Skip to main content
Log in

Efficacy of preoperative electrocardiographic-gated computed tomography in predicting the accurate aortic annulus diameter in surgical aortic valve replacement

  • Original Article
  • Published:
General Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

Electrocardiographic (ECG)-gated computed tomography (CT) can be used to determine which valve and size should be used in transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). It is beneficial to predict the accurate annulus diameter in surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR), which can help in determining the surgical strategy. We aimed to compare the predicted aortic annulus size with the actual annulus size measured intraoperatively and to examine its validity.

Methods

A total of 88 patients underwent isolated or concomitant SAVR in 2018 at our hospital. The study population consisted of 45 patients who underwent preoperative CT assessment and intraoperative measurement. The perimeter- and area-derived diameters at the level of basal attachments were determined using CT, and the lower value among the two was defined as the predicted aortic annulus (CTpredict). The predicted aortic annulus (TTEpredict) was measured by transthoracic echography in the parasternal long-axis view. An actual-sized ball sizer was inserted into the annulus intraoperatively. True annulus size was determined as the labeled size that just fits on the annulus, and labeled size plus 1 mm was determined as one that passes through the annulus.

Results

There was better agreement with minimal bias between CTpredict and true annulus size as demonstrated in the Bland–Altman analysis with an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.796 compared with TTEpredict.

Conclusion

ECG-gated CT is also helpful in predicting the annulus diameter even in patients undergoing SAVR. This has important clinical implications for planning SAVR, including the surgical approach.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Tops LF, Wood DA, Delgado V, Schuijf JD, Mayo JR, Pasupati S, et al. Noninvasive evaluation of the aortic root with multislice computed tomography. Implications for transcatheter aortic valve replacement. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2008;1(3):321–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. George I, Guglielmetti LC, Bettinger N, Moss A, Wang C, Kheysin N, et al. Aortic valve annular sizing intraoperative assessment versus preoperative multidetector computed tomography. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017;10(5):1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Kasel AM, Cassese S, Bleiziffer S, Amaki M, Hahn RT, Kastrati A, et al. Standardized imaging for aortic annular sizing: implications for transcatheter valve selection. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2013;6(2):249–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Tsuneyoshi H, Komiya T, Shimamoto T. Accuracy of aortic annulus diameter measurement: comparison of multi-detector CT, two- and three-dimensional echocardiography. J Card Surg. 2016;31(1):18–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Kempfert J, Van Linden A, Lehmkuhl L, Rastan AJ, Holzhey D, Blumenstein J, et al. Aortic annulus sizing: echocardiographic versus computed tomography derived measurements in comparison with direct surgical sizing. Eur J Cardio-thoracic Surg. 2012;42(4):627–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Binder RK, Webb JG, Willson AB, Urena M, Hansson NC, Norgaard BL, et al. The impact of integration of a multidetector computed tomography annulus area sizing algorithm on outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve replacement: a prospective, multicenter, controlled trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;62(5):431–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ingimarsdóttir IJ, Hellgren Johansson L, Flachskampf FA. Preoperative aortic annulus size assessment by transthoracic echocardiography compared to the size of surgically implanted aortic prostheses. Echo Res Pract. 2019;6(2):37–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Wang H, Hanna JM, Ganapathi A, Keenan JE, Hurwitz LM, Vavalle JP, et al. Comparison of aortic annulus size by transesophageal echocardiography and computed tomography angiography with direct surgical measurement. Am J Cardiol. 2015;115(11):1568–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

All authors would like to thank Enago (www.enago.jp) for the English review.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Satoshi Kimura.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

All authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kimura, S., Ushijima, T., Fujita, S. et al. Efficacy of preoperative electrocardiographic-gated computed tomography in predicting the accurate aortic annulus diameter in surgical aortic valve replacement. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 69, 466–471 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11748-020-01469-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11748-020-01469-1

Keywords

Navigation