Corporate brand name changes and business restructuring: is the relationship complementary or substitutive?
- 1.2k Downloads
Corporate brands are strategic assets for organizations, but it is difficult to understand the value added by corporate brand name changes because they often occur simultaneously with business restructuring initiatives. The authors test a framework that delineates the informational relationship between corporate name changes and business restructuring initiatives. The hypothesis is tested on a sample of jointly announced corporate name changes and business restructuring initiatives. The results show that jointly announced corporate name changes and business restructuring are significantly more informative than the sum of their individual effects. The results further suggest that the information complementarity arises because corporate brand name changes resolve uncertainty and help in coordinating business restructuring initiatives. The results do not support the view that corporate brand name changes are cosmetic and/or primarily signals for business restructuring. The study offers a promising research foundation for understanding the value of marketing actions announced jointly with other corporate events.
KeywordsCorporate brands Corporate name change Business restructuring Complementarity
- Albert, S., & Whetten, D. A. (1985). Organizational identity. In L. L. Cummings & B. M. Staw (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior, Vol. 7 (pp. 263–295). Greenwich: JAI Press.Google Scholar
- Belkin, L. (1987). How American can became primerica: Chairman Cerry Tsai found it an order. New York Times, 8, 3–1.Google Scholar
- Corley, K. G., & Gioai, D. A. (2004). Identity ambiguity and change in the wake of a corporate spin-off. Administrative Science Quarterly, 49, 173–208.Google Scholar
- Dinner, I., Mizik, N., & Lehmann, D. (2009). The Unappreciated value of marketing: the moderating role of changes in marketing and r&d spending on valuation of earnings reports. Marketing Science Institute Special Report 09–204.Google Scholar
- Gioai, D. A., Schultz, M., & Corley, K. G. (2000). Organizational identity, image and adaptive instability. Academy of Management Review, 25, 63–81.Google Scholar
- Hoskisson, R. E., & Turk, T. A. (1990). Corporate restructuring: governance and control limits of the internal capital market. Academy of Management Review, 15, 459–477.Google Scholar
- Keller, K. L. (1998). Strategic brand management: building, measuring, and managing customer-based brand equity. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
- Lehmann, D. R., & Reibstein, D. J. (2006). Marketing metrics and financial performance. Cambridge: Marketing Science Institute Relevant Knowledge Series.Google Scholar
- Li, K., & Prabhala, N. R. (2006). Self-selection models in corporate finance. In B. Espen Eckbo (Ed.), Handbook of corporate finance: empirical corporate finance. North-Holland: Elsevier.Google Scholar
- Markides, C. C. (1992). Consequences of corporate refocusing: ex-ante evidence. Strategic Management Journal, 35, 398–412.Google Scholar
- Wine, E., & Sullivan, A. (2001). Growth makes way for value in mutual fund name changes. Financial Times, 21, 40.Google Scholar