Advertisement

Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science

, Volume 36, Issue 1, pp 97–108 | Cite as

A descriptive model of the consumer co-production process

  • Michael EtgarEmail author
Methodological Paper

Abstract

Purpose

This article presents a model of consumer engagement in co-production.

Method

A theoretical paper which develops a five-stage dynamic model of consumer involvement in co-production.

Results and Conclusions

The article discusses the basic linkages between co-production and customization and presents co-production as a dynamic process which is composed of five distinct stages. It also specifies five distinct phases of the production activity chain where consumers can become involved in co-production. The model offers researchers an analytical framework conducive for more advanced studies of the phenomenon from both descriptive and analytical points of view. Managers can use it to segment consumers according to their tendencies to engage in co-production and suggests bases for developing corresponding offers of co-production possibilities which focus on diverse consumer benefits.

Keywords

Co-production Co-creation Customization Risk reduction Activity chains 

Notes

Acknowledgement

The author wishes to thank the editors, Robert Lusch and Stephen Vargo, and two anonymous referees for their helpful comments on early drafts of this article. He acknowledges the assistance of the Research Unit at the School of Business Administration at the College of Management in Rishon Lezion in Israel for its financial support.

References

  1. Aaker, D. (1996). Building strong brands. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  2. Achrol, R. S, & Kotler, P. (1999). Marketing in the network economy. Journal of Marketing, 63, 146–164, Special Issue.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Achrol, R., & Kotler, P. (2006). The service dominant logic for marketing: A critique. In R. Lusch, & S. Vargo (Eds.), The service-dominant logic of marketing: Dialog, debate and directions (pp. 128–138). N.Y.: M. S. Sharpe.Google Scholar
  4. Alderson, W. (1957). Marketing behavior and executive action: A functionalist approach to marketing theory. Homewood, Ill: Richard Irwin D.Google Scholar
  5. Arnold, D. (2004). The mirage of global markets. NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  6. Arnould, E., & Price, L. (1993). River magic: Extraordinary experience and the extended service encounter. Journal of Consumer Research, 20, 24–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Arnould, E., Price, L., & Malshe, A. (2006). Toward a cultural resource— based theory of the consumer. In R. Lusch & S. Vargo (Eds.), The service-dominant logic of marketing: Dialog, debate, and directions (pp. 91–104). New York: M. S. Sharpe.Google Scholar
  8. Arnould, E. J., & Thompson, C. (2005). Consumer culture theory (CCT): Twenty years of research. Journal of Consumer Research, 31, 868–883.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Axelrod, R. (1984). The evolution of cooperation. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  10. Ballantyne, D., & Varey, R. J (2006). Introducing a dialogical orientation to the service dominant logic of marketing. In R. Lusch, & S. Vargo (Eds.), The service-dominant logic of marketing: Dialog, debate and directions (pp. 224–235). N.Y.: M. S. Sharpe.Google Scholar
  11. Bauer, R. A. (1967). Consumer behavior as risk taking. Risk taking and information handling in consumer behavior. Boston: Harvard Business School.Google Scholar
  12. Benpaudi, N., & Leone, R. P (2003). Psychological implications of customer participation in co-production. Journal of Marketing, 67, 14–28, (January).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bergen, M., Dutta, S., & Walker, O. C. (1992). Agency relationships in marketing: A review of the implications and applications of agency and related theories. Journal of Marketing, 56, 1–24, (July).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Berry, L., Seiders, K., & Greval, D.(2002). Understanding service convenience. Journal of Marketing, 66, 1–17, (July).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Berthon, P., & John, J. (2006). From entities to interfaces. In R. Lusch, & S. Vargo (Eds.), The service-dominant logic of marketing: Dialog, debate and directions (pp 196–207). N.Y: M. S. Sharpe.Google Scholar
  16. Bitner, M. J., Zeithaml, V., Hubbert, A. R., & Faranda, W. T. (1997). Customer Contributions and roles in service delivery. International Journal of Service Industry Managemen, 8, 193–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Bucklin, L.P. (1966). A Theory of distribution channel structure. Berkeley, CA: IBER.Google Scholar
  18. Diamond, D. (2006). Do it yourself. Progressive Grocer, 85, 30.Google Scholar
  19. Donaldson, B., & O’Toole, T. (2002). Strategic market relationships. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
  20. Dowling, G. R., & Staelin, R. (1994). A Model of perceived risk and intended risk-handling activity. Journal of Consumer Research, 21, 119–134, (January).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Duncan, T., & Moriarty, S. E (1998). Communication-based marketing model for managing relationships. Journal of Marketing, 62, 1–13, (April).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Etgar, M. (2006). Co-production of services: A managerial extension. In: Lusch, R., & Vargo, S. (Eds.), The service-dominant logic of marketing: Dialog, debate and directions (pp. 128–138). N.Y: M.E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
  23. Flint, D. J, & Mentzer, J. (2006). Striving for integrated value chain management, given a service-dominant logic for marketing. In R. Lusch, & S. Vargo (Eds.), The service-dominant logic of marketing: Dialog, debate, and directions. NY: M. E. Sharpe, 139–149.Google Scholar
  24. Fournier, S., Sensiper. S., McAlexander, J., & Schouten, J. (2002). Building brand community on the Harley-Davidson posse ride: Multimedia case. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard Business School.Google Scholar
  25. Gabel, T. (2005). Toward an expanded theory of surrogate consumption: Consideration of consumer choice and choicelessness. Academy of Marketing Science Review, 6, 1–33.Google Scholar
  26. Geyskens, I., Steenkamp, J., & Kumar, N. (1998). Generalizations about trust in marketing channel relationships using meta-analysis. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 15, 222–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Gronroos, C. (1983). Strategic Management and marketing in the service sector. Report No. 83–104, Cambridge, Mass: Marketing Science Institute.Google Scholar
  28. Gronroos, C. (1990). Service management and marketing: Managing the moments of truth in the service competition. Lexington, MA: Free Press/Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  29. Gronroos, C. (1994). From scientific management to service management: A management perspective for the age of service competition. International Journal of Service Industry Management, 5(1), 5–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Gundlach, G. T., Achrol, R., & Mentzer J. T. (1995). The Structure of commitment in exchange. Journal of Marketing, 59, 78–92, (Jan).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Gutterman, A. (2002). International joint ventures: how to negotiate, establish and manage an international joint venture (lst Ed.). Novato, California: World Trade Press.Google Scholar
  32. Hartley, R.F. (2005). Management mistakes and successes (8th ed.). N.J: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
  33. Heide, J. (1994). Inter-organizational governance in marketing channels. Journal of Marketing, 58, 71–85, (Jan).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Hirschman, E. C. (1980). Innovativeness, novelty seeking, and consumer creativity. Journal of Consumer, 7, 283–295, (Dec).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Holbrook, M. B. (2006). ROSEPEKICECIVECI versus CCV. In: Lusch, R., & Vargo, S. (eds.), The service-dominant logic of marketing: Dialog, debate and directions (pp. 208–223). N.Y: M. E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
  36. Holbrook, M. B., & Hirschman, E. (1982). The experiential aspects of consumption: Consumer fantasies, feelings and fun. Journal of Consumer Research, 9, 132–140, (Sep).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Johansson, J. (2006). Global marketing (4th ed). Boston: McGraw-Hill International Edition.Google Scholar
  38. John, G. (1984). An empirical investigation of some antecedents of opportunism in a marketing channel. Journal of Marketing Research, 21, 278–289, (Aug.).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Kahn, B.E. (1995). Consumer variety seeking among goods and services—An integrative review. Journal of Retail and Consumer Services, 2, 139–148, (July).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Kahneman, D., Tversky, A. (2000). Choices, values, and frames. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  41. Kelley, S. W., Donnelly, J., & Skinner, S. (1990). Customer participation in service production and delivery. Journal of Retailing, 66, 315–335, (Fall).Google Scholar
  42. Knee, C. R., & Zuckerman, M. (1996). Causality orientations and the disappearance of the self serving bias. Journal of Research in Personality, 30(1), 76–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Lambert, D. M., & Garcia-Dastugue, S. (2006). Cross-functional business processes for the implementation of service-dominant logic. In R. Lusch, S. Vargo (Eds.), The service-dominant logic of marketing: dialog, Debate, and directions (pp. 150–165). N.Y.: M. E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
  44. Lee, J., & Allaway, A. (2002). Effects of personal control on adoption of self-service technology innovations. Journal of Services Marketing, 16, 553–572, (Nov).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Lehman, D. (2006). More dominant logics for marketing: Productivity and growth. In: R. Lusch, & S. Vargo (Eds.), The service-dominant logic of marketing: Dialog, debate, and directions (296–301). NY: M. E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
  46. Levitt, T. (1983). The globalization of markets. Harvard Business Review, 2–11, (May–June).Google Scholar
  47. Lovelock, C. (1991). Services marketing (2nd ed). Englewoods Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  48. Lusch, R. F., Brown, S., & Brunswick, G. J. (1992). A generic framework for explaining internal vs. external exchange. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 20, 119–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Lusch, R. F., & Vargo, S. (2006a). Service dominant logic: Reactions, reflections and refinements. Marketing Theory, 6, 281–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Lusch, R. F., & Vargo, S. (2006b). The service-dominant logic of marketing: Dialog, debate, and directions. N.Y: M. S. Sharpe.Google Scholar
  51. Mano, H., & Oliver, R. (1993). Assessing the dimensionality and structure of the consumption experience: Evaluation, feeling and satisfaction. Journal of Consumer Research, 20, 451–466, (Dec).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. McAlister, L., & Pessemier, E. (1982). Variety seeking behavior: An interdisciplinary review. Journal of Consumer Research, 9, 311–322, (Dec).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Mills, P. K., Chaes, R., & Margulies, N. (1983). Motivating the client/employee system as a service production strategy. Academy of Management Review, 8, 301–310, (Apr).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Muniz, A. M. J. R., O’Guinn, T. C. (2001). Brand community. Journal of Consumer Research, 27, 412–432, (March).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Oracle (2004) Driven by demand. Available at: http//www.oracle.com/industries/automotive/White_paper.pdf. 2004; Accessed 29 March 2006.
  56. Palmer, A. (2005). Principles of service marketing. London: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  57. Pine, J.B. II., & Gilmore J. (1998). Welcome to the experience economy. Harvard Business Review, 76, 97–105, (July–August).Google Scholar
  58. Pine, J.B., II., & Gilmore, J. (1999). The experience economy: Work is theatre and every business a stage. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  59. Porter, M. (1985). Competitive advantage: Creating and sustaining superior performance. New York: Simon and Shuster.Google Scholar
  60. Pralahad, C. K., Ramaswamy, V. (2004). The future of competition: Co-creating unique value with customers. Boston, Mass: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  61. Prahalad, C. K., Ramaswamy, V., & Venkaratam S. K. (2000). Consumer centricity. Information Week, (April).Google Scholar
  62. Rahn, J. (1989). What is valuable in art, and can music still achieve it? Perspectives of New Music, 27, 6–17, (Summer).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Ratner, R. K., Kahn, B., & Kahneman, D. (1999). Choosing less preferred experiences for the sake of variety. Journal of Consumer Research, 26, 1–15, (Jun).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Ries, A., & Trout, J. (2000). Positioning: The battle for your mind. New York: Mc Graw-Hill.Google Scholar
  65. Rook, D. W. (1985). The Ritual dimension of consumer behavior. Journal of Consumer Research, 12, 251–264, (Dec.).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Rust, R. T., Lemon, K. (2001). E-Service and the consumer. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 5, 85–101, (Spring).Google Scholar
  67. Schmitt, Bernd H. (1999). Experiential marketing: How to get consumers to sense, feel, think and relate to your company. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  68. Selnes, F., & Johnson, M. D. (2004). Customer portfolio management: Toward a dynamic theory of exchange relationships, Journal of Marketing, 68(2), 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Solveig, W. (1996). The customer as co-producer. European Journal of Marketing, 30(4), 6–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Stern, L. W., & Reve, T. (1980). Distribution channels as political economies: A framework for comparative analysis. Journal of Marketing, 44, 52–64, (Summer).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Stone, R. N., & Gronhaug, K. (1993). Perceived risk: Further considerations for the marketing discipline. European Journal of Marketing, 27(3), 39–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Taylor, J. W. (1974). The role of risk in consumer behavior. Journal of Marketing, 38, 54–60, (April).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Teerlink, R., & Ozley, L. (2000). More than a motorcycle: The leadership journey at Harley-Davidson. Boston: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  74. Thompson, C. J., Locander, W., & Pollio, H.R.(1989). Putting consumer experience back into consumer research: The philosophy and method of existential methodology. Journal of Consumer Research, 16(2), 133–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Thompson, C. J., Pollio, H. R., & Locander W. B. (1994). The spoken and the unspoken: A hermeneutic approach to understanding the cultural viewpoints that underlie consumers’ expressed meanings. Journal of Consumer Research, 21(3), 432–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Tian, K.T., Bearden, W., & Hunter G.L. (2001). Consumers’ need for uniqueness: Scale development and validation. Journal of Consumer Research, 28, 50–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Vargo, S., & Lusch, R. (2004). Evolving to a new dominant logic for marketing. Journal of Marketing, 68, 1–17, (Jan).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Venkatraman, N., & Subramaniam, M. (2002). Theorizing the future of strategy: Questions for shaping strategy research in the knowledge economy. In Handbook of Strategy and Management. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  79. Walker, O., Mullins, J.W., Harper, B.H., & Larreche, J. (2006). Marketing strategy—a decision focused approach. New York: McGraw-Hill International Edition.Google Scholar
  80. Whitaker, G. (1980). Coproduction: Citizen participation in service delivery. Public Administration Review, 40, 240–246, (May–Jun.).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Williamson, O. E. (1979). Transaction-cost economics: The governance of contractual relations. Journal of Law and Economics, 22(2), 233–261, (October).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Williamson, O. E. (1985). The economic institution of capitalism. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  83. Womack, J. P., & Jones, D.T. (2005). Lean solutions: How companies and customers can create value and wealth together. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  84. Xue, M., & Harker, P. (2002), Customer efficiency: Concept and its impact on e-business management. Journal of Service Research, 4(4), 253–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Xue, M., Heim, G., & Harker, P. (2005). Consumer and co-producer roles in e-service: Analyzing efficiency and effectiveness of e-service designs. International Journal of Electronic Business, 3(2), 174–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Academy of Marketing Science 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Graduate School of Business AdministrationCollege of ManagementRishon LezionIsrael

Personalised recommendations