Skip to main content
Log in

Comparison of saddle-shape flexibility and elliptical-shape stability between Cosgrove-Edwards and Memo-3D annuloplasty rings using three-dimensional analysis software

  • Original Article
  • Published:
General Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

To compare three-dimensional dynamics between implanted Cosgrove-Edwards and Sorin Memo-3D annuloplasty rings during the cardiac cycle.

Methods

We examined 11 Cosgrove-Edwards rings and 20 Sorin Memo-3D rings after mitral plasty using real-time three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography. We evaluated ring height, ellipticity, and geometry during one cardiac cycle. Four evenly spaced phases each selected during systole and diastole were assessed using REAL VIEW software.

Results

The height of the Cosgrove-Edwards and Sorin Memo-3D rings was similar (2.3 ± 0.8 vs. 1.9 ± 0.9 mm, p = 0.44). The maximum difference in ring height during one cardiac cycle (change in height) was larger for the Cosgrove-Edwards than the Sorin Memo-3D rings (2.3 ± 0.8 vs. 1.5 ± 0.6 mm, p = 0.014). Ellipticity and the maximum difference in ellipticity during one cardiac cycle (change in ellipticity) were larger for Cosgrove-Edwards than Sorin Memo-3D rings (80.0 ± 9.1 vs. 72.0 ± 4.8 %, p = 0.014, respectively, and 12.0 ± 3.1 vs. 6.0 ± 1.8 %, p < 0.001).

