Skip to main content
Log in

Rejoinder on: Control of the false discovery rate under dependence using the bootstrap and subsampling

  • Discussion
  • Published:
TEST Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Dudoit S, van der Laan MJ (2008) Multiple testing procedures with applications to genomics. Springer series in statistics. Springer, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Efron B (2008) Microarrays, empirical Bayes and the two-groups model. Stat Sci 23:1035–1061

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Gavrilov Y, Benjamini Y, Sarkar SK (2008) An adaptive step-down procedure with proven FDR control. Ann Stat (in press)

  • Genovese CR, Wasserman L (2004) A stochastic process approach to false discovery control. Ann Stat 32(3):1035–1061

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Korn EL, Troendle JF, McShane LM, Simon R (2004) Controlling the number of false discoveries: application to high-dimensional genomic data. J Stat Plann Inference 124:379–398

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Lehmann EL, Romano JP (2005a) Generalizations of the familywise error rate. Ann Stat 33(3):1138–1154

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Lehmann EL, Romano JP (2005b) Testing statistical hypotheses, 3rd edn. Springer, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Pacifico. M, Genovese. C, Verdinelli. I, Wasserman. L (2004) False discovery control for random fields. J Am Stat Assoc 99:1002–1014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Romano JP, Shaikh AM (2008) Inference for identifiable parameters in partially identified econometric models. J Stat Plann Inference 138:2786–2807

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Romano JP, Wolf M (2007) Control of generalized error rates in multiple testing. Ann Stat 35(4):1378–1408

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Romano JP, Shaikh AM, Wolf M (2008) Formalized data snooping based on generalized error rates. Econom Theory 24(2):404–447

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Samuel-Cahn E (1996) Is the Simes improved Bonferroni procedure conservative? Biometrika 83:928–933

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Storey JD, Taylor JE, Siegmund D (2004) Strong control, conservative point estimation and simultaneous conservative consistency of false discovery rates: a unified approach. J R Stat Soc Ser B 66(1):187–205

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael Wolf.

Additional information

This rejoinder is discussed in the comments available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11749-008-0127-5, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11749-008-0128-4, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11749-008-0129-3, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11749-008-0130-x, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11749-008-0131-9.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Romano, J.P., Shaikh, A.M. & Wolf, M. Rejoinder on: Control of the false discovery rate under dependence using the bootstrap and subsampling. TEST 17, 461–471 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11749-008-0134-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11749-008-0134-6

Keywords

Navigation