Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Comments on: Deville and Särndal’s calibration: revisiting a 25 years old successful optimization problem

  • Discussion
  • Published:
TEST Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Beaumont J-F (2019) Are probability surveys bound to disappear for the production of official statistics? Surv Methodol 45

  • Beaumont J-F, Bocci C (2008) Another look at ridge calibration. Metron 66:5–20

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Beaumont J-F, Patak Z (2012) On the generalized bootstrap for sample surveys with special attention to Poisson sampling. Int Stat Rev 80:127–148

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Brewer KRW (1963) Ratio estimation and finite populations: some results deducible from the assumption of an underlying stochastic process. Aust J Stat 5:93–105

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Chambers RL (1996) Robust case-weighting for multipurpose establishment surveys. J Off Stat 12:3–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen Y, Li P, Wu C (2019) Doubly robust inference with non-probability survey samples. J Am Stat Assoc (submitted)

  • Deville J-C, Särndal C-E (1992) Calibration estimators in survey sampling. J Am Stat Assoc 87:376–382

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Elliot M, Valliant R (2017) Inference for non-probability samples. Stat Sci 32:249–264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Folsom RE, Singh AC (2000) The generalized exponential model for sampling weight calibration for extreme values, nonresponse, and poststratification. In: Proceedings of the section on survey research methods. American Statistical Association, Alexandria, VA, pp 598–603

  • Horvitz DG, Thompson DJ (1952) A generalization of sampling without replacement from a finite universe. J Am Stat Assoc 47:663–685

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Haziza D, Beaumont J-F (2017) Construction of weights in surveys: a review. Stat Sci 32:206–226

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Haziza D, Lesage É (2016) A discussion of weighting procedures for unit nonresponse. J of Off Stat 32:129–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang ET, Fuller WA (1978) Nonnegative regression estimation for sample survey data. In: Proceedings of the social statistics section, American Statistical Association, pp 300–305

  • Iannacchione VG, Milne JG, Folsom RE (1991) Response probability weight adjustments using logistic regression. In: Proceedings of the survey research methods section. American Statistical Association, Alexandria, VA, pp 637–642

  • Kott PS (2006) Using calibration weighting to adjust for nonresponse and undercoverage. Surv Method 32:133–142

    Google Scholar 

  • McConville KS, Toth D (2018) Automated selection of post-strata using a model-assisted regression tree estimator. Scand J Stat. https://doi.org/10.1111/sjos.12356

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • McConville KS, Breidt FJ, Lee TC, Moisen GG (2017) Model-assisted survey regression estimation with the lasso. J Surv Stat Methodol 5:131–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Narain RD (1951) On sampling without replacement with varying probabilities. J Indian Soc Agric Stat 3:169–174

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Rao JNK (2005) Interplay between sample survey theory and practice: an appraisal. Surv Methodol 31:117–138

    Google Scholar 

  • Rao JNK (2011) Impact of frequentist and Bayesian methods on survey sampling practice: a selective appraisal. Stat Sci 26:240–256

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Rao JNK (2019) Making inference by combining data from multiple sources: an appraisal. Sankhya (submitted for publication)

  • Rao JNK, Singh AC (1997) A ridge-shrinkage method for range-restricted weight calibration in survey sampling. In: Proceedings of the section on survey research methods. American Statistical Association, Alexandria, VA, pp 57–65

  • Rao JNK, Singh AC (2009) Range-restricted weight calibration for survey data using ridge regression. Pak J Stat 25:371–384

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Rao JNK, Wu CFJ, Yue K (1992) Some recent work on resampling methods for complex surveys. Surv Methodol 18:209–217

    Google Scholar 

  • Rao JNK, Hidiroglou M, Yung W, Kovacevic M (2010) Role of weights in descriptive and analytical inferences from survey data: an overview. J Indian Soc Agric Stat 64:129–135

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Royall RM (1970) On finite population sampling theory under certain linear regression models. Biometrika 57:377–387

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van den Brakel JA, Bethlehem J (2008) Model-based estimation for official statistics. Discussion paper 08002, Statistics, the Netherlands

  • Wu C, Lu WW (2016) Calibration weighting methods for complex surveys. Int Stat Rev 84:79–98

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao P, Rao JNK, Wu C (2019) Empirical likelihood inference with public-use survey data (submitted for publication)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. International Cooperation and Methodology Innovation Centre, Statistics Canada, Ottawa, Canada

    Jean-Francois Beaumont

  2. School of Mathematics and Statistics, Carleton University, Ottawa, Canada

    J. N. K. Rao

Authors
  1. Jean-Francois Beaumont
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. J. N. K. Rao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. N. K. Rao.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This comment refers to the invited paper available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11749-019-00681-3.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Beaumont, JF., Rao, J.N.K. Comments on: Deville and Särndal’s calibration: revisiting a 25 years old successful optimization problem. TEST 28, 1071–1076 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11749-019-00687-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11749-019-00687-x

Search

Navigation