Skip to main content

First records of Calamagrostis purpurea (Poaceae) in the Carpathians, a relict species new to the flora of Slovakia, Ukraine, and Romania

Abstract

The first records of Calamagrostis purpurea, an apomictic wetland grass species with a Euro-Siberian, predominantly boreal distribution, are reported for the Carpathians. This significantly expands the species’ range in Central Europe eastwards from the known localities in Austria and Czechia. Due to in situ finds and revision of the herbarium vouchers, C. purpurea was discovered in the Western Carpathians in Slovakia (the Nízke Tatry Mts) as well as in the Eastern Carpathians in Ukraine (the Chornohora Mts) and Romania (Dorna Depression, the Harghita, Bodoc Mts, Intorsura Buzaului Depression) at 6 sites in total. All these newly found localities are situated within 870–1570 m a.s.l. The locality in the Nízke Tatry Mts is at the highest elevation, while those in the Romanian Carpathians are the southeasternmost in Central Europe. In the Carpathians, C. purpurea is confined to undisturbed wetland habitats, which implies its relict origin in the region. A distribution map, habitat characteristics, morphological description, and images of the plants from the Carpatians are provided. Carpathian populations tested with flow cytometry are DNA-octoploid (the predominant ploidy level of the species in Europe). Because of the species’ rarity and vulnerability, it is suggested to include C. purpurea in the next editions of the Red Data Books and/or Red Lists of the corresponding countries.

Introduction

Calamagrostis purpurea (Trin.) Trin. belongs to the Calamagrostis purpurea-langsdorffii-canadensis complex (Tateoka 1974) that includes a group of closely related apomictic as well as sexual taxa with a vast range, most abundant in the north of Eurasia and North America including Greenland (Tzvelev 1974; Hultén and Fries 1986). The C. purpurea-langsdorffii-canadensis complex is very polymorphic (Nygren 1946, 1951; Sell and Murrel 1996), and its taxonomic treatment (which taxa are accepted and at what rank) differs considerably among authors. In Europe, that complex is represented by three subspecies of C. purpurea: subsp. purpurea, subsp. phragmitoides (Hartm.) Tzvelev and subsp. langsdorffii (Link) Tzvelev (Euro + Med 2006–2021). The latter taxon is restricted to the north and north-east of the European part of Russia (Tzvelev 1976; Clarke 1980). Because of rather ambiguous diagnostic traits and their significant variability and unknown evolutionary history, the C, W and N European C. purpurea subsp. phragmitoides (Tzvelev 1976; Clarke 1980) or C. phragmitoides Hartm. (Scholz 1971; Conert 1998) is not well distinguishable (Cope and Gray 2009) from the mostly Siberian C. purpurea sensu stricto. Therefore, we use a wider circumscription that includes C. phragmitoides in C. purpurea (Nygren 1946; Mossberg and Stenberg 2018; Štech 2019; Štech et al. unpubl.). Calamagrostis purpurea is a Euro-Siberian species whose more or less continuous distribution range covers Fennoscandia, the Baltic states (Lithuania, Latvia, Estonia), northern Belarus, north-eastern European Russia, the Central and Southern Urals, northern Kazakhstan, Mongolia, and Siberia (mostly its boreal zone) up to the Far East (Tzvelev 1965, 1976; Tretyakov 2013; Urgamal et al. 2014; Tzvelev and Probatova 2019; Kotuchov et al. 2019). Furthermore, it also occurs on the northern slopes of the Greater Caucasus (Tzvelev 1974; Fig. 1).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Distribution of Calamagrostis purpurea a in Europe and b in the Carpathians. 1–6: discovered localities. Map background and unit boundaries prepared by P. Turis (used with his permission)

In Europe, C. purpurea is sporadically scattered south and west of the continuous distribution area (Fig. 1). In Central Europe, it was first discovered in the late 19th century by Hackel (1883) from Hesse in Germany. Later, after the 1960s, this species’ occurrence has been recognized in Belgium, France, Switzerland, Austria, other regions of Germany, and the Czech Republic (Scholz 1971; Smejkal 1976; Conert 1998; Růžička 2005; Ondráček 2011; Štech 2013; Kaplan et al. 2020; Štech et al. 2020). It is considered a glacial relict in these countries (Scholz 1971; Dersch and Mast 2000). In addition, C. purpurea was first recognized in Great Britain in the 1980s and later in Ireland (Sell and Murrel 1996; Stace 2019).

The fact that the species has been long overlooked in a number of Western- and Central-European countries can be explained by its resemblance to other Calamagrostis species, especially C. canescens (Weber) Roth and C. villosa (Chaix) J. F. Gmel. That indicates that the distribution of C. purpurea is still insufficiently known and discoveries of new localities, particularly in the regions beyond its continuous distribution may be expected. Quite surprisingly, the occurrence of C. purpurea has not been known in the Carpathians, a European mountain system that harbours other boreal species with similar habitat needs (Soó 1939; Meusel et al. 1965–1992; Dítě et al. 2018), except for a single report from the Börzsöny Mts, Hungary (Tatár 1995) that proved to be erroneous (Štech et al. 2020; confusion with C. villosa). Revision of herbarium vouchers of Calamagrostis spp. and surveys in the suitable habitats proved that C. purpurea is present and native in different parts of the Carpathians in Slovakia, Ukraine, and Romania, and this occurrence is for the first time described in this paper.

