Abstract
Based on primary data spanning 5 years, we examine factors that influence the entry-level placement of marketing doctoral candidates at U.S. universities and colleges. Contributing to the emerging research on human brands, we identify marketing doctoral candidates’ intrinsic and extrinsic brand cues that influence their number of AMA interviews, campus visit offers, and starting base salary. The strongest brand cue is the research productivity of candidates’ doctoral degree-granting departments. A related cue that also predicts initial salary is the candidates’ advisors’ research record. Further, when beginning the job search, doctoral students who have a top research publication, who have a dissertation proposal defended with data, and who have attended the AMA-Sheth Foundation Doctoral Consortium receive a substantial entry salary premium. Based on branding frameworks and theories of academic rewards, this study adds to the emerging knowledge on both the concept of human brands as well as the growing literature on issues relating to marketing academia.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aaker, D. A., & Keller, K. L. (1990). Consumer evaluations of brand extensions. Journal of Marketing, 54, 27–41.
AMA Marketing Thought Task Force. (1988). Developing, disseminating, and utilizing marketing knowledge. Journal of Marketing, 52, 1–25.
Ataman, M. B., Mela, C. F., & van Heerde, H. J. (2008). Building brands. Marketing Science, 27, 1036–1054.
Babin, B. L. (2008). Scholarly marketing publication: the American Advantage? European Business Review, 20(5), 370–383.
Bakir, A., Vitell, S. J., & Rose, G. M. (2000). Publications in major marketing journals: an analysis of scholars and marketing departments. Journal of Marketing Education, 22(2), 99–107.
Bauerly, R. J., & Johnson, D. T. (2005). An evaluation of journals used in doctoral marketing programs. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 33(3), 313–329.
Baumgartner, H., & Pieters, R. (2003). The structural influence of marketing journals: a citation analysis of the discipline and its subareas over time. Journal of Marketing, 67(2), 123–129.
Bertin, W. J., & Zivney, T. L. (1991). The new hire market for finance: productivity, salaries, and other market factors. Financial Practice and Education, 1, 25–34.
Broniarczyk, S. M., & Alba, J. (1994). The importance of brand in brand extension. Journal of Marketing Research, 31, 214–228.
Brown, T. J., & Dacin, P. A. (1997). The company and the product: corporate associations and consumer product responses. Journal of Marketing, 61(1), 68–84.
Burris, V. (2004). The academic caste system: prestige hierarchies in Ph.D. exchange networks. American Sociological Review, 69, 239–264.
Carson, R., & Navaro, P. (1988). A seller’s (& buyer’s) guide to the job market for beginning academic economists. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 2, 137–148.
Cole, J. R., & Cole, S. (1973). Social stratification in science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Desai, K. K., & Keller, K. L. (2002). The effects of ingredient branding strategies on host brand extendibility. Journal of Marketing, 66, 73–93.
Erdem, T., Swait, J., & Valenzuela, A. (2006). Brands as signals: a cross-country validation study. Journal of Marketing, 70, 34–49.
Fournier, S. (2010). Taking stock in Martha Stewart: A cultural critique of the marketing practice of building person-brands. In Campbell, M. C., Inman, J., & Pieters, R. (Eds.), Advances in consumer research, volume 37. Duluth: Association for Consumer Research (forthcoming).
Gatignon, H., Weitz, B., & Bansal, P. (1990). Brand introduction strategies and competitive environments. Journal of Marketing Research, 27, 390–401.
Gürhan-Canli, Z., & Maheswaran, D. (2000). Cultural variations in country of origin effects. Journal of Marketing Research, 37, 309–317.
Hagstrom, W. O. (1971). Inputs, outputs, and the prestige of university science departments. Sociology of Education, 44(1), 375–397.
Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (1998). Multivariate data analysis (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River: Prentice-Hall.
Hirschman, E. C. (1987). People as products: analysis of a complex marketing exchange. Journal of Marketing, 51(1), 98–108.
Hofacker, C. F., Gleim, M. R., & Lawson, S. J. (2009). Revealed reader preference for marketing journals. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 37(4), 238–247.
Hult, G. T. M., Neese, W. T., & Bashaw, R. E. (1997). Faculty perceptions of marketing journals. Journal of Marketing Education, 19(1), 37–52.
Hult, G. T. M., Reimann, M., & Schilke, O. (2009). Worldwide faculty perceptions of marketing journals: rankings, trends, comparisons, and segmentations. Global Edge Business Review, 3(3), 1–23.
Iyer, V. M., & Clark, D. (1999). Criteria for recruitment as assistant professor of accounting in colleges and universities. Journal of Education for Business, 74, 6–29.
Jacoby, J., Olson, J. C., & Haddock, R. A. (1971). Price, brand name, and product composition characteristics as determinants of perceived quality. Journal of Applied Psychology, 55(6), 570–579.
Janiszewski, C. A. (1988). Preconscious processing effects: the independence of attitude formation and conscious thought. Journal of Consumer Research, 15(2), 199–209.
