Abstract
Objectives: The exact role of pressure gradient across the prosthetic valve estimated from Doppler flow velocity remains controversial. This in-vivo study was designed to assess the actual discrepancy between Doppler and catheter measurements of the pressure gradients for small bileaflet prosthetic valves in the aortic position. Methods: Bileaflet prosthetic valves (19 mm-ATS) were implanted into the aortic position in pigs, and pressure gradients across the valves were examined by volume loading under right heart bypass. The pressure gradient obtained by catheter was defined as the conventional peak-to-peak gradient between the left ventricle and aorta. The peak Doppler gradients were calculated from the maximal instantaneous Doppler velocity with the ultrasound probe positioned on the diaphragm at the level of the cardiac apex. Results: There were strong correlations between pressure gradients and cardiac output. The Doppler gradient was constantly higher than the catheter values, and the resultant discrepancy between Doppler and catheter measurements was directly dependent on cardiac output (y=9.9x+0.6, r2=0.55). For cardiac output ≧5.0 L/min, the difference between Doppler and catheter gradients reached 40 mmHg, and maximum differences of up to 80 mmHg were observed. Conclusions: In view of the presence of striking overestimation of catheter gradient by Doppler measurement, Doppler ultrasound should be used cautiously to assess small-size bileaflet prosthetic valve function with consideration of the patient’s hemodynamic state.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Arom KV, Goldenberg IF, Emery RW. Long-term clinical outcome with small size Standard St. Jude Medical valves implanted in the aortic position. J Heart Valve Dis 1994; 3: 531–6.
Fisher J. Comparative study of the hydrodynamic function of six size 19 mm bileaflet heart valves. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 1995; 9: 692–6.
Hegranes L, Hatle L. Aortic stenosis in adults. Non-invasive estimation of pressure differences by continuous wave Doppler echocardiography. Br Heart J 1985; 54: 396–404.
Garcia D, Dumesnil JG, Durand LG, Kadem L, Pibarot P. Discrepancies between catheter and Doppler estimates of valve effective orifice area can be predicted from the pressure recovery phenomenon: Practical implications with regard to quantification of aortic stenosis severity. J Am Coll Cardiol 2003; 41: 435–42.
Baumgartner H, Khan S, DeRobertis M, Czer L, Maurer G. Effect of prosthetic aortic valve design on the Doppler-catheter gradient correlation: An in vitro study of normal St. Jude, Medtronic-Hall, Starr-Edwards and Hancock valves. J Am Coll Cardiol 1992; 19: 324–32.
OH JK, Taliercio CP, Holmes DR Jr, Reeder GS, Bailey KR, Seward JB, et al. Prediction of the severity of aortic stenosis by Doppler aortic valve area determination: Prospective Doppler-catheterization correlation in 100 patients. J Am Coll Cardiol 1988; 11: 1227–34.
Vandervoort PM, Greenberg NL, Powell KA, Cosgrove DM, Thomas JD. Pressure recovery in bileaflet heart valve prostheses: localized high velocities and gradients in central and side orifices with implications for Doppler-catheter gradient relation in aortic and mitral position. Circulation 1995; 92: 3464–72.
Schobel WA, Voelker W, Haase KK, Karsch KR. Extent, determinants and clinical importance of pressure recovery in patients with aortic valve stenosis. Eur Heart J 1999; 20: 1355–63.
Emery RW, Van Nooten GJ, Tesar PJ; Investigators for the ATS Clinical Open Pivot Heart Valve Food and Drug Administration Study. The initial experience with the ATS Medical mechanical cardiac valve prosthesis. Ann Thorac Surg 2003; 75: 444–52.
Labrousse LM, Choukroun E, Serena D, Billes MA, Madonna F, Deville C. Prospective study of hemodynamic performances of standard ATS and AP-ATS valves. J Heart Valve Dis 2003; 12: 341–7.
Van Nooten G, Caes F, Francois K, Missault L, Van Belleghem Y. Clinical experience with the first 100 ATS heart valve implants. Cardiovasc Surg 1996; 4: 288–92.
Niederberger J, Schima H, Maurer G, Baumgartner H. Importance of pressure recovery for the assessment of aortic stenosis by Doppler ultrasound. Role of aortic size, aortic valve area, and direction of the stenotic jet in vitro. Circulation 1996; 94: 1934–40.
Gjertsson P, Caidahl K, Svensson G, Wallentin I, Bech-Hanssen O. Important pressure recovery in patients with aortic stenosis and high Doppler gradients. Am J Cardiol 2001;88: 139–44.
Vannan MA, Sarkar K. Assessment of mechanical aortic valve prosthesis by means of Doppler echocardiography: What to measure and why? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2003; 126: 317–20.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Yamashita, T., Moriyama, Y., Sata, N. et al. Discrepancy between doppler and catheter measurements of pressure gradients across small-size prosthetic valve. Jpn J Thorac Caridovasc Surg 53, 64–68 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11748-005-0002-1
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11748-005-0002-1