Skip to main content
Log in

Adding coronary artery bypass grafting to aortic valve replacement increases operative mortality for elderly (70 years and older) patients with aortic stenosis

  • Original Article
  • Published:
General Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

This retrospective study aimed to determine the effect of simultaneous aortic valve replacement (AVR) and coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) on operative outcomes and long-term survival in elderly patients with a high prevalence of comorbidity.

Methods

One hundred and fifty-seven elderly patients (70 years old or older) undergoing isolated AVR (n = 120) or combined AVR/CABG (n = 37) were evaluated. Operative outcomes were compared between the two surgical groups. Long-term survival was also compared between the groups using the Kaplan–Meier method and long-rank (Mantel–Cox) test.

Results

Operative mortality was 0.8 % for the isolated AVR group and 5.4 % for the combined AVR/CABG group (p = 0.076). The length of the intensive care unit stay for the combined AVR/CABG group was significantly longer than that for the isolated AVR group (median: 40 vs. 21 h, p = 0.008). However, the occurrence rate of hospital complications, such as reoperation for bleeding, deep sternal infection, supra-ventricular arrhythmia, and neurological complications, was similar between the two groups. Actuarial survival at 3 and 5 years was 82.3 and 80.9 % for the isolated AVR group, and 88.3 and 73.0 % for the combined AVR/CABG group, respectively (p = 0.637).

Conclusions

The satisfactory operative and long-term results in our study support a more aggressive simultaneous coronary revascularization combined with AVR for aortic valve stenosis in elderly patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bonow RO, Carabello BA, Chatterjee K, de Leon AC, Faxon DP, Freed MD, et al. ACC/AHA 2006 guide lines for the management of patients with valvular heart disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006; 48:e1–148.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kurlansky PA, Williams DB, Traad EA, Carrillo RG, Zucker M, Ebra G. Surgical management of aortic valve disease in elderly patients with and without coronary artery disease: influence on quality of life. J Cardiovasc Surg. 2007;48:215–26.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Brunvald H, Offstad J, Nitter-Hauge S, Svennevig JL. Coronary artery bypass grafting combined with aortic valve replacement in healthy octogenarians does not increase postoperative risk. Scand Cardiovasc J. 2002;36:297–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Maslow A, Casey P, Poppas A, Schwartz C, Singh A. Aortic valve replacement with or without coronary artery bypass graft surgery: the risk of surgery in patients ≧80 years old. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2010;24:18–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Roberts WC, MiKo J, Garner WL, Filardo G, Henry AC, Hebeler RF, et al. Valve structure and survival in octogenarians having aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis (±aortic regurgitation) with versus without coronary artery bypass grafting at a single US medical center (1993 to 2005). Am J Cardiol. 2007;100:489–95.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Lytle BW. Impact of coronary artery disease on valvular heart disease. Cardiol Clin. 1991;9:301–14.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Czer LSC, Gray RJ, Stewart ME, Aurelio Chaux RB, Matloff JM. Reduction in sudden late death by concomitant revascularization with aortic valve replacement. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1988;95:390–1.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Karp RB, Mills N, Edmunds LH Jr. Coronary artery bypass grafting in the presence of valvular disease. Circulation. 1989;79(Suppl I):182–4.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kobayashi KJ, Williams JA, Nwakanma L, Gott VL, Baumgartner WA, Conte JV. Aortic valve replacement and concomitant coronary artery bypass: assessing the impact of multiple grafts. Ann Thorac Surg. 2007;83:969–78.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Alsoufi B, Karamlou T, Slater M, Shen I, Ungerleider R, Ravichandran P. Results of concomitant aortic valve replacement and coronary artery bypass grafting in VA population. J Heart Valve Dis. 2006;15:12–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Flameng W, Szécsi J, Sergeant P, Danen W, Herijger P, Scheys I. Combined valve and coronary artery bypass surgery: early and late results. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 1994;8:410–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Mullany CJ, Elveback LR, Frye RL, Pluth JR, Edwards W, Orszulak TA, et al. Coronary artery disease and its management: Influence on survival in patients undergoing aortic valve replacement. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1987;10:66–72.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Gehlot A, Mullany CJ, Ilstrup D, Schaff HV, Orszulak TA, Morris JJ, et al. Aortic valve replacement in patients aged eighty years and older: early and long-term results. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1996;111:1026–36.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Loop FD, Lytle BW, Cosgrove DM, Stewart RW, Goormastic M, Williams GW, et al. Influence of the internal mammary artery graft on 10-year survival and other cardiac events. N Eng J Med. 1986;314:1–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Gall S, Lowe JE, Wolfe WG, Oldham HN, Van Trigt III, et al. Efficacy of the internal mammary artery in combined aortic valve replacement-coronary artery bypass grafting. Ann Thorac Surg. 2000;69:524–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yasuyuki Sasaki.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sasaki, Y., Hirai, H., Hosono, M. et al. Adding coronary artery bypass grafting to aortic valve replacement increases operative mortality for elderly (70 years and older) patients with aortic stenosis. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 61, 626–631 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11748-013-0232-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11748-013-0232-6

Keywords

Navigation