Information about ethical strengths and weaknesses of individual products (e.g., cause-related marketing, corporate social responsibility records) is increasingly available in the marketplace. However, market shares of ethical brands are still low, even though prior research indicates that ethical attributes influence brand choice. This research broadens the perspective of prior research by investigating the role of ethical attributes during earlier stages of the decision funnel, namely, consideration set formation. Four empirical studies demonstrate that brands’ ethical strengths exert less impact on the consideration than on the choice stage. Specifically, brands that are not otherwise part of consideration sets benefit less from ethical strengths in larger assortments where consideration set formation plays a more important role. By investigating the screening rules that consumers apply, this study determines that while ethical strengths are subordinate, ethical weaknesses evoke asymmetric effects, such that misconduct exerts a stronger effect during screening processes than benefits do. To increase effects of ethical strengths on screening, firms can enhance the emotional intensity of ethical attributes and make them more salient and subjectively important.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
For this and all subsequent studies we have collected no other experimental conditions or dependent variables or omitted subjects other than reported.
Andreoni, J. (1990). Impure altruism and donations to public goods: a theory of warm-glow giving. The Economic Journal, 100(401), 464–477.
Andrews, M., Luo, X., Fang, Z., & Aspara, J. (2014). Cause marketing effectiveness and the moderating role of price discounts. Journal of Marketing, 78(6), 120–142.
Arora, N., & Henderson, T. (2007). Embedded premium promotion: why it works and how to make it more effective. Marketing Science, 26(4), 514–531.
Auger, P., Devinney, T. M., Louviere, J. J., & Burke, P. F. (2008). Do social product features have value to consumers? International Journal of Research in Marketing, 25(3), 183–191.
Auger, P., Devinney, T. M., Louviere, J. J., & Burke, P. F. (2010). The importance of social product attributes in consumer purchasing decisions: A multi-country comparative study. International Business Review, 19(2), 140–159.
Balachander, S., & Ghose, S. (2003). Reciprocal spillover effects: a strategic benefit of brand extensions. Journal of Marketing, 67(1), 4–13.
Baron, J., & Spranca, M. (1997). Protected values. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 70(1), 1–16.
Barone, M. J., Miyazaki, A. D., & Taylor, K. A. (2000). The influence of cause-related marketing on consumer choice: does one good turn deserve another? Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 28(2), 248–262.
Basil, D. Z., & Herr, P. M. (2006). Attitudinal balance and cause-related marketing: an empirical application of balance theory. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 16(4), 391–403.
Batson, C. D., Thompson, E. R., Seuferling, G., Whitney, H., & Strongman, J. A. (1999). Moral hypocrisy: appearing moral to oneself without being so. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(3), 525–537.
Batson, C. D., Thompson, E. R., & Chen, H. (2002). Moral hypocrisy: addressing some alternatives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(2), 330–339.
Bettman, J. R., & Park, C. W. (1980). Effects of prior knowledge and experience and phase of the choice process on consumer decision processes: a protocol analysis. Journal of Consumer Research, 7(3), 234–248.
Bettman, J. R., Luce, M. F., & Payne, J. W. (1998). Constructive consumer choice processes. Journal of Consumer Research, 25(3), 187–217.
Bremer, L., Heitmann, M., & Schreiner, T. F. (2017). When and how to infer heuristic consideration set rules of consumers. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 34(2), 516–535.
Campbell, M. C., & Keller, K. L. (2003). Brand familiarity and advertising repetition effects. Journal of Consumer Research, 30(2), 292–304.
Carpenter, G. S., Glazer, R., & Nakamoto, K. (1994). Meaningful brands from meaningless differentiation: the dependence on irrelevant attributes. Journal of Marketing Research, 31(3), 339–350.
Chakravarti, A., & Janiszewski, C. (2003). The influence of macro-level motives on consideration set composition in novel purchase situations. Journal of Consumer Research, 30(2), 244–258.
Chernev, A., & Blair, S. (2015). Doing well by doing good: the benevolent halo of corporate social responsibility. Journal of Consumer Research, 41(6), 1412–1425.
Creyer, E. H., & Ross, W. T. (1996). The impact of corporate behavior on perceived product value. Marketing Letters, 7(2), 173–185.
De Martino, B., Kumaran, D., Seymour, B., & Dolan, R. J. (2006). Frames, biases, and rational decision-making in the human brain. Science, 313(5787), 684–687.
Ding, M., Hauser, J. R., Dong, S., Dzyabura, D., Yang, Z., Su, C., & Gaskin, S. P. (2011). Unstructured direct elicitation of decision rules. Journal of Marketing Research, 48(1), 116–127.
Edelman, R. (2012). Business must earn license to lead. Retrieved January 04, 2018 from https://bschool.nus.edu.sg/pdf/acsep/2012-Edelman-goodpurpose%C2%AE-Study.pdf.
Ehrich, K. R., & Irwin, J. R. (2005). Willful ignorance in the request for product attribute information. Journal of Marketing Research, 42(3), 266–277.
Erdem, T., & Swait, J. (2004). Brand credibility, brand consideration, and choice. Journal of Consumer Research, 31(1), 191–198.
Finucane, M. L., Alhakami, A., Slovic, P., & Johnson, S. M. (2000). The affect heuristic in judgments of risks and benefits. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 13(1), 1–17.
Gershoff, A. D., & Frels, J. K. (2015). What makes it green? The role of centrality of green attributes in evaluations of the greenness of products. Journal of Marketing, 79(1), 97–110.
Gigerenzer, G., & Goldstein, D. G. (1996). Reasoning the fast and frugal way: models of bounded rationality. Psychological Review, 103(4), 650–669.
Gilbride, T. J., & Allenby, G. M. (2004). A choice model with conjunctive, disjunctive, and compensatory screening rules. Marketing Science, 23(3), 391–406.
Gourville, J. T., & Soman, D. (2005). Overchoice and assortment type: when and why variety backfires. Marketing Science, 24(3), 382–395.
Green, T., & Peloza, J. (2011). How does corporate social responsibility create value for consumers? Journal of Consumer Marketing, 28(1), 48–56.
Green, T., & Peloza, J. (2014). Finding the right shade of green: the effect of advertising appeal type on environmentally friendly consumption. Journal of Advertising, 43(2), 128–141.
Hatfield, E., Cacioppo, J. T., & Rapson, R. L. (1992). Primitive emotional contagion. Review of Personality and Social Psychology, 14, 151–177 Emotions and social behavior. Newbury Park, Ca.: Sage.
Häubl, G., & Trifts, V. (2000). Consumer decision-making in online shopping environments: The effects of interactive decision aids. Marketing Science, 19(1), 4–21.
Hauser, J. R. (2014). Consideration-set heuristics. Journal of Business Research, 67(8), 1688–1699.
Hauser, J. R., & Wernerfelt, B. (1990). An evaluation cost model of consideration sets. Journal of Consumer Research, 16(4), 393–408.
Hauser, J. R., Toubia, O., Evgeniou, T., Befurt, R., & Dzyabura, D. (2010). Disjunctions of conjunctions, cognitive simplicity, and consideration sets. Journal of Marketing Research, 47(3), 485–496.
Henderson, T., & Arora, N. (2010). Promoting brands across categories with a social cause. Implementing effective embedded premium programs. Journal of Marketing, 74(11), 41–60.
Hogarth, R. M. (1987). Judgement and choice. New York: Wiley.
Hogarth, R. M., & Karelaia, N. (2005). Simple models for multiattribute choice with many alternatives: When it does and does not pay to face trade-offs with binary attributes. Management Science, 51(12), 1860–1872.
De Houwer, J. D., & Hermans, D. (1994). Differences in the affective processing of words and pictures. Cognition & Emotion, 8(1), 1–20.
Hoyer, W. D. (1984). An examination of consumer decision-making for a common repeat purchase product. Journal of Consumer Research, 11(3), 822–829.
Irwin, J. R. (1994). Buying/selling price preference reversals: preference for environmental changes in buying versus selling modes. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 60(3), 431–457.
Irwin, J. R., & Baron, J. (2001). Response mode effects and moral values. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 84(2), 177–197.
Irwin, J. R., & Naylor, R. W. (2009). Ethical decisions and response mode compatibility: weighting of ethical attributes in consideration sets formed by excluding versus including product alternatives. Journal of Marketing Research, 46(2), 234–246.
Irwin, J. R., & Spira, S. J. (1997). Anomalies in the values for consumer goods with environmental attributes. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 6(4), 339–363.
Kahneman, D., & Knetsch, J. L. (1992). Valuing public goods: the purchase of moral satisfaction. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 22(1), 57–70.
Kahneman, D., & Ritov, I. (1994). Determinants of stated willingness to pay for public goods: a study in the headline method. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 9(1), 5–37.
Kahneman, D., & Snell, J. (1992). Predicting a changing taste: Do people know what they will like? Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 5(3), 187–200.
Kirmani, A., Hamilton, R. W., Thompson, D. V., & Lantzy, S. (2017). Doing well versus doing good: the differential effect of underdog positioning on moral and competent service providers. Journal of Marketing, 81(1), 103–117.
Kivetz, R., & Simonson, I. (2000). The effects of incomplete information on consumer choice. Journal of Marketing Research, 37(4), 427–448.
Kogut, T., & Ritov, I. (2005a). The singularity effect of identified victims in separate and joint evaluations. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 97(2), 106–116.
Kogut, T., & Ritov, I. (2005b). The “identified victim” effect: an identified group, or just a single individual? Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 18(3), 157–167.
Lee, S., Winterich, K. P., & Ross, W. T., Jr. (2014). I'm moral, but I won't help you: the distinct roles of empathy and justice in donations. Journal of Consumer Research, 41(3), 678–696.
Luchs, M. G., Naylor, R. W., Irwin, J. R., & Raghunathan, R. (2010). The sustainability liability: potential negative effects of ethicality on product preference. Journal of Marketing, 74(5), 18–31.
Markman, A. B., & Medin, D. L. (1995). Similarity and alignment in choice. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 63(2), 117–130.
McKinsey (2017). The new battleground for marketing-led growth. Retrieved January 22, 2018 from https://www.mckinsey.com/business-functions/marketing-and-sales/ourinsights/the-new-battleground-for-marketing-led-growth.
Menon, S., & Kahn, B. E. (2003). Corporate sponsorships of philanthropic activities: when do they impact perception of sponsor brand? Journal of Consumer Psychology, 13(3), 316–327.
Mizerski, R. W. (1982). An attribution explanation of the disproportionate influence of unfavorable information. Journal of Consumer Research, 9(3), 301–310.
Nyilasy, G., Gangadharbatla, H., & Paladino, A. (2014). Perceived greenwashing: the interactive effects of green advertising and corporate environmental performance on consumer reactions. Journal of Business Ethics, 125(4), 693–707.
Paharia, N., Vohs, K. D., & Deshpandé, R. (2013). Sweatshop labor is wrong unless the shoes are cute: cognition can both help and hurt moral motivated reasoning. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 121(1), 81–88.
Payne, J. W., Bettman, J. R., & Johnson, E. J. (1988). Adaptive strategy selection in decision-making. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 14(3), 534–552.
Payne, J. W., Bettman, J. R., & Johnson, E. J. (1993). The adaptive decision maker. Cambridge: University Press.
Peloza, J., White, K., & Shang, J. (2013). Good and guilt-free: the role of self-accountability in influencing preferences for products with ethical attributes. Journal of Marketing, 77(1), 104–119.
Pracejus, J. W., & Olsen, G. D. (2004). The role of brand/cause fit in the effectiveness of cause-related marketing campaigns. Journal of Business Research, 57(6), 635–640.
Roberts, J. H., & Lattin, J. M. (1997). Consideration: review of research and prospects for future insights. Journal of Marketing Research, 34(3), 406–410.
Robinson, S. R., Irmak, C., & Jayachandran, S. (2012). Choice of cause in cause-related marketing. Journal of Marketing, 76(4), 126–139.
Rozin, P., & Royzman, E. B. (2001). Negativity bias, negativity dominance, and contagion. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 5(4), 296–320.
Russell, D. W., & Russell, C. A. (2010). Here or there? Consumer reactions to corporate social responsibility initiatives: egocentric tendencies and their moderators. Marketing Letters, 21(1), 65–81.
Shiv, B., & Fedorikhin, A. (1999). Heart and mind in conflict: the interplay of affect and cognition in consumer decision-making. Journal of Consumer Research, 26(3), 278–292.
Shugan, S. M. (1980). The cost of thinking. Journal of Consumer Research, 7(2), 99–111.
Slovic, P., & MacPhillamy, D. (1974). Dimensional commensurability and cue utilization in comparative judgment. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 11(2), 172–194.
Strahilevitz, M. (1999). The effects of product type and donation magnitude on willingness to pay more for a charity-linked brand. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 8(3), 215–241.
Strahilevitz, M., & Myers, J. G. (1998). Donations to charity as purchase incentives: how well they work may depend on what you are trying to sell. Journal of Consumer Research, 24(4), 434–446.
Street, D. J., Burgess, L., & Louviere, J. J. (2005). Quick and easy choice sets: constructing optimal and nearly optimal stated choice experiments. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 22(4), 459–470.
Tversky, A. (1972). Elimination by aspects: a theory of choice. Psychological Review, 79(4), 281–299.
Völckner, F., & Sattler, H. (2006). Drivers of brand extension success. Journal of Marketing, 70(2), 18–34.
White, K., MacDonnell, R., & Ellard, J. H. (2012). Belief in a just world: consumer intentions and behaviors toward ethical products. Journal of Marketing, 76(1), 103–118.
WHO (2017). France becomes one of the first countries in region to recommend colour-coded front-of-pack nutrition labelling system. Retrieved January 17, 2018 from http://www.euro.who.int/en/countries/france/news/news.
Winterich, K. P., & Barone, M. J. (2011). Warm glow or cold, hard cash? Social identity effects on consumer choice for donation versus discount promotions. Journal of Marketing Research, 48(5), 855–868.
Zane, D. M., Irwin, J. R., & Reczek, R. W. (2016). Do less ethical consumers denigrate more ethical consumers? The effect of willful ignorance on judgments of others. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 26(3), 337–349.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rebecca Hamilton served as Special Issue Guest Editor for this article.
Electronic supplementary material
About this article
Cite this article
Schamp, C., Heitmann, M. & Katzenstein, R. Consideration of ethical attributes along the consumer decision-making journey. J. of the Acad. Mark. Sci. 47, 328–348 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-019-00629-x
- Corporate social responsibility
- Cause-related marketing
- Ethical values
- Consideration set formation
- Decision funnel
- Non-compensatory decision heuristics