Materials and methods

Study species and region

Calamagrostis purpurea belongs to section Calamagrostis which includes 6 other species that occur in Europe: C. canescens, C. epigejos (L.) Roth, C. langsdorffii, C. pseudophragmites (Haller f.) Koeler, C. rivalis H. Scholz, and C. villosa (Tzvelev 1974; Clarke 1980).

The main diagnostic traits in which C. purpurea differs from the two most similar species of the genus occurring in the Carpathians (C. canescens and C. villosa, both able to produce branched stems, similarly as C. purpurea) are longer leaf ligules covered with dense patent hairs (Fig. 2; in the other two species the hairs are shorter and erecto-patent, appressed or absent), characteristic structure of a floret (Fig. 3), and notably indehiscent pollen-free anthers. The identification key to distinguish C. purpurea from the other species of the genus Calamagrostis is provided e.g. by Štech (2019) and Štech et al. (2020).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Upper leaf ligule in Calamagrostis purpurea from the Chornohora Mts, Ukraine

Fig. 3
figure 3

Floret of Calamagrostis purpurea from the Chornohora Mts, Ukraine

Morphological description of C. purpurea based on the plants from the Carpathians is as follows:

Laxly caespitose, rhizomatous perennial grass. Culms 80–130 cm, rather stout, with 5–6 nodes. Leaves 4–10 mm wide, flat, slightly glaucous, adaxially with scabrid hairs mostly along the prominent veins. Upper ligule 6–15 mm, lacerate, with dense, over 50 μm, ± patent hairs (Fig. 2).

Panicle 10–20 cm long, 2.5–4 cm wide, oblong-ovate or lanceolate in outline, nodding at maturity. Rhachis, branchlets, and pedicels scabrid with prickle hairs. Glumes subequal, 4.2–5.5 mm long, lanceolate, dark dirty-violet to greenish, with patent hairs, setaceous along keel. Callus-hairs longer than lemma. Lemma 3.0–3.2 mm, membranous, 5-nerved, notched at the apex, light-brown. Awn 1.2–1.5 mm, arising from upper 1/2–1/3 of lemma, straight and ± parallel to the floret axis or gently curved, slightly exceeding or almost equalling lemma (Fig. 3). Anthers yellow, without viable pollen, not separating at maturity.

Calamagrostis purpurea is an apomictic species. The formation of viable pollen is very rare and is regarded as an exception (Nygren 1946; Dersch and Mast 2000). The chromosome number is reported as variable. The base chromosome number is x = 7 and the somatic chromosome count ranges in Europe from 2n = 56 to 2n = 91, but is mostly 2n = 8x = 56 (Nygren 1946; Tateoka 1974).

Calamagrostis purpurea is confined to wetlands, e.g. wet meadows, damp woodlands, mire margins, lakeshores, and river banks (Tzvelev 1976; Conert 1998; Kotuchov et al. 2019) and occurs in hygrophilous to subhygrophilous communities belonging to the classes Alnetea glutinosae, Betulo-Adenostyletea, Molinio-Arrhenatheretea, Salicetea purpureae (Dersch and Mast 2000; Jäger 2017) and Scheuchzerio-Caricetea nigrae (Smejkal 1976). It often forms monodominant stands (Dersch and Mast 2000; Cope and Gray 2009).

In Central Europe, C. purpurea prefers mid-altitude areas in the mountains within 500–1000 m a.s.l. with most of its localities situated in low mountain massifs, like those called Mittelgebirge in Germany (Scholz 1971; Štech et al. 2020). Diverse habitat conditions in higher mountain systems, notably in the Alps, do not seem beneficial for this species and it is much rarer there not only at higher altitudes close to the timberline but also within its usual altitudinal range (Štech et al. 2020).

The study region, i.e. the Carpathians is a remarkable hotspot of plant diversity at the pan-European scale (Mráz and Ronikier 2016; Breman et al. 2020). Extending through Austria, Czechia, Slovakia, Poland, Ukraine, Hungary, Romania, and Serbia that mountain system is usually divided into the Western, Eastern, Southern Carpathians, and the Apuseni Mts (Fig. 1). The Carpathian flora is composed of ca. 4,000 taxa that makes about 30% of the whole flora of Europe (Tasenkevich 2003). The Carpathians are an important element of the European Alpine System (Ozenda 1985), a discontinuous orographic chain that spans the continent and provides a migration route for the mountain plant species (Mráz and Ronikier 2016). The Carpathians, inter alia, harbour many arctic-alpine and boreal-montane species with a disjunct distribution, which were probably more abundant in the past colder epochs when climatic conditions were more favourable for them and are, therefore, generally considered glacial relicts (arctic-alpine species) or Early Holocene relicts [boreal(-montane) species, particularly those restricted to the wetlands] in this region (Dítě et al. 2018). In the Carpathians, some of these species occur at the edge of their distribution (Meusel et al. 1965–1992; Kobiv 2018).

Data collection

After a find of C. purpurea in Slovakia in 2015 and the discovery of populations in the Austrian Alps (see Štech et al. 2020 for details), herbaria rich in Carpathian collections (BP, BRNM, CB, CHER, CL, KRAM, LW, LWS, PR, PRC, W, WU; abbreviations after Thiers 2021) have been searched by C. Pachschwöll and M. Štech for misidentified or overlooked specimens of C. purpurea.

In July 2020 Y. Kobiv discovered this species in the Ukrainian part of the Carpathians. Because that locality is situated near the Pozhyzhevska Biological Station, it was possible to examine that population in more detail including habitat characteristics and morphological characters of plants. Phytosociological relevés using Braun-Blanquet’s scale were taken on two 2 × 2 m plots. The content of calcium in soil was assessed by complexometric titration with the aid of metallochromic indicators, and pH(H2O) by potentiometric measurement using a standard hydrogen electrode (Mineev 2001). Microphotographs were obtained with a Zeiss Stemi 2000-C stereo microscope equipped with a Nikon Coolpix 4500 camera.

