Skip to main content

Buyers’ perceived switching costs and switching: a meta-analytic assessment of their antecedents

Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science volume 42, pages 186–204 (2014)Cite this article

Abstract

This article presents a meta-analysis of the antecedents of buyers’ perceived switching costs and switching. The authors synthesize results from 170 independent samples in 152 manuscripts and test several moderator effects and a causal meta-analytic model. The major findings are as follows: (1) Of all antecedents, market-related variables (i.e., alternatives and competition) have the strongest influence on switching costs; they reduce these costs via affecting buyers’ quality perception of a relationship and offerings. Firm-related variables (e.g., seller investments) play a minor role as a driver of switching costs and switching, indicating a limited influence of firms’ activities on switching costs. (2) Switching costs have only a weak negative influence on switching. (3) A moderator analysis reveals that most of the effects are context specific. For instance, services (versus goods) decrease and B2C (versus B2B) settings increase the relationship between antecedents and switching costs. Further, the moderating influence of year and culture indicate fundamental market changes and variations across countries. The study provides several implications for relationship research and management.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

References

  • Adams, J. S. (1965). Inequity in social exchange. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (pp. 267–299). New York: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andaleeb, S. S. (1996). An experimental investigation of satisfaction and commitment in marketing channels: The role of trust and dependence. Journal of Retailing, 72, 77–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Antón, C., Camarero, C., & Carrero, M. (2007). Analysing firms’ failures as determinants of consumer switching intentions - the effect of moderating factors. European Journal of Marketing, 41, 135–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashley, C., Noble, S. M., Donthu, N., & Lemon, K. N. (2011). Why customers won't relate: obstacles to relationship marketing engagement. Journal of Business Research, 64, 749–756.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aydin, S., & Özer, G. (2005). The analysis of antecedents of customer loyalty in the Turkish mobile telecommunication market. European Journal of Marketing, 39, 910–925.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bansal, H. S., Irving, P. G., & Taylor, S. F. (2004). A three-component model of customer to service providers. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 32, 234–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bansal, H. S., Taylor, S. F., & James, Y. S. (2005). “Migrating” to new service providers: toward a unifying framework of consumers’ switching behaviors. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 33, 96–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beatson, A., Coote, L. V., & Rudd, J. M. (2006). Determining consumer satisfaction and commitment through self-service technology and personal service usage. Journal of Marketing Management, 22, 853–882.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beatty, S. E., Reynolds, K. E., Noble, S. M., & Harrison, M. P. (2012). Understanding the relationships between commitment and voice: hypotheses, empirical evidence, and directions for future research. Journal of Service Research, 15, 296–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bell, S. J., Auh, S., & Smalley, K. (2005). Customer relationship dynamics: service quality and customer loyalty in the context of varying levels of customer expertise and switching costs. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 33, 169–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhattacharya, C. B., & Sen, S. (2003). Consumer-company identification: a framework for understanding consumers' relationships with companies. Journal of Marketing, 67, 76–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bloemer, J., & Odekerken-Schröder, G. (2007). The psychological antecedents of enduring customer relationships. Journal of Relationship Marketing, 6, 21–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bougie, R., Peters, R., & Zeelenberg, M. (2003). Angry customers don’t come back, they get back: the experience and behavioral implications of anger and dissatisfaction in services. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 31, 377–393.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boulding, W., Staelin, R., Ehret, M., & Johnston, W. J. (2005). A customer relationship management roadmap: what is known, potential pitfalls, and where to go. Journal of Marketing, 69, 155–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burnham, T. A., Frels, J. K., & Mahajan, V. (2003). Consumer switching costs: a typology, antecedents, and consequences. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 31, 109–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Camarero, C., Antón, C., & Carrero, M. (2010). Relationship exit in different legal environments: a cross-cultural analysis. Service Industries Journal, 30, 1457–1478.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caruana, A., & Calleya, P. (1998). The effect of internal marketing on organisational commitment among retail bank managers. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 16, 108–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chou, P.-F., & Lu, C.-S. (2009). Assessing service quality, switching costs and customer loyalty in home-delivery services in Taiwan. Transport Reviews, 29, 741–758.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chui, A. C. W., & Kwok, C. C. Y. (2008). National culture and life insurance consumption. Journal of International Business Studies, 39, 88–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coelho, P. S., & Henseler, J. (2012). Creating customer loyalty through service customization. European Journal of Marketing, 46, 331–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crosby, L. A., Evans, K. R., & Cowles, D. (1990). Relationship quality in services selling: an interpersonal influence perspective. Journal of Marketing, 54, 68–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crosno, J. L., & Dahlstrom, R. (2008). A meta-analytic review of opportunism in exchange relationships. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 36, 191–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Wulf, K., Odekerken-Schröder, G., & Iacobucci, D. (2001). Investments in consumer relationships: a cross-country and cross-industry exploration. Journal of Marketing, 65, 33–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dick, A. S., & Basu, K. (1994). Customer loyalty: toward an integrated conceptual framework. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 22, 99–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dwyer, F. R., Schurr, P. H., & Oh, S. (1987). Developing buyer-seller relationships. Journal of Marketing, 51, 11–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fang, E., Palmatier, R. W., & Evans, K. R. (2008). Influence of customer participation on creating and sharing of new product value. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 36, 322–336.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson, R., & Hlavinka, K. (2007). The COLLOQUY loyalty marketing census: sizing up the US loyalty marketing industry. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 24, 313–321.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fullerton, G. (2005). How commitment both enables and undermines marketing relationships. European Journal of Marketing, 39, 1372–1388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gao, T., Sirgy, M. J., & Bird, M. M. (2005). Reducing buyer decision-making uncertainty in organizational purchasing: Can supplier trust, commitment, and dependence help? Journal of Business Research, 58, 397–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geyskens, I., Steenkamp, J.-B. E. M., Scheer, L. K., & Kumar, N. (1996). The effects of trust and interdependence on relationship commitment: a trans-Atlantic study. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 13, 303–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geyskens, I., Steenkamp, J.-B. E. M., & Kumar, N. (1998). Generalizations about trust in marketing channel relationships using meta-analysis. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 15, 223–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geyskens, I., Steenkamp, J.-B. E. M., & Kumar, N. (1999). A meta-analysis of satisfaction in marketing channel relationships. Journal of Marketing Research, 36, 223–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goode, M. M. H., & Harris, L. C. (2007). Online behavioural intentions: an empirical investigation of antecedents and moderators. European Journal of Marketing, 41, 512–536.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, L. E., & Dion, P. A. (2001). The determinants of commitment in the distributor - manufacturer relationship. Industrial Marketing Management, 30, 287–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gounaris, S. P. (2005). Trust and commitment influences on customer retention: insights from business-to-business services. Journal of Business Research, 58, 126–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heide, J. B., & Weiss, A. M. (1995). Vendor consideration and switching behavior for buyers in high-technology markets. Journal of Marketing, 59, 30–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heilman, C. M., Bowman, D., & Wright, G. P. (2000). The evolution of brand preferences and choice behaviors of consumers new to a market. Journal of Marketing Research, 37, 139–155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hewett, K., Money, R. B., & Sharma, S. (2006). National culture and industrial buyer-seller relationships in the United States and Latin America. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 34, 386–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, G. H. (1980). Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind. London: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Homburg, C., Müller, M., & Klarmann, M. (2011). When does salespeople’s customer orientation lead to customer loyalty? The differential effects of relational and functional customer orientation. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 39, 795–812.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunter, J. E., & Schmidt, F. L. (2004). Methods of meta-analysis. Correcting error and bias in research findings. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Izquierdo, C. C., Rodrííguez, S., & Joséé, R. S. (2006). Customers‘ perception of value in financial services relationships. Journal of International Consumer Marketing, 19, 57–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, B. B. (1985). Winning and keeping industrial customers. Lexington: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, M. A., Mothersbaugh, D. L., & Beatty, S. E. (2000). Switching barriers and repurchase intentions in services. Journal of Retailing, 76, 259–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, M. A., Mothersbaugh, D. L., & Beatty, S. E. (2002). Why customers stay: measuring the underlying dimensions of services switching costs and managing their differential strategic outcomes. Journal of Business Research, 55, 441–450.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaur, G., Sharma, R. D., & Mahajan, N. (2012). Exploring customer switching intentions through relationship marketing paradigm. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 30, 280–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keaveney, S. M. (1995). Customer switching behavior in service industries: an exploratory study. Journal of Marketing, 59, 71–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, S. K. (2007). Relational behaviors in marketing channel relationships: transaction cost implications. Journal of Business Research, 60, 1125–1134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, S. K., Stump, R. L., & Oh, C. (2009). Driving forces of coordination costs in distributor–supplier relationships: toward a middle-range theory. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 37, 384–399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirca, A. H., Jayachandran, S., & Bearden, W. O. (2005). Market orientation: a meta-analytic review and assessment of its antecedents and impact on performance. Journal of Marketing, 69, 24–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kwon, K.-N., Lee, M.-H., & Kwon, Y. J. (2008). The effect of perceived product characteristics on private brand purchase. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 25, 105–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lam, S. K., Ahearne, M., Hu, Y., & Schillewaert, N. (2010). Resistance to brand switching when a radically new brand is introduced: a social identity theory perspective. Journal of Marketing, 74, 128–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lancastre, A., & Lages, L. F. (2006). The relationship between buyer and a B2B e-marketplace: cooperation determinants in an electronic market context. Industrial Marketing Management, 35, 774–789.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipsey, M. W., & Wilson, D. T. (2001). Practical meta-analysis. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lovelock, C. & Wirtz, J. (2011). Services marketing. people, technology, strategy. Boston: Prentice Hall.

  • McKee, S. (2007). The problem with loyalty programs. BusinessWeek.com.

  • Melancon, J. P., Noble, S. M., & Noble, C. H. (2011). Managing rewards to enhance relational worth. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 39, 341–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, R. M., & Hunt, S. D. (1994). The commitment-trust theory of relationship marketing. Journal of Marketing, 58, 20–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orsingher, C., Valentini, S., & de Angelis, M. (2010). A meta-analysis of satisfaction with complaint handling in services. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 38, 169–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palmatier, R. W., Dant, R. P., Grewal, D., & Evans, K. R. (2006). Factors influencing the effectiveness of relationship marketing: a meta-analysis. Journal of Marketing, 70, 136–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmatier, R. W., Jarvis, C. B., Bechkoff, J. R., & Kardes, F. R. (2009). The role of customer gratitude in relationship marketing. Journal of Marketing, 73, 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palmatier, R. W., Houston, M. B., Dant, R. P., & Grewal, D. (2013). Relationship velocity: toward a theory of relationship dynamics. Journal of Marketing, 77, 13–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A., & Berry, L. L. (1985). A conceptual model of service quality and its implications for future research. Journal of Marketing, 49, 41–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ping, R. A. J. (1993). The effects of satisfaction and structural constraints on retailer exiting, voice, loyalty, opportunism, and neglect. Journal of Retailing, 69, 320–352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Polo, Y., & Sesé, F. J. (2009). How to make switching costly. The role of marketing and relationship characteristics. Journal of Service Research, 12, 119–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheer, L. K., Miao, C. F., & Garrett, J. (2010). The effects of supplier capabilities on industrial customers’ loyalty: the role of dependence. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 38, 90–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sengupta, S., Krapfel, R. E., & Pusateri, M. A. (1997). Switching costs in key account relationships. The Journal of Personal Selling and Sales Management, 17, 9–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, N. (2003). The role of pure and quasi-moderators in services: an empirical investigation of ongoing customer-service-provider relationships. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Service, 10, 253–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Szymanski, D. M., & Henard, D. H. (2001). Customer satisfaction: a meta-analysis of the empirical evidence. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 29, 16–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Szymanski, D. M., Kroff, M. W., & Troy, L. C. (2007). Innovativeness and new product success: insights from the cumulative evidence. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 35, 35–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsai, H.-T., & Huang, H.-C. (2007). Determinants of e-repurchase intentions: an integrative model of quadruple retention drivers. Information Management, 44, 231–239.

    Google Scholar 

  • Varki, S., & Wong, S. (2003). Consumer involvement in relationship marketing of services. Journal of Service Research, 6, 83–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vázquez-Casielles, R., Suárez-Álvarez, L., & Del Río-Lanza, A. B. (2009). Customer satisfaction and switching barriers: effects on repurchase intentions, positive recommendations, and price tolerance. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 39, 2275–2302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verbeke, W., Dietz, B., & Verwaal, E. (2011). Drivers of sales performance: a contemporary meta-analysis. Have salespeople become knowledge brokers? Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 39, 407–428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verhoef, P. C., Franses, P. H., & Hoekstra, J. C. (2002). The effect of relational constructs on customer referrals and number of services purchased from a multiservice provider: does age of relationship matter? Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 30, 202–216.

    Google Scholar 

  • Viswesvaran, C., & Ones, D. S. (1995). Theory testing: combining psychometric meta-analysis and structural equations modeling. Personnel Psychology, 48, 865–885.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walsh, G., Groth, M., & Wiedmann, K.-P. (2005). An examination of consumers' motives to switch energy suppliers. Journal of Marketing Management, 21, 421–440.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Y.-S., Wu, S.-C., Lin, H.-H., & Wang, Y.-Y. (2010). The relationship of service failure severity, service recovery justice and perceived switching costs with customer loyalty in the context of E-tailing. International Journal of Information Management, 31, 350–359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wathne, K. H., Biong, H., & Heide, J. B. (2001). Choice of supplier in embedded markets: Relationship and marketing program effects. Journal of Marketing, 65, 54–66.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the editor and the two anonymous JAMS reviewers for their constructive and helpful comments. They wish to acknowledge the helpful input of Wayne D. Hoyer, Peter C. Verhoef and Jochen Wirtz and thank them for comments on a former draft of this article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Freie Universitaet Berlin, Otto-von-Simson-Str. 19, 14195, Berlin, Germany

    Doreén Pick

  2. European University Viadrina Frankfurt (Oder), Große Scharrnstraße 59, 15230, Frankfurt (Oder), Germany

    Martin Eisend

Authors
  1. Doreén Pick
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Martin Eisend
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Martin Eisend.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

ESM 1

(DOC 556 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pick, D., Eisend, M. Buyers’ perceived switching costs and switching: a meta-analytic assessment of their antecedents. J. of the Acad. Mark. Sci. 42, 186–204 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-013-0349-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-013-0349-2

Keywords

  • Perceived switching costs
  • Switching
  • Relationship marketing
  • Meta-analysis