Skip to main content
Log in

Strongly consistent model selection for densities

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
TEST Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Let f be an unknown multivariate density belonging to a set of densities \(\mathcal{F}_{k^{*}}\) of finite associated Vapnik–Chervonenkis dimension, where the complexity k * is unknown, and ℱ k k+1 for all k. Given an i.i.d. sample of size n drawn from f, this article presents a density estimate \(\hat{f}_{K_{n}}\) yielding almost sure convergence of the estimated complexity K n to the true but unknown k * and with the property \(\mathbf{E}\{\int|\hat{f}_{K_{n}}-f|\}=\mbox{O}(1/\sqrt{n}\,)\) . The methodology is inspired by the combinatorial tools developed in Devroye and Lugosi (Combinatorial methods in density estimation. Springer, New York, 2001) and it includes a wide range of density models, such as mixture models and exponential families.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Biau G, Devroye L (2004) A note on density model size testing. IEEE Trans Inf Theory 50:576–581

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Biau G, Devroye L (2005) Density estimation by the penalized combinatorial method. J Multivar Anal 94:196–208

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Biau G, Györfi L (2005) On the asymptotic properties of a nonparametric L 1-test of homogeneity. IEEE Trans Inf Theory 51:3965–3973

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cao R, Lugosi G (2005) Goodness-of-fit tests based on the kernel density estimator. Scand J Stat 32:599–616

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Devroye L (1997) Universal smoothing factor selection in density estimation: theory and practice (with discussion). Test 6:223–320

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Devroye L, Györfi L (1985) Nonparametric density estimation: the L 1 view. Wiley, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Devroye L, Györfi L, Lugosi G (1996) A probabilistic theory of pattern recognition. Springer, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Devroye L, Lugosi G (2001) Combinatorial methods in density estimation. Springer, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Dudley RM (1978) Central limit theorems for empirical measures. Ann Probab 6:899–929

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Dudley RM (2002) Real analysis and probability. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • James LF, Priebe CE, Marchette DJ (2001) Consistent estimation of mixture complexity. Ann Stat 29:1281–1296

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • McDiarmid C (1989) On the method of bounded differences. In: Surveys in combinatorics 1989, pp 148–188. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagaev SV (1965) Some limit theorems for large deviations. Teor Verojatn Primen 10:231–254 (Russian)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Priebe CE (1994) Adaptive mixtures. J Am Stat Assoc 89:796–806

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers GW, Marchette DJ, Priebe CE (1995) A procedure for model complexity selection in semiparametric model mixture density estimation. In: Proceedings of the 10th international conference on mathematics and computer modelling, 1995

  • Vapnik VN, Chervonenkis AYa (1971) On the uniform convergence of relative frequencies of events to their probabilities. Theory Probab Appl 16:264–280

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Yatracos YG (1985) Rates of convergence of minimum distance estimators and Kolmogorov’s entropy. Ann Stat 13:768–774

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gérard Biau.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Biau, G., Cadre, B., Devroye, L. et al. Strongly consistent model selection for densities. TEST 17, 531–545 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11749-006-0042-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11749-006-0042-6

Keywords

Mathematics Subject Classification (2000)

Navigation