Taxonomy and nomenclature follow Euro + Med PlantBase (2006–2021) for vascular plants and Hodgetts et al. (2020) for bryophytes. Delimitation and names of the Carpathian orographic units follow Breman et al. (2020).

Flow cytometry

DNA-ploidy level of C. purpurea from the sites in Slovakia and Ukraine was analyzed using the standard methodology with Otto’s buffers (i.e. the protocol 1C in Doležel et al. 2007). About 0.5 cm2 of Calamagrostis fresh leaf was co-chopped with an equal amount of the internal standard (Bellis perennis L.) in 400 ml of ice-cold Otto I buffer. After ca. 10 min of incubation, 800 ml of the Otto II buffer supplemented with 2-mercaptoethanol (2 µl / ml) and DAPI (4 µg / ml) was added. The samples were run on the Sysmex CyFlow Space flow cytometer equipped with 365 nm UV-LED as a light source and fluorescence of 3000–5000 particles was recorded. The fluorescence histograms were evaluated using FlowJo 10 (TreeStar Inc.).

For comparison, 6 specimens of C. canescens (2n = 4x = 28; Krahulcová 2003) and 6 of C. villosa (2n = 10x = 70; Krahulcová 2003) from different part of Central Europe were studied; see Table S1 for locality details.

Results

Record of Calamagrostis purpurea from Slovakia

In the Carpathians, C. purpurea was first discovered by P. Koutecký in 2015 in the Nízke Tatry Mts, Western Carpathians, Slovakia (Fig. 1, locality 1). The locality is situated in the subalpine zone in a Salix helvetica carr (Fig. 4) at the headwaters of the Ludárov potok Stream in the glacial cirque below the summit of Mt. Ďumbier at the altitude of 1570 m a.s.l., which is the highest elevation recorded for C. purpurea in the Carpathians. The site lies within the Nízke Tatry National Park.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Locality of Calamagrostis purpurea in the Nízke Tatry Mts, Slovakia. The species grows there at the bottom of a glacial cirque on a flat waterlogged site in the carr of Salix helvetica (the greyish shrubs in the foreground)

Herbarium vouchers

Slovakia, Nízke Tatry Mts, Liptovský Mikuláš district; Mt. Ďumbier: glacial cirque ca. 0.86 km NE of the summit, in a Salix helvetica carr at the headwaters of Ludárov potok Stream, 1570 m a.s.l., 48°56′31.9″N, 19°38′53.3″E, leg. et det. P. Koutecký, 14 July 2015 (CBFS 7258); same locality, leg. P. Turis, 6 August 2015 (P. Turis’ herbarium).

Record of Calamagrostis purpurea from Ukraine

The species was found in the Chornohora Mts, the highest mountain range of the Ukrainian Carpathians (Fig. 1, locality 2). The locality is situated at the headwaters of the Prut River in the lower glacial cirque between Mt. Breskul and Mt. Pozhyzhevska on a large, ca. 5 ha peat bog called Tsybul’nyk. The peat bog lies on a flat area at the bottom of the cirque at the altitude of 1375–1390 m a.s.l. It is moderately drained due to the ditch that was dug over a hundred years ago to make the area more suitable for grazing. The impact of grazing on vegetation was very significant in the region until the 1970s when the nature protection regime was established in that part of the Chornohora Mts and grazing was ceased. The site belongs to the strictly protected zone of the Carpathian National Nature Park now and no human activities have been carried out there for over 40 years.

Herbarium vouchers

Ukraine, Chornohora Mts, Ivano-Frankivsk Region: peat bog Tsybul’nyk between Mt. Breskul and Mt. Pozhyszhevska, 1375 m a.s.l., 48°09′15.4″N, 24°31′48.1″E, leg. et det. Y. Kobiv, 28 July 2020 (LW 215,297, WU 0120504 [https://wu.jacq.org/WU0120504]).

Habitat characteristics

Calamagrostis purpurea is confined to the margins of the peat bog where it distinctly dominates in 5–6 patches of 5–100 m² each (Fig. 5). In these patches, the number of flowering stems reaches up to 50 per m². The species occurs within a 300 m wide area.

Fig. 5
figure 5

Population of Calamagrostis purpurea in the Chornohora Mts, Ukraine

The species prefers damp conditions where the groundwater table does not reach its rhizomes and the upper root system. Therefore, C. purpurea occurs at the edge of the peat bog and avoids its wetter central part. The species’ microhabitats are well-insolated and it does not occur even in the semi-shaded carrs. The soil is peat-rich, subacidic, with pH(H2O) value of 5.60–5.85 and content of calcium 16.8–22.2 mg equivalents per 100 g of soil.

The locality is situated slightly below the climatic timberline, which stretches at ca. 1500–1550 m a.s.l. on the adjacent slopes but fragments of Pinus mugo and Alnus viridis krummholz are scattered within and around the site because of sufficient insolation at that treeless peat bog.

Phytosociological relevés were recorded in two patches of C. purpurea.

Relevé 1: 48°09′15.4″N, 24°31′48.1″E, 1375 m a.s.l., slope: 0°, area 4 m², E0 30%, E1 75%, stand height 55–70 cm, 28 July 2020; – E0: Sphagnum teres 3, Straminergon stramineum 1; – E1: Calamagrostis purpurea 4, Filipendula ulmaria 2, Allium schoenoprasum 1, Caltha palustris 1, Crepis paludosa 1, Equisetum palustre 1, Valeriana dioica subsp. simplicifolia 1, Dactylorhiza cordigera +, Eriophorum angustifolium +, Homogyne alpina +, Pilosella aurantiaca +, Potentilla erecta +, Myosotis sylvatica r, Ranunculus acris r, Tozzia alpina subsp. carpatica r.

Relevé 2: 48°09′14.5″N, 24°31′38.0″E, 1389 m a.s.l., slope: 0°, area 4 m², E0 35%, E1 70%, stand height 55–70 cm, 28 July 2020; – E0: Sphagnum teres 3; – E1: Calamagrostis purpurea 4, Caltha palustris 1, Deschampsia cespitosa 1, Equisetum palustre 1, Jacobaea subalpina 1, Chaerophyllum hirsutum +, Picea abies +.

Records of Calamagrostis purpurea from Romania

All records of Calamagrostis purpurea from the Eastern Carpathians, Romania, are based on the revision of previously misidentified herbarium specimens. Unfortunately, we did not have an opportunity to visit the sites during the last two years since the discovery of the specimens. Seven specimens from 4 localities were revealed. The original localization printed on the labels is presented with added notes (e.g. the current geographic names) in square brackets:

Locality 3 in Fig. 1, [Dorna Depression, Suceava county]: in dumeto palud. ad “36 sz. őrház” ad rivum Tesna [Teșna] prope pag. Kosna [Coșna], cca. 870 m.s.m., leg. Á. Boros, 30. Jul. 1942 (BP 505,891 [HNHM-TRA 00033849], W 1958–0023627). Both vouchers were originally determined as C. canescens. The site is situated near or within the Natura 2000 wetland area “Tinovul de la Româneşti” (Pop 1960; Mihalca 2012). Its approximate geographic coordinates are 47°22′3″N, 25°10′0″E.

Locality 4 in Fig. 1, [Harghita Mts, Harghita county]: in torfosis [recte: turfosis] Lucsmelléke [Luci] supra opp. Csíkszereda [Miercurea Ciuc], alt. ca. 1075 msm, leg. T. Pócs, 14. Aug. 1955 (BP 203,662 [HNHM-TRA 00034775]). This voucher was originally identified as C. villosa and collected in a site later declared the Natura 2000 area and IUCN Category IV nature reserve, the remarkable “Tinovul Luci” peat bog (Pop 1960; Samu and Urák 2014; Tanţău et al. 2014) with the approximate coordinates 46°18′0″N, 25°43′1″E.

Locality 5 in Fig. 1, [Bodoc Mts, Harghita county]: lacus “Sf. Ana” non procul ab oppido “Băile Tușnad”, cca. 950–1000 msm, leg. Karel Sutorý, 1986-07-01 (BRNM 379,370). This voucher was originally identified as Calamagrostis sp. It was collected at the shores of the volcanic Lake Sfânta Ana belonging to the “Tinovul Mohoş – Lacul Sf. Ana” Natura 2000 site at present (Pop 1960; Magyari et al. 2014b; Samu and Urák 2014). The approximate coordinates are 46°7′43″N, 25°53′21″E.

Locality 6 in Fig. 1, [Intorsura Buzaului, Covasna county]: (1) in nemorosis ad rivum Rozsdás-patak [Pîrîul Ruginosu], pr. pagum Komandó [Comandău], leg. Dr. [Z.] Hargitai, 12. VII. 1941 (CL 200,162). This voucher was originally determined as C. canescens. – (2) in dumetosis [recte: dumetis] paludosis ad rivum Rozsdás-patak [Pîrîul Ruginosu] pr. pag. Kommandó [Comandău], cca. 1000 m.s.m., leg. A. Boros, 10. Aug. 1942 (BP 405,803 [HNHM-TRA 00034400], W 1958–0023626 [http://www.jacq.org/detail.php?ID=1539194]). These two vouchers were originally determined as C. pseudophragmites. Locality 6 refers to the Natura 2000 site “Turbăria Ruginosu” with approximate coordinates 45°45′60″N, 26°14′48″E.

DNA-ploidy levels

The relative genome size (i.e. the ratio of Calamagrostis / Bellis mean fluorescence) is the same for both studied Carpathian populations of C. purpurea and significantly differs from that of C. canescens and C. villosa (Table 1). As the ratio of the relative genome sizes between ploidy-uniform decaploid C. villosa and tetraploid C. canescens (2.15) is lower than the expected value (2.5), genome downsizing towards higher ploidy levels, as it is usual in polyploid plants (Leitch and Bennett 2004), seems to be present in the genus Calamagrostis. With respect to this, we infer that the ratio of C. purpurea / C. canescens (1.84) corresponds to DNA-octoploids. This is the most frequently reported ploidy level for C. purpurea in Europe (Štech et al. 2020).

Table 1 Relative genome size (RGS) of the Carpathian populations of Calamagrostis purpurea and comparison with similar species. Bellis perennis was used as the internal standard and DAPI as the stain. Localities of analyzed plants of C. canescens and C. villosa are listed in Appendix 1.

Discussion

Phytogeography

The above results show that Calamagrostis purpurea occurs not only in different countries of the Carpathians – Slovakia, Ukraine, and Romania but also in the two main parts of the mountain system – the Western (one site) and Eastern Carpathians (5 sites). Its localities are scattered along most of the Carpathian arch. The two sites (in Slovakia and Ukraine) are situated in north-facing glacial cirques at a rather high elevation similar to some sites in the Alps (e.g. Lac de Champex, Valais Alps, Switzerland; Desfayes 2008), the site in Slovakia at 1570 m a.s.l. being the highest recorded in Central Europe and the only in the subalpine zone. In contrast, localities in Romania are situated at elevations around 900–1100 m a.s.l., comparable to sites in lower Central European mountain ranges in Czechia or Germany. The Carpathian records significantly expand the south-eastern limit of this species’ range in Central Europe (Fig. 1) from its already known localities in Czechia and Austria (Štech et al. 2020).

The Carpathian localities of C. purpurea are separated by a 750–800 km disjunction from the closest occurrences (Fig. 1), which represent its main range in the north of Europe (i.e. in Lithuania, Belarus, and European Russia). Though the species is generally classified as boreal (Štech et al. 2020), in Europe it can be also referred to as boreal-montane (Preston and Hill 1997) taking into account the Central-European mountainous part of its range. A similar distribution pattern (latitudinal disjunction and absence in the South-European mountains) is exhibited by some other Euro-Siberian wetland species, e.g. Betula humilis, B. nana, Cirsium heterophyllum, Ligularia sibirica, Pedicularis sceptrum-carolinum or Vaccinium microcarpum (Soó 1939; Meusel et al. 1965–1992) though some of them prefer more acidic soil than C. purpurea. For instance, Tinovul Luci (locality 4), the largest peat bog of Transylvania, is famous for glacial relicts like Betula nana and Ligularia sibirica (Pop 1960; Samu and Urák 2014).

It is noteworthy that all the Carpathian populations of C. purpurea are confined to primary undisturbed sites (mostly mires). That significantly differs from the species’ performance in the northern part of its range where it is rather common and readily colonizes vacant sites in the course of anthropogenic (Salonen and Setala 1992) or primary successions (Dolezal et al. 2008). The occurrence of C. purpurea in the Carpathians in undisturbed wetland habitats that have persisted for long periods of time (e.g. lakeshores, mires) implies its relict survival since colder epochs (Late Pleistocene–Early Holocene) when the climatic conditions resembled those in today’s portion of its continuous range in the north of Europe (Dítě et al. 2018). This is especially likely for well-studied mires like Tinovul Luci (locality 4), as its pleniglacial vegetation resembled modern vegetation analogues in Siberia (Magyari et al. 2014a), the main distribution area of C. purpurea (Tzvelev 1965, 1976). The model of vegetation types in Europe at the Last Glacial Maximum by Janská et al. (2017) supports wide distribution of peatland forests and to a lesser extent minerotrophic fens potentially suitable for C. purpurea in the area adjacent to the Western and Eastern Carpathians and within the mountains themselves. The species prefers the edges of minerotrophic peatlands with meso- to eutrophic conditions (Eurola and Huttunen 2006) and avoids highly acidic bogs.

Interestingly enough, there is only one species’ record (in Ukraine, locality 2) so far from the so-called Outer Carpathians, which stretch along the north-eastern side of the Carpathian arch and are built mostly of acidic flysch bedrock (Rudneva 1960; Kondracki 1989). The rest of the discovered localities belong to the Inner Carpathians where the bedrock is much more diverse.

Conservation

During the last decades, Carpathian plant communities have been undergoing significant successional changes triggered by massive abandonment of grazing and haymaking due to low profitability of mountain sheep and cattle farming or to the establishment of nature reserves in the region (Kuemmerle et al. 2008; Kolecka et al. 2017; Kobiv and Kobiv 2020). Such restoration succession enhances the spread of tall-herb and tall-grass communities (Czortek 2018; Kobiv 2018) that could be beneficial for C. purpurea as their component. Notably, all the species’ finds in the Carpathians come from protected areas.

As C. purpurea is rare in all the three countries of the Carpathian region where it was discovered, namely in Slovakia, Ukraine, and Romania, and considering that it is relict and confined mostly to large undisturbed wetland habitats that are uncommon for the mountainous landscape and are often vulnerable to anthropogenic impact and climate change (Winter 2000), it would be reasonable to include the species in the next editions of the Red Data Books and/or Red Lists of the corresponding countries or local administrative units in the Carpathian region. In all three above-mentioned countries C. purpurea can be categorized as Vulnerable (VU) according to the IUCN Red List categories and criteria (IUCN 2012) due to the low number of its localities, restricted area of occupancy, and small size of most populations without their evident recent decline (criteria VU D1 + D2). The conservation status of C. purpurea in these countries seems reasonable because it is also included in the British Red Data Book (Stewart and Wiggington 1998) and the Red Lists of Great Britain (Cheffings and Farrell 2005), Germany (Metzing et al. 2018), Czech Republic (Grulich 2012), as well as in the local Red Data Book of South Bohemia (Štech 2013) and local Red Lists of Bavaria (Scheuerer and Ahlmer 2003) and England (Stroh et al. 2014).

Conclusion and outlook

We are aware that the above results may not exhaustively reflect the distribution of C. purpurea in the Carpathian Mountains and the species could have more locations in the region. One of the goals of this paper is to draw attention to that overlooked species and inspire the ad hoc search in the most suitable wetland habitats, such as lakeshores, peat bogs, fens, stream sources in the montane forest zone and at the timberline.

