Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The effects of loyalty program introduction and design on short- and long-term sales and gross profits

  • Original Empirical Research
  • Published:
Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Loyalty programs (LPs) are marketing investments designed to foster behavioral loyalty among a firm’s best customers and, ultimately, increase firm performance. Surprisingly, the effectiveness of introducing LPs on firm performance in the short and long term has not been thoroughly evaluated. This research examines the extent to which introducing an LP can increase both firm sales and gross profits. Leveraging data from 322 publicly-traded firms that introduced an LP between 2000 and 2015, the authors demonstrate that introducing an LP can increase sales and gross profits in the short term (within the first year), and these positive effects are sustained long term (for at least three years). However, the effects on gross profits do not become significant until the second quarter after LP introduction, and their overall impact on performance lags substantially behind sales. Complementing these primary findings, the results reveal that offering an LP with tiers or earning mechanisms can provide firms with significant increases in sales and gross profits. Taken together, this research demonstrates that introducing strategically designed LPs can dramatically increase firm performance in both the short and long term.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. As a robustness check, we also re-estimated the models using a “one to one” matched sample (N = 644), and the results were consistent with respect to signs and significance with those using the entire sample of control firms.

  2. We also assessed the effects of LP introduction on a longer time horizon and found that the effects on both the log of sales and log of gross profits remained significant in years 4 and 5 following launch, providing additional evidence of the enduring effects of LP introduction. These results are available from the authors upon request.

  3. As a robustness check, we also estimated the models using OIDBP as an alternative measure of profitability (Feng et al. 2017), and the results were consistent with those reported for gross profits.

References

  • Arkes, H. R., & Blumer, C. (1985). The psychology of sunk cost. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 35(1), 124–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bateson, M., Nettle, D., & Roberts, G. (2006). Cues of being watched enhance cooperation in a real-world setting. Biology Letters, 2(3), 412–414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bijmolt, T. H., & Verhoef, P. C. (2017). Loyalty programs: Current insights, research challenges, and emerging trends. In Handbook of marketing decision models (pp. 143–165). Cham: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bijmolt, T. H., Dorotic, M., & Verhoef, P. C. (2011). Loyalty programs: Generalizations on their adoption, effectiveness and design. Foundations and Trends® in Marketing, 5(4), 197–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowles, S., & Hwang, S. (2008). Social preferences and public economics: Mechanism design when social preferences depend on incentives. Journal of Public Economics, 92(8), 1811–1820.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Breivik, E., & Thorbjørnsen, H. (2008). Consumer brand relationships: An investigation of two alternative models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 36(4), 443–472.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cerasoli, C. P., Nicklin, J. M., & Ford, M. T. (2014). Intrinsic motivation and extrinsic incentives jointly predict performance: A 40-year meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 140(4), 980–1008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colloquy. (2017). U.S. customer loyalty program memberships reach double digit growth at 3.8 billion, 2017 colloquy loyalty census reports. https://www.colloquy.com/latest-news/u-s-customer-loyalty-program-memberships-reach-double-digit-growth-at-3-8-billion-2017-colloquy-loyalty-census-reports/. Accessed 10 Jan 2018.

  • Day, G. S., & Van den Bulte, C. (2002). Superiority in customer relationship management: Consequences for competitive advantage and performance. Marketing Science Institute.

