner.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 697 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shokoohi, E., Abolafia, J. & Mashela, P.W. Redescription of Hoplolaimus indicus Sher, 1963 (Rhabditida, Hoplolaimidae) from Iran, including the first SEM study of the species. Biologia 77, 2161–2172 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11756-022-01104-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11756-022-01104-9

Keywords

Navigation