Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

More than money: establishing the importance of a sense of purpose for salespeople

  • Original Empirical Research
  • Published:
Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Much of the current research on salesperson motivation focuses on extrinsic reward expectancy related to compensation, contests, incentives, and quotas. We find that while salespeople want to make money, they also want to make a difference and contribute to society through their work. In Study 1, the qualitative findings reveal that a sense of purpose–the belief that one is making a contribution to a cause greater and more enduring than oneself–is a significant motivator for salespeople. Hence, in Study 2 we develop a measure for sense of purpose and distinguish it from related constructs. Finally, in Study 3 we use a dynamic modeling approach with longitudinal salesperson data to empirically demonstrate that sense of purpose is an antecedent to intrinsic motivation. We also discover that intrinsic motivation is more positively associated with increased salesperson effort, adaptivity, and performance than is a desire for money on average over time, particularly for younger salespeople. These findings not only contribute to theory but also have important ramifications for the effective management of modern sales organizations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price includes VAT (Canada)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. We would like to thank an anonymous reviewer for making this observation.

  2. We would like to thank an anonymous reviewer for this suggestion.

References

  • Ahearne, M., Mathieu, J., & Rapp, A. (2005). To empower or not to empower your sales force? An empirical examination of the influence of leadership empowerment behavior on customer satisfaction and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(5), 945–955.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahn, S. C., & Schmidt, P. (1995). Efficient estimation of models for dynamic panel data. Journal of Econometrics, 68(1), 5–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alavi, S., Habel, J., & Linsenmayer, K. (2019). What does adaptive selling mean to salespeople? An exploratory analysis of practitioners’ responses to generic adaptive selling scales. Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management, 39(3), 254–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 411–423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (2012). Specification, evaluation, and interpretation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 40(1), 8–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barrick, M. R., Mount, M. K., & Li, N. (2013). The theory of purposeful work behavior: The role of personality, higher-order goals, and job characteristics. Academy of Management Review, 38(1), 132–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barrick, M. R., Thurgood, G. R., Smith, T. A., & Courtright, S. H. (2015). Collective organizational engagement: Linking motivational antecedents, strategic implementation, and firm performance. Academy of Management Journal, 58(1), 111–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boichuk, J. P., Bommaraju, R., Ahearne, M., Kraus, F., & Steenburgh, T. J. (2019). Managing laggards: The importance of a deep sales bench. Journal of Marketing Research, 56(4), 652–665.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bolander, W., Satornino, C. B., Hughes, D. E., & Ferris, G. R. (2015). Social networks within sales organizations: Their development and importance for salesperson performance. Journal of Marketing, 79(6), 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bollen, K. A., & Brand, J. E. (2010). A general panel model with random and fixed effects: A structural equations approach. Social Forces, 89(1), 1–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bommaraju, R., & Hohenberg, S. (2018). Self-selected sales incentives: Evidence of their effectiveness, persistence, durability, and underlying mechanisms. Journal of Marketing, 82(5), 106–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonney, L., Plouffe, C. R., & Brady, M. (2016). Investigations of sales representatives’ valuation of options. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 44(2), 135–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boswell, W. R., Boudreau, J. W., & Tichy, J. (2005). The relationship between employee job change and job satisfaction: The honeymoon-hangover effect. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(5), 882–892.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, S. P., & Peterson, R. A. (1994). The effect of effort on sales performance and job satisfaction. Journal of Marketing, 58(2), 70–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, T. J., Mowen, J. C., Donavan, D. T., & Licata, J. W. (2002). The customer orientation of service workers: Personality trait effects on self-and supervisor performance ratings. Journal of Marketing Research, 39(1), 110–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calo, T. J., Patterson, M. M., & Decker, W. H. (2014). Age-related work motivation declines: Myth or reality? Journal of Organizational Psychology, 14(1), 96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carton, A. M. (2018). “I’m not mopping the floors, I’m putting a man on the moon”: How NASA leaders enhanced the meaningfulness of work by changing the meaning of work. Administrative Science Quarterly, 63(2), 323–369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Challagalla, G., Murtha, B. R., & Jaworski, B. (2014). Marketing doctrine: a principles-based approach to guiding marketing decision making in firms. Journal of Marketing, 78(4), 4–20.

