An attempt to analyze the relation between hospital surgical volume and clinical outcome
The aim of this study was to investigate the relation between hospital volume and clinical surgical outcome for 10 cardiac, lung, and esophageal surgical procedures.
The Committee for Scientific Affairs of the Japanese Association for Thoracic Surgery collected the pooled data on cardiac, lung, and esophageal surgical procedures between 2000 and 2004 from the annual reports. The relation between operative mortality (30-day or in-hospital mortality) and hospital volume was analyzed using a logistic regression model. The surgical procedures studied were surgery for acquired cardiac diseases [coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), valve procedures, acute type A dissection surgery], total CABG (elective + emergency), elective CABG, emergency CABG, single-valve surgery, acute type A dissection surgery, open heart surgery for the newborn, open heart surgery for the infants, lung cancer surgery, and esophageal cancer surgery. The data used in this study were not risk-adjusted.
The data on the relation between hospital volume and operative mortality generally tended to show an inverse correlation for all 10 cardiac, lung, and esophageal surgical procedures; that is, the higher was the volume the lower was the mortality. However, wide variations in operative mortality were noted among the very-low-volume hospital groups.
An inverse correlation was noted between hospital volume and operative mortality in the present study, although wide variations in clinical outcome were noted among the very low-volume hospitals. Further analysis is warranted using risk-adjusted data.
Key wordsHospital volume Clinical outcome Cardiac surgery Lung cancer surgery Esophageal cancer surgery
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 10.Zacharias, A, Schwann, TA, Riordan, CJ, Durham, SJ, Shah, A, Papadimos, TJ, et al. 2005Is hospital procedure volume a reliable marker of quality for coronary artery bypass surgery? A comparison of risk and propensity adjusted operative and midterm outcomesAnn Thorac Surg7919619PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 13.Nishida, H, Yoshida, E 2005Suggestions from non-pandering governmental health care policy groups: across-the-board 30% cut of surgeon's fee according to number of operation-pandering fool and disguised health care cost-cutting policy under fiscal crisisCardiovasc Med Surg741729Google Scholar
- 15.Hatori S, Yanagawa T. Martel-Haenszel projection method estimator for sparse data. Presented at the International Biometric Conference, Montreal, July 2006Google Scholar
- 17.Wada, J, Nakajima, H 1987Current status of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery in Japan 1964, 1965 National Database AnalysisJpn J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg359189Google Scholar
- 18.Yasui, H, Osada, H, Ando, U, Koyanagi, H 1988Thoracic and cardiovascular surgery in Japan during 1996: annual report by the Japanese Association for Thoracic SurgeryJpn J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg4640620Google Scholar
- 19.Yasuda, K, Ayabe, H, Ide, H, Yasui, H 2002Thoracic and cardiovascular surgery in Japan during 2000: annual report by the Japanese Association for Thoracic SurgeryJpn J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg50398412Google Scholar
- 21.Yada, I, Wada, H, Fujita, H 2004Thoracic and cardiovascular surgery in Japan during 2002: annual report of the Japanese Association for Thoracic SurgeryJpn J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg52491508Google Scholar
- 25.STS Adult CV Surgery National Database—Spring 2006 Executive Summer Contents, STS Spring 2006 ReportGoogle Scholar