Skip to main content
Log in

Surgical experience with chronic constrictive pericarditis

  • Original Article
  • Published:
General Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

Constrictive pericarditis is a disease characterized by marked thickening of the pericardium which causes restriction of diastolic cardiac function. The purpose of this report is to review the outcome of pericardiectomy for constrictive pericarditis and to discuss its problems.

Methods

Sixteen consecutive patients who underwent pericardiectomy for constrictive pericarditis in our institution between March 2000 and June 2011 were reviewed. All patients underwent decortication including at least the anterior surface from the right atrium to the left phrenic nerve and the diaphragmatic surface of the heart. The epicardium was concomitantly resectioned because it was usually sclerotic and constrictive.

Results

Postoperatively, mean central venous pressure decreased to 8.8 ± 3.1 mmHg and was significantly lower than the preoperative value 15.3 ± 3.7 mmHg (p < 0.001). The mean postoperative duration of hospitalization was 25.6 ± 13.5 days. There were 2 in-hospital deaths and early mortality rate was 12.5 %; however, excluding hospital deaths, there were no significant postoperative complications and all survivors recovered and maintained good cardiac function during the mean follow-up period of 3.7 ± 2.8 years.

Conclusion

For an acceptable outcome, surgical intervention should be performed at an appropriate time and the pericardiectomy should have proper scope and depth to prevent irreversible changes in the heart, liver, and other organs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Rehn L, Sauerbruch F. Cited by White PD. Chronic constrictive pericarditis (Pick’s disease) treated by pericardial resection. Lancet. 1935; 2:539 and 537.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Harrison EC, Crawford DW, Lau FY. Sequential left ventricular function studies before and after pericardiectomy for constrictive pericarditis. Delayed Resolution of residual restriction. Am J Cardiol. 1970;26(3):319–23.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Kloster FE, Crislip RL, Bristow JD, Herr RH, Ritzmann LW, Griswold HE. Hemodynamic studies following pericardiectomy for constrictive pericarditis. Circulation. 1965;32(3):415–24.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Lazarides DP, Avgoustakis DG, Lekos D, Michaelides GB. Evaluation of radical pericardiectomy for constrictive pericarditis: a clinical, hemodynamic and electrocardiographic study of twenty cases. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1966;51(6):821–33.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Das PB, Gupta RP, Sukumar IP, Cherian G, John S. Pericardiectomy. Indications and results. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1973;66(1):58–70.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Majid AA, Omar A. Diagnosis and management of purulent pericarditis. Experience with pericardiectomy. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1991;102(3):413–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Burney DP, Martin CE, Thomas CS, Fisher RD, Bender HW. Rheumatoid pericarditis. Clinical significance and operative management. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1979;77(4):511–5.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Ling LH, Oh JK, Schaff HV, Danielson GK, Mahoney DW, Seward JB, et al. Constrictive pericarditis in the modern era: evolving clinical spectrum and impact on outcome after pericardiectomy. Circulation. 1999;100:1380–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Bertog SC, Thambidorai SK, Parakh K, Schoenhagen P, Ozduran V, Houghtaling PL, et al. Constrictive pericarditis: etiology and cause-specific survival after pericardiectomy. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004;43:1445–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Chowdhury UK, Subramaniam GK, Kumar AS, Arian B, Singh R, Talwar S, et al. Pericardiectomy for constrictive pericarditis: a clinical, echocardiographic, and hemodynamic evaluation of two surgical techniques. Ann Thorac Surg. 2006;81:522–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Viola AR. The influence of pericardiectomy on the hemodynamics of chronic constrictive pericarditis. Circulation. 1973;48(5):1038–42.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Walsh TJ, Baughman KL, Gardner TJ, Bulkley BH. Constrictive epicarditis as a cause of delayed or absent response to pericardiectomy: a clinicopathological study. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1982;83(1):126–32.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Heimbecker RO, Smith D, Shimizu S, Kestle J. Surgical technique for the management of constrictive epicarditis complicating constrictive pericarditis (the waffle procedure). Ann Thorac Surg. 1983;36(5):605–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Himelman RB, Lee E, Schiller NB. Septal bounce, vena cava plethora, and pericardial adhesion: informative two-dimensional echocardiographic signs in the diagnosis of pericardial constriction. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 1988;1(5):333–40.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Oh JK, Hatle LK, Seward JB, Danielson GK, Schaff HV, Reeder GS, et al. Diagnostic role of Doppler echocardiography in constrictive pericarditis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1994;23(1):154–62.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Breen JF. Imaging of the pericardium. J Thorac Imaging. 2001;16(1):47–54.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Verhaert D, Gabriel RS, Johnston D, Lytle BW, Desai MY, Klein AL. The role of multimodality imaging in the management of pericardial disease. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2010;3:333–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Feng D, Glockner J, Kim K, Martinez M, Syed IS, Araoz P, et al. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging pericardial late gadolinium enhancement and elevated inflammatory markers can predict the reversibility of constrictive pericarditis after antiinflammatory medical therapy: a pilot study. Circulation. 2011;124(17):1830–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Rienmüller R, Gürgan M, Erdmann E, Kemkes BM, Kreutzer E, Weinhold C. CT and MR evaluation of pericardial constriction: a new diagnostic and therapeutic concept. J Thorac Imaging. 1993;8:108–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Tirilomis T, Unverdorben S, von der Emde J. Pericardectomy for chronic constrictive pericarditis: risks and outcome. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 1994;8(9):487–92.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Levine HD. Myocardial fibrosis in constrictive pericarditis. Electrocardiographic and pathologic observations. Circulation. 1973;48(6):1268–81.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Tagami H, Utoh J, Kunitomo R, Hagiwara S, Uemura S, Muranaka T, et al. Hepatic function after surgical repair of constrictive pericarditis. Kyobu geka (Jpn J Thorac Surg). 2000;53(7):567–70.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Haley JH, Tajik AJ, Danielson GK, Schaff HV, Mulvagh SL, Oh JK. Transient constrictive pericarditis: causes and natural history. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004;43:271–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tsuneo Ariyoshi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ariyoshi, T., Hashizume, K., Taniguchi, S. et al. Surgical experience with chronic constrictive pericarditis. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 60, 796–802 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11748-012-0129-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11748-012-0129-9

Keywords

Navigation