  • Chen, H., & Lim, N. (2017). How does team composition affect effort in contests? A theoretical and experimental analysis. Journal of Marketing Research, 54(1), 44–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christen, M., Iyer, G., & Soberman, D. (2006). Job satisfaction, job performance, and effort: A reexamination using agency theory. Journal of Marketing, 70(1), 137–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chung, D. J., & Narayandas, D. (2017). Incentives versus reciprocity: Insights from a field experiment. Journal of Marketing Research, 54(4), 511–524.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Churchill Jr., G. A. (1979). A paradigm for developing better measures of marketing constructs. Journal of Marketing Research, 16(1), 64–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daljord, Ø., Misra, S., & Nair, H. S. (2016). Homogeneous contracts for heterogeneous agents: Aligning sales force composition and compensation. Journal of Marketing Research, 53(2), 161–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, D. F., Golicic, S. L., & Boerstler, C. N. (2011). Benefits and challenges of conducting multiple methods research in marketing. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 39(3), 467–479.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Debevoise, N. (2019). The risk of having purpose without being purposeful. Forbes. Retrieved from https://www.forbes.com/sites/nelldebevoise/2019/12/23/the-risk-of-having-purpose-without-being-purposeful/#1c5894fe4584. Accessed 12 May 2020.

  • DeCarlo, T. E., & Lam, S. K. (2016). Identifying effective hunters and farmers in the salesforce: A dispositional–situational framework. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 44(4), 415–439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deci, E. L. (1972). The effects of contingent and noncontingent rewards and controls on intrinsic motivation. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 8(2), 217–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). The general causality orientations scale: Self-determination in personality. Journal of Research in Personality, 19(2), 109–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2008). Self-determination theory: A macrotheory of human motivation, development, and health. Canadian Psychology/Psychologie Canadienne, 49(3), 182–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deci, E. L., Ryan, R. M., Gagné, M., Leone, D. R., Usunov, J., & Kornazheva, B. P. (2001). Need satisfaction, motivation, and well-being in the work organizations of a former eastern bloc country: A cross-cultural study of self-determination. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27(8), 930–942.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deci, E. L., Olafsen, A. H., & Ryan, R. M. (2017). Self-determination theory in work organizations: The state of a science. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 4, 19–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeVellis, R. F. (2003). Scale development: Theory and applications (2nd ed.). Sage Publications, Inc..

  • Edwards, J. R. (2001). Multidimensional constructs in organizational behavior research: An integrative analytical framework. Organizational Research Methods, 4(2), 144–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fang, E., Palmatier, R. W., & Evans, K. R. (2004). Goal-setting paradoxes? Trade-offs between working hard and working smart: The United States versus China. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 32(2), 188–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fu, F. Q., Richards, K. A., Hughes, D. E., & Jones, E. (2010). Motivating salespeople to sell new products: The relative influence of attitudes, subjective norms, and self-efficacy. Journal of Marketing, 74(6), 61–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fu, F. Q., Elliott, M. T., Mano, H., & Galloway, C. (2017). The role of affective brand commitment on sales effort. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 25(3), 257–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fulmer, I. S., & Shaw, J. D. (2018). Person-based differences in pay reactions: A compensation-activation theory and integrative conceptual review. Journal of Applied Psychology, 103(9), 939–958.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Funder, D. C., & Colvin, C. R. (1991). Explorations in behavioral consistency: Properties of persons, situations, and behaviors. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60(5), 773–794.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • George, J. M. (1992). Extrinsic and intrinsic origins of perceived social loafing in organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 35(1), 191–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gillespie, E. A., Noble, S. M., & Lam, S. K. (2016). Extrinsic versus intrinsic approaches to managing a multi-brand salesforce: When and how do they work? Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 44(6), 707–725.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gioia, D. A., & Chittipeddi, K. (1991). Sensemaking and sensegiving in strategic change initiation. Strategic Management Journal, 12(6), 433–448.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goleman, D. (2020). “Millennials: The Purpose Generation,” Korn Ferry, retrieved from https://www.kornferry.com/ insights/articles/millennials-purpose-generation. Accessed 8 July 2020.

  • Gopalakrishna, S., Garrett, J., Mantrala, M. K., & Sridhar, S. (2016). Assessing sales contest effectiveness: The role of salesperson and sales district characteristics. Marketing Letters, 27(3), 589–602.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grant, A. M. (2007). Relational job design and the motivation to make a prosocial difference. Academy of Management Review, 32(2), 393–417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffith, D. A., & Lusch, R. F. (2007). Getting marketers to invest in firm-specific capital. Journal of Marketing, 71(1), 129–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hackman, J. R., & Oldham, G. R. (1976). Motivation through the Design of Work: Test of a theory. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 16(2), 250–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartmann, N. N., Wieland, H., & Vargo, S. L. (2018). Converging on a new theoretical foundation for selling. Journal of Marketing, 82(2), 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • He, W., Li, S. L., Feng, J., Zhang, G., & Sturman, M. C. (2021). When does pay for performance motivate employee helping behavior? The contextual influence of performance subjectivity. Academy of Management Journal,64(1), 293–326.

  • Heckman, J. J. (1979). Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 153–161.

  • Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herzberg, F. (1968). One more time: How do you motivate employees? Harvard Business Review, 65(5), 87–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinkin, T. R. (1995). A review of scale development practices in the study of organizations. Journal of Management, 21(5), 967–988.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hohenberg, S., & Homburg, C. (2016). Motivating sales reps for innovation selling in different cultures. Journal of Marketing, 80(2), 101–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Homburg, C., Hohenberg, S., & Hahn, A. (2019). Steering the sales force for new product selling: Why is it different, and how can firms motivate different sales reps? Journal of Product Innovation Management, 36(3), 282–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Homburg, C., Morguet, T. R., & Hohenberg, S. (2021). Incentivizing of inside sales units—The interplay of incentive types and unit structures. Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management, 1–43.

  • Hossain, T., Shi, M., & Waiser, R. (2019). Measuring rank-based utility in contests: The effect of disclosure schemes. Journal of Marketing Research, 56(6), 981–994.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, D. E. (2013). This Ad’s for you: The effect of advertising perceptions on salesperson effort and performance. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 41(1), 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, D. E., & Ahearne, M. (2010). Energizing the reseller's sales force: The power of brand identification. Journal of Marketing, 74(4), 81–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, D. E., & Ogilvie, J. L. (2020). When sales becomes service: The evolution of the professional selling role and an organic model of frontline ambidexterity. Journal of Service Research, 23(1), 22–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Humphrey, S. E., Nahrgang, J. D., & Morgeson, F. P. (2007). Integrating motivational, social, and contextual work design features: A meta-analytic summary and theoretical extension of the work design literature. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(5), 1332–1356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaramillo, F., & Mulki, J. P. (2008). Sales effort: The intertwined roles of the leader, customers, and the salesperson. Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management, 28(1), 37–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaramillo, F., Locander, W. B., Spector, P. E., & Harris, E. G. (2007). Getting the job done: The moderating role of initiative on the relationship between intrinsic motivation and adaptive selling. Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management, 27(1), 59–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jebb, A. T., & Tay, L. (2017). Introduction to time series analysis for organizational research: Methods for longitudinal analyses. Organizational Research Methods, 20(1), 61–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jerath, K., & Long, F. (2020). Multiperiod contracting and salesperson effort profiles: The optimality of “hockey stick,” “giving up,” and “resting on laurels”. Journal of Marketing Research, 57(2), 211–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, J. S., Friend, S. B., & Agrawal, A. (2016). Dimensions and contingent effects of variable compensation system changes. Journal of Business Research, 69(8), 2923–2930.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kassarjian, H. H. (1977). Content analysis in consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research, 4(1), 8–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katsikeas, C. S., Auh, S., Spyropoulou, S., & Menguc, B. (2018). Unpacking the relationship between sales control and salesperson performance: A regulatory fit perspective. Journal of Marketing, 82(3), 45–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khusainova, R., de Jong, A., Lee, N., Marshall, G. W., & Rudd, J. M. (2018). (re) defining salesperson motivation: Current status, main challenges, and research directions. Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management, 38(1), 2–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, S. K., & Tiwana, A. (2016). Chicken or egg? Sequential complementarity among salesforce control mechanisms. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 44(3), 316–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, M., Sudhir, K., Uetake, K., & Canales, R. (2019). When salespeople manage customer relationships: Multidimensional incentives and private information. Journal of Marketing Research, 56(5), 749–766.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kimura, T., Bande, B., & Fernández-Ferrín, P. (2019). The roles of political skill and intrinsic motivation in performance prediction of adaptive selling. Industrial Marketing Management, 77, 198–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kiviet, J. F., & Phillips, G. D. (2014). Improved variance estimation of maximum likelihood estimators in stable first-order dynamic regression models. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 76, 424–448.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krippendorff, K. (2019). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology (4th ed.). Sage.

  • Lee, S., & Meyer-Doyle, P. (2017). How performance incentives shape individual exploration and exploitation: Evidence from microdata. Organization Science, 28(1), 19–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, J., Lim, N., & Chen, H. (2020). Examining salesperson effort allocation in teams: A randomized field experiment. Marketing Science, 39(6), 1122–1141.

  • Lindell, M. K., & Whitney, D. J. (2001). Accounting for common method variance in cross-sectional research designs. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(1), 114–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magnotta, S., Murtha, B., & Challagalla, G. (2020). The joint and multilevel effects of training and incentives from upstream manufacturers on downstream Salespeople’s efforts. Journal of Marketing Research, 57(4), 695–716.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maitlis, S. (2005). The social processes of organizational sensemaking. Academy of Management Journal, 48(1), 21–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maitlis, S., & Christianson, M. (2014). Sensemaking in organizations: Taking stock and moving forward. Academy of Management Annals, 8(1), 57–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malek, S. L., Sarin, S., & Jaworski, B. J. (2018). Sales management control systems: Review, synthesis, and directions for future exploration. Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management, 38(1), 30–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mallin, M. L., Gammoh, B. S., Pullins, E. B., & Johnson, C. M. (2017). A new perspective of salesperson motivation and salesforce outcomes: The mediating role of salesperson-brand identification. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 25(4), 357–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maslow, A. H. (1943). A theory of human motivation. Psychological Review, 50(4), 370–396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayberry, R., Boles, J. S., & Donthu, N. (2018). An escalation of commitment perspective on allocation-of-effort decisions in professional selling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 46(5), 879–894.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGregor, D. (1960). Theory X and theory Y. Organization Theory, 358(1), 374.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLeod, L. E. (2020). (2nd ed.), Selling with noble purpose: How to drive revenue and do work that makes you proud. John Wiley & Sons.

  • Miao, C. F., & Evans, K. R. (2012). Effects of formal sales control systems: A combinatory perspective. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 29(2), 181–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miao, C. F., Evans, K. R., & Shaoming, Z. (2007). The role of salesperson motivation in sales control systems—Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation revisited. Journal of Business Research, 60(5), 417–425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miao, C. F., Lund, D. J., & Evans, K. R. (2009). Reexamining the influence of career stages on salesperson motivation: A cognitive and affective perspective. Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management, 29(3), 243–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miao, C. F., Evans, K. R., & Li, P. (2017). Effects of top-performer rewards on fellow salespeople: A double-edged sword. Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management, 37(4), 280–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nijssen, E. J., Guenzi, P., & Van der Borgh, M. (2017). Beyond the retention—Acquisition trade-off: Capabilities of ambidextrous sales organizations. Industrial Marketing Management, 64, 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noble, C. H. (2008). The influence of job security on field sales manager satisfaction: Exploring frontline tensions. Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management, 28(3), 247–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nowlin, E. L., Walker, D., & Anaza, N. A. (2018). How does salesperson connectedness impact performance? It depends upon the level of internal volatility. Industrial Marketing Management, 68, 106–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ogilvie, J., Rapp, A., Agnihotri, R., & Bachrach, D. G. (2017). Translating sales effort into service performance: it's an emotional ride. Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management, 37(2), 100–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, R. L., & Anderson, E. (1994). An empirical test of the consequences of behavior-and outcome-based sales control systems. Journal of Marketing, 58(4), 53–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patil, A., & Syam, N. (2018). How do specialized personal incentives enhance sales performance? The benefits of steady sales growth. Journal of Marketing, 82(1), 57–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pink, D. H. (2011). Drive: The surprising truth about what motivates us. Penguin.

  • Pratt-Kelly, E. (Feb 1, 2020). How to Help My Young Adult Find Their Purpose. Retrieved from: https://www.today.com/parenting-guides/how-help-my-young-adult-find-their-purpose-t179010. Accessed 5 June 2020.

  • Preacher, K. J. (2002). Calculation for the Test of the Difference Between Two Independent Correlation Coefficients [Computer software]. Retrieved from http.quantpsy.org. Accessed 7 June 2019.

  • Ramarajan, L., Rothbard, N. P., & Wilk, S. L. (2017). Discordant vs. harmonious selves: The effects of identity conflict and enhancement on sales performance in employee–customer interactions. Academy of Management Journal, 60(6), 2208–2238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rapp, A., Agnihotri, R., & Baker, T. L. (2015). Competitive intelligence collection and use by sales and service representatives: How managers’ recognition and autonomy moderate individual performance. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(3), 357–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raykov, T., & Marcoulides, G. A. (2011). Introduction to psychometric theory. Routledge.

