Skip to main content
Log in

Corporate social responsibility: attributions, loyalty, and the mediating role of trust

  • Original Empirical Research
  • Published:
Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study investigates whether consumers’ perceptions of motives influence their evaluation of corporate social responsibility (CSR) efforts. The study reveals the mediating role of consumer trust in CSR evaluation frameworks; managers should monitor consumer trust, which seems to be an important subprocess regulating the effect of consumer attributions on patronage and recommendation intentions. Further, managers may allay the negative effects of profit-motivated giving by doing well on service quality perceptions. On the other hand, appropriately motivated giving continues to positively affect trust regardless of the performance of the firm on service quality provision.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arumi, A. M., Wooden, R., Johnson, J., Farkas, S., Duffet, A., & Amber, O. (2005). The charitable impulse: A public agenda report. http://www.publicagenda.org.

  • Bagozzi, R. P. (1992). The self-regulation of attitudes, intentions, and behavior. Social Psychology Quarterly, 55(2), 178–204. doi:10.2307/2786945.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barone, M. J., Miyazaki, A. D., & Taylor, K. A. (2000). The influence of cause-related marketing on consumer choice: Does one good turn deserve another? Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 28(2), 248–263. doi:10.1177/0092070300282006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barone, M. J., Norman, A. T., & Miyazaki, A. D. (2007). Consumer response to retailer use of cause-related marketing: Is more fit better? Journal of Retailing, 83(4), 437–445. doi:10.1016/j.jretai.2007.03.006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baumeister, R. F., Bratislavsky, E., Finkenauer, C., & Vohs, K. D. (2001). Bad is stronger than good. Review of General Psychology, 5(4), 323–370. doi:10.1037/1089-2680.5.4.323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berens, G., van Riel, C. B. M., & van Rekom, J. (2007). The CSR-quality trade-off: When can corporate social responsibility and corporate ability compensate each other? Journal of Business Ethics, 74(3), 233–252. doi:10.1007/s10551-006-9232-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhattacharya, R., Devinney, T. M., & Pillutla, M. M. (1998). A formal model of trust based on outcomes. Academy of Management Review, 23(3), 459–472. doi:10.2307/259289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blau, P. M. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolton, R. N., Lemon, K. N., & Verhoef, P. C. (2004). The theoretical underpinnings of customer asset management: A framework and propositions for future research. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 32(3), 271–292. doi:10.1177/0092070304263341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowen, J. (1990). Development of a taxonomy of services to gain strategic marketing insights. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 18, 43–49 (Winter) doi:10.1007/BF02729761.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brady, M., & Cronin, J. (2001). Some new thoughts on conceptualizing perceived service quality: A hierarchical approach. Journal of Marketing, 65, 34–49 (July) doi:10.1509/jmkg.65.3.34.18334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brady, M. K., Knight, G. A., Cronin, J., Tomas, G., Hult, M., & Keillor, B. D. (2005). Removing the contextual lens: A multinational, multi-setting comparison of service evaluation models. Journal of Retailing, 81(3), 215–230. doi:10.1016/j.jretai.2005.07.005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carrigan, M., & Attalla, A. (2001). The myth of the ethical consumer—do ethics matter in purchase behaviour? Journal of Consumer Marketing, 18(7), 560–577. doi:10.1108/07363760110410263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cropanzano, R., & Mitchell, M. S. (2005). Social exchange theory: An interdisciplinary review. Journal of Management, 31, 1–27. doi:10.1177/0149206305279602.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dabholkar, P. A., & Bagozzi, R. P. (2002). An attitudinal model of technology-based self-service: Moderating effects of consumer traits and situational factors. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 30(3), 184–201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellen, P. S., Web, D. J., & Mohr, L. A. (2006). Building corporate associations: Consumer attributions for corporate social responsibility programs. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 34(2), 147–157. doi:10.1177/0092070305284976.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fein, S. (1996). Effects of suspicion on attributional thinking and the correspondence bias. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(6), 1164–1184. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.70.6.1164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franklin, D. (2008). Just good business: A special report on corporate social responsibility. The Economist, (January), 19.

  • Geyskens, I., Steenkamp, J., & Kumar, N. (1998). Generalizations about trust in marketing channel relationships using meta-analysis. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 15(3), 223–248. doi:10.1016/S0167-8116(98)00002-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, D. T., & Malone, P. S. (1995). The correspondence bias. Psychological Bulletin, 117(1), 21–38. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.117.1.21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giving USA Foundation (2007). Annual Report on Philanthropy 2006. http://www.aafrc.org/press_releases/gusa.cfm.

  • Globe Scan-MRB (2006). Corporate social responsibility in Greece (in Greek). http://www.instofcom.gr/03CSR%202007.pdf.

  • Godfrey, P. C. (2005). The relationship between corporate philanthropy and shareholder wealth: A risk management perspective. Academy of Management Review, 30(4), 777–798.

    Google Scholar 

  • Handelman, J. M., & Arnold, J. A. (1999). The role of marketing actions with a social dimension: Appeals to the institutional environment. Journal of Marketing, 63, 33–48. doi:10.2307/1251774.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helm, A. (2004). Cynics and skeptics: Consumer dispositional trust. Advances in Consumer Research. Association for Consumer Research (U. S.), 31, 345–351.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herzberg, F. (1966). Work and the nature of man. Cleveland: World Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hosmer, L. T. (1995). Trust: The connecting link between organizational theory and philosophic ethics. Academy of Management Review, 20(2), 379–403. doi:10.2307/258851.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, E. E., & Davis, K. (1965). From acts to dispositions. In Berkowitz, L. (Eds.), Advances in experimental psychology (pp. 219–266). New York: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keaveney, S. M. (1995). Customer switching behavior in service industries: An exploratory study. Journal of Marketing, 59, 71–82 (April) doi:10.2307/1252074.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lam, S. Y., Venkatesh, S., Erramilli, M. K., & Murthy, B. (2004). Customer value, satisfaction, loyalty, and switching costs: An illustration from a business-to-business service context. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 32(3), 293–311. doi:10.1177/0092070304263330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luo, X., & Bhattacharya, C. B. (2006). Corporate social responsibility, customer satisfaction, and market value. Journal of Marketing, 70(4), 1–18. doi:10.1509/jmkg.70.4.1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacKenzie, S. B., & Lutz, R. J. (1989). An empirical examination of the structural antecedents of attitude toward the ad in an advertising pretesting context. Journal of Marketing, 53(2), 48–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohr, L., Eroglu, D., & Ellen, P. (1998). The development and testing of a measure of skepticism toward environmental claims in marketers’ communications. The Journal of Consumer Affairs, 32(1), 30–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, R. M., & Hunt, S. D. (1994). The commitment-trust theory of relationship marketing. Journal of Marketing, 58(3), 20–38. doi:10.2307/1252308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nysveen, H., Pedersen, P. E., & Thorbjørnsen, H. (2005). Intentions to use mobile services: Antecedents and cross-service comparisons. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 33(3), 1–17. doi:10.1177/0092070305276149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ping, R. A. (1996). Latent variable interaction and quadratic effect estimation: A two-step technique using structural equation analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 119(1), 166–175. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.119.1.166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ping, R. A. (2003). Latent variable interactions and quadratics in survey data: A source book for theoretical model testing, 2nd ed. [on-line monograph].

  • Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2004). Strategy and society: The link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility. Harvard Business Review, 84(12), 5–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Progressive Grocer (2008). Special report: Environmental sustainability: Seeing green. http://www.progressivegrocer.com/progressivegrocer/research-analysis/index.jsp.

  • Reuters (2008). Consumers puts ads to greenwashing test. http://www.reuters.com/.

  • Sen, S., Bhattacharya, C. B., & Korschun, D. (2006). The role of corporate social responsibility in strengthening multiple stakeholder relationships: A field experiment. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 34(2), 158–166. doi:10.1177/0092070305284978.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shrout, P. E., & Bolger, N. (2002). Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies: New procedures and recommendations. Psychological Methods, 7, 422–445. doi:10.1037/1082-989X.7.4.422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sirdeshmukh, D., Singh, J., & Sabol, B. (2002). Consumer trust, value, and loyalty in relational exchanges. Journal of Marketing, 66(1), 5–37. doi:10.1509/jmkg.66.1.15.18449.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, R. E., & Hunt, S. D. (1978). Attributional processes and effects in promotional situations. The Journal of Consumer Research, 5(3), 149–158. doi:10.1086/208725.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Varadarajan, P. R., & Menon, A. (1988). Cause-related marketing: A coalignment of marketing strategy and corporate philanthropy. Journal of Marketing, 52, 58–74 (July) doi:10.2307/1251450.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zafirovski, M. (2003). Some amendments to social exchange theory: A sociological perspective. Theory & Science, 4(2) Online paper. http://theoryandscience.icaap.org/content/vol004.002/01_zafirovski.html.

  • Zeithaml, V. A., Berry, L. L., & Parasuraman, A. (1996). The behavioral consequences of service quality. Journal of Marketing, 60(2), 31–36. doi:10.2307/1251929.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

The authors are grateful to Editor David W. Stewart and four anonymous JAMS reviewers for comments on earlier versions of the article. This research is supported by the European Social Fund (ESF), Operational Program for Educational and Vocational Training II: Program PYTHAGORAS II.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pavlos A. Vlachos.

Appendix

Appendix

Table 2 Measurement model results (standardized estimates)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Vlachos, P.A., Tsamakos, A., Vrechopoulos, A.P. et al. Corporate social responsibility: attributions, loyalty, and the mediating role of trust. J. of the Acad. Mark. Sci. 37, 170–180 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-008-0117-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-008-0117-x

Keywords

Navigation