Skip to main content
Log in

Twelve years of experience with the ATS mechanical heart valve prostheses

  • Original Article
  • Published:
General Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

The ATS Open Pivot mechanical heart valve has been implanted routinely at our institution since 1999. The objective of this study is to retrospectively analyze our 12-year clinical results with ATS prostheses.

Methods

ATS Open Pivot mechanical valves were implanted in 268 adult patients between May 1999 and August 2010. We selected 259 subjects who could be adequately followed (follow-up rate 96.6 %). Aortic valve replacement was performed in 157 patients, mitral valve replacement (MVR) in 71, and double (aortic and mitral) valve replacements (DVR) in 31. Mean age at the time of implant was 58.8 ± 10.6 years. The gender ratio was 128 males/131 females. Mean follow-up was 4.4 ± 7.8 years, and the cumulative follow-up was 1144 patient-years (pt-yr).

Results

Early death within 30 days after the operation occurred in 5 (2.5 %) patients. Late death occurred in 27 patients including valve-related deaths in 13. The 10-year survival rate after the operation was 82.7 ± 2.9 %. The rate of freedom from valve-related death was 92.2 ± 2.2 %. The incidence of valve-related complications was 2.19 %/pt-yr. Of these, the incidence of thromboembolic events and that of bleeding complications were 1.22 and that 0.87 %/pt-yr. The incidence of valve thrombosis was 0.09 %/pt-yr. No structural valve deterioration was observed in any of the three operative procedure groups.

Conclusions

Our 12-year experience with aortic and MVR using the ATS mechanical heart valve demonstrated low incidences of thromboembolic events, bleeding complications, and valve thrombosis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Emery RW, Van Nooten GJ. Investigators for the ATS Clinical Open Pivot Heart Valve Food and Drug Administration Study. The initial experience with the ATS Medical mechanical cardiac valve prosthesis. Ann Thorac Surg. 2003;75:444–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Emery RW, Krogh CC, Jones DJ, Nicoloff DM, Blake DP, Arom KV. Five-year follow up of the ATS mechanical heart valve. J Heart Valve Dis. 2004;13:231–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Nicks R, Cartmill T, Bernstein L. Hypoplasia of the aortic root: the problem of aortic valve replacement. Thorax. 1970;25:339–46.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Akins CW, Miller DC, Turina MI, Kouchoukos NT, Blackstone EH, Grunkemeier GL, et al. Guidelines for reporting mortality and morbidity after cardiac valve interventions. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2008;135:732–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Baykut D, Grize L, Schindler C, Keil AS, Bernet F, Zerkowski HR. Eleven-year single-center experience with the ATS open pivot bileaflet heart valve. Ann Thorac Surg. 2006;82:847–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Aoyagi S, Hori H, Yoshikawa K, Arinaga K, Fukunaga S. Mid-term results of valve replacement with the ATS valve: a seven-year follow up. J Heart Valve Dis. 2007;16:267–74.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Van Nooten GJ, Caes F, François K, Van Belleghem Y, Bové T, Vandenplas G, et al. Fifteen years’ single-center experience with the ATS bileaflet valve. J Heart Valve Dis. 2009;18:444–52.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Sezai A, Hata M, Niino T, Yoshitake I, Kasamaki Y, Hirayama A, et al. Fifteen years of experience with ATS mechanical heart valve prostheses. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2010;139:1494–500.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Nakano K, Koyanagi H, Hashimoto A, Kitamura M, Endo M, Nagashima M, et al. Twelve years’ experience with the St. Jude Medical valve prosthesis. Ann Thorac Surg. 1994;57:697–703.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Aoyagi S, Oryoji A, Nishi Y, Tanaka K, Kosuga K, Oishi K. Long-term results of valve replacement with the St. Jude Medical valve. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1994;108:1021–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Soga Y, Okabayashi H, Nishina T, Enomoto S, Shimada I, Miyamoto TA, et al. Up to 8-year follow-up of valve replacement with carbomedics valve. Ann Thorac Surg. 2002;73:474–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Tominaga R, Kurisu K, Ochiai Y, Tomita Y, Masuda M, Morita S, et al. A 10-year experience with the carbomedics cardiac prosthesis. Ann Thorac Surg. 2005;79:784–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Vitale N, Cappabianca G, Visicchio G, Fondacone C, Paradiso V, Mannatrizio G, et al. Midterm evaluation of the Sorin Bicarbon heart valve prosthesis: single-center experience. Ann Thorac Surg. 2004;77:527–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Azarnoush K, Laborde F, de Riberolles C. The Sorin Bicarbon over 15 years clinical outcomes: multicentre experience in 1704 patients. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2010;38:759–66.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Moidl R, Simon P, Wolner E, and members of the On-X Prosthesis Heart Valve Trial. The On-X prosthetic heart valve at five years. Ann Thorac Surg. 2002;74:S1312–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Palatianos GM, Laczkovics AM, Simon P, Pomar JL, Birnbaum DE, Greve HH, et al. Multicentered European study on safety and effectiveness of the On-X prosthetic heart valve: intermediate follow-up. Ann Thorac Surg. 2007;83:40–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Tanaka K, Tajima K, Takami Y, Okada N, Terazawa S, Usui A, et al. Early and late outcomes of aortic valve replacement in dialysis patients. Ann Thorac Surg. 2010;89:65–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Bonow RO, Carabello B, de Leon AC, Edmunds LH Jr, Fedderly BJ, Freed MD, et al. ACC/AHA guidelines for the management of patients with valvular heart disease. Executive summary. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association task force on practice guidelines (committee on management of patients with valvular heart disease). J Heart Valve Dis. 1998;7:672–707.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Bonow RO, Carabello BA, Chatterjee K, de Leon AC, Faxon DP Jr, Freed MD, et al. ACC/AHA 2006 guidelines for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association task force on practice guidelines (writing committee to revise the 1998 guidelines for the management of patients with valvular heart disease): developed in collaboration with the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists: endorsed by the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Circulation. 2006;114:e84–231.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Brinkman WT, Williams WH, Guyton RA, Jones EL, Craver JM. Valve replacement in patients on chronic renal dialysis: implications for valve prosthesis selection. Ann Thorac Surg. 2002;74:37–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Kaplon RJ, Cosgrove DM 3rd, Gillinov AM, Lytle BW, Blackstone EH, Smedira NG. Cardiac valve replacement in patients on dialysis: influence of prosthesis on survival. Ann Thorac Surg. 2000;70:438–41.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Nishi K, Eishi K, Shibata Y, Amano J, Kaneko T, Okabayashi H, et al. Influence of prosthetic heart valve sound on a patient’s quality of life. Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2010;16:410–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shinichiro Taniguchi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Taniguchi, S., Hashizume, K., Ariyoshi, T. et al. Twelve years of experience with the ATS mechanical heart valve prostheses. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 60, 561–568 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11748-012-0124-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11748-012-0124-1

Keywords

Navigation