Abstract
We would like to supplement this article with two more points. First, we express our views about the proposed work’s major contributions to the area of sparse functional data classification. Second, we suggest some possible future research directions and discuss ideas of generalizing the method to deal with the problem of multiclass classification for sparse functional data.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Delaigle A, Hall P (2012) Achieving near perfect classification for functional data. J R Stat Soc Ser B (Stat Methodol) 74:267–286
James GM (2002) Generalized linear models with functional predictors. J R Stat Soc Ser B (Stat Methodol) 64(3):411–432
Liu Y, Shen X (2006) Multicategory \(\psi \)-learning. J Am Stat Assoc 101:500–509
Müller HG, Stadtmüller U (2005) Generalized functional linear models. Ann Stat 33(2):774–805
Rao JA (2004) Functional and longitudinal data analysis: perspectives on smoothing. Stat Sin 14:631–647
Wu Y, Zhang HH, Liu Y (2010) Robust model-free multiclass probability estimation. J Am Stat Assoc 105(489):424–436
Wu Y, Liu Y (2007) Robust truncated-hinge-loss support vector machines. J Am Stat Assoc 102:974–983
Wu Y, Liu Y (2013) Functional robust support vector machines for sparse and irregular longitudinal data. J Comput Graph Stat 2:379–395
Yao F, Müller HG, Wang JL (2005) Functional data analysis for sparse longitudinal data. J Am Stat Assoc 100(470):577–590
Zhao X, Marron JS, Wells MT (2004) The functional data analysis view of longitudinal data. Stat Sin 14:789–808
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Zhang’s research is partly supported by National Science Foundation Grant DMS-1418172 and National Natural Science Foundation of China grant NSFC-11571009.
This comment refers to the invited paper available at: doi:10.1007/s11749-015-0470-2.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zhang, H.H. Comments on: Probability enhanced effective dimension reduction for classifying sparse functional data. TEST 25, 47–51 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11749-015-0477-8
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11749-015-0477-8