References

  • Breman E, Hurdu BI, Kliment J, Kobiv Y, Kučera J, Mráz P, Pușcaș M, Renaud J, Ronikier M, Šibík J, Schmotzer A, Štubňová E, Szatmari P-M, Tasenkevich L, Turis P, Slovák M (2020) Conserving the endemic flora of the Carpathian Region: an international project to increase and share knowledge of the distribution, evolution and taxonomy of Carpathian endemics and to conserve endangered species. Plant Syst Evol 306(3):1–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00606-020-01685-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheffings CM, Farrell L (2005) The vascular plant Red Data list for Great Britain. Joint Nature Conservation Committee, Peterborough

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke GCS (1980) Calamagrostis Adanson. In: Tutin TG, Heywood VH, Burges NA, Moore DM, Valentine DH, Walters SM (eds) Flora Europaea 5. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (UK), pp 236–239

    Google Scholar 

  • Conert HJ (1998) Poaceae (Echte Gräser oder Süßgräser) 3. In: Conert HJ, Jäger E, Kadereit JW, Schultze-Motel W, Wagenitz G, Weber HE (eds) Illustrierte Flora von Mitteleuropa 1, 3rd edn. Parey, Berlin, pp 1–898

    Google Scholar 

  • Cope T, Gray A (2009) Grasses of the British Isles. Botanical Society of the British Isles, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Czortek P, Kapfer J, Delimat A, Eycott AE, Grytnes J-A, Orczewska A, Ratyńska H, Zięba A, Jaroszewicz B (2018) Plant species composition shifts in the Tatra Mts as a response to environmental change: A resurvey study after 90 years. Folia Geobot 52:1–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12224-018-9312-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dersch G, Mast R (2000) Verbreitung und Vergesellschaftung von Calamagrostis phragmitoides Hartman (Purpur-Reitgras, Poaceae) im Harz. Tuexenia 10:119–129

    Google Scholar 

  • Desfayes M (2008) Flore aquatique et palustre du Valais et du Chablais vaudois: additions. Bull Murithienne 125:99–124

    Google Scholar 

  • Dítě D, Hájek M, Svitková I, Košuthová A, Šoltés R, Kliment J (2018) Glacial-relict symptoms in the Western Carpathian flora. Folia Geobot 53:277–300. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12224-018-9321-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dolezal J, Homma K, Takahashi K, Vyatkina MP, Yakubov V, Vetrova VP, Hara T (2008) Primary succession following deglaciation at Koryto Glacier Valley, Kamchatka. Arct Antarc Alp Res 40(2):309–322. https://doi.org/10.1657/1523-0430(06-123)[DOLEZAL]2.0.CO;2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doležel J, Greilhuber J, Suda J (2007) Estimation of nuclear DNA content in plants using flow cytometry. Nat Protoc 2:2233–2244. https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2007.310

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Euro + Med (2006–2021) Euro + Med plantbase – The information resource for Euro-Mediterranean plant diversity. http://ww2.bgbm.org/EuroPlusMed/. Accessed 14 November 2021

  • Eurola S, Huttunen A (2006) Mire plant species and their ecology in Finland. In: Lindholm T, Heikkilä R (eds) Finland – land of mires. Finnish Environment Institute, Helsinki, pp 127–144

    Google Scholar 

  • Grulich V (2012) Red List of vascular plants of the Czech Republic. Preslia 84:631–645

    Google Scholar 

  • Hackel E (1883) Über das Vorkommen von Calamagrostis phragmitoides Hartm. in Deutschland. Ber Deut Bot Ges 1:161–162

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodgetts NG, Söderström L, Blockeel TL, Caspari S, Ignatov MS, Konstantinova NA, Lockhart N, Papp B, Schröck C, Sim-Sim M, Bell D, Bell NE, Blom HH, Bruggeman-Nannenga MA, Brugués M, Enroth J, Flatberg KI, Garilleti R, Hedenäs L, Holyoak DT, Hugonnot V, Kariyawasam I, Köckinger H, Kučera J, Lara F, Porley RD (2020) An annotated checklist of bryophytes of Europe, Macaronesia and Cyprus. J Bryol 42(1):1–116. https://doi.org/10.1080/03736687.2019.1694329

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hultén E, Fries M (1986) Atlas of north European vascular plants north of the Tropic of Cancer 2. Koeltz Scientific Books, Königstein

    Google Scholar 

  • IUCN (2012) Red List categories and criteria: version 3.1 2nd edn.IUCN Species Survival Commission, Gland & Cambridge

  • Janská V, Jiménez-Alfaro B, Chytrý M, Divíšek J, Anenkhonov O, Korolyuk A, Lashchinskyi N, Culek M (2017) Palaeodistribution modelling of European vegetation types at the Last Glacial Maximum using modern analogues from Siberia: Prospects and limitations. Quaternary Sci Rev 159:103–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2017.01.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jäger EJ (ed) (2017) Rothmaler – Exkursionsflora von Deutschland. Gefäßpflanzen: Grundband, 21st edn. Springer, Berlin. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-49708-1

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan Z, Danihelka J, Ekrt L, Štech M, Řepka R, Chrtek J Jr, Grulich V, Rotreklová O, Dřevojan P, Šumberová K, Wild J (2020) Distributions of vascular plants in the Czech Republic 9. Preslia 92:255–340. https://doi.org/10.23855/preslia.2020.255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kobiv Y (2018) Trends in population size of rare plant species in the alpine habitats of the Ukrainian Carpathians under climate change. Diversity 10(3):1–12. https://doi.org/10.3390/d10030062

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kobiv Y, Kobiv V (2020) Impact of environmental change on a rare high-mountain tall-herb species: a case study on Achillea lingulata in the Ukrainian Carpathians. Bot Lett 167(2):1–9. https://doi.org/10.1080/23818107.2019.1679249

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kolecka N, Kozak J, Kaim D, Dobosz M, Ostafin K, Ostapowicz K, Wężyk P, Price B (2017) Understanding farmland abandonment in the Polish Carpathians. Appl Geogr 88:62–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2017.09.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kondracki J (1989) Karpaty. Wydawnictwo Szkolne i Pedagogiczne, Warszawa

    Google Scholar 

  • Kotuchov YA, Danilova AN, Anufrieva OA (2019) Konspekt vidov roda Сalamagrostis Adans. (sem. Poaceae Barnhart) Kazakhstanskogo Altaya, Sauro-Manraka i Zaysanskoy vpadiny. Exp Biol 79(2):20–31. https://doi.org/10.26577/eb-2019-2-1405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krahulcová A (2003) Chromosome numbers in selected monocotyledons (Czech Republic, Hungary, and Slovakia). Preslia 75:97–113

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuemmerle T, Hostert P, Radeloff VC, van der Linden S, Perzanowski K, Kruhlov I (2008) Cross-border comparison of post-socialist farmland abandonment in the Carpathians. Ecosystems 11:614–628. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-008-9146-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leitch IJ, Bennett MD (2004) Genome downsizing in polyploid plants. Biol J Linn Soc 82(4):651–663. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8312.2004.00349.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magyari EK, Kuneš P, Jakab G, Sümegi P, Pelánková B, Schäbitz F, Braun M, Chytrý M (2014a) Late Pleniglacial vegetation in eastern-central Europe: are there modern analogues in Siberia? Quaternary Sci Rev 95:60–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2014.04.020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magyari EK, Veres D, Wennrich V, Wagner B, Braun M, Jakab G, Karátson D, Pál Z, Ferenczy G, St-Onge G, Rethemeyer J, Francois JP, von Reumont F, Schäbitz F (2014b) Vegetation and environmental responses to climate forcing during the Last Glacial Maximum and deglaciation in the East Carpathians: attenuated response to maximum cooling and increased biomass burning. Quaternary Sci Rev 106:278–298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2014.09.015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Metzing D, Garve E, Matzke-Hajek G, Adler J, Bleeker W, Breunig T, Caspari S, Dunkel FG, Fritsch R, Gottschlich G, Gregor T, Hand R, Hauck M, Korsch H, Meierott L, Meyer N, Renker C, Romahn K, Schulz D, Täuber T, Uhlemann I, Welk E, van de Weyer K, Wörz A, Zahlheimer W, Zehm A, Zimmermann F (2018) Rote Liste und Gesamtartenliste der Farn- und Blütenpflanzen (Trachaeophyta) Deutschlands. In: Metzing D, Hofbauer N, Ludwig G, Matzke-Hajek (eds) Rote Liste gefährdeter Tiere, Pflanzen und Pilze Deutschlands. Pflanzen. Naturschutz und Biologische Vielfalt 70(7):13–358

  • Meusel H, Jäger EJ, Weinert E, Rauschert S (1965–1992) Vergleichende Chorologie der zentraleuropäischen Flora. Text u. Karten 1–3. Gustav Fischer Verlag, Jena & Stuttgart

  • Mihalca IA (2012) The landscape of marshes in the land of Dorna. Analele Univ din Oradea Ser Geogr 22:66–71

    Google Scholar 

  • Mineev VG (ed) (2001) Praktikum po agrokhimii. Izdatelstvo Moskovskogo Universiteta, Moskva

    Google Scholar 

  • Mossberg B, Stenberg L (2018) Nordens flora. Bonnier Fakta, Stockholm

    Google Scholar 

  • Mráz P, Ronikier M (2016) Biogeography of the Carpathians: Evolutionary and spatial facets of biodiversity. Biol J Linn Soc 119:528–559. https://doi.org/10.1111/bij.12918

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nygren A (1946) The genesis of some Scandinavian species of Calamagrostis. Hereditas 32:181–263. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1601-5223.1946.tb02778.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nygren A (1951) Form and biotype formation in Calamagrostis purpurea. Hereditas 37:519–532. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1601-5223.1951.tb02908.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ondráček Č (2011) Rozšírení třtiny nachové (Calamagrostis phragmitoides Hartman) a poznámky k výskytu C. canescens (Weber) Roth v Krušných horách. Acta Musei Bohemiae Borealis Scientiae Naturales 42:21–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Ozenda P (1985) La végétation de la chaîne alpine dans l’espace montagnard européen. Masson, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Pop E (1960) Mlaştinile de turbă din RP Română. Editura Academiei RPR, Bucureşti

    Google Scholar 

  • Preston CD, Hill MO (1997) The geographical relationships of British and Irish vascular plants. Biol J Linn Soc 124:1–120. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8339.1997.tb01785.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rudneva EN (1960) Pochvennyi pokrov Zakarpatskoy oblasti. Izdatiel’stvo AN SSSR, Moscow

    Google Scholar 

  • Růžička I (2005) Dva nové nálezy Calamagrostis phragmitoides Hartman na Českomoravské vrchovině. Acta Rerum Naturalium 1:57–59

    Google Scholar 

  • Salonen V, Setala H (1992) Plant colonization of bare peat surface – relative importance of seed availability and soil. Ecography 15:199–204. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0587.1992.tb00025.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Samu F, Urák I (2014) Are more bogs better? Comparative studies into Transylvanian peat bog spider (Arachnida: Araneae) assemblages from a conservation biological perspective. North-West J Zool 10(Supplement 1):S94–S101

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheuerer M, Ahlmer W (2003) Rote Liste gefährdeter Gefäßpflanzen Bayerns mit regionalisierter Florenliste. Schriftenreihe Bayerisches Landesamtes für Umweltschutz 165:1–372

    Google Scholar 

  • Scholz H (1971) Gegenwärtige Kenntnisse über die Verbreitung der Calamagrostis phragmitoides Hartm. (Purpurreitgras) in Mitteleuropa. Philippia 1:85–90

    Google Scholar 

  • Sell P, Murrell G (1996) Flora of Great Britain and Ireland 5. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (UK)

    Google Scholar 

  • Smejkal M (1976) Calamagrostis phragmitoides, nový druh československé flóry. Preslia 48:124–130

    Google Scholar 

  • Soó R (1939) Északi reliktumnövények Magyarország flórájában. Acta Geobot Hung 2:151–199

    Google Scholar 

  • Stace C (2019) New Flora of the British Isles, 4th edn. C&M Floristics, Middlewood Green

    Google Scholar 

  • Štech M (2013) Calamagrostis phragmitoides Hartm. – třtina nachová. In: Lepší P, Lepší M, Boublík K, Štech M, Hans V (eds) Červená kniha květeny jižní části Čech. Jihočeské muzeum v Českých Budějovicích, České Budějovice, p 90

  • Štech M (2019) Calamagrostis Adans. – třtina. In: Kaplan Z, Danihelka J, Chrtek J, Kirschner J, Kubát K, Štech M, Štěpánek J (eds) Klíč ke květeně České republiky, 4th edn. Academia, Praha, pp 295–299

    Google Scholar 

  • Štech M, Koutecký P, Tribsch A, Schratt-Ehrendorfer L, Paszko B, Pachschwöll C (2020) Calamagrostis purpurea (Poaceae) – a long neglected boreal element, new for the flora of Austria. Neilreichia 11:133–152. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4016760

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stewart OM, Wigginton MJ (1998) Calamagrostis purpurea (Trin.) Trin. ssp. phragmitoides (Hartman) Tzvelev (Poaceae). In: Wigginton MJ (ed) British Red Data Books 1: Vascular plants. Joint Nature Conservation Committee, Peterborough (UK), p 6

    Google Scholar 

  • Stroh PA, Leach SJ, August TA, Walker KJ, Pearman DA, Rumsey FJ, Harrower CA, Fay MF, Martin JP, Pankhurst T, Preston CD, Taylor I (2014) A vascular plant Red List for England. Botanical Society of Britain and Ireland, Bristol

    Google Scholar 

  • Tanţău I, Feurdean A, De Beaulieu JL, Reille M, Fărcaş S (2014) Vegetation sensitivity to climate changes and human impact in the Harghita Mountains (Eastern Romanian Carpathians) over the past 15 000 years. J Quaternary Sci 29(2):141–152. https://doi.org/10.1002/jqs.2688

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tasenkevich L (2003) Vascular plants. In: Witkowki ZJ, Król W, Solarz W (eds) Carpathian list of endangered species. WWF and Institute of Nature Conservation, Vienna & Krakow, pp 6–20

  • Tatár D (1995) Két új nádtippan a magyar flórában: Calamagrostis villosa (Chaix) Gmel. és C. purpurea Trin. Bot Közl 82:39–44

    Google Scholar 

  • Tateoka T (1974) A cytotaxonomic study of the Calamagrostis purpurealangsdorffiicanadensis complex in the lowlands of Hokkaido. Bot Mag Tokyo 87:237–251. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02489300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thiers B (2021) Index Herbariorum: A global directory of public herbaria and associated staff. New York Botanical Garden’s Virtual Herbarium, New York (NY). http://sweetgum.nybg.org/science/ih/. Accessed 14 November 2021

  • Tretyakov DI (2013) Poaceae. In: Parfenov VI (ed) Flora Belarusi. Sosudistyye rasteniya 2. Belaruskaya Navuka, Minsk, pp 102–401

    Google Scholar 

  • Tzvelev NN (1965) K sistematike roda veynik (Calamagrostis Adans.) v SSSR. Novosti Sistematiki Vysshikh Rasteniy 2:5–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Tzvelev NN (1974) Poaceae. In: Fedorov AA (ed) Flora evropeyskoy chasti SSSR 1. Nauka, Leningrad, pp 17–368

    Google Scholar 

  • Tzvelev NN (1976) Zlaki SSSR. Nauka, Leningrad

    Google Scholar 

  • Tzvelev NN, Probatova NS (2019) Zlaki Rossii. KMK Scientific Press, Moscow

    Google Scholar 

  • Urgamal M, Oyuntsetseg B, Nyambayar D, Dulamsuren C (2014) Conspectus of the Vascular Plants of Mongolia. “Admon” Press, Ulaanbaatar

    Google Scholar 

  • Winter TC (2000) The vulnerability of wetlands to climate change: A hydrologic landscape perspective. J Am Water Resour As 36:305–311. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-1688.2000.tb04269.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Peter Turis (Nízke Tatry National Park Administration, Banská Bystrica) and the curators from the above-mentioned herbaria.

Funding

Open access funding provided by University of Vienna.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Clemens Pachschwöll.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kobiv, Y., Koutecký, P., Štech, M. et al. First records of Calamagrostis purpurea (Poaceae) in the Carpathians, a relict species new to the flora of Slovakia, Ukraine, and Romania. Biologia (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11756-022-01083-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11756-022-01083-x

Keywords

  • Carpathians
  • Distribution
  • New records
  • Rare species
  • Relict
  • Wetlands