Advertisement

Observations on the estimation of scavenging activity of phenolic compounds using rapid 1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) tests

  • Nikolaos Nenadis
  • Maria TsimidouEmail author
Article

Abstract

Rapid 1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) tests are often applied to classify the scavenging activity of phenolic compounds (AH). Published analytical protocols differ in more than one experimental condition, and results for the relative order or magnitude of activity are often contradictory. In this work, parameters such as duration of test, [AH]/[DPPH] molar ratio, and solvent effects were examined and discussed. The test duration and the value of the [AH]/[DPPH] ratio did not influence the order of activity among tested antioxidants. Ethanol, commonly used as solvent in such tests, was compared with acetonitrile and tert-butyl alcohol. Solvent properties such as the ability to form hydrogen bonds with the AH seem to influence the level of the relative activity (%RSA). Higher %RSA values were observed in ethanol. The activity of the most polar compounds was affected the most, and in some cases (caffeic, dihydrocaffeic, and rosmarinic acids) the order of activity was changed owing to different kinetics. Standardization of the analytical protocol should include a 20-min reaction period and a molar ratio that permits attainment of a 60–80% RSA value for the most potent antioxidant. Solvent choice is critical for classifying activity. Safe classification can be based only on results from kinetic studies.

Key Words

DPPH test phenolic antioxidants radical scavenging activity solvent effect 

References

  1. 1.
    Frankel, N.E., Lipid Oxidation, The Oily Press Ltd., Dundee, 1998, pp. 129–160.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bors, W., W. Heller, C. Michel, and M. Saran, Flavonoids as Antioxidants: Determination of Radical Scavenging Efficiencies, Methods Enzymol. 186:343–355 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Li, X., Z. Cai, Y. Katsumura, G. Wu, and Y. Muroya, Reaction of Reducing and Oxidizing Radicals with Caffeic Acid: A Pulse Radiolysis and Theoretical Study, Radiation Phys. Chem. 60: 345–350 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Perdielli, P., G.F. Pedulli, and L.H. Skibstead, Antioxidant Mechanism of Flavonoids. Solvent Effect on Rate Constant for Chain-Breaking Reaction of Quercetin and Epicatechin in Autoxidation of Methyl Linoleate, J. Agric. Food Chem. 49: 3034–3040 (2001).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Brand-Williams, W., M.E. Cuvelier, and C. Berset, Use of a Free Radical Method to Evaluate Antioxidant Activity, Lebensm. Wiss. Technol. 28:25–30 (1995).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sanchez-Moreno, C., J.A. Larrauri, and F. Saura-Calixto, A Procedure to Measure the Antiradical Efficiency of Polyphenols, J. Sci. Food Agric. 76:270–276 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Silva, F.M., F. Borges, C. Guimaraes, J.L.F.C. Lima, C. Matos, and S. Reis, Phenolic Acid Derivatives: Studies on the Relationship Among Structure, Radical Scavenging Activity, and Physicochemical Parameters, J. Agric. Food Chem. 48: 2122–2126 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Russell, K.E., The Abstraction of Hydrogen Atoms from Mercaptans by 2,2-Diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 76:437–439 (1954).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Braude, E.A., A.G. Brook, and R.P. Linstead, Hydrogen Transfer. Part V. Dehydrogenation Reactions with Diphenylpicrylhydrazyl, 76:3574–3578 (1954).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Blois, M.S., Antioxidant Determination by the Use of a Free Radical, Nature 181:1199–1200 (1958).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Pekkarinen, S., H. Stockmann, K. Schwarz, I.M. Heinonen, and A.I. Hopia, Antioxidant Activity and Partitioning of Phenolic Acids in Bulk and Emulsified Methyl Linoleate, J. Agric. Food Chem. 47:3036–3043 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Onishi, M., H. Morishita, H. Iawashi, S. Toda, Y. Shirataki, M. Kimura, and R. Kido, Inhibitory Effects of Chlorogenic Acids on Linolenic Acid Peroxidation and Haemolysis, Phytochemistry 36:579–583 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Valgimigli, L., J.T. Banks, J. Lusztyk, and K.U. Ingold, Kinetic Solvent Effects on Hydroxylic Hydrogen Atom Abstractions Are Independent of the Nature of the Abstracting Radical. Two Extreme Tests Using Vitamin E and Phenol, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 117:9966–9971 (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Valgimigli, L., J.T. Banks, J. Lusztyk, and K.U. Ingold, Solvent Effects on the Antioxidant Activity of Vitamin E, J. Org. Chem. 64:3381–3383 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Barcley, L.R.C., C.E. Edwards, and M.R. Vinqvist, Media Effects on the Antioxidant Activities of Phenols and Catechols, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 121:6226–6231 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Abraham, M.H., Hydrogen Bonding. Part 10. A Scale of Solute Hydrogen-Bond Basicity Using log K Values for Complexation in Tetrachloromethane, J. Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans. 2, 1:521–529 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Shahidi, F., and P.K.J.P.D. Wanasundara, Phenolic Antioxidants, Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 32:67–103 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Reichart, C., Solvents and Solvent Effects in Organic Chemistry, VCH, Weinheim, 1988, pp. 363–367.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Yordanof, N.D., and A.G. Christova, Quantitative Spectrophotometric and EPR Determination of 1,1-Diphenyl-2-picryl-hydrazyl (DPPH), Fresenius J. Anal. Chem. 358:610–613 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Foti, M., and G. Ruberto, Kinetic Solvent Effects on Phenolic Antioxidants Determined by Spectrophotometric Measurements, J. Agric. Food. Chem. 49:342–348 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© AOCS Press 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Laboratory of Food Chemistry and Technology, School of ChemistryAristotle University of ThessalonikiThessalonikiGreece

Personalised recommendations