Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Influence of Sophorolipid Structure on Interfacial Properties of Aqueous-Arabian Light Crude and Related Constituent Emulsions

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of the American Oil Chemists' Society

Abstract

Sophorolipids (SLs) offer an “environmentally friendly” alternative to chemically produced surfactants currently used in formulations for crude oil extraction, processing, and reclamation. Studies herein describe how sophorolipid structure influences its interfacial properties for environmentally and industrially relevant oil–water systems where the oil phase is Arabian light crude oil, paraffin oil, decane, hexadecane, a 1:1 vol/vol mixture of o-xylene and 1,2-dimethylcyclohexane, or a mixture of paraffin oil, o-xylene, and 1,2-dimethylcyclohexane (synthetic crude oil). SL-hexyl ester (SL-HE) reduces the crude oil–water interfacial tension (IFT) by 57 and 91% at 0.001 and 0.5 mg/mL, respectively. Crude oil displacement tests reveal that SL-ethyl ester (SL-EE) and SL-HE contract a crude oil slick on water to about 20% of its starting volume allowing for easier burning of spilled crude oil on marine surfaces. Water retention and emulsion phase (e.g., o/w vs. w/o) are determined by SL-structure/concentration, oil concentration, and oil composition to understand their performance for crude oil transportation and clean-up. For the first time, w/o emulsions were obtained using SLs and their formation occurred after homogenization when the oil phase consisted of a 1:1 mixture of o-xylene and 1,2-dimethylcyclohexane. Generally, the performance of SL-esters in the above studies was superior to that using Triton X-100, a comparison nonionic surfactant. Hence, SL-esters offer a valuable platform for tuning interfacial properties to optimize surfactant performance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Scheme 1
Scheme 2
Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. EIA (2015) Annual energy outlook 2015 with projections to 2040. US Energy Information Administration, Washington DC

  2. Kark S, Brokovich E, Mazor T, Levin N (2015) Emerging conservation challenges and prospects in an era of offshore hydrocarbon exploration and exploitation. Conserv Biol 29:1573–1585

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Kimes NE, Callaghan AV, Suflita JM, Morris PJ (2014) Microbial transformation of the Deepwater Horizon oil spill-past, present, and future perspectives. Front Microbiol 5:1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Sandifer PA, Trtanj JM, Collier TK (2013) A perspective on the history and evolution of an oceans and human health “metadiscipline” in the USA. Microb Ecol 65:880–888

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Wasan D, McNamara J, Shah S, Sampath K, Aderangi N (1979) The role of coalescence phenomena and interfacial rheological properties in enhanced oil recovery: an overview. J Rheol 23:181–207

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Mandal A, Samanta A, Bera A, Ojha K (2010) Role of oil-water emulsion in enhanced oil recovery. In: International conference on chemistry and chemical engineering (ICCCE 2010). doi:10.1109/ICCCENG.2010.5560393

  7. Nour A, Mohd R, Anwaruddin Y, Anwaruddin H (2007) Water-in-crude oil emulsions: its stabilization and demulsification. J Appl Sci 22:3512–3517

    Google Scholar 

  8. Filho D, Ramalho J, Spinelli L, Lucas E (2012) Aging of water-in-crude oil emulsions: effect on water content, droplet size distribution, dynamic viscosity and stability. Colloids Surf A Physiochem Eng Asp 396:208–212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Sjöblom J, Aske N, Auflem I, Brandal Ø, Havre T, Saether Ø, Westvik A, Johnsen E, Kallevik H (2002) Our current understanding of water-in-crude oil emulsions. Recent characterization techniques and high pressure performance. Adv Colloid Interface Sci 100–102:399–473

    Google Scholar 

  10. Browarzik D, Rahimian H (1999) Asphaltene flocculation in crude oil systems. Fluid Phase Equilib 154:285–300

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Eley D, Hey M, Symonds J (1988) Emulsions of water in asphaltene-containing oils droplet size distribution and emulsification rates. Colloids Surf 32:87–101

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. API (2011) Robust summary information on crude oil (CAS 8002-05-9). American Petroleum Institute, Washington, DC

