Skip to main content

Potential Relationships Between Fatty Acid Compositions and Phytochemicals of Selected Low Linolenic Soybeans Grown in Maryland

Abstract

Eight soybean genotypes grown in Maryland were analyzed for total phenolic content, antioxidant capacity, isoflavone composition, lutein content, tocopherol composition, and fatty acid profile. The soybean samples consisted of seven low α-linolenic (18:3n-3) genotypes and 1 standard genotype for comparison. 18:3n-3 levels were positively correlated with palmitic acid (16:0) content, and negatively correlated with oleic acid (18:1n-9) concentration. Daidzein and genistein concentrations were positively correlated with 18:3n-3 levels. α-Tocopherol, γ-tocopherol, and total tocopherol contents were negatively correlated with that for 18:3n-3. Two of the reduced 18:3n-3 genotypes contained significantly higher lutein levels than the non-modified genotype. All genotypes contained similar antioxidant capacity to the non-modified genotype. There were not significant differences among genotypes in relative 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH·) scavenging capacity or oxygen radical absorbing capacity. No correlation was observed between 18:3n-3 and antioxidant capacity. The results of this study show that the Maryland-grown low 18:3n-3 soybeans are sources of phytochemicals and antioxidants with potential health benefits. Specific genotypes may be selected for food production to obtain the most desirable combination of nutritional, nutraceutical, and chemical properties. The reduction in 18:3n-3 may also influence the levels of other fatty acids and antioxidant compounds in soybeans.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

References

  1. United Soybean Board (2008) Consumer attitudes about nutrition. United Soybean Board, St. Louis

    Google Scholar 

  2. Anderson JW, Smith BM, Washnock CS (1999) Cardiovascular and renal benefits of dry bean and soybean intake. Am J Clin Nutr 70:464S–474S

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Xiao C (2008) Health effects of soy protein and isoflavones in humans. J Nutr 138:1244S–1249S

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Meydani S, Lichtenstein A, White P, Goodnight S, Elson C, Woods M, Gorbach S, Schaefer E (1991) Food use and health effects of soybean and sunflower oils. J Am Coll Nutr 10:406–428

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Connor W (2000) Importance of n-3 fatty acids in health and disease. Am J Clin Nutr 71:171–175S

    Google Scholar 

  6. Wilson RF (2004) Seed composition. In: Boerma HR, Specht JE (eds) Soybeans: improvement, production, and uses. American Society of Agronomy, Inc., Crop Science Society of America, Inc., Soil Science Society of America, Inc, Madison, pp 621–677

    Google Scholar 

  7. Eckel R, Borra S, Lichtenstein A, Yin-Piazza S (2007) Understanding the complexity of trans fatty acid reduction in the American diet: American Heart Association Trans Fat Conference 2006: Report of the Trans Fat Conference Planning Group. Circulation 115:2231–2245

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Tarrago-Trani M, Phillips K, Lemar L, Holden J (2006) New and existing oils and fats used in products with reduced trans-fatty acid content. J Am Diet Assn 106:867–880

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Slavin M, Cheng Z, Luther M, Kenworthy W, Yu L (2009) Antioxidant properties and phenolic, isoflavone, tocopherol, and carotenoid composition of Maryland-grown soybean lines with altered fatty acid profiles. Food Chem 114:20–27

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Sugano M (2006) Nutritional implications of soybean. In: Sugano M (ed) Soy in health and disease prevention. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 3–16

    Google Scholar 

  11. Warensjö E, Sundström J, Vessby B, Cederholm T, Risérus U (2008) Markers of dietary fat quality and fatty acid desaturation as predictors of total and cardiovascular mortality: a population-based prospective study. Am J Clin Nutr 88:203–209

    Google Scholar 

  12. Baer D, Judd J, Kris-Etherton P, Zhao G, Emken E (2003) Stearic acid absorption and its metabolizable energy value are minimally lower than those of other fatty acids in healthy men fed mixed diets. J Nutr 133:4129–4134

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Lichtenstein A, Matthan N, Jalbert S, Resteghini N, Shaefer E, Ausman L (2006) Novel soybean oils with different fatty acid profiles alter cardiovascular disease risk factors in moderately hyperlipidemic subjects. Am J Clin Nut 84:497–504

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. McCord KL, Fehr WR, Wang T, Welke GA, Cianzio SR, Schnebly SR (2004) Tocopherol content of soybean lines with reduced linolenate in the seed oil. Crop Sci 44:772–776

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Scherder CW, Fehr WR, Welke G, Wang T (2006) Tocopherol content and agronomic performance of soybean lines with reduced palmitate. Crop Sci 46:1286–1290

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Yu L, Adams D, Gabel M (2002) Conjugated linoleic acid isomers differ in their free radical scavenging properties. J Agric Food Chem 50:4135–4140

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Parry J, Hao Z, Luther M, Su L, Zhou K, Yu L (2006) Characterization of cold-pressed onion, parsley, cardamom, mullein, roasted pumpkin, and milk thistle seed oils. J Am Oil Chem Soc 83:847–854

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Lee Y, Kim J, Zheng J, Row KH (2007) Comparisons of isoflavones from Korean and Chinese soybean and processed products. Bio Eng J 36:49–53

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Su Q, Rowley KG, Itsiopoulos C, O’Dea K (2002) Identification and quantitation of major carotenoids in selected components of the Mediterranean diet: green leafy vegetables, figs, and olive oil. Eur J Clin Nutr 56:1149–1154

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Darnoko D, Cheryan M, Moros E, Jerrel J, Perkins EG (2000) Simultaneous HPLC analysis of palm carotenoids and tocopherols using a C-30 column and photodiode array detector. J Liq Chrom Rel Technol 23:1873–1885

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Cheng Z, Moore J, Yu L (2006) High-throughput relative DPPH radical scavenging capacity assay. J Agric Food Chem 54:7429–7436

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Moore J, Yin J-J, Yu L (2006) Novel fluorometric assay for hydroxyl radical scavenging capacity (HOSC) estimation. J Agric Food Chem 54:617–626

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Ou B, Hampsch-Woodill M, Prior RL (2001) Development and validation of an improved oxygen radical absorbance capacity assay using fluorescein as the fluorescent probe. J Agric Food Chem 49:4619–4626

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Sakthivelu G, Akitha Devi MK, Giridar P, Rajasekaran T, Ravishankar GA, Niolova MT, Angelov GB, Todorova RM, Kosturkova GP (2008) Isoflavone composition, phenol content, and antioxidant activity of soybean seeds from India and Bulgaria. J Ag Food Chem 56:2090–2095

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Xu B, Chang SKC (2008) Characterization of phenolic substances and antioxidant properties of food soybeans grown in the North Dakota-Minnesota region. J Agric Food Chem 56:9102–9113

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Bennett JO, Yu O, Heatherly LG, Krishnan H (2004) Accumulation of genistein and daidzein, soybean isoflavones implicated in promoting human health, is significantly elevated by irrigation. J Agric Food Chem 52:7574–7579

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Arts ICW, Hollman PCH (2005) Polyphenols and disease risk in epidemiologic studies. Am J Clin Nutr 81(suppl):317S–325S

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Sroka Z, Cisowski W (2003) Hydrogen peroxide scavenging, antioxidant and anti-radical activity of some phenolic acids. Food Chem Tox 41:753–758

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Wang H, Murphy P (1994) Isoflavone content in commercial soybean foods. J Agric Food Chem 42:1666–1673

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Riedl KM, Lee JH, Renita M, St. Martin SK, Schwartz SJ, Vodovitz Y (2007) Isoflavone profiles, phenol content, and antioxidant activity of soybean seeds as influenced by cultivar and growing location in Ohio. J Sci Food Agric 87:1197–1206

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Lee SJ, Yan W, Ahn JK, Chung IL (2003) Effects of year, site, genotype and their interactions on various soybean isoflavones. Field Crops Res 81:181–192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Xu B, Chang S (2008) Total phenolics, phenolic acids, isoflavones, anthocyanins, and antioxidant properties of yellow and black soybeans as affected by thermal processing. J Agric Food Chem 56:7165–7175

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Hoeck JA, Fehr WR, Murphy PA, Welke GA (2000) Influence of genotype and environment on isoflavone contents of soybean. Crop Sci 40:48–51

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Kanamaru K, Wang S, Abe J, Yamada T, Kitamura K (2006) Identification and characterization of wild soybean (Glycine soja Sieb. et Zecc.) strains with high lutein content. Breed Sci 56:231–234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Monma M, Terao J, Ito M, Saito M, Chikuni K (1994) Carotenoid components in soybean seeds varying in color and maturation stage. Biosci Biotech Biochem 58:926–930

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Heinrich U, Gartner C, Wiebush M, Eichler O, Sies H, Tronnier H, Stahl W (2003) Supplementation with β-carotene or a similar amount of mixed carotenoids protects humans from UV-induced erythema. J Nutr 133:98–101

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Mares-Perlman JA, Millen AE, Ficek TL, Hankinson SE (2002) The body of evidence to support a protective role of lutein and zeaxanthin in delaying chronic disease. Overview J Nutr 162:518S–524S

    Google Scholar 

  38. Wang S, Kanamuru W, Li J, Abe J, Yamada T, Kitamura K (2007) Simultaneous accumulation of high contents of α-tocopherol and lutein is possible in the seed of soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merr.). Breed Sci 57:297–304

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Dolde D, Vlahakis C, Hazebroek J (1999) Tocopherols in breeding lines and effects of planting location, fatty acid composition, and temperature during development. J Am Oil Chem Soc 76:349–355

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Prior RL, Wu X, Schaich K (2005) Standardized methods for determination of antioxidant capacity and phenolics in food and dietary supplements. J Agric Food Chem 53:4290–5301

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Huang D, Ou B, Prior RL (2005) The chemistry behind antioxidant capacity assays. J Agric Food Chem 53:1841–1856

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Moore J, Liu JG, Zhou K, Yu L (2006) Effects of genotype and environment on antioxidant properties of hard winter wheat bran. J Agric Food Chem 54:5313–5322

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Xu B, Chang S (2007) A comparative study on phenolic profiles and antioxidant activities of legumes as affected by extraction solvents. J Food Sci 72:S159–S166

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by grants from the Maryland Soybean Board in 2008 and 2009, grants from the Maryland Grain Producers Utilization Board (MGPUB) with MGPUB grant proposal numbers of 208198 and 209198, a grant from the National Science Foundation with a federal grant number of CBET-0650650.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Liangli Yu.

About this article

Cite this article

Whent, M., Slavin, M., Kenworthy, W. et al. Potential Relationships Between Fatty Acid Compositions and Phytochemicals of Selected Low Linolenic Soybeans Grown in Maryland. J Am Oil Chem Soc 87, 549–558 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11746-009-1519-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11746-009-1519-8

Keywords