Skip to main content
Log in

Console and bedside surgeon fused robot-assisted thoracic surgery

  • How to Do It
  • Published:
General Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the last decade, even thoracic surgery has seen an increase in the use of robotic surgical systems, and robot-assisted thoracic surgery (RATS) is considered one of the main issues. While RATS is associated with solo manipulative freedom and high-definition optical systems, several disadvantages, such as the lack of tactile sensation and difficult learning curves for the whole team, have been raised. Therefore, to overcome these issues, we developed a ‘fusion surgery’ approach combining a robotic procedure with manual maneuvers, where the table surgeon retracts the lung and staples the pulmonary vasculature and bronchus. Herein, we introduce our ‘fusion surgery’ procedure and elaborate on its advantage from technical and educational perspectives.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Nakamura H, Suda T, Ikeda N, Okada M, Date H, Oda M, et al. Initial results of robot-assisted thoracoscopic surgery in Japan. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014;62:720–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Kanzaki R, Inoue M, Minami M, Shintani Y, Nakagiri T, Funaki S, et al. Surgery for pulmonary malignancies in patients with a previous history of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Surg Today. 2014;44:646–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Mattioni G, Palleschi A, Mendogni P, Tosi D. Approaches and outcomes of robotic-assisted thoracic surgery (RATS) for lung cancer: a narrative review. J Robot Surg. 2022;17:797–809.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Melfi FM, Menconi GF, Mariani AM, Angeletti CA. Early experience with robotic technology for thoracoscopic surgery. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2002;21:864–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Li R, Ma Z, Li Y, Qu C, Qiu J, Zhang Y, et al. Robotic-assisted thoracoscopic surgery improves perioperative outcomes in overweight and obese patients with non-small-cell lung cancer undergoing lobectomy: a propensity score matching analysis. Thorac Cancer. 2022;13:2606–15.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The authors declare no funding resources.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shinya Tane.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Yugo Tanaka received lecture fee from Ethicon, Inc (Cincinnati, OH, USA). All the other authors declare no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (MOV 14581 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tane, S., Tanaka, Y., Nishikubo, M. et al. Console and bedside surgeon fused robot-assisted thoracic surgery. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 71, 730–732 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11748-023-01964-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11748-023-01964-1

Keywords

Navigation