Paths to and off purchase: quantifying the impact of traditional marketing and online consumer activity
This study investigates the effects of consumer activity in online media (paid, owned, and earned) on sales and their interdependencies with the traditional marketing mix elements of price, advertising and distribution. We develop an integrative conceptual framework that links marketing actions to online consumer activity metrics along the consumer’s path to purchase (P2P). Our framework proposes that the path to purchase has three basic stages–learning (cognitive), feeling (affective), behavior (conative)—and that these can be measured with novel online consumer activity metrics such as clicking on a paid search ads (cognitive) or Facebook likes and unlikes of the brand (affective). Our empirical analysis of a fast moving consumer good supports a know–feel–do pathway for the low–involvement product studied. We find, for example, that earned media can drive sales. However, we find that the news is not all good as it relates to online consumer activity: higher consumer activity on earned and owned media can lead to consumer disengagement in the form of unlikes. While traditional marketing such as distribution (60%) and price (20%) are the main drivers of sales variation for the studied brand, online owned (10%), (un)earned (3%), and paid (2%) media explain a substantial part of the path to purchase. It is noteworthy that TV advertising (5%) explains significantly less than online media in our case. Overall, our study should help strengthen marketers’ case for building share in consumers’ hearts and minds, as measured through consumer online activity and engagement.
KeywordsPaid, owned, and earned media VAR FMCG Path to purchase Advertising
The authors thank Google WPP for supporting this work with data and funding and Randy Bucklin for insightful comments and suggestions.
- Ambler, T. (2003). Marketing and the bottom line. Harlow: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
- Anderson, S. P., & Renault, R. (2006). Advertising content. The American Economic Review, 39(1), 305–326.Google Scholar
- Comscore (2014). http://www.comscore.com/Insights/Press-Releases/2014/3/comScore-Releases-February-2014-U.S.-Search-Engine-Rankings. Accessed Nov 2014.
- Court, D., Elzinga, D., Mulder, S., &Vetvik, O.J. (2009). The Consumer Decision Journey. McKinsey Quarterly, June.Google Scholar
- Dekimpe, M.G., & Hanssens, D.M. (1995). Empirical Generalizations About Market Evolution and Stationarity. Marketing Science, 14(summer, part 2), 109–121.Google Scholar
- Dekimpe, M. G., & Hanssens, D. M. (1999). Sustained spending and persistent response: A new look at long-term marketing profitability. Journal of Marketing Research, 36(4), 397-412.Google Scholar
- Godes, D., Mayzlin, D., Chen, Y., Das, S., Dellarocas, C., Pfeiffer, B., Libai, B., Sen, S., Shi, M., & Verlegh, P. (2005). Firm’s management of social interactions. Marketing Letters, 16(3/4), 415–428.Google Scholar
- Hanssens, D.M. (2009). Advertising Impact Generalizations in a Marketing Mix Context. Journal of Advertising Research, June, 127–129.Google Scholar
- Hanssens, D.M., Parsons, L.J., & Schultz, R.L. (2001). Market Response Models: Econometric and Time Series Analysis. 2nd Edition, Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
- Hirschman, A. O. (1970). Organizations, and States. Harvard: University press. Exit, Voice, and Loyalty: Responses to Decline in Firms.Google Scholar
- Horváth, C. (2003). Dynamic Analysis of Marketing Systems. Doctoral Thesis, University of Groningen, Alblasserdam: Labyrinth Publication.Google Scholar
- Internet Live Stats (2014). http://www.internetlivestats.com/google-search-statistics/. Accessed Nov 2014.
- Keller, K., & Lehmann, D. (2006). Brands and Branding: Research Findings and Future Priorities. Marketing Science, 25(November-December), 740–759.Google Scholar
- Kotler, P., & Keller, K. (2012). Marketing management (14th ed.). Upper Saddle: Pearson Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
- Lecinski, J. (2011). Zero Moment of Truth. http://www.zeromomentoftruth.com. Accessed 2014.
- Nielsen (2012). State of the Media: Advertising and Audience Part 2. http://nielsen.com/content/dam/corporate/us/en/reports-downloads/2012-Reports/nielsen-advertising-audiences-report-spring-2012.pdf. Accessed April 2014.
- Ofcom (2013). Communications Market Report 2013. White paper.Google Scholar
- Pauwels, K., & van Ewijk, B. (2014). Do Online Behavior Tracking or Attitude Survey Metrics Drive Brand Sales? An Integrative Model of Attitudes and Actions on the Consumer Boulevard. Marketing Science Institute, Working Paper #13-118.Google Scholar
- Tellis, G. (2004). Effective advertising: How, when, and Why advertising works. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
- Zephoria (2014). https://zephoria.com/social-media/top-15-valuable-facebook-statistics/. Accessed Nov 2014.
- Zigmond, D., & Stipp, H. (2011). Multitaskers may be advertisers’ best audience. Harvard Business Review, 12(1/2), 32–33.Google Scholar