Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Comments on: Goodness-of-fit tests in mixed models

  • Discussion
  • Published:
TEST Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Agresti A, Caffo B, Ohman P (2004) Examples in which misspecification of a random effects distribution reduces efficiency. Comput Stat Data Anal 47(3):639–653

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Bissantz N, Claeskens G, Holzmann H, Munk A (2009) Testing for lack of fit in inverse regression—with applications to biophotonic imaging. J R Stat Soc, Ser B 71:25–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Box GE (1976) Science and statistics. J Am Stat Assoc 71:791–799

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Brumback BA, Ruppert D, Wand MP (1999) Comment on Shively, Kohn and Wood. J Am Stat Assoc 94:794–797

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dette H, Munk A (2003) Some methodological aspects of validation of models in nonparametric regression. Stat Neerl 57(2):207–244

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Eilers PHC, Marx BD (1996) Flexible smoothing with B-splines and penalties. Stat Sci 11(2):89–121. With comments and a rejoinder by the authors

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Eubank R, Hart JD (1992) Testing goodness-of-fit in regression via order selection criteria. Ann Stat 20(3):1412–1425

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Kauermann G (2005) A note on smoothing parameter selection for penalised spline smoothing. J Stat Plan Inference 127:53–69

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Krivobokova T, Kneib T, Claeskens G (2009) Simultaneous confidence bands for penalized spline estimators. Technical report, University of Göttingen

  • Munk A (2002) Testing the goodness of fit of parametric regression models with random Toeplitz forms. Scand J Stat 29(3):501–533

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Ruppert D, Wand M, Carroll R (2003) Semiparametric regression. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Verbeke G, Lesaffre E (1997) The effect of misspecifying the random-effects distribution in linear mixed models for longitudinal data. Comput Stat Data Anal 23(4):541–556

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao LH (2000) Bayesian aspects of some nonparametric problems. Ann Stat 28(2):532–552

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Georg-August-Universität Göttingen, Goldschmidtstr. 7, 37077, Göttingen, Germany

    Axel Munk & Tatyana Krivobokova

Authors
  1. Axel Munk
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Tatyana Krivobokova
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Axel Munk.

Additional information

This comment refers to the invited paper available at: doi:10.1007/s11749-009-0148-8.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Munk, A., Krivobokova, T. Comments on: Goodness-of-fit tests in mixed models. TEST 18, 256–259 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11749-009-0152-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11749-009-0152-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation