Skip to main content
Log in

Outcomes of mitral valve replacement with bileaflet mechanical prosthetic valve in children

  • Original Article
  • Published:
General Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

We examined the outcomes following mitral valve replacement with bileaflet mechanical prosthetic valve in children and identified the predictors for mortality and reoperation.

Methods

Medical records from 49 children who underwent mitral valve replacement between 1982 and 2015 were reviewed retrospectively. Median age and body weight at initial mitral valve replacement were 2.4 years and 9.7 kg, respectively. The median follow-up was 13 years. Surgical results and predictors for mortality and reoperation were investigated.

Results

There was no operative mortality; eight late deaths occurred. The actuarial survival rates were 89.5%, 84.2%, and 80.7% at 5, 10, and 15 years, respectively, after initial mitral valve replacement. The actuarial freedom rates from related complications were 89.5%, 78.3%, and 70.7% at 5, 10, and 15 years, respectively. Nineteen patients required 1st re-mitral valve replacement at a median of 5.9 years; six of these 19 required 2nd re-mitral valve replacement at a median of 8.9 years after 1st re-MVR. The actuarial freedom rates from re-mitral valve replacement were 86.0%, 56.8%, and 44.2% at 5, 10, and 15 years, respectively. No predictor for death was determined; however, the predictor for re-mitral valve replacement was initial valve diameter less than 19 mm.

