Skip to main content
Log in

Safety of the paravertebral block in patients ineligible for epidural block undergoing pulmonary resection

  • Original Article
  • Published:
General Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Letter to the Editor to this article was published on 13 February 2014

Abstract

Objective

We previously reported the noninferiority of paravertebral block (PVB) to epidural block. In this study, we assessed whether PVB via an intrathoracic approach was also safe for the patients ineligible for epidural block because of, for example, anticoagulation or antiplatelet therapy.

Methods

Patients admitted to our hospital for pulmonary resection between April 2010 and March 2012, and who were ineligible for epidural block for various reasons, were enrolled in this study. A catheter for PVB was inserted in the operative field by the surgeons just before closing the chest. Ropivacaine of 0.2 % was injected at 4 ml/h using an infuser pump for 5 days. Concurrent use of intravenous patient controlled analgesia (IVPCA) for 2 days with PVB was permitted as a post-operative analgesic at the discretion of anesthesiologists. We estimated the post-operative complications in these patients.

Results

A total of 35 (15.8 %) consecutive patients were enrolled in this study and successfully completed the study protocol. Thirty-two patients received concurrent IVPCA treatment. Post-operative complications due to PVB were not observed, but other complications included 1 incidence of atrial fibrillation, 1 hypertension, 1 pleural fluid accumulation, 1 respiratory failure requiring mechanical ventilation, and 1 of late chest pain requiring intercostal nerve block.

Conclusion

This study suggests that PVB is safe in patients ineligible for epidural block and can contribute to their pain relief following pulmonary resection procedure including video-assisted thoracic surgery.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ballantyne JC, Carr DB, deFerranti S, Suarez T, Lau J, Chalmers TC, et al. The comparative effects of postoperative analgesic therapies on pulmonary outcome: cumulative meta-analyses of randomized, controlled trials. Anesth Analg. 1998;86:598–612.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Licker M, Spiliopoulos A, Frey JG, Robert J, Höhn L, de Perrot M, et al. Risk factors for early mortality and major complications following pneumonectomy for non-small cell carcinoma of the lung. Chest. 2002;121:1890–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Kobayashi R, Mori S, Wakai K, Fukumoto K, Saito T, Katayama T, et al. Paravertebral block via the surgical field versus epidural block for patients undergoing thoracotomy: a randomized clinical trial. Jpn J Surg (in press)

  4. Interview Form (Drug Information). AstraZeneka.2011.

  5. Lee JJ, Choi SS, Lee MK, Lim BG, Hur W. Effect of continuous psoas compartment block and intravenous patient controlled analgesia on postoperative pain control after total knee arthroplasty. Korean J Anesthesiol. 2012;62:47–51.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Sabanathan S, Mearns AJ, Bickford Smith PJ, Eng J, Berrisford RG, Bibby SR, et al. Efficacy of continuous extrapleural intercostals nerve block on post-thoracotomy pain and pulmonary mechanics. Br J Surg. 1988;46:221–5.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Sabanathan S, Richardson J, Shah R. Continuous intercostal nerve block for pain relief after thoracotomy. Ann Thorac Surg. 1995;59:1261–3.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Eng J, Sabanathan S. Continuous paravertebral block for postthoracotomy analgesia in children. J Pediatr Surg. 1992;27:556–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Richardson J, Sabanathan S, Mearns AJ, Shah RD, Goulden C. A prospective, randomized comparison of interpleural and paravertebral analgesia in thoracic surgery. Br J Anaesth. 1995;75:405–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Richardson J, Sabanathan S, Jones J, Shah RD, Cheema S, Mearns AJ. A prospective, randomized comparison of preoperative and continuous balanced epidural or paravertebral bupivacaine on post-thoracotomy pain, pulmonary function and stress responses. Br J Anaesth. 1999;83:387–92.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Davies RG, Myles PS, Graham JM. A comparison of the analgesic efficacy and side-effects of paravertebral vs. epidural blockade for thoracotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials. Br J Anaesth. 2006;96:418–26.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We greatly appreciate the anesthesia performed during the operation by Dr. Miwako Nakao and all anesthetists in our hospital.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tatsuya Katayama.

Additional information

A comment to this article is available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11748-014-0370-5.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Katayama, T., Hirai, S., Kobayashi, R. et al. Safety of the paravertebral block in patients ineligible for epidural block undergoing pulmonary resection. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 60, 811–814 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11748-012-0149-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11748-012-0149-5

Keywords

Navigation