  • Rockmann, K. W., & Ballinger, G. A. (2017). Intrinsic motivation and organizational identification among on-demand workers. Journal of Applied Psychology, 102(9), 1305–1316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Román, S., & Iacobucci, D. (2010). Antecedents and consequences of adaptive selling confidence and behavior: A dyadic analysis of salespeople and their customers. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 38(3), 363–382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rossiter, J. R. (2002). The C-OAR-SE procedure for scale development in marketing. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 19(4), 305–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rubel, O., & Prasad, A. (2016). Dynamic incentives in sales force compensation. Marketing Science, 35(4), 676–689.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saxe, R., & Weitz, B. A. (1982). The SOCO scale: A measure of the customer orientation of salespeople. Journal of Marketing Research, 19(3), 343–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shin, J., & Grant, A. M. (2019). Bored by interest: How intrinsic motivation in one task can reduce performance on other tasks. Academy of Management Journal, 62(2), 415–436.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sleep, S., Lam, S. K., & Hulland, J. (2018). The sales–marketing integration gap: A social identity approach. Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management, 38(4), 371–390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spiro, R. L., & Weitz, B. A. (1990). Adaptive selling: Conceptualization, measurement, and nomological validity. Journal of Marketing Research, 27(1), 61–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • St. Clair, D. P., Hunter, G. K., Cola, P. A., & Boland, R. J. (2018). Systems-savvy selling, interpersonal identification with customers, and the sales manager’s motivational paradox: A constructivist grounded theory approach. Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management, 38(4), 391–412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sujan, H. (1986). Smarter versus harder: An exploratory attributional analysis of Salespeople's motivation. Journal of Marketing Research, 23, 41–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sujan, H., Weitz, B. A., & Kumar, N. (1994). Learning orientation, working smart, and effective selling. Journal of Marketing, 58(3), 39–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thakor, M. V., & Joshi, A. W. (2005). Motivating salesperson customer orientation: Insights from the job characteristics model. Journal of Business Research, 58(5), 584–592.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thoresen, C. J., Bradley, J. C., Bliese, P. D., & Thoresen, J. D. (2004). The big five personality traits and individual job performance growth trajectories in maintenance and transitional job stages. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(5), 835–853.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tyagi, P. K. (1985). Relative importance of key job dimensions and leadership behaviors in motivating salesperson work performance. Journal of Marketing, 49(3), 76–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van der Borgh, M., & Schepers, J. (2018). Are conservative approaches to new product selling a blessing in disguise? Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 46(5), 857–878.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Viswanathan, M., Li, X., John, G., & Narasimhan, O. (2018). Is cash king for sales compensation plans? Evidence from a large-scale field intervention. Journal of Marketing Research, 55(3), 368–381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Voorhees, C. M., Brady, M. K., Calantone, R., & Ramirez, E. (2016). Discriminant validity testing in marketing: An analysis, causes for concern, and proposed remedies. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 44(1), 119–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walters, G. D. (2018). Getting specific about psychological inertia: Mediating the past crime–future crime relationship with self-efficacy for a conventional lifestyle. Criminal Justice Review, 43(2), 186–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, G., & Netemeyer, R. G. (2002). The effects of job autonomy, customer demandingness, and trait competitiveness on salesperson learning, self-efficacy, and performance. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 30(3), 217–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, M., Zhou, L., & Zhang, Z. (2016). Dynamic modeling. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 3, 241–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weick, K. E., Sutcliffe, K. M., & Obstfeld, D. (2005). Organizing and the process of sensemaking. Organization Science, 16(4), 409–421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wooldridge, J. M. (2010). Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data. MIT Press.

  • Xu, R., DeShon, R. P., & Dishop, C. R. (2020). Challenges and opportunities in the estimation of dynamic models. Organizational Research Methods, 23(4), 595–619.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, X., & Bartol, K. M. (2010). Linking empowering leadership and employee creativity: The influence of psychological empowerment, intrinsic motivation, and creative process engagement. Academy of Management Journal, 53(1), 107–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeithaml, V. A., Jaworski, B. J., Kohli, A. K., Tuli, K. R., Ulaga, W., & Zaltman, G. (2020). A theories-in-use approach to building marketing theory. Journal of Marketing, 84(1), 32–51.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Valerie Good.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Son Lam served as Area Editor.

Supplementary Information

ESM 1

(DOCX 153 kb)

Appendices

Appendix A: Constructs and scale items

All scale items are based on a 7-point Likert scale with anchors 1_Strongly Disagree to 7_Strongly Agree.

Sense of Purpose (Current Authors)

Standardized Loading

S.E.

  1. My work allows me to make a contribution to society.

.797

.036

  2. The work I do on my job is part of the legacy I will leave on this earth after I am gone.

*

 

  3. The work I do on my job impacts the lives of others.

.819

.037

  4. The work I do on my job is meaningful to others.

.888

.023

  5. I give back to society through the work I do on my job.

.889

.018

  6. My work allows me to be part of something bigger than just myself.

.865

.020

  7. The better I perform at this job, the more I improve the lives of others.

.739

.027

  8. I work for a cause greater than my own paycheck.

.846

.019

Autonomy (Zhang & Bartol, 2010)

  1. I have significant autonomy in determining how I do my job.

.804

.030

  2. I can decide on my own how to go about doing my work.

.950

.012

  3. I have considerable opportunity for independence and freedom in how I do my job.

.858

.019

Self-Efficacy (Sujan et al., 1994)

  1. I am good at selling.

.865

.024

  2. It is not hard for me to convince a customer to buy from me.

.780

.036

  3. I know the right thing to do in selling situations.

.848

.019

  4. I find it difficult to overcome a customer’s objections. (R)

.830

.019

  5. My temperament is well suited for selling.

 

.709

  6. I am good at finding out what customers want.

.815

.025

  7. It is easy for me to get customers to see my point of view.

.828

.021

Sense of Belonging/Connection (Deci et al., 2001)

  1. I really like the people I work with.

.806

.031

  2. I get along with people at work.

*

 

  3. I pretty much keep to myself when I am at work. (R)

*

 

  4. I consider the people I work with to be my friends.

.743

.033

  5. People at work care about me.

.778

.035

  6. There are not many people at work that I am close to. (R)

*

 

  7. The people I work with do not seem to like me much. (R)

*

 

  8. People at work are pretty friendly towards me.

.614

.045

Intrinsic Motivation (Oliver & Anderson, 1994)

  1. When I perform well, I know it’s because my own desire to achieve.

.652

.042

  2. I don’t need a reason to sell; I sell because I want to.

.618

.044

  3. Becoming successful in sales is something that I want to do for me.

.684

.044

  4. If I were independently wealthy, I would still sell for the challenge of it.

.602

.040

  5. I wish I didn’t have to retire someday so I could always continue selling for the pleasure of it.

*

 

Extrinsic Motivation (Oliver & Anderson, 1994)

  1. If it weren’t for the money, I would not be in a selling job.

.821

.041

  2. I sell because I get paid to sell.

.715

.043

  3. After a long hard day, I realize that if it weren’t for the money, I wouldn’t put up with this job.

.767

.031

Adaptive Selling/Working Smart (Spiro & Weitz, 1990)

  1. When I feel that my sales approach is not working, I can easily change to another approach.

.751

.046

  2. I like to experiment with different sales approaches.

.661

.037

  3. I am very flexible in the selling approach I use.

.868

.017

  4. I can easily use a wide variety of selling approaches.

.877

.020

  5. I try to understand how one customer differs from another.

.645

.036

  6. Each customer requires a unique approach.

.439

.070

  7. I feel that most buyers can be dealt with in pretty much the same manner.

*

 

Appendix B: Additional constructs used in the scale validation study

Job Meaningfulness (Thakor & Joshi, 2005).

  1. My job lets me have the chance to be somebody.

.798

.041

  2. My job gives me a feeling of accomplishment.

.877

.023

  3. My job lets me make full use of my abilities.

.838

.040

  4. My job allows me to have control over my life.

.720

.048

  5. My job is exciting and challenging.

.865

.023

  6. My job allows me to grow and develop as a person.

.878

.021

  7. My job is mostly comprised of selling (e.g., making sales presentations) rather than servicing customers.

*

 

Customer Orientation (Brown et al., 2002; Saxe & Weitz, 1982).

  1. I try to help customers achieve their goals.

.657

.081

  2. A good salesperson has to have the customer’s best interest in mind.

.653

.096

  3. I offer the product of mine that is best suited to the customer’s problem.

.811

.054

  4. I try to find out what kind of product would be most helpful to a customer.

.797

.051

  5. I try to get customers to discuss their needs with me.

.667

.070

Performance Orientation (Sujan et al., 1994).

  1. It is very important to me that my supervisor sees me as a good salesperson.

.763

.121

  2. I very much want my coworkers to consider me to be good at selling.

.839

.129

  3. I feel very good when I know I have outperformed other salespeople in my company.

.714

.138

  4. I always try to communicate my accomplishments to my manager.

.611

.148

  5. I spend a lot of time thinking about how my performance compares with other salespeople’s.

.666

.145

  6. I evaluate myself using my supervisor’s criteria.

.699

.136

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Good, V., Hughes, D.E. & Wang, H. More than money: establishing the importance of a sense of purpose for salespeople. J. of the Acad. Mark. Sci. 50, 272–295 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-021-00795-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-021-00795-x

Keywords

Navigation