Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science

, Volume 36, Issue 2, pp 166–173 | Cite as

The effect of market orientation and its components on innovation consequences: a meta-analysis

  • Amir GrinsteinEmail author
Original Empirical Research


While there is a rich body of research on market orientation’s effect on business performance, much little attention has been given to its effect on innovation consequences. This is the first meta-analytic effort to study the independent effects of market orientation components (customer orientation, competitor orientation, interfunctional coordination) on innovation consequences. Also, it is the first meta-analysis to study the impact of contextual characteristics on the way market orientation affects innovation consequences. The study finds that market orientation components positively affect innovation consequences but that competitor orientation’s effect depends on a minimum level of customer orientation. The study also suggests that the relationship between market orientation and innovation consequences is stronger in highly competitive environments but weaker in technology turbulent ones. Finally, findings suggest that the relationship is stronger in large firms, service companies, and in countries characterized by high individualism and high power distance national cultures.


Market orientation Innovation New products Meta-analysis Cross-national 


  1. Agarwal, S., Erramilli, K., & Dev, C. (2003). Market orientation and performance in service firms: Role of innovation. Journal of Services Marketing, 17(1), 68–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Atuahene-Gima, K. (1995). An exploratory analysis of the impact of market orientation on new product performance. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 12, 275–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Atuahene-Gima, K. (2005). Resolving the capability–rigidity paradox in new product innovation. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 12, 275–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cadogan, J., Sanna, S., Risto, S., & Kaisu, P. (2002). Market-oriented behavior: Comparing service with product exporters. European Journal of Marketing, 36(9/10), 1076–1102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cano, C., Carrillat, F., & Jaramillo, F. (2004). A meta-analysis of the relationship between market orientation and business performance: Evidence from five continents. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 21, 179–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Christensen, C. (1997). The innovator’s dilemma. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  7. Christensen, C., Cook, S., & Hall, T. (2005). Marketing malpractice. Harvard Business Review, 12, 74–83.Google Scholar
  8. Dwyer, S., Mesak, H., & Hsu, M. (2005). An exploratory examination of the influence of national culture on cross-national product diffusion. Journal of International Marketing, 13(2), 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ellis, P. (2006). Market orientation and performance: A meta-analysis and cross-national comparisons. Journal of Management Studies, 43(5), 1089–1107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Field, A. (2001). Meta-analysis of correlation coefficients: A Monte Carlo comparison of fixed and random-effects methods. Psychological Methods, 6(2), 161–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Frambach, R., Prabhu, J., & Verhallen, T. (2003). The influence of business strategy on new product activity: The role of market orientation. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 20, 377–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Freedom House (2000). (accessed March 2, 2007).
  13. Gatignon, H., Eliashberg, J., & Robertson, T. (1989). Modeling multinational diffusion patterns: Am efficient methodology. Marketing Science, 8(3), 231–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gatignon, H., & Xuereb, J.-M. (1997). Strategic orientation of the firm and new product performance. Journal of Marketing Research, 34, 77–90. (February).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Geyskens, I., Steenkamp, J.-B., & Kumar, N. (1998). Generalizations about Trust in Marketing Channel Relationships using meta-analysis. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 15, 223–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Henard, D., & Szymanski, D. (2001). Why some new products are more successful than others. Journal of Marketing Research, 38, 362–375. (August).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hofstede, G. (2001). Cultural consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organizations across nations (2nd edn). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  18. House, R., Hanges, P., Javidan, M., Dorfman, P., & Gupta, V. (2004). Culture, leadership and organizations: The GLOBE study of 62 societies. Thousands Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  19. Hunter, J., & Schmidt, F. (1990). Methods of meta-analysis: Correcting error and bias in research findings. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  20. Im, S., & Workman, J. (2004). Market orientation, creativity, and new product performance in high-technology firms. Journal of Marketing, 68, 114–132. (April).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Jaworski, B., & Kohli, A. (1993). Market orientation: Antecedents and consequences. Journal of Marketing, 57(3), 53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Katila, R., & Shane, S. (2005). When does lack of resources make new firms innovative?. Academy of Management Journal, 48(5), 814–829.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. King, D., Dalton, D., Daily, C., & Covin, J. (2004). Meta-analysis of post-acquisition performance: Indicators of unidentified moderators. Strategic Management Journal, 25, 187–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kirca, A., Jayachandran, S., & Bearden, W. (2005). Market orientation: A meta-analytic review and assessment of its antecedents and impact on performance. Journal of Marketing, 69, 24–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kohli, A., & Jaworski, B. (1990). Market orientation: The construct, research propositions and managerial implications. Journal of Marketing, 54, 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kohli, A., Jaworski, B., & Kumar, A. (1993). MARKOR: A measure of market orientation. Journal of Marketing Research, 30, 467–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lukas, B., & Ferrell, O. (2000). The effect of market orientation on product innovation. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 28(2), 239–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Narver, J., & Slater, S. (1990). The effect of a market orientation on business profitability. Journal of Marketing, 54(4), 20–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Narver, J., Slater, S., & MacLachlan, D. (2004). Responsive and proactive market orientation and new product success. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 21(5), 334–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Nelson, R. (1993). National innovation systems: A comparative analysis. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Porter, M. (1990). The competitive advantage of nations. Harvard Business Review, 68(2), 73–93.Google Scholar
  32. Steenkamp, J.-B., Hofstede, F., & Wedel, M. (1999). A cross-national investigation into the individual and national cultural antecedents of consumer innovativeness. Journal of Marketing, 63, 55–69. (April).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. van den Bulte, C., & Stremersch, S. (2004). Social contagion and income heterogeneity in new product diffusion: A meta-analytic test. Marketing Science, 23(4), 530–544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. van Everdingen, Y., & Waarts, E. (2003). The effect of national culture on the adoption of innovations. Marketing Letters, 14(3), 217–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. World Bank. (2000). (accessed March 2, 2007).

Copyright information

© Academy of Marketing Science 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The Marketing Department, The Harvard Business SchoolHarvard UniversityBostonUSA

Personalised recommendations