Skip to main content
Log in

Analysis of the effectiveness of the theseus multi-criteria sorting method: theoretical remarks and experimental evidence

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
TOP Aims and scope Submit manuscript

    We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

    Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Abstract

The effectiveness of the THESEUS multi-criteria sorting method is characterized, here, by (i) its capacity for suggesting precise and appropriate assignments; (ii) the probability of suggesting imprecise assignments; and (iii) the probability of suggesting incorrect assignments. We study how these important features are influenced by the number of criteria and categories, the cardinality of the reference set and the level of decision-maker consistency. We present a theoretical characterization and a wide range of experimental results that confirm and complement the formal analysis. The proposed way of analyzing effectiveness may be applied to other multi-criteria sorting methods.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

Jeffrey Sanford Russell, John Hawthorne & Lara Buchak

References

  • Almeida-Dias J, Figueira JR, Roy B (2010) Electre tri-c: a multiple criteria sorting method based on characteristic reference actions. Eur J Oper Res 204(3):565–580

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Almeida-Dias J, Figueira JR, Roy B (2012) A multiple criteria sorting method where each category is characterized by several reference actions: the electre tri-nc method. Eur J Oper Res 217(3):567–579

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bouyssou D, Marchant T (2015) On the relations between electre tri-b and electre tri-c and on a new variant of electre tri-b. Eur J Oper Res 242(1):201–211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brito AJ, de Almeida AT, Mota CM (2010) A multicriteria model for risk sorting of natural gas pipelines based on electre tri integrating utility theory. Eur J Oper Res 200(3):812–821

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butler J, Jia J, Dyer J (1997) Simulation techniques for the sensitivity analysis of multi-criteria decision models. Eur J Oper Res 103(3):531–546

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dimitras A, Zopounidis C, Hurson C (1995) A multicriteria decision aid method for the assessment of business failure risk. Found Comput Decis Sci 20(2):99–112

    Google Scholar 

  • Doumpos M, Marinakis Y, Marinaki M, Zopounidis C (2009) An evolutionary approach to construction of outranking models for multicriteria classification: the case of the electre tri method. Eur J Oper Res 199(2):496–505

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doumpos M, Zopounidis C (2002) Multicriteria decision aid classification methods. Applied Optimization, vol 73. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, Boston, London

  • Fernandez E, Navarro J (2011) A new approach to multi-criteria sorting based on fuzzy outranking relations: the theseus method. Eur J Oper Res 213(2):405–413

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fernandez E, Navarro J, Bernal S (2009) Multicriteria sorting using a valued indifference relation under a preference disaggregation paradigm. Eur J Oper Res 198(2):602–609

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fernandez E, Navarro J, Duarte A, Ibarra G (2013) Core: a decision support system for regional competitiveness analysis based on multi-criteria sorting. Decis Support Syst 54(3):1417–1426

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fernandez E, Navarro J, Mazcorro G (2012) Evolutionary multi-objective optimization for inferring outranking model’s parameters under scarce reference information and effects of reinforced preference. Found Comput Decis Sci 37(3):163–197

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernandez E, Navarro J, Salomon E (2014) Automatic enhancement of the reference set for multi-criteria sorting in the frame of theseus method. Found Comput Decis Sci 39(2):57–77

    Google Scholar 

  • Figueira JR, Greco S, Roy B, Słowiński R (2010) ELECTRE methods: main features and recent developments. In: Zopounidis C, Pardalos PM (eds) Handbook of multicriteria analysis. Applied optimization, vol 103, pp 51–89. Springer, Heidelberg, Dordrecht, London, New York

  • Macary F, Dias JA, Figueira J, Roy B (2014) A multiple criteria decision analysis model based on electre tri-c for erosion risk assessment in agricultural areas. Environ Model Assess 19(3):221–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mailly D, Abi-Zeid I, Pepin S (2014) A multi-criteria classification approach for identifying favourable climates for tourism. J Multi Criteria Decis Anal 21(1–2):65–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mavrotas G, Diakoulaki D, Capros P (2003) Combined mcda-ip approach for project selection in the electricity market. Ann Oper Res 120(1–4):159–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mousseau V, Dias L (2004) Valued outranking relations in electre providing manageable disaggregation procedures. Eur J Oper Res 156(2):467–482

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nepomuceno LDdO, Costa HG (2015) Analyzing perceptions about the influence of a master course over the professional skills of its alumni: a multicriteria approach. Pesqui Oper 35(1):187–211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norese MF, Carbone V (2014) An application of electre tri to support innovation. J Multi Criteria Decis Anal 21(1–2):77–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pereira D, Mota C, Miranda J (2013) Municipal human development index for brazilian cities based on electre tri-c. In: 2013 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (SMC), pp 736–740. IEEE

  • Roy B (1991) The outranking approach and the foundations of electre methods. Theory Decis 31(1):49–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roy B (2002) Présentation et interprétation de la méthode electre tri pour affecter des zones dans des catégories de risque. Document du LAMSADE 124

  • Siskos Y, Grigoroudis E, Krassadaki E, Matsatsinis N (2007) A multicriteria accreditation system for information technology skills and qualifications. Eur J Oper Res 182(2):867–885

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • The AN, Mousseau V (2002) Using assignment examples to infer category limits for the electre tri method. J Multi Criteria Decis Anal 11(1):29–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xidonas P, Mavrotas G, Psarras J (2009) A multicriteria methodology for equity selection using financial analysis. Comput Oper Res 36(12):3187–3203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu W (1992) Electre tri(aspects méthodologiques et manueld’utilisation). Document- Université de Paris-Dauphine,LAMSADE

  • Zopounidis C, Doumpos M (2002) Multi-criteria decision aid in financial decision making: methodologies and literature review. J Multi Criteria Decis Anal 11(4–5):167–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge the support from CONACYT Project No. 236154. We also thank the anonymous reviewers for their helpful remarks.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eduardo Fernandez.

Appendix

Appendix

1.1 Deriving Equations (14) and (15)

Suppose that \(k'<k^{*}\).

Equations (12) and (13) can be arranged as:

$$\begin{aligned} \displaystyle { n }_{ i }(k')= & {} \sum _{ k=k'+1 }^{ { k }^{ * } }{ n(k)f({ k }^{ * }-k) } +\sum _{ k={ k }^{ * }+1 }^{ M }{ n(k)f({ k }^{ * }-k) } +\sum _{ k=1 }^{ k'-1 }{ n(k)f(k-{ k }^{ * }) } \\ \displaystyle { n }_{ i }({ k }^{ * })= & {} \sum _{ k={ k }^{ * }+1 }^{ M }{ n(k)f({ k }^{ * }-k) } +\sum _{ k=1 }^{ k'-1 }{ n(k)f(k-{ k }^{ * }) } +\sum _{ k=k' }^{ { k }^{ * }-1 }{ n(k)f(k-{ k }^{ * }) } \end{aligned}$$

Then,

$$\begin{aligned} \displaystyle { n }_{ i }({ k }')-{ n }_{ i }({ k }^{ * })=\sum _{ k={ k }'+1 }^{ { k }^{ * } }{ n(k)f({ k }^{ * }-k) } -\sum _{ k=k' }^{ { k }^{ * }-1 }{ n(k)f(k-{ k }^{ * }) } \end{aligned}$$

or

$$\begin{aligned} \displaystyle { n }_{ i }({ k }')-{ n }_{ i }({ k }^{ * })= & {} \sum _{ k={ k }'+1 }^{ { k }^{ * }-1 }{ n(k)f({ k }^{ * }-k) } +n({ k }^{* })f(0) \\&-\sum _{ k=k'+1 }^{ { k }^{ * }-1 }{ n(k)f(k-{ k }^{ * }) } -n(k')f(k'-{ k }^{ * }) \end{aligned}$$

Grouping both sums, we obtain Eq. (14).

If \(k'>k^{*}\), Eqs. (12) and (13) can be arranged as:

$$\begin{aligned} \displaystyle { n }_{ i }({ k }')= & {} \sum _{ k={ k }'+1 }^{ { M } }{ n(k)f({ k }^{ * }-k) } +\sum _{ k=1 }^{ { k }^{ * }-1 }{ n(k)f(k-{ k}^{ * }) } +\sum _{ k={ k }^{ * } }^{ k'-1 }{ n(k)f(k-{ k}^{ * })}\\ \displaystyle { n }_{ i }({ { k }^{ * } })= & {} \sum _{ k={ k }'+1}^{ { M } }{ n(k)f({ k }^{ * }-k) } +\sum _{ k={ k }^{ * }+1 }^{ { k }' }{ n(k)f({ k }^{ * }-k) } \\&+\sum _{ k=1 }^{ { k }^{ * }-1 }{ n(k)f(k-{ k}^{ * }) }\\ \displaystyle { { n }_{ i }({ { k }' })-n }_{ i }({ { k }^{ * } })= & {} \sum _{ k={ k }^{ * } }^{ { k'-1 } }{ n(k)f(k-{ k }^{ * }) } -\sum _{ k={ k }^{ * }+1 }^{ { k }' }{ n(k)f({ k }^{ * }-k) } \end{aligned}$$

or

$$\begin{aligned} \displaystyle { { n }_{ i }({ { k }' })-n }_{ i }({ { k }^{ * } })= & {} n({ k }^{ * })f(0)+\sum _{ k={ k }^{ * }+1 }^{ { k'-1 } }{ n(k)f(k-{ k }^{ * }) } \\&-\sum _{ k={ k }^{ * }+1 }^{ { k }'-1 }{ n(k)f({ k }^{ * }-k) } -n(k')f({ k }^{ * }-k') \end{aligned}$$

Equation (15) comes from grouping both sums.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fernandez, E., Navarro, J., Covantes, E. et al. Analysis of the effectiveness of the theseus multi-criteria sorting method: theoretical remarks and experimental evidence. TOP 25, 314–339 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11750-016-0433-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11750-016-0433-0

Keywords

Mathematics Subject Classification

Navigation