  • Day, G. S., & Wensley, R. (1988). Assessing advantage: A framework for diagnosing competitive superiority. Journal of Marketing, 52(2), 1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dick, A. S., & Basu, K. (1994). Customer loyalty: Toward an integrated conceptual framework. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 22(2), 99–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dowling, G. R., & Uncles, M. (1997). Do customer loyalty programs really work? Sloan Management Review, 38, 71–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drèze, X., & Nunes, J. C. (2009). Feeling superior: The impact of loyalty program structure on consumers' perceptions of status. Journal of Consumer Research, 35(6), 890–905.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drèze, X., & Nunes, J. C. (2011). Recurring goals and learning: The impact of successful reward attainment on purchase behavior. Journal of Marketing Research, 48(2), 268–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evanschitzky, H., Ramaseshan, B., Woisetschläger, D. M., Richelsen, V., Blut, M., & Backhaus, C. (2012). Consequences of customer loyalty to the loyalty program and to the company. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 40(5), 625–638.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feng, H., Morgan, N. A., & Rego, L. L. (2017). Firm capabilities and growth: The moderating role of market conditions. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 45(1), 76–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foa, U. G. (1971). Interpersonal and economic resources. Science, 171(3969), 345–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Germann, F., Ebbes, P., & Grewal, R. (2015). The chief marketing officer matters! Journal of Marketing, 79(3), 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartmann, W. R., & Viard, V. B. (2008). Do frequency reward programs create switching costs? A dynamic structural analysis of demand in a reward program. Quantitative Marketing and Economics, 6(2), 109–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, C. M., Beck, J. T., & Palmatier, R. W. (2011). Review of the theoretical underpinnings of loyalty programs. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 21(3), 256–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hogan, J. E., Lemon, K. N., & Rust, R. T. (2002). Customer equity management: Charting new directions for the future of marketing. Journal of Service Research, 5(1), 4–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jayachandran, S., Sharma, S., Kaufman, P., & Raman, P. (2005). The role of relational information processes and technology use in customer relationship management. Journal of Marketing, 69(4), 177–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kashmiri, S., & Mahajan, V. (2010). What's in a name?: An analysis of the strategic behavior of family firms. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 27(3), 271–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kivetz, R., & Simonson, I. (2003). The idiosyncratic fit heuristic: Effort advantage as a determinant of consumer response to loyalty programs. Journal of Marketing Research, 40(4), 454–467.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kivetz, R., Urminsky, O., & Zheng, Y. (2006). The goal-gradient hypothesis resurrected: Purchase acceleration, illusionary goal progress, and customer retention. Journal of Marketing Research, 43(1), 39–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kopalle, P. K., Sun, Y., Neslin, S. A., Sun, B., & Swaminathan, V. (2012). The joint sales impact of frequency reward and customer tier components of loyalty programs. Marketing Science, 31(2), 216–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, V., & Petersen, J. A. (2005). Using a customer-level marketing strategy to enhance firm performance: A review of theoretical and empirical evidence. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 33(4), 504–519.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lal, R., & Bell, D. E. (2003). The impact of frequent shopper programs in grocery retailing. Quantitative Marketing and Economics, 1(2), 179–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leenheer, J., Van Heerde, H. J., Bijmolt, T. H., & Smidts, A. (2007). Do loyalty programs really enhance behavioral loyalty? An empirical analysis accounting for self-selecting members. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 24(1), 31–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lemon, K. N., & Wangenheim, F. V. (2009). The reinforcing effects of loyalty program partnerships and core service usage: A longitudinal analysis. Journal of Service Research, 11(4), 357–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, M. (2004). The influence of loyalty programs and short-term promotions on customer retention. Journal of Marketing Research, 41(3), 281–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, Y. (2007). The long-term impact of loyalty programs on consumer purchase behavior and loyalty. Journal of Marketing, 71(4), 19–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, Y., & Yang, R. (2009). Competing loyalty programs: Impact of market saturation, market share, and category expandability. Journal of Marketing, 73(1), 93–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lourenço, S. M. (2015). Monetary incentives, feedback, and recognition – Complements or substitutes? Evidence from a field experiment in a retail services company. The Accounting Review, 91(1), 279–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luo, X., & Bhattacharya, C. B. (2009). The debate over doing good: Corporate social performance, strategic marketing levers, and firm-idiosyncratic risk. Journal of Marketing, 73(6), 198–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mela, C. F., Gupta, S., & Lehmann, D. R. (1997). The long-term impact of promotion and advertising on consumer brand choice. Journal of Marketing Research, 34, 248–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer-Waarden, L. (2007). The effects of loyalty programs on customer lifetime duration and share of wallet. Journal of Retailing, 83(2), 223–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer-Waarden, L., & Benavent, C. (2006). The impact of loyalty programmes on repeat purchase behaviour. Journal of Marketing Management, 22(1–2), 61–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer-Waarden, L., & Benavent, C. (2009). Grocery retail loyalty program effects: self-selection or purchase behavior change? Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 37(3), 345–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mimouni-Chaabane, A., & Volle, P. (2010). Perceived benefits of loyalty programs: Scale development and implications for relational strategies. Journal of Business Research, 63(1), 32–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitra, D., & Golder, P. N. (2006). How does objective quality affect perceived quality? Short-term effects, long-term effects, and asymmetries. Marketing Science, 25(3), 230–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nunes, J. C., & Drèze, X. (2006). Your loyalty program is betraying you. Harvard Business Review, 84(4), 124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Papies, D., Ebbes, P., & Van Heerde, H. J. (2017). Addressing endogeneity in marketing models. In Advanced methods for modeling markets (pp. 581–627). Cham: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Petrin, A., & Train, K. (2003). Omitted product attributes in discrete choice models (No. w9452). National Bureau of Economic Research. https://doi.org/10.3386/w9452.

  • Petrin, A., & Train, K. (2010). A control function approach to endogeneity in consumer choice models. Journal of Marketing Research, 47(1), 3–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. E. (1980). Competitive strategy: Techniques for analyzing industries and competitors.

  • Reimann, M., Schilke, O., & Thomas, J. S. (2010). Customer relationship management and firm performance: The mediating role of business strategy. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 38(3), 326–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reinartz, W., Krafft, M., & Hoyer, W. D. (2004). The customer relationship management process: Its measurement and impact on performance. Journal of Marketing Research, 41(3), 293–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shugan, S. M. (2005). Brand loyalty programs: Are they shams? Marketing Science, 24, 185–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A., & Sparks, L. (2009). “It's nice to get a wee treat if you've had a bad week”: Consumer motivations in retail loyalty scheme points redemption. Journal of Business Research, 62(5), 542–547.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steinhoff, L., & Palmatier, R. W. (2016). Understanding loyalty program effectiveness: Managing target and bystander effects. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 44(1), 88–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, G. A., & Neslin, S. A. (2005). The current and future sales impact of a retail frequency reward program. Journal of Retailing, 81(4), 293–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thaler, R. (1980). Toward a positive theory of consumer choice. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 1(1), 39–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tuli, K. R., & Bharadwaj, S. G. (2009). Customer satisfaction and stock returns risk. Journal of Marketing, 73(6), 184–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wooldridge, J. M. (2010). Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data. MIT press.

  • Zhang, J., & Breugelmans, E. (2012). The impact of an item-based loyalty program on consumer purchase behavior. Journal of Marketing Research, 49(1), 50–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Business Administration, Department of Management and Marketing, University of Dayton, 300 College Park, Dayton, OH, 45469, USA

    Malika Chaudhuri

  2. Culverhouse College of Business, Department of Marketing, University of Alabama, Box 870225, Tuscaloosa, AL, 35487, USA

    Clay M. Voorhees

  3. The Eli Broad College of Business, N466 North Business Complex, Michigan State University, 632 Bogue Street, East Lansing, MI, 48824, USA

    Jonathan M. Beck

Authors
  1. Malika Chaudhuri
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Clay M. Voorhees
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jonathan M. Beck
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Malika Chaudhuri.

Additional information

Son Lam served as Area Editor for this article.

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chaudhuri, M., Voorhees, C.M. & Beck, J.M. The effects of loyalty program introduction and design on short- and long-term sales and gross profits. J. of the Acad. Mark. Sci. 47, 640–658 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-019-00652-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-019-00652-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation