Advertisement

Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science

, Volume 42, Issue 6, pp 619–641 | Cite as

Optimizing marketer costs and consumer benefits across “clicks” and “bricks”

  • Stephen Mahar
  • P. Daniel Wright
  • Kurt M. Bretthauer
  • Ronald Paul Hill
Original Empirical Research

Abstract

The Internet has revolutionized the retailing landscape and how goods and services are sold and distributed to consumers. One avenue of significant growth in online selling comes from multichannel retailers who offer products in stores as well as over the Web. These hybrids may leverage their “brick” locations by allowing customers to pick up or return orders purchased online at retail stores. This option lets Web-based buyers avoid added shipping costs and long package carrier lead times, albeit at a cost to retailers. To examine the viability of this strategy, we develop a mathematical model that examines the cost and value of providing in-store pickup and return. The model is used to determine the best subset of brick-and-mortar stores to handle in-store pickup and return demand. One of the principal takeaways is that not all retail stores should be offering in-store pickups and/or returns. Our computational results show optimizing the set of pickup and return locations may reduce system cost over baseline marketing policies where these services are set up at all or none of a retailer’s stores. In addition, we show that retailers can significantly improve some consumer benefits at little extra cost.

Keywords

E-tailing Internet marketing Clicks and bricks Optimization models 

References

  1. Agatz, N. A. H., & Fleischmann, M. (2008). E-fulfillment and multichannel distribution—a review. European Journal of Operations Research, 187, 339–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alptekinoğlu, A., & Tang, C. S. (2005). A model for analyzing multichannel distribution systems. European Journal of Operations Research, 163, 802–824.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anderson, E. T., Fong, N. M., Simester, D. I., & Tucker, C. E. (2010). How sales taxes affect customer and firm behavior: the role of search on the Internet. Journal of Marketing Research, 47, 229–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Balasubramanian, S. (1998). Mail versus mall: a strategic analysis of competition between direct marketers and conventional retailers. Marketing Science, 17, 181–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bendoly, E., Blocher, D., Bretthauer, K., & Venkataramanan, M. A. (2007). Service and cost benefits through clicks-and-mortar integration: implications for the centralization/ decentralization debate. European Journal of Operations Research, 180, 426–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bollapragada, S., Akella, R., & Srinivasan, R. (1998). Centralized ordering and allocation policies in a two-echelon system with non-identical warehouses. European Journal of Operations Research, 106, 74–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Boyaci, T. (2005). Competitive stocking and coordination in a multiple-channel distribution system. IIE Transactions, 37, 407–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brodie, R. J., Winklhofer, H., Coviello, N. E., & Johnston, W. J. (2007). Is e-marketing coming of age? An examination of the penetration of e-marketing and firm performance. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 21, 2–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brynjolfsson, E., & Smith, M. D. (2000). Frictionless commerce? A comparison of Internet and conventional retailers. Management Science, 46, 563–585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cai, G. (2010). Channel selection and coordination in dual-channel supply chains. Journal of Retailing, 86, 22–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chiang, W. K., Chhajed, D., & Hess, J. D. (2003). Direct marketing, indirect profits: a strategic analysis of dual-channel supply-chain design. Management Science, 49, 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. De Koster, R. B. M. (2003). Distribution strategies for online retailers. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 50, 448–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Eppen, G. (1979). Effects of centralization on expected costs in a multi-location newsboy problem. Management Science, 25(5), 498–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Eppen, G., & Schrage, L. (1981). Centralized ordering policies in a multi-warehouse system with lead times and random demand. In L. B. Schwarz (Ed.), Multi-level production/inventory systems: Theory and practice. North-Holland: TIMS Studies in Management Sciences.Google Scholar
  15. Forman, C., Ghose, A., & Goldfarb, A. (2009). Competition between local and electronic markets: how the benefit of buying online depends on where you live. Management Science, 55, 47–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Forrester Research. (2007). The state of retailing online 2006. www.forrester.com.
