Skip to main content
Log in

Comments on: Data science, big data and statistics

  • Discussion
  • Published:
TEST Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Baehrens D, Schroeter T, Harmeling S, Kawanabe M, Hansen K, MÞller KR (2010) How to explain individual classification decisions. J Mach Learn Res 11(Jun):1803–1831

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Biecek P (2018) DALEX: explainers for complex predictive models in R. arXiv:1806.08915v2

  • Biran O, Cotton C (2017) Explanation and justification in machine learning: a survey. In: Proceedings of The IJCAI-17 workshop on Explainable AI (XAI), pp 8–13

  • Breiman L (2001) Statistical modeling: the two cultures. Stat Sci 16:199–231

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Datta A, Sen S, Zick Y (2016) Algorithmic transparency via quantitative input influence: theory and experiments with learning systems. In: 2016 IEEE symposium on security and privacy (SP). IEEE, pp 598–617

  • Ferrando P (2018) Lighting the black box: explaining individual predictions of machine learning algorithms. Master Thesis, MESIO UPC-UB. Advisors: Belanche, L. and Delicado, P. http://hdl.handle.net/2117/113463. Accessed 13 Dec 2018

  • Fisher A, Rudin C, Dominici F (2018) All models are wrong but many are useful: Variable importance for black-box, proprietary, or misspecified prediction models, using model class reliance. arXiv:1801.01489v3

  • Gregorutti B, Michel B, Saint-Pierre P (2015) Grouped variable importance with random forests and application to multiple functional data analysis. Comput Stat Data Anal 90:15–35

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Gregorutti B, Michel B, Saint-Pierre P (2017) Correlation and variable importance in random forests. Stat Comput 27(3):659–678

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Kononenko I et al (2010) An efficient explanation of individual classifications using game theory. J Mach Learn Res 11(Jan):1–18

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • van der Laan MJ (2006) Statistical inference for variable importance. Int J Biostat. https://doi.org/10.2202/1557-4679.1008

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Miller T (2019) Explanation in artificial intelligence: insights from the social sciences. Artif Intell 267:1–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artint.2018.07.007

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Nott G (2017) Explainable artificial intelligence: cracking open the black box of AI. Computer World. https://www.computerworld.com.au/article/617359. Accessed 12 Dec 2018

  • Ribeiro MT, Singh S, Guestrin C (2016) Why should i trust you?: explaining the predictions of any classifier. In: Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD international conference on knowledge discovery and data mining. ACM, pp 1135–1144

  • Staniak M, Biecek P (2018) Explanations of model predictions with live and breakDown packages. arXiv:1804.01955

  • Wikipedia Contributors: Explainable Artificial Intelligence (2018) Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia (2018). https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Explainable_Artificial_Intelligence. Accessed 12 Dec 2018

Download references

Acknowledgements

Work supported in part by the Spanish Ministerio de Economía, Industria y Competitividad, Grant MTM2017-88142-P.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pedro Delicado.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This comment refers to the invited paper available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11749-019-00651-9

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Delicado, P. Comments on: Data science, big data and statistics. TEST 28, 334–337 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11749-019-00639-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11749-019-00639-5

Navigation