Conclusions

Survival outcomes among children after mitral valve replacement with bileaflet mechanical prosthetic valve in biventricular heart were satisfactory. However, complications, including re-mitral valve replacement, were frequent and the predictor was of a small prosthesis size.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Oda S, Nakano T, Tatewaki H, Hinokiyama K, Machida D, Kado H. A 17-year experience with mitral valve repair with artificial chordae in infants and children. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2013;44:e40–e4545.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ando M, Takahashi Y. Durability of mitral valve repair performed before the age of 5 years. Circ J. 2016;80:124–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Chauvaud S, Fuzellier JF, Houel R, Berrebi A, Mihaileanu S, Carpentier A. Reconstructive surgery in congenital mitral valve insufficiency (Carpentier’s technique): long-term results. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1998;115:84–93.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Alsoufi B, Manlhiot C, McCrindle BW, Al-Halees Z, Sallehuddin A, Al-Oufi A, et al. Results after mitral valve replacement with mechanical prosthesis in young children. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2010;139:1189–1196.e2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Henaine R, Nloga J, Wautot F, Yoshimura N, Rabilloud M, Obadia JF, et al. Long-term outcome after annular mechanical mitral valve replacement in children aged less than 5 years. Ann Thorac Surg. 2010;90:1570–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Cardarone CA, Reghuveer G, Hills CB, Atkins DL, Burns TL, Behrendt DM, et al. Long-term survival after mitral valve replacement in children aged %3c 5 years: a multi-institutional study. Circulation. 2001;104:I-143–I-147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Myers PO, del Nido PJ, Mcelhinney DB, Khalpey Z, Lock JE, Baird CW. Annulus upsizing for mitral valve re-replacement in children. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2013;146:347–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Sim HT, Lee SC, Shin HJ, Park JJ, Yun TJ, Jyang WK, et al. Mitral valve replacement using mechanical prostheses in children: early and long-term outcomes. Pediatr Cardiol. 2012;33:639–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Brown JW, Fiore AC, Ruzmetov M, Eltayeb O, Rodefeld MD, Turrentine MW. Evolution of mitral valve replacement in children: a 40-year experience. Ann Thorac Surg. 2012;93:626–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Alsoufi B, Manlhiot C, Al-Ahmadi M, McCrindle BW, Kalloghlian A, Siblini G, et al. Outcomes and associated risk factors for mitral valve replacement in children. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2011;40:543–51.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Moon J, Hoashi T, Kagisaki K, Kurosaki K, Shiraishi I, Ichikawa H. Clinical outcomes of mitral valve replacement with the 16-mm ATS advanced performance valve in neonates and infants. Ann Thorac Surg. 2015;99:653–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Friedman S, Edmunds H, Cuasi CC. Long-term mitral valve replacement in young children: influence of somatic growth on prosthetic valve adequacy. Circulation. 1978;57:981–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Yoshimura N, Yamaguchi M, Oshima Y, Oka S, Ootaki Y, Murakami H, et al. Surgery for mitral valve disease in the pediatric age group. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1999;118:99–106.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Masuda M, Kado H, Tatewaki H, Shiokawa Y, Yasui H. Late results after mitral valve replacement with bileaflet mechanical prosthesis in children: evaluation of prosthesis-patient mismatch. Ann Thorac Surg. 2004;77:913–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Higashita R, Ichikawa S, Niinami H, Ban T, Suda Y, Takeuchi Y. Long-term results after Starr–Edwards mitral valve replacement in children aged 5 years or younger. Ann Thorac Surg. 2003;75:826–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kanda Y. Investigation of the freely available easy-to-use software ‘EZR’ for medical statics. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2013;48:452–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Selamet Tierney ES, Pigura FA, Berul CI, Lock JE, Del Nido PJ, McElhinney DB. Mitral valve replacement in infants and children 5 years of age or younger: evolution in practice and outcome over three decades with a focus on supra-annular prosthesis implantation. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2008;136:954–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Eble BK, Fiser WP, Simpson P, Dugan J, Drummond-Webb JJ, Yetman AT. Mitral valve replacement in children: predictors of long-term outcomes. Ann Thorac Surg. 2003;76:853–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Sawan EB, Brink J, Soquet J, Liava AM, Brizard CP, Konstantinov IE, et al. The ordeal of left atrioventricular vlave replacement in children under 1 year of age. Interact CardioVasc Thorac Surg. 2017;25:317–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Alexiou C, Galogavrou M, Chen Q, Mcdonald A, Salmon AP, Keeton BK, et al. Mitral valve replacement with mechanical prostheses in children: improved operative risk and survival. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2001;20:105–13.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Ackermann K, Balling G, Eicken A, Günther T, Schreiber C, Hess J. Replacement of the systemic atrioventricular valve with a mechanical prosthesis in children aged less than 6 years: late clinical results of survival and subsequent replacement. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2007;134:750–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Rafii DY, Davies RR, Carroll SJ, Quaegebeur JM, Chen JM. Age less than 2 years is not a risk factor for mortality after mitral valve replacement in children. Ann Thorac Surg. 2011;91:1228–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Kojori F, Chen R, Caldarone CA, Merklinger SL, Azakie A, Williams WG, et al. Outcomes of mitral valve replacement in children: a competing-risks analysis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2004;128:703–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Reghuveer G, Caldarone CA, Hills CB, Atkins DL, Belmont JM, Moller JH. Predictors of prosthesis survival, growth, and functional status following mechanical mitral valve replacement in children aged %3c 5 years, a multi-institutional study. Circulation. 2003; 108(suppl II):II-174–II-179.

  25. Rosenkranz S, Gibbs JS, Wachter R, De Marco T, Vonk-Noordegraaf A, Vachiery JL. Left ventricular heart failure and pulmonary hypertension. Eur Heart J. 2016;37:942–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Vohra HA, Laker S, Stumper O, et al. Predicting the performance of mitral prostheses implanted in children under 5 years of age. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2006;29:688–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Daou L, Sidi D, Mauriat P, Butera G, Kachaner J, Vouhe PR, et al. Mitral valve replacement with mechanical valves in children under 2 years of age. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2001;121:994–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Kanter KR, Kogan BE, Kirshbom PM. Supra-annular mitral valve replacement in children. Ann Thorac Surg. 2011;92:2221–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Editage (www.editage.jp) for English language editing.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Takuya Okamoto.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

All the authors have no conflict of interest to disclose with respect to this study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Okamoto, T., Nakano, T., Goda, M. et al. Outcomes of mitral valve replacement with bileaflet mechanical prosthetic valve in children. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 68, 571–577 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11748-019-01236-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11748-019-01236-x

Keywords

Navigation