Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Early chest drain removal on the day of uniportal thoracoscopic segmentectomy

  • Original Article
  • Published:
General Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

Although early removal of postoperative chest drains can facilitate recovery, it can be difficult to achieve in segmentectomy due to the management of air leakage in intersegmental planes. This study prospectively examined the feasibility of drain removal on the same day of uniportal thoracoscopic segmentectomy.

Methods

Twenty patients who underwent uniportal thoracoscopic segmentectomy between July 2021 and May 2022 were enrolled in this prospective study. The indications for drain removal on the day of surgery were absence of air leakage in an intraoperative sealing test, radiographic evidence of lung expansion, and continuous absence of air leakage via a drainage bottle for 4 h after the operation. The primary endpoint was rate of the patients who required re-drainage after the postoperative drainage tube was removed on the day of surgery. The secondary end points were postoperative pain evaluated using a numerical rating scale on postoperative days 1, 7, and 28; morbidity; and postoperative hospitalization period.

Results

Fifteen patients successfully underwent drain removal on the day of surgery. None required re-drainage. The mean postoperative hospitalization period was 2.3 ± 1.7 days. Overall, 12 of the 15 (80%) patients were discharged on postoperative day 1 or 2. The mean numerical rating scale scores were 1.2 ± 1.6, 0.4 ± 0.7, and 0.4 ± 1.5 on postoperative days 1, 7, and 28, respectively.

Conclusion

In uniportal thoracoscopic segmentectomy, drain removal on the day of surgery is feasible and may reduce pain on postoperative day 1.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data related to this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

  1. Rocco G, Martin-Ucar A, Passera E. Uniportal VATS wedge pulmonary resections. Ann Thorac Surg. 2004;77:726–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Gonzalez D, Paradela M, Garcia J, et al. Single-port video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2011;12:514–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Al-Ameri M, Sachs E, Sartipy U, Jackson V. Uniportal versus multiportal video-assisted thoracic surgery for lung cancer. J Thorac Dis. 2019;11:5152–61.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Xiang Z, Wu B, Zhang X, Wei Y, Xu J, Zhang W. Uniportal versus multiportal video-assisted thoracoscopic segmentectomy for non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Today. 2023;53:293–305.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Harris CG, James RS, Tian DH, Yan TD, Doyle MP, Gonzalez-Rivas D, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of uniportal versus multiportal video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy for lung cancer. Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2016;5:76–84.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Bourdages-Pageau E, Vieira A, Lacasse Y, Figueroa PU. Outcomes of uniportal vs multiportal video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2020;32:145–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Dai W, Dai Z, Wei X, Pompili C, Shi QL, Xie TP, et al. Early patient-Reported outcomes after uniportal vs multiportal thoracoscopic lobectomy. Ann Thorac Surg. 2022;114:1229–37.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Matsuura N, Igai H, Ohsawa F, Yazawa T, Kamiyoshihara M (2021) Uniport vs. multiport video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for anatomical lung resection-which is less invasive?. J Thorac Dis 13: 244–251

  9. Igai H, Matsuura N, Numajiri K, Ohsawa F, Kamiyoshihara M. Feasibility of tubeless thoracoscopic bullectomy in primary spontaneous pneumothorax patients. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2023;71:138–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Matsuura N, Igai H, Ohsawa F, Numajiri K, Kamiyoshihara M. Novel thoracoscopic segmentectomy combining preoperative three-dimensional image simulation and intravenous administration of indocyanine green. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2022;35:ivac064. https://doi.org/10.1093/icvts/ivac064.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Brunelli A. Uncommon pulmonary anatomic segmentectomies: state of the art and technical aspects. J Vis Surg. 2018;4:175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Saji H, Okada M, Tsuboi M, Nakajima R, Suzuki K, Aokage K, et al. Segmentectomy versus lobectomy in small-sized peripheral non-small-cell lung cancer (JCOG0802/WJCOG4607L): a multicentre, open-label, phase 3, randomized, controlled, non-inferiority trial. Lancet. 2022;399:1607–17.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Suzuki K, Saji H, Aokage K, Watanabe SI, Okada M, Mizusawa J, et al.; West Japan Oncology Group; Japan Clinical Oncology Group (2019) Comparison of pulmonary segmentectomy and lobectomy: safety results of a randomized trial. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 158: 895–907

  14. Liu CY, Hsu PK, Leong KI, Ting CK, Tsou MY (2020) Is tubeless uniportal video-assisted thoracic surgery for pulmonary wedge resection a safe procedure?. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 58(Suppl-1): i70–i76

  15. Liu CY, Hsu PK, Chien HC, Hsieh CC, Ting CK, Tsou MY. Tubeless single-port thoracoscopic sublobar resection: indication and safety. J Thorac Dis. 2018;10:3729–37.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Yang SM, Wang ML, Hung MH, Hsu HH, Cheng YJ, Chen JS. Tubeless uniportal thoracoscopic wedge resection for peripheral lung nodules. Ann Thorax Surg. 2017;103:462–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Murakami J, Ueda K, Tanaka T, Kobayashi T, Kunihiro Y, Hamano K. The validation of a no-drain policy after thoracoscopic major lung resection. Ann Thorac Surg. 2017;104:1005–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Pfeuty K, Lenot B. Early postoperative day 0 chest tube removal using a digital drainage device protocol after thoracoscopic major pulmonary resection. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2020;31:657–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Chen X, Jin R, Xiang J, et al. Methods for dissecting intersegmental planes in segmentectomy: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Thorac Surg. 2020;110:258–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Matsumoto M, Shiraishi K, Yamamoto H, et al. Division of the intersegmental plane using electrocautery for segmentectomy in clinical stage I non-small cell lung cancer. J Thorac Dis. 2018;10:S1215–21.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Igai H, Matsuura N, Kamiyoshihara M. Uniportal thoracoscopic right anterior basal (S8) segmentectomy using unidirectional dissection. Multimed Man Cardiothorac Surg. 2021;21:2021. https://doi.org/10.1510/mmcts.2021.021.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Igai H, Kamiyoshihara M, Matsuura N. Uniportal thoracoscopic apical (S1) segmentectomy of the right upper lobe via an anterior approach. Multimed Man Cardiothorac Surg. 2021;21:2021. https://doi.org/10.1510/mmcts.2021.051.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Koh JC, Song Y, Kim SY, Park S, Ko SH, Han DW. Postoperative pain and patient-controlled epidural analgesia-related adverse effects in young and elderly patients: a retrospective analysis of 2435 patients. J Pain Res. 2017;10:897–904.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to the surgeons and the teams who participated in the study, the editors, and the reviewers for their assistance with the manuscript.

Funding

The study had no externally funding.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

HI: conceptualization; formal analysis; investigation; and writing of the original draft. MK: project administration. KN: writing, review, and editing. FO: writing, review, and editing. NM: writing, review, and editing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hitoshi Igai.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Igai, H., Matsuura, N., Numajiri, K. et al. Early chest drain removal on the day of uniportal thoracoscopic segmentectomy. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 71, 700–707 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11748-023-01951-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11748-023-01951-6

Keywords

Navigation