Conclusions

Cosgrove-Edwards rings were more flexible, whereas Sorin Memo-3D rings maintained the elliptical shape more effectively.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Levine RA, Handschumacher MD, Sanfilippo AJ, Hagege AA, Harrigan P, Marshall JE, et al. Three-dimensional echocardiographic reconstruction of the mitral valve, with implications for the diagnosis of mitral valve prolapse. Circulation. 1989;80:589–98.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Ryan LP, Jackson BM, Enomoto Y, Parish L, Plappert TJ, St John-Sutton MG, et al. Description of regional mitral annular nonplanarity in healthy human subjects: a novel methodology. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2007;134:644–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Daimon M, Saracino G, Fukuda S, Koyama Y, Kwan J, Song JM, et al. Dynamic change of mitral annular geometry and motion in ischemic mitral regurgitation assessed by a computerized 3D echo method. Echocardiography. 2010;27:1069–77.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kwan J, Qin JX, Popovic ZB, Agler DA, Thomas JD, Shiota T. Geometric changes of mitral annulus assessed by real-time 3-dimensional echocardiography: becoming enlarged and less nonplanar in the anteroposterior direction during systole in proportion to global left ventricular systolic function. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2004;17:1179–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Levack MM, Jassar AS, Shang EK, Vergnat M, Woo YJ, Acker MA, et al. Three-dimensional echocardiographic analysis of mitral annular dynamics: implication for annuloplasty selection. Circulation. 2012;126:S183–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Miura T, Ariyoshi T, Tanigawa K, Matsukuma S, Yokose S, Sumi M, et al. Technical aspects of mitral valve repair in Barlow’s valve with prolapse of both leaflets: triangular resection for excess tissue, sophisticated chordal replacement, and their combination (the restoration technique). Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2015;63:61–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Pressman GS, Movva R, Topilsky Y, Clavel MA, Saldanha JA, Watanabe N, et al. Mitral annular dynamics in mitral annular calcification: a three-dimensional imaging study. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2015;28:786–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Gorman JH 3rd, Gupta KB, Streicher JT, Gorman RC, Jackson BM, Ratcliffe MB, et al. Dynamic three-dimensional imaging of the mitral valve and left ventricle by rapid sonomicrometry array localization. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1996;112:712–26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Salgo IS, Gorman JH, Gorman RC, Jackson BM, Bowen FW, Plappert T, et al. Effect of annular shape on leaflet curvature in reducing mitral leaflet stress. Circulation. 2002;106:711–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Jimenez JH, Liou SW, Padala M, He Z, Sacks M, Gorman RC, et al. A saddle-shaped annulus reduces systolic strain on the central region of the mitral valve anterior leaflet. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2007;134:1562–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Padala M, Hutchison RA, Croft LR, Jimenez JH, Gorman RC, Gorman JH 3rd, et al. Saddle shape of the mitral annulus reduces systolic strains on the P2 segment of the posterior mitral leaflet. Ann Thorac Surg. 2009;88:1499–504.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Jassar AS, Vergnat M, Jackson BM, McGarvey JR, Cheung AT, Ferrari G, et al. Regional annular geometry in patients with mitral regurgitation: implications for annuloplasty ring selection. Ann Thorac Surg. 2014;97:64–70.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Lee AP, Hsiung MC, Salgo IS, Fang F, Xie JM, Zhang YC, et al. Quantitative analysis of mitral valve morphology in mitral valve prolapse with real-time 3-dimensional echocardiography: importance of annular saddle shape in the pathogenesis of mitral regurgitation. Circulation. 2013;127:832–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Itoh A, Ennis DB, Bothe W, Swanson JC, Krishnamurthy G, Nguyen TC, et al. Mitral annular hinge motion contribution to changes in mitral septal-lateral dimension and annular area. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2009;138:1090–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Rausch MK, Bothe W, Kvitting JP, Swanson JC, Ingels NB Jr, Miller DC, et al. Characterization of mitral valve annular dynamics in the beating heart. Ann Biomed Eng. 2011;39:1690–702.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Topilsky Y, Vaturi O, Watanabe N, Bichara V, Nkomo VT, Michelena H, et al. Real-time 3-dimensional dynamics of functional mitral regurgitation: a prospective quantitative and mechanistic study. J Am Heart Assoc. 2013;2:e000039.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Dagum P, Timek T, Green GR, Daughters GT, Liang D, Ingels NB Jr, et al. Three-dimensional geometric comparison of partial and complete flexible mitral annuloplasty rings. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2001;122:665–73.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Owais K, Kim H, Khabbaz KR, Bergman R, Matyal R, Gorman RC, et al. In-vivo analysis of selectively flexible mitral annuloplasty rings using three-dimensional echocardiography. Ann Thorac Surg. 2014;97:2005–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Bruno PG, Leva C, Santambrogio L, Lazzarini I, Musazzi G, Del Rosso G, et al. Early clinical experience and echocardiographic results with a new semirigid mitral annuloplasty ring: the Sorin Memo 3D. Ann Thorac Surg. 2009;88:1492–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Santarpino G, Pfeiffer S, Fischlein T. First-in-man implantation of a Sorin Memo 3D ring: mitral annular flexibility is still preserved at 5 years of follow-up! Int J Cardiol. 2012;159:e23–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Ryomoto M, Mitsuno M, Yamamura M, Tanaka H, Fukui S, Tsujiya N, et al. Is physiologic annular dynamics preserved after mitral valve repair with rigid or semirigid ring? Ann Thorac Surg. 2014;97:492–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Okada Y, Shomura T, Yamaura Y, Yoshikawa J. Comparison of the Carpentier and Duran prosthetic rings used in mitral reconstruction. Ann Thorac Surg. 1995;59:658–62 (discussion 62–3).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Chang BC, Youn YN, Ha JW, Lim SH, Hong YS, Chung N. Long-term clinical results of mitral valvuloplasty using flexible and rigid rings: a prospective and randomized study. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2007;133:995–1003.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Silberman S, Klutstein MW, Sabag T, Oren A, Fink D, Merin O, et al. Repair of ischemic mitral regurgitation: comparison between flexible and rigid annuloplasty rings. Ann Thorac Surg. 2009;87:1721–6 (discussion 6–7).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We are Grateful Dr. Shiro Yamachika and the sonographers at the ultrasound imaging center in our hospital for invaluable assistance.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Akira Tsuneto.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest disclosure statement

Akira Tsuneto received a research Grant from Japan Lifeline Co., Ltd. (Tokyo, Japan). Koji Maemura received lecture fees from MSD Co,. Ltd. (Tokyo, Japan). None of the other authors has any conflicts of interest to declare.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tsuneto, A., Eishi, K., Miura, T. et al. Comparison of saddle-shape flexibility and elliptical-shape stability between Cosgrove-Edwards and Memo-3D annuloplasty rings using three-dimensional analysis software. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 64, 325–332 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11748-016-0645-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11748-016-0645-0

Keywords

Navigation