Skip to main content
Log in

Nonequivalence of two least-absolute-deviation estimators for mediation effects

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
TEST Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper provides two groups of conditions of model consistency in least-absolute-deviation mediation models. Under model consistency, we establish the asymptotic theory of the difference estimator and the product estimator, and show that the two estimators are not only numerically nonequivalent but asymptotically nonequivalent, which is dramatically different from the situation in the least squares mediation analysis where these two estimators are numerically equivalent. In all three possible scenarios of model parameters, both the asymptotic theories and simulation studies show that the product estimator is more efficient than the difference estimator.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Angrist J, Chernozhukov V, Fernández-Val I (2006) Quantile regression under misspecification, with an application to the U.S. wage structure. Econometrica 74:539–563

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Baron RM, Kenny DA (1986) The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J Person Soc Psychol 51:1173–1182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bind M-A, VanderWeele TJ, Schwartz JD, Coull BA (2017) Quantile causal mediation analysis allowing longitudinal data. Stat Med 36:4182–4195

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Field AP, Wilcox RR (2017) Robust statistical methods: a primer for clinical psychology and experimental psychopathology researchers. Behav Res Therapy 98:19–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayes AF (2018) Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: a regression-based approach, 2nd edn. Guilford Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Hox JJ (2002) Multilevel analysis: techniques and applications. Erlbau, Mahwah

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Huber PJ, Ronchetti EM (2009) Robust statistics, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Knight K (1998) Limiting distributions for \({L}_{1}\) regression estimators under general conditions. Ann Stat 26:755–770

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Koenker R (2005) Quantile regression. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Lindquist MA (2012) Functional causal mediation analysis with an application to brain connectivity. J Am Stat Assoc 107:1297–1309

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • MacKinnon DP (2008) Introduction to statistical mediation analysis. New York

  • MacKinnon DP, Lockwood CM, Hoffman JM, West SG, Sheets V (2002) A comparison of methods to test mediation and other intervening variable effects. Psychol Methods 7:83–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacKinnon DP, Warsi G, Dwyer JH (1995) A simulation study of mediated effect measures. Multivar Behav Res 30:41–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Micceri T (1989) The unicorn, the normal curve, and other improbable creatures. Psychol Bull 105:156–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pearl J (1995) Causal diagrams for empirical research. Biometrika 82:669–710

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Pearl J (2009) Causality: models, reasoning, and inference, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Pollard D (1991) Asymptotics for least absolute deviation regression estimators. Econom Theory 7:186–199

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Preacher KJ (2015) Advances in mediation analysis: a survey and synthesis of new developments. Annu Rev Psychol 66:825–852

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Preacher KJ, Zyphur MJ, Zhang Z (2010) A general multilevel SEM framework for assessing multilevel mediation. Psychol Methods 15:209–233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shen E, Chou C-P, Pentz MA, Berhane K (2014) Quantile mediation models: a comparison of methods for assessing mediation across the outcome distribution. Multivar Behav Res 49:471–485

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • VanderWeele TJ (2015) Explanation in causal inference: methods for mediation and interaction. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • VanderWeele TJ, Hong GL, Jones SM, Brown JL (2013) Mediation and spillover effects in group-randomized trials: a case study of the 4Rs educational intervention. J Am Stat Assoc 108:469–482

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • VanderWeele TJ, Vansteelandt S (2014) Mediation analysis with multiple mediators. Epidemiol Methods 2:95–115

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Wang WW, Yu P, Lin L, Tong T (2019) Robust estimation of derivatives using locally weighted least absolute deviation regression. J Mach Learn Res 60:1–49

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Wang WW, Yu P, Zhou Y, Tong T, Liu Z (2021) Equivalence of two least-squares estimators for indirect effects. Current Psychol 1–12

  • Wilcox RR (2017) Introduction to robust estimation & hypothesis testing, 4th edn. Elsevier, Amsterdam

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Yuan Y, MacKinnon DP (2014) Robust mediation analysis based on median regression. Psychol Methods 19(1):1–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao Z, Xiao Z (2014) Efficient regression via optimally combining quantile information. Econom Theory 30:1272–1314

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Zu J, Yuan K-H (2010) Local influence and robust procedures for mediation analysis. Multivar Behav Res 45:1–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Professor Keith Knight for providing us his papers on second-order asymptotics of quantile regression. WenWu Wang was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 12071248) and National Statistical Science Research Foundation of China (No. 2020LZ26). Yu acknowledges support from the GRF of Hong Kong Government under Grant No. 106200228.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to WenWu Wang.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file 1 (pdf 331 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, W., Yu, P. Nonequivalence of two least-absolute-deviation estimators for mediation effects. TEST 32, 370–387 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11749-022-00837-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11749-022-00837-8

Keywords

Mathematics Subject Classification

Navigation