Keller, K. L. (1993). Conceptualizing, measuring, and managing customer-based brand equity. Journal of Marketing, 57(1), 1–22.
Keller, K. L., & Aaker, J. (1992). The effects of sequential introduction of brand extensions. Journal of Marketing Research, 23, 35–50.
Kirmani, A., & Rao, R. R. (2000). No pain, no gain: a critical review of the literature on signaling unobservable product quality. Journal of Marketing, 64, 66–79.
Laforet, S., & Saunders, J. (1994). Managing brand portfolios: how the leaders do it. Journal of Advertising Research, 34(5), 64–76.
Long, J. S., & McGinnis, R. (1985). The effects of the mentor on the academic career. Scientometrics, 7(3–6), 255–280.
Malhotra, N. K., Patil, A., & Kim, S. S. (2007). Bias breakdown. Marketing Research, 19(1), 24–29.
McGuire, W. J. (1985). Attitudes and attitude change. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 233–246). New York: Random House.
Merton, R. K. (1973) [1942]. The normative structure of science. In Storer, N. W. (Ed.), The sociology of science (pp. 267–278). Chicago: University of Chicago Press, National Research Council.
Mittal, V., Feick, L., & Murshed, F. (2008). Publish and prosper: the financial impact of publishing by marketing faculty. Marketing Science, 27, 430–442.
Nelson, P. (1970). Information and consumer behavior. Journal of Political Economy, 78(2), 311–329.
Olson, J. C. (1977). Price as an informational cue: Effects on product evaluations. In A. G. Woodside, J. N. Sheth, & P. D. Bennett (Eds.), Consumer and industrial buying behavior (pp. 267–286). New York: Elsvier North Holland, Inc.
Rao, A. R., & Monroe, K. B. (1988). The moderating effect of prior knowledge on cue utilization in product evaluations. Journal of Consumer Research, 15, 253–264.
Rao, A. R., & Ruekert, R. W. (1994). Brand alliances as signals of product quality. Sloan Management Review, 36(1), 87–97.
Richardson, P. S., Dick, A. S., & Jain, A. K. (1994). Extrinsic and intrinsic cue effects on perceptions of store brand quality. Journal of Marketing, 58, 28–36.
Russell, C., & Schau, H. J. (2010). The ties that bind: Consumer engagement and transference with a human brand. In Campbell, M. C., Inman, J., & Pieters, R. (Eds.), Advances in consumer research, volume 37. Duluth: Association for Consumer Research, forthcoming.
Seggie, S. H., & Griffith, D. A. (2009). What does it take to get promoted in marketing academia? Understanding exceptional publication productivity in the leading marketing journals. Journal of Marketing, 73(1), 122–132.
Simonin, B. L., & Ruth, J. A. (1998). Is a company known by the company it keeps? Assessing the spillover effects of brand alliances on consumer brand attitudes. Journal of Marketing Research, 35(1), 30–42.
Tajfel, H. (1978). Social categorization, social identity and social comparison. In H. Tajfel (Ed.), Differentiation between social groups: Studies in the social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 61–76). London: Academic.
Taube, P. M., & MacDonald, D. N. (1989). The job market for finance Ph.D.s. Journal of Financial Education, 18, 54–59.
Teas, R. K., & Agarwal, S. (2000). The effects of extrinsic product cues on consumers’ perceptions of quality, sacrifice, and value. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 28(2), 278–290.
Tellis, G. J., Chandy, R. K., & Ackerman, D. S. (1999). In search of diversity: the record of major marketing journals. Journal of Marketing Research, 36, 120–131.
Thomson, M. (2006). Human brands: investigating antecedents to consumers’ strong attachments to celebrities. Journal of Marketing, 70, 104–119.
University of Texas at Dallas. (2010). University of Texas at Dallas School of Managements’ Top 100 Business School Research Rankings, (http://citm.utdallas.edu/utdrankings/home.aspx).
Wilkie, W. L. (2005). Needed: a larger sense of marketing and scholarship. Journal of Marketing, 69, 8–10.
Williamson, I., & Cable, D. M. (2003). Predicting early career research productivity: the case of management faculty. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 24(1), 25–44.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
The authors sincerely wish to thank the members, leaders, and advisory board of AMA’s DocSIG, especially Annie Cui, Maureen Bourassa, Jody Crosno, Jodie Ferguson, Alex Zablah, and Tom DeWitt. The authors thank Georgia State University for hosting the online survey. The authors also thank the scholars who provided valuable input to this manuscript: Mike Brady, Mike LaTour, Roland Gau, Peter Dixon, Dhruv Grewal, Peter Dacin, Dan Ladick, and Jack Schibrowski.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Close, A.G., Moulard, J.G. & Monroe, K.B. Establishing human brands: determinants of placement success for first faculty positions in marketing. J. of the Acad. Mark. Sci. 39, 922–941 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-010-0221-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-010-0221-6