Skip to main content
Log in

Quality of US Soybean Meal Compared to the Quality of Soybean Meal from Other Origins

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of the American Oil Chemists' Society

Abstract

Quality of soybeans and soybean meals (SBM) from non-US and US origins were compared. The US SBM was more consistent with higher digestibility (by KOH solubility), lower fiber and better quality of protein (by essential amino acid levels) than SBM of other major export origins (Argentina, Brazil and India). Protein quality carried through from whole soybeans to SBM, for a given origin. While the protein content was higher for the SBM from Brazil, the percentage of total digestible amino acids was highest for the SBM from the US and China. The US SBM had the highest content (total) of five essential amino acids for both poultry and swine feed uses, which when coupled with higher digestibility, would give US meal an advantage in rations balanced on amino acids. The mean particle size for all SBM from all origins was within the desirable range specified by nutritionists. The US soybeans were lower in protein than Brazilian soybeans, but higher than Argentine soybeans. The crude protein disadvantage of US soybeans was offset by higher concentrations of the essential amino acids in the lower protein soybeans. The US soybeans were lower in oil content than soybeans from either of the South American origins. Average protein and oil contents of US soybeans were consistent with the 2003 and 2004 annual soybean quality surveys. The US SBM held an advantage in digestibility and concentration of key amino acids in all three studies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Soy Stats 2005, http://www.soystats.com/2005/Default-frames.htm

  2. Grieshop CM, Fahey GC Jr (2001) Comparison of quality characteristics of soybeans from Brazil, China and the United States. J Agric Food Chem 49:2669–2673

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Moizzudin S (2003) Soybean meal quality in US and world markets. MS Thesis, IA State University

  4. Park HS, Hurburgh CR Jr, Improving the US position in world soybean meal trade. MATRIC working paper 02-MWP 7, http://www.card.iastate.edu/publications/DBS/PDFFiles/02mwp7.pdf

  5. Batal AB, Douglas MW, Engram AE, Parsons CM (2000) Protein dispensability index as an indicator of adequately processed soybean meal. J Poult Sci 79:1592–1596

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Araba M, Dale NM (1990) Evaluation of protein solubility as an indicator of overprocessing soybean meal. J Poult Sci 69:76–83

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Karr-Lilienthal LK, Mershen NR, Grieshop CM, Flahaven MA, Mahan DC, Fastinger ND, Watts M, Fahey GC Jr (2004) Ileal amino acid digestibilities by pigs fed soybean meals from five major soybean-producing countries. J Anim Sci 82:3198–3209

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. AOCS (1999) Official methods and recommended practices of the AOCS, 5th edn. AOCS, Champaign

    Google Scholar 

  9. AOAC (1990) Official methods of analysis, 15th edn. AOAC, Arlington

    Google Scholar 

  10. AACC (2000) Approved methods of American association of cereal chemists, 10th edn. American Association of Cereal Chemists, St Paul

    Google Scholar 

  11. ASAE (1997) ASAE standards, 44th edn. American Society of Agricultural Engineers, St Joseph

    Google Scholar 

  12. Brumm TJ, Hurburgh CR Jr (2004) Quality of the 2003 soybean crop from United States, http://www.soybeans.umn.edu/pdfs/2003ProteinSurvey/2003USSoybeanQuality_final.pdf

  13. Brumm TJ, Hurburgh CR Jr, Rippke G (2005) Quality of the 2004 soybean crop from United States http://www.asasoya.org/News/2004US20SBQualityFINAL.pdf

  14. Baize J (2000) Global soybean meal sampling and analysis activity (final report) http://www.soymeal.org/worldlitarticles_new/globalsmsampling.html

  15. Trading Rules (2004) National oilseed processors association, http://www.nopa.org/content/trading/trading.html

  16. Specifications for soybean meal http://www.ussoyexports.org/resources/soyinfo/SBMSpecs.pdf

  17. Non-protein nitrogen poisoning: introduction. The Merck veterinary manual http://www.merckvetmanual.com/mvm/index.jsp?cfile=htm/bc/212300.htm

  18. DiCostanzo A, Murphy M (1994) Strategies for feeding mycotoxins and mold-contaminated grains to cattle. Beef Cattle Management Update 32:1–11 http://www.extension.umn.edu/beef/components/publications/bcmu32.pdf

  19. Kopinski J, Amino acids for pig diets. Department of primary industries and fisheries, Queensland http://www.dpi.qld.gov.au/pigs/4374.html

  20. Ingredient analysis table (2002) Feedstuffs 74(28):16

    Google Scholar 

  21. Research and reviews: swine, particle-size evaluation of grain fed on Ohio swine operations. The Ohio State University extension and research bulletin, http://www.ohioline.osu.edu/sc185/sc185_10b.html

Download references

Acknowledgments

This journal paper of the IOWA Agriculture and Home Economics Experiment Station, Ames, IA, USA, Project No. 3,261 was supported by Hatch Act and State of IOWA funds. Research was also supported by checkoff funds from the United Soybean Board through the American Soybean Association International Marketing Division.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Charles R. Hurburgh.

About this article

Cite this article

Thakur, M., Hurburgh, C.R. Quality of US Soybean Meal Compared to the Quality of Soybean Meal from Other Origins. J Am Oil Chem Soc 84, 835–843 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11746-007-1107-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11746-007-1107-8

Keywords

Navigation