Market-based capabilities and financial performance of firms: insights into marketing’s contribution to firm value
- 2.2k Downloads
While there is recognition that market-based capabilities contribute to a firm’s financial performance, the exposition is largely conceptual (Srivastava et al. Journal of Marketing 62:2–18, 1998; Journal of Marketing 63:168–179, 1999). Using a resource based view of the firm, the present study proposes that (1) market-based assets and capabilities of a firm impacts (2) performance in three market-facing business processes (new product development, supply-chain and customer management), which in turn, influence (3) the firm’s financial performance. It develops related hypotheses and tests the framework empirically. The study also examines for the first time the interrelationship among the three business processes and their impact on the market value of firms. Further, the study examines the moderating influence of two organizational variables—size and age of the firm. Overall, the major contribution of the study is that it offers a process linkage between capabilities, process performance and financial performance. The results of this research will provide strategic insights to managers on optimal customer management, product development and supply chain strategies.
KeywordsMarket-based assets and capabilities Business processes Customer management New product development Supply chain management Financial performance Marketing and firm value
The authors thank the Marketing Science Institute for providing support and funding for the study.
- Bowersox, D. J., Closs, D. J., & Stank, T. P. (2000). The mega trends that will revolutionize supply chain logistics. Journal of Business Logistics, 21, 1–16 (March).Google Scholar
- Day, G. S. (1999). The market driven organization: Understanding, attracting and keeping valuable customers. New York: Free.Google Scholar
- Francis, P. H. (2000). Product creation: The heart of the enterprise form engineering to E-commerce. New York: Free.Google Scholar
- Gupta, A. K., & Wilemon, D. L. (1990). Accelerating the development of technology-based new products. California Management Review, 32(2), 24–44.Google Scholar
- Hagel, J., III, & Singer, M. (1999). Unbundling the corporation. Harvard Business Review, 77, 133–141 (March/April).Google Scholar
- Joshi, A., & Hanssens, D. (2004). Advertising spending and market capitalization. Cambridge: MSI MSI Report No. 04-110.Google Scholar
- Learned, E., Christensen, C., Andrews, K., & Guth, W. (1969). Business policy: Text and cases. Homewood: Irwin.Google Scholar
- Mathias, P. F., & Capon, N. (2003). Managing strategic customer relationships as assets: developing customer relationship capital. Velocity, 5(2), 45–49.Google Scholar
- Miles, R. E., & Snow, C. C. (1978). Organizational strategy, structure, and process. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
- O’Reilly, C. A., 3rd, & Tushman, M. L. (2004). The ambidextrous organization. Harvard Business Review, 82, 74–81 (April).Google Scholar
- Peppers, D., & Rogers, M. (2004). Managing customer relationships: A strategic framework. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Poirier, C. C., & Reiter, S. E. (1996). Supply chain optimization: building the strongest total business network. San Francisco: BerrettKoehler.Google Scholar
- Prahalad, C. K., & Hamel, G. (1990). The core competence of the corporation. Harvard Business Review, 68, 79–91 (May/June).Google Scholar
- Reinartz, W., Krafft, M., & Hoyer, W. D. (2004). The customer relationship management process: its measurement and impact on performance. Journal of Marketing, 68, 293–305 (August).Google Scholar
- Sanders, N. R., & Premus, R. (2005). Modeling the relationship between firm IT capability, collaboration, and performance. Journal of Business Logistics, 26(1), 1–23.Google Scholar
- Schalet, S. D. (2001). The cost of secrecy. CIO Magazine, July 15, www.cio.com/archive/071501/guru.html.
- Souder, W. E., Sherman, J. D., & Davies-Cooper, R. (1998). Environmental uncertainty, organizational integration, and new product development effectiveness: a test of contingency theory. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 15, 520–533, (November). doi: 10.1016/S0737-6782(98)00033-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Stinchcombe, A. L. (1964). Organizations and social structure. In J. G. March (Ed.), Handbook of organizations. Chicago: McNally.Google Scholar
- Thomas, J. (1999). Hard sell. Logistics Management Distribution Report, 38(2), 57.Google Scholar