Advertisement

TOP

, Volume 26, Issue 1, pp 21–24 | Cite as

Comments on: Disruption management in vehicle routing and scheduling for road freight transport: a review

  • Karl F. Doerner
  • Richard F. Hartl
Discussion
  • 36 Downloads
Disruption management has become more and more important as real-time information (e.g., blocked roads, vehicle breakdowns, real-time travel time, and accidents) has become available. The authors provide a highly valuable survey on this important new trend in vehicle routing, which is also of high practical relevance. The paper is well organized. In Section 1, the key factors are nicely summarized, and in Subsection 1.1, the appropriate objectives are reviewed. In Section 2, the different solution approaches including multi-objective optimization approaches are explained. The core of the paper is Section 3, where a comprehensive survey of the relevant literature on disruption in vehicle routing is presented. Particularly useful is Table 1, where types of disruptions, objectives, and solutions are classified. Undoubtedly, this paper is very good first read for anyone who wants to do research on disruption management or wants to deal with real-world disruption issues. While it is...

References

  1. Bent RW, Van Hentenryck P (2004) Scenario-based planning for partially dynamic vehicle routing with stochastic customers. Oper Res 52(6):977–987CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Boland NL, Savelsbergh MWP (2012) Optimizing the Hunter Valley coal chain. In: Gurnani H, Mehrotra A, Ray S (eds) Supply chain disruptions. Springer, London, pp 275–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Clausen J, Larsen A, Larsen J, Rezanova NJ (2010) Disruption management in the airline industry - concepts, models and methods. Comput Oper Res 37(5):809–821CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Erera AL, Savelsbergh MWP, Uyar E (2009) Fixed routes with backup vehicles for stochastic vehicle routing problems with time constraints. Networks 54(4):270–283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ichoua S, Gendreau M, Potvin J-Y (2000) Diversion issues in real-time vehicle dispatching. Transp Sci 34(4):426–438CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Kiefer A, Kritzinger S, Doerner KF (2016) Disruption management for the viennese public transport provider. Public Transp 8(2):161–183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Qi X, Bard JF, Yu G (2004) Supply chain coordination with demand disruptions. Omega 32(4):301–312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Qi X, Bard JF, Yu G (2006) Disruption management for machine scheduling: the case of SPT schedules. Int J Prod Econ 103(1):166–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ritzinger U, Puchinger J, Hartl RF (2016) A survey on dynamic and stochastic vehicle routing problems. Int J Prod Res 54:215–231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Schilde M, Doerner KF, Hartl RF (2014) Integrating stochastic time-dependent travel speed in solution methods for the dynamic dial-a-ride problem. Eur J Oper Res 238(1):18–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Shaw P (1998) Using constraint programming and local search methods to solve vehicle routing problems. In: CP-98, fourth international conference on principles and practice of constraint programming. Lecture notes in computer science, vol 1520. Springer, Berlin, pp 417–431Google Scholar
  12. Vidal T, Crainic TG, Gendreau M, Prins M (2013) A hybrid genetic algorithm with adaptive diversity management for a large class of vehicle routing problems with time windows. Comput Oper Res 40:475–489CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Zhao C-L, Tang H-Y (2010) Scheduling deteriorating jobs under disruption. Int J Prod Econ 125(2):294–299CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Business AdministrationProduction and Operations ManagementViennaAustria

Personalised recommendations