  17. Frazier, G. L. (1999). Organizing and managing channels of distribution. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 27, 226–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Frazier, G. L. (2009). Physical distribution and channel management: a knowledge and capabilities perspective. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 45, 23–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gong, Y., & De Koster, R. B. M. (2008). A polling-based dynamic order picking system for online retailers. IIE Transactions, 40, 1070–1082.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hill, R. R., & Watkins, A. R. (2009). The profit implications of altruistic versus egoistic orientations for business-to-business exchanges. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 26, 52–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hill, A. V., Collier, D. A., Froehle, C. M., Goodale, J. C., Metters, R. D., & Verma, R. (2002). Research opportunities in service process design. Journal of Operations Management, 20, 189–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Jing, X., & Lewis, M. (2011). Stockouts in online retailing. Journal of Marketing Research, 48, 342–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kwon, W. S., & Lennon, S. J. (2009). Reciprocal effects between Multichannel retailers’ offline and online brand images. Journal of Retailing, 85, 376–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Mahar, S., Bretthauer, K., & Venkataramanan, M. A. (2009). The value of virtual pooling in dual sales channel supply chains. European Journal of Operational Research, 192, 561–575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Mahar, S. P., Wright, D., & Bretthauer, K. (2011). Dual channel supply chains: challenges and opportunities in e-fulfillment. Production and Inventory Management Journal, 47, 14–30.Google Scholar
  26. Malkoc, S. A., & Zauberman, G. (2006). Deferring versus expediting consumption: the effect of outcome. Journal of Marketing Research, 43, 705–718.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Miller, P. (2004). In-store pickup pitfalls and payoffs. Catalog Age, December, 27.Google Scholar
  28. Min, H., Ko, H. J., & Ko, C. S. (2006). A Genetic algorithm approach to developing the multi-echelon reverse logistics network for product returns. Omega, 34, 56–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Mollenkopf, D., Rabinovich, E., Laseter, T. M., & Boyer, K. K. (2007). Managing Internet product returns: a focus on effective service operations. Decision Sciences, 38, 215–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Mukhopadhyay, S. K., & Setoputro, R. (2004). Reverse logistics in e-business. International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, 34, 70–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Netessine, S., & Rudi, N. (2006). Supply chain choice on the Internet. Management Science, 52, 844–864.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Ofec, E., Katona, Z., & Sarvary, M. (2011). “Bricks and clicks:” the impact of product returns on the strategies of multichannel retailers. Marketing Science, 30, 42–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Randall, T., Netessine, S., & Rudi, N. (2006). An empirical examination of the decision to invest in fulfillment capabilities: a study of Internet retailers. Management Science, 52, 567–580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Sharma, A., & Sheth, J. N. (2004). Web-based marketing: the coming revolution in marketing thought and strategy. Journal of Business Strategy, 57, 696–702.Google Scholar
  35. Spencer, J. (2003). “I ordered that?” Web retailers make it easier to return goods. Wall Street Journal—Eastern Edition, 242, D1–D2.Google Scholar
  36. Stewart, D. W., & Zhao, Q. (2000). Internet marketing, business models, and public policy. Journal of Public Policy and Marketing, 19, 287–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Syam, S., & Bhatnagar, A. (2010). A decision model for e-commerce-enabled partial market exit. Journal of Retailing, 86, 401–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Tang, F. F., & Xing, X. (2001). Will the growth of multichannel retailing diminish the pricing efficiency of the Web? Journal of Retailing, 77, 319–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Tarn, J. M., Razi, M. A., & Wen, H. J. (2003). E-fulfillment: the strategy and operational requirements. Logistics Information Management, 16, 350–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Viswanathan, S. (2005). Competing across technology-differentiated channels: the impact of network externalities and switching costs. Management Science, 51, 483–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Zhang, Z., Farris, P. W., Irvin, J. W., Kushwaha, T., Steenburgh, T. J., & Weitz, B. A. (2010). Crafting integrated multichannel retailing strategies. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 24, 168–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Academy of Marketing Science 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Stephen Mahar
    • 1
  • P. Daniel Wright
    • 1
  • Kurt M. Bretthauer
    • 2
  • Ronald Paul Hill
    • 1
  1. 1.Villanova School of BusinessVillanova UniversityVillanovaUSA
  2. 2.Kelley School of BusinessIndiana UniversityBloomingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations