Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science

, Volume 39, Issue 1, pp 117–135 | Cite as

How can corporate social responsibility activities create value for stakeholders? A systematic review

Article

Abstract

Corporate social responsibility (CSR) activities have the potential to create stronger relationships between firms and stakeholders. Although marketing researchers have studied the impacts of CSR activities on stakeholder responses, the CSR activities and outcomes measured have been varied and inconsistent. In this article we (a) review the extant literature to outline which CSR activities and outcomes have been included in previous research; (b) synthesize the means by which CSR activities can add value for consumers and how these have been represented in CSR literature, and; (c) present a research agenda for future research to allow greater consistency among CSR researchers.

Keywords

Corporate social responsibility Sustainability Systematic review Green marketing Consumption values Philanthropy Identification Customer value 

Notes

The financial support from the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada is gratefully acknowledged.

References

  1. Aguilera, R. V., Rupp, D. E., Williams, C. A., & Ganapathi, J. (2007). Putting the S back in corporate social responsibility: a multilevel theory of social change in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 32(3), 836–863.Google Scholar
  2. *Al-Ajmi, J., Hussain, H., & Al-Saleh, N. (2009). Clients of conventional and Islamic banks in Bahrain: how they choose which bank to patronize. International Journal of Social Economics, 36(11), 1086–1112.Google Scholar
  3. *Albinger, H. S., & Freeman, S. J. (2000). Corporate social performance and attractiveness as an employer to different job seeking populations. Journal of Business Ethics, 28, 243–254.Google Scholar
  4. Allen, C. T. (1982). Self-perception based strategies for stimulating energy conservation. Journal of Consumer Research, 8(4), 381–390.Google Scholar
  5. *Anselmsson, J., & Johansson, U. (2007). Corporate social responsibility and the positioning of grocery brands. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 35(10), 835–856.Google Scholar
  6. *Arli, D. I., & Lasmono, H. K. (2010). Consumers’ perception of corporate social responsibility in a developing country. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 34, 46–51.Google Scholar
  7. *Arora, N., & Henderson, T. (2007). Embedded premium promotion: why it works and how to make it more effective. Marketing Science, 26(4), 514–531.Google Scholar
  8. *Atkin, J. L., McCardle, M., & Newell, S. J. (2008). The role of advertiser motives in consumer evaluations of ‘responsibility’ messages from the alcohol industry. Journal of Marketing Communications, 14(4), 315–335.Google Scholar
  9. *Auger, P., Burke, P., Devinney, T. M., & Louviere, J. J. (2003). What will consumers pay for social product features? Journal of Business Ethics, 42, 281–304.Google Scholar
  10. *Auger, P., Devinney, T. M., Louviere, J. J., & Burke, P. F. (2008). Do social product features have value to consumers? International Journal of Research in Marketing, 25, 183–191.Google Scholar
  11. *Backhaus, K. B., Stone, B. A., & Heiner, K. (2002). Exploring the relationship between corporate social performance and employer attractiveness. Business & Society, 41(3), 292–318.Google Scholar
  12. *Baghi, I., Rubaltelli, E., & Tedeschi, M. (2009). A strategy to communicate corporate social responsibility: cause related marketing and its dark side. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 16, 15–26.Google Scholar
  13. Barnett, M. (2007). Stakeholder influence capacity and the variability of financial returns to corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 32(3), 794–816.Google Scholar
  14. *Barone, M. J., Miyazaki, A. D., & Taylor, K. A. (2000). The influence of cause-related marketing on consumer choice: does one good turn deserve another? Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 28(2), 248–262.Google Scholar
  15. *Barone, M. J., Norman, A. T., & Miyazaki, A. D. (2007). Consumer responses to retailer use of cause-related marketing: is more fit better? Journal of Retailing, 83(4), 437–445.Google Scholar
  16. *Basil, D. Z., & Herr, P. M. (2006). Attitudinal balance and cause-related marketing: an empirical application of balance theory. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 16(4), 391–403.Google Scholar
  17. *Basil, D. Z., & Weber, D. (2006). Values motivation and concern for appearances: the effect of personality traits on responses to corporate social responsibility. International Journal of Nonprofit & Voluntary Sector Marketing, 11(1), 61–72.Google Scholar
  18. *Becker-Olsen, K. L., Cudmore, B. A., & Hill, R. P. (2006). The impact of perceived corporate social responsibility on consumer behavior. Journal of Business Research, 59(1), 46–53.Google Scholar
  19. *Behrend, T. S., Baker, B. A., & Thompson, L. F. (2009). Effects of pro-environmental recruiting messages: the role of organizational reputation. Journal of Business Psychology, 24, 341–350.Google Scholar
