Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Is conventional management of primary spontaneous pneumothorax appropriate?

  • Original Article
  • Published:
General Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

This study aimed to evaluate the recurrence rate after primary and secondary conservative treatments and to clarify the validity of current primary spontaneous pneumothorax management by comparing secondary conservative treatment and surgical outcomes.

Methods

Data from 166 patients with primary spontaneous pneumothorax treated at a single site between September 2015 and March 2019 were retrospectively evaluated. Patient characteristics of those who received primary conservative therapy (n = 166) and secondary conservative therapy (n = 28) were summarized. The outcomes from patients who experienced recurrence (n = 64) were compared based on those who underwent surgery (n = 24) and those who underwent secondary conservative therapy (n = 28).

Results

The post-treatment day 60 recurrence rate was 27.1 and 49.5% cases in the primary and secondary treatment groups, respectively, which was significantly higher after secondary treatment than after primary treatment with conservative therapy (p = 0.032). The post-treatment one-year recurrence rate was 13.5 and 57.9% in patients who underwent surgery and secondary conservative treatment, respectively; secondary conservative treatment resulted in a significantly higher recurrence rate than surgery (p < 0.001).

Conclusions

There is evidence for guidelines that recommend surgery for recurrent primary spontaneous pneumothorax after primary conservative therapy based on its lower and more delayed post-treatment recurrence rate than secondary treatment with conservative therapy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Baumann MH, Strange C, Heffner JE, Light R, Kirby TJ, Klein J, et al. Management of spontaneous pneumothorax: an American College of Chest Physicians Delphi consensus statement. Chest. 2001;119:590–602.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. MacDuff A, Arnold A, Harvey J. Management of spontaneous pneumothorax: British Thoracic Society Pleural Disease Guideline. Thorax. 2010;65(Suppl 2):ii18-31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Tschopp JM, Bintcliffe O, Astoul P, Canalis E, Driesen P, Janssen J, et al. ERS task force statement: diagnosis and treatment of primary spontaneous pneumothorax. Eur Respir J. 2015;46:321–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Chen JS, Chan WK, Tsai KT, Hsu HH, Lin CY, Yuan A, et al. Simple aspiration and drainage and intrapleural minocycline pleurodesis versus simple aspiration and drainage for the initial treatment of primary spontaneous pneumothorax: an open-label, parallel-group, prospective, randomized, controlled trial. Lancet. 2013;381:1277–82.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Sadikot RT, Greene T, Meadows K, Arnold AG. Recurrence of primary spontaneous pneumothorax. Thorax. 1997;52:805–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Park S, Jang HJ, Song JH, Bae SY, Kim H, Nam SH, et al. Do blebs or bullae on high-resolution computed tomography predict ipsilateral recurrence in young patients at the first episode of primary spontaneous pneumothorax? Korean J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2019;52:91–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Chambers A, Scarci M. In patients with first-episode primary spontaneous pneumothorax is video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery superior to tube thoracostomy alone in terms of time to resolution of pneumothorax and incidence of recurrence? Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2009;9:1003–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Huang H, Ji H, Tian H. Risk factors for recurrence of primary spontaneous pneumothorax after thoracoscopic surgery. Biosci Trends. 2015;9:193–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Noh D, Lee S, Haam SJ, Paik HC, Lee DY. Recurrence of primary spontaneous pneumothorax in young adults and children. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2015;21:195–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Nakayama T, Takahashi Y, Uehara H, Matsutani N, Kawamura M. Outcome and risk factors of recurrence after thoracoscopic bullectomy in young adults with primary spontaneous pneumothorax. Surg Today. 2017;47:859–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Schramel FM, Sutedja TG, Braber JC, van Mourik JC, Postmus PE. Cost-effectiveness of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery versus conservative treatment for first time or recurrent spontaneous pneumothorax. Eur Respir J. 1996;9:1821–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Sawada S, Watanabe Y, Moriyama S. Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for primary spontaneous pneumothorax: evaluation of indications and long-term outcome compared with conservative treatment and open thoracotomy. Chest. 2005;127:2226–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Tsuboshima K, Matoba Y, Wakahara T, Maniwa Y. Natural history of bulla neogenesis for primary spontaneous pneumothorax: a propensity score analysis. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2019;67:464–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kim D, Shin HJ, Kim SW, Hong JM, Lee KS, Lee SH. Psychological problems of pneumothorax according to resilience, stress, and post-traumatic stress. Psychiatry Investig. 2017;14:795–800.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Lee SH, Choi H, Kim S, Choi TK, Lee S, Kim B, et al. Association between anger and first-onset primary spontaneous pneumothorax. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2008;30:331–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Noppen M, Alexander P, Driesen P, Slabbynck H, Verstraeten A. Manual aspiration versus chest tube drainage in first episodes of primary spontaneous pneumothorax: a multicenter, prospective, randomized pilot study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2002;165:1240–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Chen J, Volpi S, Ali JM, Aresu G, Wu L, Chen Z, et al. Comparison of post-operative pain and quality of life between uniportal subxiphoid and intercostal video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy. J Thorac Dis. 2020;12:3582–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

None declared.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Pneumothorax Research Center and Division of Thoracic Surgery, Nissan Tamagawa Hospital, 4-8-1 Seta Setagaya-ku, Tokyo, 158-0095, Japan

    Kenji Tsuboshima, Masatoshi Kurihara, Yuto Nonaka & Takahiro Ochi

Authors
  1. Kenji Tsuboshima
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Masatoshi Kurihara
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Yuto Nonaka
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Takahiro Ochi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Masatoshi Kurihara.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tsuboshima, K., Kurihara, M., Nonaka, Y. et al. Is conventional management of primary spontaneous pneumothorax appropriate?. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 69, 716–721 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11748-020-01535-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11748-020-01535-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation