Journal of the American Oil Chemists' Society

, Volume 89, Issue 11, pp 2103–2111 | Cite as

Preparation and Characterization of Sustainable Polyurethane Foams from Soybean Oils

Original Paper

Abstract

Polyol derived from soybean oil was made from crude soybean oil by epoxidization and hydroxylation. Soy-based polyurethane (PU) foams were prepared by the in-situ reaction of methylene diphenyl diisocyanate (MDI) polyurea prepolymer and soy-based polyol. A free-rise method was developed to prepare the sustainable PU foams for use in automotive and bedding cushions. In this study, three petroleum-based PU foams were compared with two soy-based PU foams in terms of their foam characterizations and properties. Soy-based PU foams were made with soy-based polyols with different hydroxyl values. Soy-based PU foams had higher Tg (glass transition temperature) and worse cryogenic properties than petroleum-based PU foams. Bio-foams had lower thermal degradation temperatures in the urethane degradation due to natural molecular chains with lower thermal stability than petroleum skeletons. However, these foams had good thermal degradation at a high temperature stage because of MDI polyurea prepolymer, which had superior thermal stability than toluene diisocyanate adducts in petroleum-based PU foams. In addition, soy-based polyol, with high hydroxyl value, contributed PU foam with superior tensile and higher elongation, but lower compressive strength and modulus. Nonetheless, bio-foam made with high hydroxyl valued soy-based polyol had smaller and better distributed cell size than that using low hydroxyl soy-based polyol. Soy-based polyol with high hydroxyl value also contributed the bio-foam with thinner cell walls compared to that with low hydroxyl value, whereas, petroleum-based PU foams had no variations in cell thickness and cell distributions.

Keywords

Petrochemical Polyurethane foam Soybean oil Soy-based polyol 

References

  1. 1.
    Anon. (2011) Markets and Markets market report #CH 1596: MDI, TDI and polyurethane market by type, applications, prices, regulations trends and global forecasts 2011–2016. Publishing Date: July 2011Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Global Industry Analysis, Inc. (2011) Foamed plastics (polyurethane)—a global strategic business report. #MCP-2069. Released in February 2011Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Howard GT (2002) Biodegradation of polyurethane: a review. Int Biodeterior Biodegradation 49:245–252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Urgun-Demirtas M, Singh D, Pagilla K (2007) Laboratory investigation of biodegradability of a polyurethane foam under anaerobic conditions. Polym Degrad Stab 92:1599–1610CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lichtenberg F (2002) The environmental fate of TDI/MDI-based polyurethane foams, Alliance for the polyurethanes industry, Proceedings of the technical program of the polyurethane foam association meeting, Arlington, May 9, 2002Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Oprea S, Doroftei F (2011) Biodegradation of polyurethane acrylate with acrylated epoxidized soybean oil blend elastomers by Chaetomium globosum. Int Biodeterior Biodegradation 65:533–538CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Raquez J-M, Deléglise M, Lacrampe M-F, Krawczak P (2010) Thermosetting (bio)materials derived from renewable resources: a critical review. Prog Polym Sci 35:487–509CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Uyama H, Kuwabara M, Tsujimoto T, Kobayashi S (2003) Enzymatic synthesis and curing of biodegradable epoxide-containing polyesters from renewable resources. Biomacromolecules 4:211–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Shogren RL, Petrovic Z, Liu Z, Erhan SZ (2004) Biodegradation behavior of some vegetable oil-based polymers. J Polym Environ 12:173–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Anon (2010) Life cycle impact of soybean production and soy industrial products. Omni Tech International prepared for the United Soybean Board, USAGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Petrović ZS (2008) Polyurethanes from vegetable oils. Polym Rev 48:109–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Meyer H-P (2011) Sustainability and biotechnology. Org Process Res Dev 15:180–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    ICIS Pricing. www.icispricing.com
  14. 14.
    Ash M (2011) Oil crops outlook: foreign competition may diminish the export potential for US soybeans next fall. US Department of Agriculture. June 10, 2011. P. 16Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Javni I, Zhang W, Petrović ZS (2004) Soybean-oil-based polyisocyanurate rigid foams. J Polym Environ 12:123–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Banik I, Sain MM (2008) Water blown soy polyol-based polyurethane foams of different rigidities. J Reinf Plast Compos 27:357–373CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Khazabi M, Gu R, Sain M (2011) Fiber reinforced soy-based polyurethane spray foam insulation. Part 1: cell morphologies. BioResources 6:3757–3774Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Gu R, Khazabi M, Sain M (2011) Fiber reinforced soy-based polyurethane spray foam insulation. Part 2: thermal and Mechanical Properties. BioResources 6:3775–3790Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Guo A, Javni I, Petrovic Z (2000) Rigid polyurethane foams based on soybean oil. J Appl Polym Sci 77:467–473CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Petrovic ZS, Yang L, Zlatanic A, Zhang W, Javni I (2007) Network structure and properties of polyurethanes from soybean oil. Appl Polym Sci 105:467–473CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Ghosh-Roy S (2010) Master thesis. Novel approaches for synthesis of polyols from soy oils. Faculty of Forestry, University of Toronto. Issued on January 19, 2010Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Frankel EN (1980) Lipid oxidation. Prog Lipid Res 19:1–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Wabel C (1998) Doctoral dissertation. Influence of Lecithin on Structure and Stability of Parenteral Fat Emulsions. Chapter 4. Department of Chemistry and Pharmacy, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU). Erlangen, Germany. Issued on July 30, 1998Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Çaylı G, Küsefoğlu S (2008) Biobased polyisocyanates from plant oil triglycerides Synthesis, polymerization, and characterization. J Appl Polym Sci 109:2948–2955CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Molero C, de Lucas A, Rodríguez JF (2006) Recovery of polyols from flexible polyurethane foam by “split-phase” glycolysis with new catalysts. Polym Degrad Stab 91:894–901CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    David D, Silverstein MS (2009) Porous polyurethanes synthesized within high internal phase emulsions. J Polym Sci Part A: Polym Chem 47:5806–5814CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Meyer-Stork LS, Höcker H, Berndt H (1992) Syntheses and reactions of urethanes of cellobiose and cellulose-containing uretdione groups. J Appl Polym Sci 44:1043–1049CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Halpaad R, Kocher J, Laas H-J, Richter F (2006) Isocyanates containing uretdione groups. US Patent # 7098289. Issued on August 29, 2006Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Grogler G, Kopp R, Hess H (1988) Process for the preparation of complexes of one mol of dimerized or low-oligodimerized 4,4′-diisocyanatodiphenylmethane and two to three mol of 4,4′-diisocyanatodiphenylmethane, corresponding complexes, and their use for polyurethane production. US Patent #4720545 Issued on January 19, 1988Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Chuayjuljit S, Sangpakdee T, Saravari O (2007) Processing and properties of palm oil-based rigid polyurethane foam. J Metals Mater Miner 17:17–23Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Blagbrough IS, Mackenzie NE, Ortiz C, Scott AI (1986) The condensation reaction between isocyanates and carboxylic acids. A practical synthesis of substituted amides and anilides. Tetrahedron Lett 27:1251–1254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Hatchett DW, Kodippili G, Kinyanjui JM, Benincasa F, Sapochak L (2005) FTIR analysis of thermally processed PU foam. Polym Degrad Stab 87:555–561CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Zhang L, Jeon HK, Malsam J, Herrington R, Macosko CW (2007) Substituting soybean oil-based polyol into polyurethane flexible foams. Polymer 48:6656–6667CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Bunjes H, Westesen K, Koch MHJ (1996) Crystallization tendency and polymorphic transitions in triglyceride nanoparticles. Int J Pharm 129:159–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Güner FS, Yağcı Y, Erciyes AT (2006) Polymers from triglyceride oils. Prog Polym Sci 31:633–670CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Li X, Cao H, Zhang Y (2006) Structures and physical properties of rigid polyurethane foams with water as the sole blowing agent. Sci China, Ser B: Chem 49:363–370CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Grünbauer HJM, Thoen JA, Folmer JCW, Lieshout HCV (1992) Polymer morphology of water-blown rigid polyurethane foam: development of new polyols. J Cell Plast 28:36–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Dai Z, Hatano B, Kadokawa J, Tagaya H (2002) Effect of diaminotoluene on the decomposition of polyurethane foam waste in superheated water. Polym Degrad Stab 76:179–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Gerlock JL, Braslaw J, Mahoney LR, Ferris FC (1980) Reaction of polyurethane foam with dry steam: kinetics and mechanism of reactions. Journal of Polymer Science: Polymer Chemistry Edition 18:541–557CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Rogers ME, Long TE (eds) (2003) Synthetic methods in step-growth polymers. In: Wiley, Hoboken. ISBN 0-471-38769-XGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© AOCS 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre for Biocomposites and Biomaterials Processing, Faculty of ForestryUniversity of TorontoTorontoCanada

Personalised recommendations