  20. *Berens, G., van Riel, C. B. M., & van Bruggen, G. H. (2005). Corporate associations and consumer product responses: the moderating role of corporate brand dominance. Journal of Marketing, 69(3), 35–48.Google Scholar
  21. *Berens, G., van Riel, C. B. M., & van Rekom, J. (2007). The CSR-quality trade-off: when can corporate social responsibility and corporate ability compensate each other? Journal of Business Ethics, 74, 233–252.Google Scholar
  22. *Berger, I. E., & Corbin, R. M. (1992). Perceived consumer effectiveness and faith in others as moderators of environmentally responsible behaviors. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 11(2), 79–90.Google Scholar
  23. *Berger, I. E., Cunningham, P. H., & Kozinets, R. V. (1999). Consumer persuasion through cause-related advertising. Advances in Consumer Research, 26(1), 491–497.Google Scholar
  24. *Bhattacharya, C. B., & Sen, S. (2004). Doing better at doing good: when, why, and how consumers respond to corporate social initiatives. California Management Review, 47(1), 9–24.Google Scholar
  25. Bhattacharya, C. B., & Korschun, D. (2008). Stakeholder marketing: beyond the 4 Ps and the customer. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 27(1), 113–116.Google Scholar
  26. Bhattacharya, C. B., Korschun, D., & Sen, S. (2009). Strengthening stakeholder-company relationships through mutually beneficial corporate social responsibility initiatives. Journal of Business Ethics, 85, 257–272.Google Scholar
  27. *Biehal, G. J., & Sheinin, D. A. (2007). The influence of corporate messages on the product portfolio. Journal of Marketing, 71(2), 12–25.Google Scholar
  28. *Bigne-Alcaniz, E., Curras-Perez, R., & Sanchez-Garcia, I. (2009). Brand credibility in cause-related marketing: the moderating role of consumer values. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 18(6), 437–447.Google Scholar
  29. *Bower, A. B., & Grau, S. L. (2009). Explicit donations and inferred endorsements. Journal of Advertising, 38(3), 113–126.Google Scholar
  30. *Brammer, S., Millington, A., & Rayton, B. (2007). The contribution of corporate social responsibility to organizational commitment. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 18(10), 1701–1719.Google Scholar
  31. *Brammer, S., Williams, G., & Zinkin, J. (2007). Religion and attitudes to corporate social responsibility in a large cross-country sample. Journal of Business Ethics, 71, 229–243.Google Scholar
  32. Briner, R. B., Denyer, D., & Rousseau, D. M. (2009). Evidence-based management: concept cleanup time? Academy of Management Perspectives, 23(4), 19–32.Google Scholar
  33. *Broderick, A., Jogi, A., & Garry, T. (2003). Tickled pink: the personal meaning of cause related marketing for customers. Journal of Marketing Management, 19, 583–610.Google Scholar
  34. *Brown, T. J., & Dacin, P. A. (1997). The company and the product: corporate associations and consumer product responses. Journal of Marketing, 61(1), 68–84.Google Scholar
  35. Campbell, J. L. (2007). Why would corporations behave in socially responsible ways? Institutional theory of corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 32(3), 946–967.Google Scholar
  36. *Carrigan, M., & Attalla, A. (2001). The myth of the ethical consumer—do ethics matters in purchase behaviour? Journal of Consumer Marketing, 18(7), 560–577.Google Scholar
  37. Carroll, A. B. (1979). A three-dimensional model of corporate social performance. Academy of Management Review, 4, 497–505.Google Scholar
  38. *Castaldo, S., Perrini, F., Misani, N., & Tencati, A. (2009). The missing link between corporate social responsibility and consumer trust: the case of fair trade products. Journal of Business Ethics, 84(1), 1–15.Google Scholar
  39. *Chan, R. Y. K. (2001). Determinants of Chinese consumers’ green purchase behavior. Psychology & Marketing, 18(4), 389–413.Google Scholar
  40. *Chang, C. (2008). To donate or not to donate? Product characteristics and framing effects of cause-related marketing on consumer purchase behavior. Psychology & Marketing, 25(12), 1089–1110.Google Scholar
  41. *Chang, H., Chen, T., & Tseng, C. (2009). How public-issue-promoted and revenue-related types of social marketing influence customer-perceived value in Taiwan’s banking industry. Journal of International Consumer Marketing, 21, 35–49.Google Scholar
  42. *Chitra, K. (2007). In search of the green consumers: a perceptual study. Journal of Services Research, 7(1), 173–191.Google Scholar
  43. Clarkson, M. E. (1995). A stakeholder framework for analyzing and evaluating corporate social performance. Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 92–117.Google Scholar
  44. *Collins, C. M., Steg, L., & Koning, M. A. S. (2007). Customers’ values, beliefs on sustainable corporate performance, and buying behavior. Psychology & Marketing, 24(6), 555–577.Google Scholar
  45. Cone, Inc (2009). Cause branding and corporate responsibility endure despite the recession. Downloaded from: http://www.coneinc.com/weatheringtherecession.
  46. *Creyer, E. H., & Ross, W. T., Jr. (1996). The impact of corporate behavior on perceived product value. Marketing Letters, 7(2), 173–185.Google Scholar
  47. *Creyer, E. H., & Ross, W. T., Jr. (1997). The influence of firm behavior on purchase intention: do consumers really care about business Ethics? Journal of Consumer Marketing, 14(6), 421–432.Google Scholar
  48. *Cui, Y., Trent, E. S., Sullivan, P. M., & Matiru, G. N. (2003). Cause-related marketing: how generation Y responds. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 31(6), 310–320.Google Scholar
  49. *Curras-Perez, R., Bigne-Alcaniz, E., & Alvarado-Herrera, A. (2009). The role of self-definitional principles in consumer identification with a socially responsible company. Journal of Business Ethics, 89, 547–564.Google Scholar
  50. *David, P., Kline, S., & Dai, Y. (2005). Corporate social responsibility practices, corporate identity, and purchase intention: a dual-process model. Journal of Public Relations Research, 17(3), 291–313.Google Scholar
  51. *de los Salmones, M., Crespo, A. H., & del Bosque, I. R. (2005). Influence of corporate social responsibility on loyalty and valuation of services. Journal of Business Ethics, 61, 369–385.Google Scholar
  52. *de Matos, C. A., & Rossi, C. A. V. (2006). Consumer reaction to product recalls: factors influencing product judgment and behavioural intentions. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 31(1), 109–116.Google Scholar
  53. *de Pelsmacker, P., Driesen, L., & Rayp, G. (2005). Do consumers care about ethics? Willingness to pay for fair-trade coffee. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 39(2), 363–385.Google Scholar
  54. *Dean, D. H. (2002). Associating the corporation with a charitable event through sponsorship: measuring the effects on corporate community relations. Journal of Advertising, 31(4), 77–87.Google Scholar
  55. *Dean, D. H. (2003). Consumer perceptions of corporate donations. Journal of Advertising, 32(4), 91–102.Google Scholar
  56. *Dean, D. H. (2004). Consumer reaction to negative publicity. Journal of Busines Communication, 41(2), 192–211.Google Scholar
  57. *Deshpande, S., & Hitchon, J. C. (2002). Cause-related marketing ads in the light of negative news. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 79(4), 905–926.Google Scholar
  58. *Drumwright, M. E. (1994). Socially responsible organizational buying: environmental concern as a noneconomic buying criterion. Journal of Marketing, 58(3), 1–19.Google Scholar
  59. *Du, S., Bhattacharya, C. B., & Sen, S. (2007). Reaping relational rewards from corporate social responsibility: the role of competitive positioning. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 24(3), 224–241.Google Scholar
  60. *Ehrich, K. R., & Irwin, J. R. (2005). Willful ignorance in the request for product attribute information. Journal of Marketing Research, 42(3), 266–277.Google Scholar
  61. Elkington, J. (1997). Cannibals with forks: The triple bottom line of 21st century business. Oxford: Capstone.Google Scholar
  62. *Ellen, P. S., Mohr, L. A., & Webb, D. J. (2000). Charitable programs and the retailer: do they mix? Journal of Retailing, 76(3), 393–406.Google Scholar
  63. *Ellen, P. S., Webb, D. J., & Mohr, L. A. (2006). Building corporate associations: consumer attributions for corporate socially responsible programs. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 34(2), 147–157.Google Scholar
  64. *Folkes, V. S., & Kamins, M. A. (1999). Effects of information about firms’ ethical and unethical actions on consumers’ attitudes. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 8(3), 243–259.Google Scholar
  65. *Forehand, M. R., & Grier, S. (2003). When is honesty the best policy? The effect of stated company intent on consumer skepticism. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 13(3), 349–356.Google Scholar
  66. *Garcia, I., Gibaja, J. J., & Mujika, A. (2003). A study on the effect of cause-related marketing on the attitude towards the brand: the case of Pepsi in Spain. Journal of Nonprofit & Public Sector Marketing, 11(1), 111–135.Google Scholar
  67. *Giacalone, R. A., Paul, K., & Jurkiewicz, C. L. (2005). A preliminary investigation into the role of positive psychology in consumer sensitivity to corporate social performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 58, 295–305.Google Scholar
  68. Godfrey, P. C., Merrill, C. B., & Hansen, J. M. (2008). The relationship between corporate social responsibility and shareholder value: an empirical test of the risk management hypothesis. Strategic Management Review, 30, 425–445.Google Scholar
  69. Goldstein, N. J., Cialdini, R. B., & Griskevicius, V. (2008). A room with a viewpoint: using social norms to motivate environmental conservation in hotels. Journal of Consumer Research, 35(3), 472–482.Google Scholar
  70. *Golob, U., Lah, M., & Jancic, Z. (2008). Value orientations and consumer expectations of corporate social responsibility. Journal of Marketing Communications, 14(2), 83–96.Google Scholar
  71. *Grau, S. L., & Folse, J. A. G. (2007). Cause-related marketing (CRM). Journal of Advertising, 36(4), 19–33.Google Scholar
  72. *Grau, S. L., Garretson, J. A., & Pirsch, J. (2007). Cause-Related marketing: an exploratory study of campaign donation structures issues. Journal of Nonprofit & Public Sector Marketing, 18(2), 69–91.Google Scholar
  73. *Greening, D. W., & Turban, D. B. (2000). Corporate social performance as a competitive advantage in attracting a quality workforce. Business & Society, 39(3), 254–280.Google Scholar
  74. *Gupta, S., & Pirsch, J. (2006). The company-cause-customer fit decision in cause-related marketing. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 23(6), 314–326.Google Scholar
  75. *Gupta, S., & Pirsch, J. (2008). The influence of a retailer’s corporate social responsibility program on re-conceptualizing store image. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 15, 516–526.Google Scholar
  76. *Gurhan-Canli, Z., & Batra, R. (2004). When corporate image affects product evaluations: the moderating role of perceived risk. Journal of Marketing Research, 41(2), 197–205.Google Scholar
  77. *Hajjat, M. M. (2003). Effect of cause-related marketing on attitudes and purchase intentions: the moderating role of cause involvement and donation size. Journal of Nonprofit & Public Sector Marketing, 11(1), 93–111.Google Scholar
  78. *Hall, M. R. (2006). Corporate philanthropy and corporate community relations: measuring relationship-building results. Journal of Public Relations Research, 18(1), 1–21.Google Scholar
  79. *Hamlin, R. P., & Wilson, T. (2004). The impact of cause branding on consumer reactions to products: does product/cause ‘fit’ really matter? Journal of Marketing Management, 20(7/8), 66–81.Google Scholar
  80. *Handelman, J. M., & Arnold, S. J. (1999). The role of marketing actions with a social dimension: appeals to the institutional environment. Journal of Marketing, 63(3), 33–48.Google Scholar
  81. *Henion, K. E. (1972). The effect of ecologically relevant information on detergent sales. Journal of Consumer Research, 9(1), 10–14.Google Scholar
  82. Hirschman, E. C., & Holbrook, M. B. (1982). Hedonic consumption: emerging concepts, methods and propositions. Journal of Marketing, 46(3), 92–101.Google Scholar
  83. Hoeffler, S., & Keller, K. L. (2002). Building brand equity through corporate societal marketing. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 21(1), 78–89.Google Scholar
  84. *Hoek, J., & Gendall, P. (2008). An analysis of consumers’ responses to cause related marketing. Journal of Nonprofit & Public Sector Marketing, 20(2), 283–297.Google Scholar
  85. Holbrook, M. B. (2006). ROSEPEKICECIVECI versus CCV. In R. F. Lusch & S. L. Vargo (Eds.), The service-dominant logic of marketing: Dialog, debate and directions (pp. 208–221). Armonk, NY: Sharpe.Google Scholar
  86. *Huang, C. L. (1993). Simultaneous-Equation model for estimating consumer risk perceptions, attitudes, and willingness-to-pay for residue-free products. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 27(2), 377–396.Google Scholar
  87. *Johri, L., & Sahasakmontri, K. (1998). Green marketing of cosmetics and toiletries in Thailand. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 15(3), 265–281.Google Scholar
  88. *Kassarjian, H. H. (1971). Incorporating ecology into marketing strategy: the case of air pollution. Journal of Marketing, 35(3), 61–65.Google Scholar
  89. *Kinnear, T. C., & Taylor, J. R. (1973). The effect of ecological concern on brand perceptions. Journal of Marketing Research, 10(2), 191–197.Google Scholar
  90. *Klein, J., & Dawar, N. (2004). Corporate social responsibility and consumers’ attributions and brand evaluations in a product-harm crisis. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 21(3), 203–217.Google Scholar
  91. *Krishna, A., & Rajan, U. (2009). Cause marketing: spillover effects of cause-related products in a product portfolio. Management Science, 55(9), 1469–1485.Google Scholar
  92. *Lafferty, B. A. (2007). The relevance of fit in a cause-brand alliance when consumers evaluate corporate credibility. Journal of Business Research, 60(5), 447–453.Google Scholar
  93. *Lafferty, B. A. (2009). Selecting the right cause partners for the right reasons: the role of importance and fit in cause-brand alliances. Psychology & Marketing, 26(4), 359–382.Google Scholar
  94. *Lafferty, B. A., & Goldsmith, R. E. (2005). Cause-Brand alliances: does the cause help the brand or does the brand help the cause? Journal of Business Research, 58(4), 423–429.Google Scholar
  95. *Lafferty, B. A., & Edmondson, D. R. (2009). Portraying the cause instead of the brand in cause-related marketing ads: does it really matter? Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 17(2), 129–143.Google Scholar
  96. *Lafferty, B. A., Goldsmith, R. E., & Hult, G. T. M. (2004). The impact of the alliance of the partners: a look at cause-brand alliances. Psychology & Marketing, 21(7), 509–531.Google Scholar
  97. *Laroche, M., Bergeron, J., & Barbaro-Forleo, G. (2001). Targeting consumers who are willing to pay more for environmentally friendly products. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 18(6), 503–520.Google Scholar
  98. *Larson, B. V., Flaherty, K. E., Zablah, A. R., Brown, T. J., & Wiener, J. L. (2008). Linking cause-related marketing to sales force responses and performance in a direct selling context. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 36(2), 271–277.Google Scholar
  99. *Lavack, A. M., & Kropp, F. (2003). A cross-cultural comparison of consumer attitudes toward cause-related marketing. Social Marketing Quarterly, 9(2), 3–16.Google Scholar
  100. *Lee, H., Park, T., Moon, H. K., Yang, Y., & Kin, C. (2009). Corporate philanthropy, attitude towards corporation, and purchase intentions: a South Korea study. Journal of Business Research, 62, 939–946.Google Scholar
  101. *Lichtenstein, D. R., Drumwright, M. E., & Braig, B. M. (2004). The effect of corporate social responsibility on customer donations to corporate-supported nonprofits. Journal of Marketing, 68(4), 16–32.Google Scholar
  102. *Liu, T., Wang, C., & Wu, L. (2010). Moderators of the negativity effect: commitment, identification, and consumer sensitivity to corporate social performance. Psychology & Marketing, 27(1), 54–70.Google Scholar
  103. *Lodorfos, G., & Dennis, J. (2008). Consumers’ intent: in the organic food market. Journal of Food Products Marketing, 14(2), 17–38.Google Scholar
  104. *Luce, R. A., Barber, A. E., & Hillman, A. J. (2001). Good deeds and misdeeds: a mediated model of the effect of corporate social performance on organizational attractiveness. Business Society, 40(4), 397–415.Google Scholar
  105. Luo, X., & Bhattacharya, C. B. (2006). Corporate social responsibility, customer satisfaction, and market value. Journal of Marketing, 70(4), 1–18.Google Scholar
  106. *Madrigal, R., & Boush, D. M. (2008). Social responsibility as a unique dimension of brand personality and consumers’ willingness to reward. Psychology & Marketing, 25(6), 538–564.Google Scholar
  107. *Maignan, I. (2001). Consumers’ perceptions of corporate social responsibilities: a cross-cultural comparison. Journal of Business Ethics, 30, 57–72.Google Scholar
  108. Maignan, I., & Ferrell, O. C. (2004). Corporate social responsibility and marketing: an integrative framework. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 32(1), 3–19.Google Scholar
  109. *Maignan, I., Ferrell, O. C., & Hult, T. G. M. (1999). Corporate citizenship: cultural antecedents and business benefits. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 27(4), 455–469.Google Scholar
  110. Margolis, J. D., & Walsh, J. P. (2003). Misery loves companies: rethinking social initiatives by business. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48(2), 268–305.Google Scholar
  111. *Marin, L., & Ruiz, S. (2007). “I need you too!” Corporate identity attractiveness for consumers and the role of social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 71, 245–260.Google Scholar
  112. *Marin, L., Ruiz, S., & Rubio, A. (2009). The role of identity salience in the effects of corporate social responsibility on consumer behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 84, 65–78.Google Scholar
  113. *McGoldrick, P. J., & Freestone, O. M. (2008). Ethical product premiums: antecedents and extent of consumers’ willingness to pay. International Review of Retail, Distribution and Consumer Research, 18(2), 185–201.Google Scholar
  114. McKinsey & Company (2009). Global survey results—valuing corporate social responsibility. Accessed online on May 2, 2009 from: http://www.mckinseyquarterly.com/Valuing_corporate_social_responsibility_McKinsey_Global_Survey_Results_2309.
  115. McWilliams, A., & Siegel, D. (2000). Corporate social responsibility and financial performance: correlation or misspecification? Strategic Management Journal, 21(5), 603–610.Google Scholar
  116. *Megicks, P., Memery, J., & Williams, J. (2008). Influences on ethical and socially responsible shopping: evidence from the UK grocery sector. Journal of Marketing Management, 24(5/6), 637–659.Google Scholar
  117. *Mekonnen, A., & Harris, F. (2008). Linking products to a cause or affinity group. European Journal of Marketing, 42(1/2), 135–153.Google Scholar
  118. *Menon, S., & Kahn, B. E. (2003). Corporate sponsorships of philanthropic activities: when do they impact perception of sponsor brand? Journal of Consumer Psychology, 13(3), 316–327.Google Scholar
  119. *Miller, K. E., & Sturdivant, F. D. (1977). Consumer responses to socially questionable corporate behavior: an empirical test. Journal of Consumer Research, 4(1), 1–7.Google Scholar
  120. *Mizerski, D., Mizerski, K., & Sadler, O. (2001). A field experiment comparing the effectiveness of ‘ambush’ and cause related ad appeals for social marketing causes. Journal of Nonprofit & Public Sector Marketing, 9(4), 25–45.Google Scholar
  121. *Mohr, L. A., & Webb, D. J. (2005). The effects of corporate social responsibility and price on consumer responses. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 39(1), 121–147.Google Scholar
  122. *Mohr, L. A., Webb, D. J., & Harris, K. E. (2001). Do consumers expect companies to be socially responsible? The impact of corporate social responsibility on buying behavior. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 35(1), 45–72.Google Scholar
  123. *Montoro-Rios, F. J., Luque-Martinez, T., & Rodriguez-Molina, M. (2008). How green should you be: can environmental associations enhance brand performance? Journal of Advertising Research, 48(4), 547–563.Google Scholar
  124. *Murphy, P. E., Kangun, N., & Locander, W. B. (1978). Environmentally concerned consumers—racial variations. Journal of Marketing, 42(4), 61–66.Google Scholar
  125. Murray, K. B., & Montanari, J. R. (1986). Strategic management of the socially responsible firm: integrating management and marketing theory. Academy of Management Review, 11(4), 815–827.Google Scholar
  126. *Murray, K. B., & Vogel, C. M. (1997). Using a hierarchy-of-effects approach to gauge the effectiveness of corporate social responsibility to generate goodwill toward the firm: financial versus nonfinancial impacts. Journal of Business Research, 38(2), 141–159.Google Scholar
  127. *Nan, X., & Heo, K. (2007). Consumer responses to corporate social responsibility (CSR) initiatives: examining the role of brand/cause fit in cause-related marketing. Journal of Advertising, 36(2), 63–74.Google Scholar
  128. *Narwal, M., & Sharma, T. (2008). Perceptions of corporate social responsibility in India: an empirical study. Journal of Knowledge Globalization, 1(1), 61–79.Google Scholar
  129. *Newell, S. J., Goldsmith, R. E., & Banzhaf, E. J. (1998). The effect of misleading environmental claims on consumer perceptions of advertisements. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 6(2), 48–59.Google Scholar
  130. *Obermiller, C., Burke, C., Talbott, E., & Green, G. P. (2009). ‘Taste great or more fulfilling’: the effect of brand reputation on consumer social responsibility advertising for fair trade coffee. Corporate Reputation Review, 12(2), 159–176.Google Scholar
  131. Okada, E. M. (2005). Justification effects on consumer choice of hedonic and utilitarian goods. Journal of Marketing Research, 42(1), 43–53.Google Scholar
  132. *Olsen, G. D., Pracejus, J. W., & Brown, N. R. (2003). When profit equals price: consumer confusion about donation amounts in cause-related marketing. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 22(2), 170–180.Google Scholar
  133. *Oppewal, H., Alexander, A., & Sullivan, P. (2006). Consumer perceptions of corporate social responsibility in town shopping centres and their influence on shopping evaluations. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 13, 261–274.Google Scholar
  134. Orlitzky, M., Schmidt, F. L., & Rynes, S. L. (2003). Corporate social and financial performance: a meta-analysis. Organization Studies, 24(3), 403–441.Google Scholar
  135. *Osterhus, T. L. (1997). Pro-Social consumer influence strategies: when and how do they work? Journal of Marketing, 61(4), 16–29.Google Scholar
  136. *Paek, H., & Nelson, M. R. (2009). To buy or not to buy: determinants of socially responsible consumer behavior and consumer reactions to cause-related and boycotting ads. Journal of Current Issues and Research in Advertising, 31(2), 75–90.Google Scholar
  137. *Page, G., & Fearn, H. (2005). Corporate reputation: what do consumers really care about? Journal of Advertising Research, 45(3), 305–313.Google Scholar
  138. Park, C. W., Jaworski, B. J., & Macinnis, D. J. (1986). Strategic brand concept/image management. Journal of Marketing, 50, 135–145.Google Scholar
  139. Peloza, J. (2009). The challenge of measuring financial impacts from investments in corporate social performance. Journal of Management, 35(6), 1518–1541.Google Scholar
  140. Peloza, J., & Papania, L. (2008). The missing link between corporate social responsibility and financial performance: stakeholder salience and identification. Corporate Reputation Review, 11(2), 169–181.Google Scholar
  141. *Perez, R. C. (2009). Effects of perceived identity based on corporate social responsibility: the role of consumer identification with the company. Corporate Reputation Review, 12(2), 177–191.Google Scholar
  142. *Peters, C., Thomas, J., & Tolson, H. (2007). An exploratory study of cause-related retailing. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 35(11), 895–911.Google Scholar
  143. *Peterson, D. K. (2004). The relationship between perceptions of corporate citizenship and organizational commitment. Business & Society, 43(3), 296–319.Google Scholar
  144. *Phau, I., & Ong, D. (2007). An investigation of the effects of environmental claims in promotional messages for clothing brands. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 25(7), 772–788.Google Scholar
  145. *Pirsh, J., Gupta, S., & Grau, S. L. (2007). A framework for understanding corporate social responsibility programs as a continuum: an exploratory study. Journal of Business Ethics, 70, 125–140.Google Scholar
  146. *Pivato, S., Misani, N., & Tencati, A. (2008). The impact of corporate social responsibility on consumer trust: the case of organic food. Business Ethics: A European Review, 17(1), 3–12.Google Scholar
  147. *Pracejus, J. W., & Olsen, G. D. (2004). The role of brand/cause fit in the effectiveness of cause-related marketing campaigns. Journal of Business Research, 57(6), 635–640.Google Scholar
  148. *Pracejus, J. W., Olsen, G. D., & Brown, N. R. (2003). On the prevalence and impact of vague quantifiers in the advertising of cause-related marketing (CRM). Journal of Advertising, 32(4), 19–28.Google Scholar
  149. *Ricks, J. M., Jr. (2005). An assessment of strategic corporate philanthropy on perceptions of brand equality variables. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 22(3), 121–134.Google Scholar
  150. *Roberts, J. A. (1995). Profiling levels of socially responsible consumer behavior: a cluster analytic approach and its implications for marketing. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 3(4), 97–117.Google Scholar
  151. *Rodrigo, P., & Arenas, D. (2008). Do employees care about CSR programs? A typology of employees according to their attitudes. Journal of Business Ethics, 83, 265–283.Google Scholar
  152. *Rokka, J., & Uusitalo, L. (2008). Preference for green packaging in consumer product choices—do consumers care? International Journal of Consumer Studies, 32(5), 516–525.Google Scholar
  153. *Román, S., & Cuestas, P. (2008). The perceptions of consumers regarding online retailers’ ethics and their relationship with consumers’ general internet expertise and word of mouth: a preliminary analysis. Journal of Business Ethics, 83(4), 641–656.Google Scholar
  154. *Ross, J. K., III, Patterson, L. T., & Stutts, M. A. (1992). Consumer perceptions of organizations that use cause-related marketing. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 20(1), 93–97.Google Scholar
  155. Rousseau, D. M. (2006). Is there such a thing as “evidence-based management”? Academy of Management Review, 31(2), 256–269.Google Scholar
  156. Rousseau, D. M., Manning, J., & Denyer, D. (2008). Evidence in management and organizational science: assembling the field’s full weight of scientific knowledge through synthesis. The Academy of Management Annals, 2(1), 475–515.Google Scholar
  157. *Russel, D. W., & Russell, C. A. (2010). Here or there? Consumer reactions to corporate social responsibility initiatives: egocentric tendencies and their moderators. Marketing Letters, 21, 65–81.Google Scholar
  158. *Sammer, K., & Wüstenhagen, R. (2006). The influence of eco-labelling on consumer behaviour—results of a discrete choice analysis for washing machines. Business Strategy & the Environment, 15(3), 185–199.Google Scholar
  159. *Samu, S., & Wymer, W. (2009). The effect of fit and dominance in cause marketing communication. Journal of Business Research, 62, 432–440.Google Scholar
  160. *Schuhwerk, M. E., & Lefkoff-Hagius, R. (1995). Green or non-green? Does type of appeal matter when advertising a green product? Journal of Advertising, 24(2), 45–54.Google Scholar
  161. Schuler, D. A., & Cording, M. (2006). A corporate social performance-corporate financial performance behavioral model for consumers. Academy of Management Review, 31(3), 540–558.Google Scholar
  162. *Sen, S., & Bhattacharya, C. B. (2001). Does doing good always lead to doing better? Consumer reactions to corporate social responsibility. Journal of Marketing Research, 38(2), 225–243.Google Scholar
  163. *Sen, S., & Morwitz, V. G. (1996). Consumer reactions to a provider’s position on social issues: the effect of varying frames of reference. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 5(1), 27–48.Google Scholar
  164. *Sen, S., Gurhan-Canli, Z., & Morwitz, V. (2001). Withholding consumption: a social dilemma perspective on consumer boycotts. Journal of Consumer Research, 28(3), 399–417.Google Scholar
  165. *Sen, S., Bhattacharya, C. B., & Korschun, D. (2006). The role of corporate social responsibility in strengthening multiple stakeholder relationships: a field experiment. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 34(2), 158–166.Google Scholar
  166. Shavitt, S. (1990). The role of attitude objects in attitude functions. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 26(2), 128–148.Google Scholar
  167. *Shaw, D. (2007). Consumer voters in imagined communities. International Journal of Sociology & Social Policy, 27(3/4), 135–150.Google Scholar
  168. Sheth, J. N., Newman, B. I., & Gross, B. L. (1991). Why we buy what we buy: a theory of consumption values. Journal of Business Research, 22(2), 159–170.Google Scholar
  169. *Shrum, L. J., McCarthy, J. A., & Lowrey, T. M. (1995). Buyer characteristics of the green consumer and their implications for advertising strategy. Journal of Advertising, 24(2), 72–82.Google Scholar
  170. *Simmons, C. J., & Becker-Olsen, K. L. (2006). Achieving marketing objectives through social sponsorships. Journal of Marketing, 70(4), 154–169.Google Scholar
  171. *Singh, J., de los Salmones Sanchez, M., & del Bosque, I. R. (2008). Understanding corporate social responsibility and product perceptions in consumer markets: a cross-cultural evaluation. Journal of Business Ethics, 80, 597–611.Google Scholar
  172. *Singh, S., Kristensen, L., & Villasenor, E. (2009). Overcoming skepticism towards cause related claims: the case of Norway. International Marketing Review, 26(3), 312–326.Google Scholar
  173. *Smith, S. M., & Alcorn, D. S. (1991). Cause marketing: a new direction in the marketing of corporate responsibility. The Journal of Consumer Marketing, 8, 19–35.Google Scholar
  174. *Strahilevitz, M. (1999). The effects of product type and donation magnitude on willingness to pay more for a charity-linked brand. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 8(3), 215–241.Google Scholar
  175. *Strahilevitz, M. (2003). The effects of prior impressions of a firm’s ethics on the success of a cause-related marketing campaign: do the good look better while the bad look worse? Journal of Nonprofit & Public Sector Marketing, 11(1), 77–92.Google Scholar
  176. *Strahilevitz, M., & Myers, J. G. (1998). Donations to charity as purchase incentives: how well they work may depend on what you are trying to sell. Journal of Consumer Research, 24(4), 434–446.Google Scholar
  177. *Szykman, L. R., Bloom, P. N., & Blazing, J. (2004). Does corporate sponsorship of a socially-oriented message make a difference? An investigation of the effects of sponsorship identity on responses to an ant-drinking and driving message. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 14(1&2), 13–20.Google Scholar
  178. *Trimble, C. S., & Rifon, N. J. (2006). Consumer perceptions of compatibility in cause-related marketing messages. International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing, 11(1), 29–47.Google Scholar
  179. *Trudel, R., & Cotte, J. (2009). Does it pay to be good? MIT Sloan Management Review, 50(2), 61–68.Google Scholar
  180. *Turban, D. B., & Greening, D. W. (1997). Corporate social performance and organizational attractiveness to prospective employees. Academy of Management Journal, 40(3), 658–672.Google Scholar
  181. *Turker, D. (2009). How corporate social responsibility influences organizational commitment. Journal of Business Ethics, 89, 189–204.Google Scholar
  182. *Valentine, S., & Fleischman, G. (2008). Ethics programs, perceived corporate social responsibility and job satisfaction. Journal of Business Ethics, 77, 159–172.Google Scholar
  183. *van den Brink, D., Odekerken-SchrAqder, G., & Pauwels, P. (2006). The effect of strategic and tactical cause-related marketing on consumers’ brand loyalty. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 23(1), 15–25.Google Scholar
  184. *Vanhamme, J., & Grobben, B. (2009). “Too good to be true!”: the effectiveness of CSR history in countering negative publicity. Journal of Business Ethics, 85, 273–283.Google Scholar
  185. Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2004). Evolving to a new dominant logic for marketing. Journal of Marketing, 68(1), 1–17.Google Scholar
  186. *Vassilikopoulou, A., Siomkos, G., Chatzipanagiotou, K., & Pantouvakis, A. (2009). Product-harm crisis management: time heals all wounds? Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 16, 174–180.Google Scholar
  187. *Vermeir, I., & Verbeke, W. (2006). Sustainable food consumption: exploring the consumer “attitude-behavioral intention” gap. Journal of Agricultural & Environmental Ethics, 19(2), 169–194.Google Scholar
  188. *Vlachos, P. A., Tsmakos, A., Vrechopoulos, A. P., & Avramidis, P. K. (2008). Corporate social responsibility: attributions, loyalty, and the mediating role of trust. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 37(2), 170–180.Google Scholar
  189. *Wagner, T., Lutz, R. J., & Weitz, B. A. (2009). Corporate hypocrisy: overcoming the treat of inconsistent corporate social responsibility perceptions. Journal of Marketing, 73, 77–91.Google Scholar
  190. *Wang, A. (2008). Dimensions of corporate social responsibility and advertising practice. Corporate Reputation Review, 11(2), 155–168.Google Scholar
  191. Wang, H., Choi, J., & Li, J. (2008). Too little or too much? Untangling the relationship between corporate philanthropy and firm financial performance. Organization Science, 19(1), 143–159.Google Scholar
  192. *Webb, D. J., & Mohr, L. A. (1998). A typology of consumer responses to cause-related marketing: from skeptics and socially concerned. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 17(2), 226–238.Google Scholar
  193. *White, K., & Willness, C. (2009). Consumer reactions to the decreased usage message: the role of elaborative processing. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 19(1), 73–87.Google Scholar
  194. Wood, D. J. (1991). Corporate social performance revisited. Academy of Management Review, 16, 691–718.Google Scholar
  195. *Yechiam, E., Barron, G., Erev, I., & Erez, M. (2003). On the robustness and the direction of the effect of cause-related marketing. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 2(4), 320–332.Google Scholar
  196. *Yoon, Y., Gurhan-Canli, Z., & Bozok, B. (2006). Drawing inferences about others on the basis of corporate associations. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 34(2), 167–173.Google Scholar
  197. *Yoon, Y., Gurhan-Canli, Z., & Schwarz, N. (2006). The effect of corporate social responsibility (CSR) activities on companies with bad reputations. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 16(4), 377–390.Google Scholar
  198. *Youn, S., & Kim, H. (2008). Antecedents of consumer attitudes toward cause-related marketing. Journal of Advertising Research, 48(1), 123–137.Google Scholar
  199. Zeithaml, V. (1988). Consumer perceptions of price, quality, and value: a means-end model and synthesis of evidence. Journal of Marketing, 52, 2–22.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Academy of Marketing Science 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Simon Fraser UniversityBurnabyCanada

Personalised recommendations