  13. Marti M, Colonna W, Patra P, Zhang H, Green C, Reznik G, Pynn M, Jarrell K, Nyman J, Somasundaran P, Glatz C, Lamsal B (2014) Production and characterization of microbial biosurfactants for potential use in oil-spill remediation. Enzyme Microb Technol 55:31–39

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Pekdemir T, Çopur M, Urum K (2005) Emulsification of crude oil-water systems using biosurfactants. Process Saf Environ Prot 83:38–46

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Takamura K, Loahardjo N, Winoto W, Bucklet J, Morrow N, Kuneida M, Liang Y, Matsuoka T (2012) Spreading and retraction of spilled crude oil on sea water. In: Younes M (ed) Crude oil exploration in the world. InTech, Rijeka

  16. Buist I, Potter S, Nedwed T, Mullin J (2011) Herding surfactants to contract and thicken oil spills in pack ice for in situ burning. Cold Reg Sci Technol 67:3–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Azam F, Fenchel T, Field J, Gray J, Mayer-Reil L, Thingstad F (1983) The ecological role of water-column microbes in the sea. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 10:257–263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Sathishkumar M, Binupriya A, Baik S, Yun S (2008) Biodegradation of crude oil by individual bacterial strains and a mixed bacterial consortium isolated from hydrocarbon contaminated areas. Clean 1:92–96

    Google Scholar 

  19. Lechuga M, Fernández-Serrano M, Jurado E, Núñez-Olea J, Ríos F (2016) Acute toxicity of anionic and non-ionic surfactants to aquatic organisms. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 125:1–8

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Bamberger M, Oswald R (2012) Impacts on gas drilling on human and animal health. New Solut 22:51–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. DiGuilio D, Jackson R (2016) Impact to underground sources of drinking water and domestic wells from production well stimulation and completion practices in the Pavillion, Wyoming. Field Environ Sci Technol 50:4524–4536

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Cameotra S, Makkar R (2010) Biosurfactant-enhanced bioremediation of hydrophobic pollutants. Pure Appl Chem 82:97–116

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Silva R, Almeida D, Rufino R, Luna J, Santos V, Sarubbo L (2014) Applications of biosurfactants in the petroleum industry and the remediation of oil spills. Int J Mol Sci 15:12523–12542

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Bognolo G (1999) Biosurfactants as emulsifying agents for hydrocarbons. Colloids Surf A 152:41–52

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Marchant R, Banat I (2012) Microbial biosurfactants: challenges and opportunities for future exploitation. Trends Biotechnol 30:558–565

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Van Bogaert I, Saerens K, Muynck CD, Develter D, Soetaert U, Vandamme EJ (2007) Microbial production of application of sophorolipids. Appl Microbiol Biotech 76:23–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Bisht K, Gross R, Kaplan D (1999) Enzyme-mediated regioselective acylations of sophorolipids. J Org Chem 63:780–789

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Hirata Y, Ryu M, Oda Y, Igarashi K, Nagatsuka A, Furuta T, Suguira M (2009) Novel characteristics of sophorolipids, yeast glycolipid biosurfactants, as biodegradable low-foaming surfactants. J Biosci Bioeng 108:142–146

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Daverey A, Pakshirajan K (2010) Sophorolipids from Candida bombicola using mixed hydrophilic substrates: production, purification and characterization. Colloids Surf B 79:246–253

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Ma X, Li H, Song X (2012) Surface and biological activity of sophorolipid molecules produced by Wickerhamiella domercqiae var. sophorolipid CGMCC 1576. J Colloid Interface Sci 376:165–172

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. El-Sheshtawy H, Aiad I, Osman M, Abo-Elsnar A, Kobisy A (2015) Production of biosurfactants by Bacillus licheniformis and Candida albicans for application in microbial enhanced oil recovery. Egypt J Petrol. doi:10.1016/j.ejpe.2015.07.018

    Google Scholar 

  32. Cooper D, Paddock A (1984) Production of a biosurfactant from Torulopsis bombicola. Appl Environ Microbiol 47:173–176

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Koh A, Linhardt R, Gross R (2016) Effect of sophorolipid n-alkyl ester chain length on its interfacial properties at the almond oil-water interface. Langmuir 32:5562–5572. doi:10.1021/acs.langmuir.6b01008

  34. Zaki N (1997) Surfactant stabilized crude oil-in-water emulsions for pipeline transportation of viscous crude oils. Colloids Surf A Physiochem Eng Asp 25:19–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Oebius H (1999) Physical properties and processes that influence the clean up of oil spills in the marine environment. Spill Sci Technol 5:177–289

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Peng Y, Totsingan F, Meier MAR, Steinmann M, Wurm F, Koh A, Gross RA (2015) Sophorolipids: expanding structural diversity by ring-opening cross-metathesis. Eur J Lipid Sci Technol 117(735):217–228

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Ratsep P, Shah V (2009) Identification and quantification of sophorolipid analogs using ultra-fast liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry. J Microbiol Methods 78:354–356

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Bisht K, Gross R, Kaplan D (1999) Enzyme-mediated regioselective acylations of sophorolipids. J Org Chem 63:780–789

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Ward AFH, Tordai L (1946) Time-dependence of boundary tensions of solutions I. The role of diffusion time-effects. J Chem Phys 14:453–461

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Campanelli J, Wang X (1999) Dynamic interfacial tension of surfactant mixtures at liquid-liquid interfaces. J Colloid Interface Sci 213:340–351

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Thompson DG, Taylor AS, Graham DE (1985) Emulsification and demulsification relation to crude oil production. Colloids Surf 15:175–189

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Abismaïl B, Canselier JP, Wilhelm AM, Delmas H, Gourdon C (1999) Emulsification by ultrasound: drop size distribution and stability. Ultrason Sonochem 6:75–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Petrache H, Zemb T, Belloni L, Parsegian V (2006) Salt screening and specific ion adsorption determine neutral-lipid membrane interactions. PNAS 103:7982–7987

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Beunen J, Ruckenstein E (1982) The effect of salting out and micellization on interfacial tension. Adv Colloid Interface Sci 16:201–231

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Zhang Y, Cremer P (2006) Interactions between macromolecules and ions: the Hofmeister series. Curr Opin Chem Biol 10:658–663

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Griffin W (1949) Classification of surface-active agents by HLB. J Soc Cosmet Chem 1:311–326

    Google Scholar 

  47. Triton X-100 surfactant technical data sheet. The Dow Chemical Company, Midland

  48. Crude oil—physical and chemical data. International Agency for Research on Cancer, World Health Organization, Lyon

  49. Koh A, Gross R (2016) Molecular editing of sophorolipids by esterification of lipid moieties: effects on interfacial properties at paraffin and synthetic crude oil-water interfaces. Colloids Surf A Physiochem Eng Asp 507:170–181

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful for funding received from the National Science Foundation Partnerships for International Research and Education (PIRE) Program (Award #1243313).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Center for Biotechnology and Interdisciplinary Studies, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute (RPI), Biotechnology Building, 110 8th Street, Troy, NY, 12180, USA

    Amanda Koh, Anna Wong & Christine Desplat

  2. Department of Biomedical Engineering, Center for Biotechnology and Interdisciplinary Studies, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute (RPI), Biotechnology Building, 110 8th Street, Troy, NY, 12180, USA

    Alexis Quinteros

  3. Department of Chemistry and Biology, Center for Biotechnology and Interdisciplinary Studies, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute (RPI), Biotechnology Building, 110 8th Street, Troy, NY, 12180, USA

    Richard Gross

Authors
  1. Amanda Koh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Anna Wong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Alexis Quinteros
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Christine Desplat
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Richard Gross
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amanda Koh.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 30 kb)

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Koh, A., Wong, A., Quinteros, A. et al. Influence of Sophorolipid Structure on Interfacial Properties of Aqueous-Arabian Light Crude and Related Constituent Emulsions. J Am Oil Chem Soc 94, 107–119 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11746-016-2913-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11746-016-2913-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation