This research examines how perceived scarcity influences consumers’ processing of price information. To explain the effects of scarcity, a conceptual framework which incorporates both the motivational and the interference effects of scarcity on information processing is developed. The results from two studies show that under scarcity, consumers’ perceptions of quality and monetary sacrifice exhibit different response patterns, depending on the relative price level and consumers’ motivation to process information. We provide insights into how these perceptions of quality and sacrifice are integrated to form perceptions of value. Additional analyses of thought measures provided further understanding of the underlying processes that influenced the evaluation of price information under scarcity.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Transforming the need for uniqueness measure into two levels—a median split—and then using it as a variable in a MANOVA also showed no significant main and interaction effects for this factor (p > 0.10).
The authors thank the reviewers for these suggestions.
Andrews, J. C. (1988). Motivation, ability, and opportunity to process information: Conceptual and experimental manipulation issues. In M. J. Houston (Ed.), Advances in consumer research, vol. 15, (pp. 219–225). Provo UT: Association for Consumer Research.
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173–1182, (December).
Batra, R., & Ray, M. L. (1986). Situational effects of advertising repetition: The moderating influence of motivation, ability, and opportunity to respond. Journal of Consumer Research, 12, 432–445, (March).
Bozzolo, A. M., & Brock, T. C. (1992). Unavailability effects on message processing: A theoretical analysis and an empirical test. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 13, 93–101, (March).
Brannon, L. A., & Brock, T. C. (2001). Limiting time for responding enhances behavior corresponding to the merits of compliance appeals: Refutations of Heuristic-cue theory in service and consumer settings. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 10, 133–146, (May).
Brannon, L. A., & McCabe, A. E. (2001). Time-restricted sales appeals: The importance of offering real value. Cornell Hotel and Restaurant Administration Quarterly, 42, 47–52, (August–September).
Brock, T. C. (1968). Implications of commodity theory for value change. In A. G. Greenwald, T. C. Brock, & T. M. Ostrom (Eds.), Psychological foundations of attitudes (pp. 243–276). New York: Academic.
Brock, T. C. & Brannon, L. A. (1992). Liberalization of commodity theory. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 13, 135–144, (March).
Chaiken, S. (1980). Heuristic versus systematic processing and the use of source vs. message cues in persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 752–766, (November).
Cialdini, R. B. (1987). Compliance principles of compliance professionals: Psychologists of necessity. In M. P. Zanna, J. M. Olson, & C. P. Herman (Eds.), Social influence: The ontario symposium, vol. 5, (pp. 165–184). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Cialdini, R. B. (1993). Influence: Science and practice. New York: Harper Collins.
Cialdini, R. B. (2001). Harnessing the science of persuasion. Harvard Business Review, 79, 72–79, (October).
Clee, M. A., & Wicklund, R. A. (1980). Consumer behavior and psychological reactance. Journal of Consumer Research, 6, 389–405, (March).
Dhar, R., & Nowlis, S. M. (1999). The effects of time pressure on consumer choice deferral. Journal of Consumer Research, 25, 369–384, (March).
Ditto, P. H., & Jemmott, J. B. (1989). From rarity to evaluative extremity: Effects of prevalence information on evaluations of positive and negative characteristics. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 16–26, (July).
Eagly, A. H., & Chaiken, S. (1993). The psychology of attitudes. Orlando, FL: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
Gollwitzer, P. M. (1990). Action phases and mind sets. In E. T. Higgins & R. M. Sorrentino (Eds.), Handbook of motivation and cognition, vol. 2. Foundations of social behavior (pp. 53–92). New York: Guilford.
Grewal, D., Monroe, K. B., & Krishnan, R. (1998). The effects of price-comparison advertising on buyers’ perceptions of acquisition value, transaction value, and behavioral intentions. Journal of Marketing, 62, 46–59, (April).
Inman, J. J., & McAlister, L. (1994). Do coupon expiration dates affect consumer behavior? Journal of Marketing Research, 31, 423–429, (August).
Inman, J. J., Peter, A. C., & Raghubir, R. P. (1997). Framing the deal: The role of restrictions in accentuating deal value. Journal of Consumer Research, 24, 68–79, (June).
Kruglanski, A. W., & Freund, T. (1983). The freezing and unfreezing of Lay inferences: Effects of impressional primacy, ethnic stereotyping and numerical anchoring. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 19, 448–468, (September).
Lynn, M. (1987). The effects of scarcity on perceived value: Investigation of commodity theory.Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Columbus, OH: Ohio State University.
Lynn, M. (1991). Scarcity effects on desirability: A quantitative review of the commodity theory literature. Psychology & Marketing, 8, 43–57, (Spring).
Lynn, M., & Harris, J. (1997). The desire for unique consumer products: A new individual difference scale. Psychology & Marketing, 14, 601–616, (September).
Maheswaran, D., & Sternthal, B. (1990). The effects of knowledge, motivation, and type of message on ad processing and product judgments. Journal of Consumer Research, 17, 66–73, (June).
Mazis, M. B. (1975). Antipollution measures and psychological reactance theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 31, 654–660, (April).
Mittal, B. (1989). Measuring purchase-decision involvement. Psychology & Marketing, 6, 147–162, (Summer).
Monroe, K. B. (2003). Pricing: Making profitable decisions (3rd ed.). Burr Ridge, IL: Irwin
Ordóñez, L., & Benson, L. (1997). Decisions under time pressure: How time constraints affects risky decision making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 71, 121–140, (August).
Perreault, W. D., Jr., & Leigh, L. E. (1989). Reliability of nominal data based on qualitative judgments. Journal of Marketing Research, 26, 135–148, (May).
Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). Attitude change: Central and peripheral routes to persuasion. New York: Springer Berlin Heidelberg New York.
Pham, M. T. (1996). Cue representation and selection effects of arousal on persuasion. Journal of Consumer Research, 22, 373–387, (March).
Rao, A. R., & Monroe, K. B. (1988). The moderating effect of prior knowledge on cue utilizations in product evaluations. Journal of Consumer Research, 19, 253–264, (September).
Rao, A. R., & Sieben, W. A. (1992). The effect of prior knowledge on price acceptability and the type of information examined. Journal of Consumer Research, 19, 256–270, (September).
Sanbonmatsu, D. M., & Kardes, F. R. (1988). The effects of physiological arousal on information processing and persuasion. Journal of Consumer Research, 15, 379–385, (December).
Simonson, I. (1992). The influence of anticipating regret and responsibility on purchase decisions. Journal of Consumer Research, 19, 105–118, (June).
Snyder, C. R., & Fromkin, H. L. (1980). Uniqueness: The human pursuit of difference. New York: Plenum.
Suri, R., & Monroe, K. B. (2003). The effects of time constraints on consumers’ judgments of prices and products. Journal of Consumer Research, 30, 92–104, (June).
Verhallen, T. M. M. (1982). Scarcity and consumer choice behavior. Journal of Economic Psychology, 2, 299–322.
Verhallen, T. M. M., & Robben, H. S. J. (1994). Scarcity and preference: An experiment on unavailability and product evaluation. Journal of Economic Psychology, 15, 315–331, (June).
Worchel, S., Lee, J., & Adewole, A. (1975). Effects of supply and demand on ratings of object value. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32, 906–914, (November).
Wright, P. (1980). Message—evoked thoughts: Persuasion research using thought verbalizations. Journal of Consumer Research, 7, 151–171, (September).
About this article
Cite this article
Suri, R., Kohli, C. & Monroe, K.B. The effects of perceived scarcity on consumers’ processing of price information. J. of the Acad. Mark. Sci. 35, 89–100 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-006-0008-y